We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Interstitial fluid pressure in tumors: therapeutic barrier and biomarker of angiogenesis

    Sarah Jane Lunt

    Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    ,
    Anthony Fyles

    Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    ,
    Richard P Hill

    Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Departments of Medical Biophysics and Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    &
    Michael Milosevic

    † Author for correspondence

    Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital/Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/14796694.4.6.793

    Interstitial fluid pressure is elevated in virtually all solid malignant tumors as a result of abnormalities of the vasculature and interstitium. High interstitial fluid pressure is an independent predictor of disease recurrence in cervical cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, has been implicated as an important factor that impairs the delivery of chemotherapy to tumors and may influence the regulation and distribution of cytokines and growth factors. Targeted molecular treatments that inhibit angiogenesis or alter interstitial fluid dynamics also produce early reductions in interstitial fluid pressure. Reductions in interstitial fluid pressure due to anti-angiogenic treatment have been associated with improved therapeutic outcome in preclinical studies when these agents are combined with radiotherapy or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Pretreatment interstitial fluid pressure and the change in pressure during treatment may provide important predictive information that in the future will be used to optimize therapy in individual patients.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    Bibiiography

    • Bristow RG, Hill RP: Hypoxia and metabolism. Hypoxia, DNA repair and genetic instability. Nat. Rev. Cancer8,180–192 (2008).
    • Cairns R, Papandreou I, Denko N: Overcoming physiologic barriers to cancer treatment by molecularly targeting the tumor microenvironment. Mol. Cancer Res.4,61–70 (2006).
    • Moeller BJ, Richardson RA, Dewhirst MW: Hypoxia and radiotherapy: opportunities for improved outcomes in cancer treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev.26,241–248 (2007).
    • Jain RK, Duda DG, Clark JW, Loeffler JS: Lessons from Phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer. Nat. Clin. Pract. Oncol.3,24–40 (2006).
    • Milosevic M, Fyles A, Hedley D et al.: Interstitial fluid pressure predicts survival in patients with cervix cancer independent of clinical prognostic factors and tumor oxygen measurements. Cancer Res.61,6400–6405 (2001).▪▪ The only large-scale clincial study of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) as a predictor of patient outcome following radiotherapy.
    • Fyles A, Milosevic M, Pintilie M et al.: Long-term performance of interstitial fluid pressure and hypoxia as prognostic factors in cervix cancer. Radiother. Oncol.80,132–137 (2006).▪ Mature results of a large clincial study showing the sustained, independent predictive value of pretreatment IFP measurements in cervical cancer.
    • Heldin CH, Rubin K, Pietras K, Ostman A: High interstitial fluid pressure – an obstacle in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer4,806–813 (2004).▪ Excellent summary of the tumor interstitium as a determinant of IFP and drug uptake.
    • Taghian AG, Abi-Raad R, Assaad SI et al.: Paclitaxel decreases the interstitial fluid pressure and improves oxygenation in breast cancers in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: clinical implications. J. Clin. Oncol.23,1951–1961 (2005).
    • Boucher Y, Kirkwood JM, Opacic D: Interstitial hypertension in superficial metastatic melanomas in humans. Cancer Res.51,6691–6694 (1991).
    • 10  Curti BD, Urba WJ, Alvord WG et al.: Interstitial pressure of subcutaneous nodules in melanoma and lymphoma patients: changes during treatment. Cancer Res.53,2204–2207 (1993).
    • 11  Gutmann R, Leunig M, Feyh J et al.: Interstitial hypertension in head and neck tumors in patients: correlation with tumor size. Cancer Res.52,1993–1995 (1992).
    • 12  Nathan SS, DiResta GR, Casas-GanemJE et al.: Elevated physiologic tumor pressure promotes proliferation and chemosensitivity in human osteosarcoma. Clin. Cancer Res.11,2389–2397 (2005).▪ Clincial and preclinical study of high IFP as a cause of tumor proliferation and increased sensitivity to cisplatin chemotherapy.
    • 13  Jain RK: Determinants of tumor blood flow: a review. Cancer Res.48,2641–2658 (1988).
    • 14  Padera TP, Stoll BR, Tooredman JB, Capen D, di Tomaso E, Jain RK: Pathology: cancer cells compress intratumour vessels. Nature427,695 (2004).
