Abstract
The present study reviewed the geographical variations in the delivery of pancreatic cancer therapy and whether this impacts overall survival. The evidence suggests a difference in the accessibility of pancreatic cancer care to patients in rural as compared with urban Australia. While centralization of pancreatic surgery is essential to deliver high quality care to patients, it may be interfering with the ease of access of this form of care to patients in regional areas. Access to chemotherapy in regional Australia is also limited. There is need for a concerted effort to improve the overall care and uptake of medical services to patients in metropolitan and remote Australia with the overarching aim of improving survival and meaningful quality of life.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest
References
- 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's Health 2018, Chapter 3.4: Cancer (2018). www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7beca2c1-b0dd-40b5-ad2b-cf4dfc6a4796/aihw-aus-221-chapter-3-4.pdf.aspx
- 2. . [Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer]. Bull. Cancer 105(1), 63–69 (2018).
- 3. Pancreatic Cancer in Australia Statistics (2020). https://pancreatic-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics
- 4. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68(6), 394–424 (2018). • an important resource that provides the most updated global cancer statistics.
- 5. . More deaths from pancreatic cancer than breast cancer in the EU by 2017. Acta Oncol. 55(9–10), 1158–1160 (2016).
- 6. Describing patterns of care in pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. Pancreas 44(8), 1259–1265 (2015).
- 7. . The concept of ‘borderline resectable’ pancreatic cancer: limited foundations and limited future? J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 8(1), 189–193 (2017).
- 8. . Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 17(3), e118–e124 (2016).
- 9. Queensland Government. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Queensland Public and Private Hospitals 2004–2013. Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia (2015).
- 10. Optimizing the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with a focus on induction chemotherapy: expert opinion based on a review of current evidence. Cancer Treat. Rev. 77, 1–10 (2019).
- 11. . Defining value for pancreatic surgery in early-stage pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg e193019 (2019).
- 12. Optimal duration and timing of adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive surgery for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: ongoing lessons from the ESPAC-3 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 32(6), 504–512 (2014).
- 13. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10(10), 1338–1345 (2006).
- 14. Evolution of pancreatoduodenectomy in a tertiary cancer center in India: improved results from service reconfiguration. Pancreatology 13, 63–71 (2013).
- 15. . Beyond doughnuts: tumor board recommendations influence patient care. J. Cancer Educ. 17(2), 97–100 (2002).
- 16. Reduction of in-hospital mortality following regionalisation of pancreatic surgery in the south-east of the Netherlands. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 36(7), 652–656 (2010).
- 17. Queensland Government. Chapter 6 Pancreaticoduodenectomy. In: Cancer Surgery in Queensland: Infocus – Access Flows for Public and Private Patients 2002–2011. Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia (2015).
- 18. ABS. Regional Population Growth, Australia 2007–2017 Cat. No 3218.0. (2018).
- 19. . Cancer health inequality persists in regional and remote Australia. Med. J. Aust. 201(8), 445–446 (2014).
- 20. Risk factors for current and future unmet supportive care needs of people with pancreatic cancer. A longitudinal study. Support. Care Cancer 24(8), 3589–3599 (2016).
- 21. Factors associated with quality of care for patients with pancreatic cancer in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 205(10), 459–465 (2016).
- 22. Determinants of survival and attempted resection in patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: an Australian population-based study. Pancreatology 16(5), 873–881 (2016).
- 23. Pancreatectomy is underused in NSW regions with low institutional surgical volumes: a population data linkage study. Med. J. Aust. 206(1), 23–29 (2017).
- 24. Chemotherapy in patients with unresected pancreatic cancer in Australia: a population-based study of uptake and survival. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 14(4), 326–336 (2018).
- 25. Cancer services in Western Australia: a comparison of regional outcomes with metropolitan Perth. Aust. J. Rural Health 23(5), 302–308 (2015).
- 26. Determinants of outcomes following resection for pancreatic cancer: a population-based study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 20(8), 1471–1481 (2016).
- 27. . Regional versus metropolitan pancreaticoduodenectomy mortality in Australia. ANZ J. Surg. 89(12), 1582–1586 (2019).
- 28. Using a Delphi process to determine optimal care for patients with pancreatic cancer. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Oncol. 12(2), 105–114 (2016).
- 29. . Does revision of resection margins based on frozen section improve overall survival following pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? A meta-analysis. HPB 19(7), 573–579 (2017).
- 30. FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 17(6), 801–810 (2016).
- 31. . Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy: author’s reply. Lancet Oncol. 17(5), e178 (2016).
- 32. . Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy 119(4), 464–474 (2015).
- 33. Long-term survival after multidisciplinary management of resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 16(4), 836–847 (2009).
- 34. Resection of pancreatic cancer in Europe and USA: an international large-scale study highlighting large variations. Gut 68(1), 130–139 (2019).
- 35. Effect of hospital volume on surgical outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 263(4), 664–672 (2016).
- 36. Peri-operative outcomes for pancreatoduodenectomy in India: a multi-centric study. HPB (Oxford) 11(8), 638–644 (2009).
- 37. . Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 393(1), 87–91 (2008).
- 38. . Early discharge after pancreatoduodenectomy: what helps and what prevents? Pancreas 44, 273–278 (2015).
- 39. . Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med. Care 49(12), 1076–1081 (2011).
- 40. . The effect of centralization on short term outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy in a universal health care system. HPB (Oxford) 21(3), 319–327 (2019).
- 41. . Variation in use of open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and associated outcome metrics in a universal health care system. Pancreatology 19(6), 880–887 (2019).
- 42. . Australia is continuing to make progress against cancer, but the regional and remote disadvantage remains. Med. J. Aust. 199(9), 605–608 (2013).
- 43. Nationwide trends in incidence, treatment and survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 125, 83–93 (2020).
- 44. . The theory and practice of pancreatic surgery in France. Ann. Surg. 266(5), 797–804 (2017).
- 45. . Adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 27 (2019).
- 46. . Pancreatic cancer. In: Surgery of the Pancreas and Biliary Tree. Barreto SGWindsor John Albert (Eds). Springer Nature, Singapore (2018).
- 47. Clinical Oncological Society of Australia. Mapping rural and regional oncology services in Australia (2006). www.cosa.org.au/publications/reports-and-papers/
- 48. . Role of telemedicine in multidisciplinary team meetings. J. Pathol. Inform. 10, 35 (2019).
- 49. Interdisciplinary eHealth practice in cancer care: a review of the literature. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14(11), 1289 (2017).
- 50. Telemedicine for rural cancer care in North Queensland: bringing cancer care home. Aust. J. Rural Health 20(5), 259–264 (2012).
- 51. . Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in northern Queensland, Australia. Med. J. Aust. 199(6), 414–417 (2013).
- 52. Socioeconomic status impacts survival and access to