    • 15  Denko NC, Giaccia AJ: Tumor hypoxia, the physiological link between Trousseau’s syndrome (carcinoma-induced coagulopathy) and metastasis. Cancer Res.61,795–798 (2001).
    • 16  Jain RK: Transport of molecules in the tumor interstitium: a review. Cancer Res.47,3039–3051 (1987).
    • 17  Wiig H, Rubin K, Reed RK: New and active role of the interstitium in control of interstitial fluid pressure: potential therapeutic consequences. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.47,111–121 (2003).
    • 18  Leu AJ, Berk DA, Lymboussaki A, Alitalo K, Jain RK: Absence of functional lymphatics within a murine sarcoma: a molecular and functional evaluation. Cancer Res.60,4324–4327 (2000).
    • 19  Baxter L, Jain R: Transport of fluid and macromolecules in tumors I. Role of interstitial pressure and convection. Microvasc. Res.37,77–104 (1989).▪▪ First biophysical description of the cause of elevated IFP in tumors.
    • 20  Boucher Y, Baxter LT, Jain RK: Interstitial pressure gradients in tissue isolated and subcutaneous tissues: implications for therapy. Cancer Res.50,4478–4484 (1990).
    • 21  Boucher Y, Jain RK: Microvascular pressure is the principal driving force for interstitial hypertension in solid tumors: implications for vascular collapse. Cancer Res.52,5110–5114 (1992).
    • 22  Guyton AC: Textbook of Medical Physiology. Sixth edition. WB Saunders Company, PA, USA (1981).
    • 23  Lunt SJ, Kalliomaki TM, Brown A, Yang VX, Milosevic M, Hill RP: Interstitial fluid pressure, vascularity and metastasis in ectopic, orthotopic and spontaneous tumours. BMC Cancer8,2 (2008).
    • 24  Milosevic MF, Fyles AW, Wong R et al.: Interstitial fluid pressure in cervical carcinoma: within tumor heterogeneity, and relation to oxygen tension. Cancer82,2418–2426 (1998).
    • 25  DiResta GR, Lee J, Larson SM, Arbit E: Characterization of neuroblastoma xenograft in rat flank. I. Growth, interstitial fluid pressure, and interstitial fluid velocity distribution profiles. Microvasc. Res.46,158–177 (1993).
    • 26  Rofstad EK, Tunheim SH, Mathiesen B et al.: Pulmonary and lymph node metastasis is associated with primary tumor interstitial fluid pressure in human melanoma xenografts. Cancer Res.62,661–664 (2002).
    • 27  Griffon-Etienne G, Boucher Y, Jain RK, Suit HD: Effects of needle insertion in tumors on interstitial fluid pressure. Microvasc. Res.54,174–177 (1997).
    • 28  Skliarenko J, Lunt SJ, Gordon ML, Vitkin A, Milosevic M, Hill RP: Effects of the vascular targeting agent ZD6126 on interstitial fluid pressure and cell survival in tumors. Cancer Res.66,2074–2080 (2006).
    • 29  Milosevic MF, Fyles AW, Hill RP: The relationship between elevated interstitial fluid pressure and blood flow in tumors: a bioengineering analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.43,1111–1123 (1999).
    • 30  Ozerdem U, Hargens AR: A simple method for measuring interstitial fluid pressure in cancer tissues. Microvasc. Res.70,116–120 (2005).
    • 31  Schnell CR, Stauffer F, Allegrini PR et al.: Effects of the dual phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor NVP-BEZ235 on the tumor vasculature: implications for clinical imaging. Cancer Res.68,6598–6607 (2008).
    • 32  Haider M, Sitartchouk I, Roberts TPL, Fyles A, Hashmi AT, Milosevic M: Correlations between dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging derived measures of tumor microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervix cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging25,153–159 (2007).
    • 33  McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA: Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur. Radiol.18,1058–1064 (2008).
    • 34  Hassid Y, Furman-Haran E, Margalit R, Eilam R, Degani H: Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of transport and interstitial fluid pressure in ectopic human lung tumors. Cancer Res.66,4159–4166 (2006).▪ An approach to measuring IFP noninvasively using magnetic resonance imaging.
    • 35  Milosevic M, Lunt SJ, Leung E et al.: Interstitial permeability and elasticity in human cervix cancer. Microvasc. Res.75,381–390 (2008).
    • 36  Hori K, Saito S: Microvascular mechanisms by which the combretastatin A-4 derivative AC7700 (AVE8062) induces tumour blood flow stasis. Br. J. Cancer89,1334–1344 (2003).
    • 37  Tong RT, Boucher Y, Kozin SV, Winkler F, Hicklin DJ, Jain RK: Vascular normalization by vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 blockade induces a pressure gradient across the vasculature and improves drug penetration in tumors. Cancer Res.64,3731–3736 (2004).
    • 38  Lee C, Heijn M, di Tomaso E et al.: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment augments tumor radiation response under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. Cancer Res.60,5565–5570 (2000).
    • 39  Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L et al.: BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res.64,7099–7109 (2004).
    • 40  Pietras K, Ostman A, Sjoquist M et al.: Inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor receptors reduces interstitial hypertension and increases transcapillary transport in tumors. Cancer Res.61,2929–2934 (2001).
    • 41  Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E et al.: Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat. Med.10,145–147 (2004).▪ Clincial evidence that IFP can be used as a biomarker of response to anti-angiogenic treatment.
    • 42  Winkler F, Kozin SV, Tong RT et al.: Kinetics of vascular normalization by VEGFR2 blockade governs brain tumor response to radiation: role of oxygenation, angiopoietin-1, and matrix metalloproteinases. Cancer Cell6,553–563 (2004).
    • 43  Pietras K, Stumm M, Hubert M et al.: STI571 enhances the therapeutic index of epothilone B by a tumor-selective increase of drug uptake. Clin. Cancer Res.9,3779–3787 (2003).▪▪ Preclincial study of lowering IFP as a means of enhancing chemotherapy uptake and efficacy.
    • 44  Jain RK: Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science307,58–62 (2005).
    • 45  Vlahovic G, Rabbani ZN, Herndon JE 2nd, Dewhirst MW, Vujaskovic Z: Treatment with Imatinib in NSCLC is associated with decrease of phosphorylated PDGFR-beta and VEGF expression, decrease in interstitial fluid pressure and improvement of oxygenation. Br. J. Cancer95,1013–1019 (2006).
    • 46  Wildiers H, Guetens G, De Boeck G et al.: Effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment on the intratumoral uptake of CPT-11. Br. J. Cancer88,1979–1986 (2003).
    • 47  Dickson PV, Hamner JB, Sims TL et al.: Bevacizumab-induced transient remodeling of the vasculature in neuroblastoma xenografts results in improved delivery and efficacy of systemically administered chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res.13,3942–3950 (2007).
    • 48  Fyles A, Milosevic M, Hedley D et al.: Tumor hypoxia has independent predictor impact only in patients with node-negative cervix cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.20,680–687 (2002).
    • 49  Fyles A, Keane TJ, Barton M, Simm J: The effect of treatment duration in the local control of cervix cancer. Radiother. Oncol.25,273–279 (1992).
    • 50  Diresta GR, Nathan SS, Manoso MW et al.: Cell proliferation of cultured human cancer cells are affected by the elevated tumor pressures that exist in vivo. Ann. Biomed. Eng.33,1270–1280 (2005).
    • 51  Boucher Y, Lee I, Jain RK: Lack of general correlation between interstitial fluid pressure and oxygen partial pressure in solid tumors. Microvasc. Res.50,175–182 (1995).
    • 52  Mollica F, Jain RK, Netti PA: A model for temporal heterogeneities of tumor blood flow. Microvasc. Res.65,56–60 (2003).
    • 53  Baish JW, Netti PA, Jain RK: Transmural coupling of fluid flow in microcirculatory network and interstitium in tumors. Microvasc. Res.53,128–141 (1997).
    • 54  Gorski DH, Beckett MA, Jaskowiak NT et al.: Blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor stress response increases the antitumor effects of ionizing radiation. Cancer Res.59,3374–3378 (1999).
    • 55  Nathan SS, Huvos AG, Casas-Ganem JE et al.: Tumor interstitial fluid pressure may regulate angiogenic factors in osteosarcoma. J. Orthop. Res.26(11),1520–1525 (2008).▪ Preclinical study indicating that hydrostatic pressure may directly inhibit angiogenesis and stimulate lymphangiogenesis in tumors.
    • 56  Manome Y, Saeki N, Yoshinaga H, Watanabe M, Mizuno S: A culture device demonstrates that hydrostatic pressure increases mRNA of RGS5 in neuroblastoma and CHC1-L in lymphocytic cells. Cells Tissues Organs174,155–161 (2003).
    • 57  Hamzah J, Jugold M, Kiessling F et al.: Vascular normalization in Rgs5-deficient tumours promotes immune destruction. Nature453,410–414 (2008).
    • 58  Jain RK, Tong RT, Munn LL: Effect of vascular normalization by antiangiogenic therapy on interstitial hypertension, peritumor edema, and lymphatic metastasis: insights from a mathematical model. Cancer Res.67,2729–2735 (2007).
    • 59  Timke C, Zieher H, Roth A et al.: Combination of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor/platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibition markedly improves radiation tumor therapy. Clin. Cancer Res.14,2210–2219 (2008).
    • 60  Pietras K, Rubin K, Sjoblom T et al.: Inhibition of PDGF receptor signaling in tumor stroma enhances antitumor effect of chemotherapy. Cancer Res.62,5476–5484 (2002).
    • 61  Vlahovic G, Ponce AM, Rabbani Z et al.: Treatment with imatinib improves drug delivery and efficacy in NSCLC xenografts. Br. J. Cancer97,735–740 (2007).
    • 62  Chiu JJ, Usami S, Chien S: Vascular endothelial responses to altered shear stress: pathologic implications for atherosclerosis. Ann. Med.1–10 (2008).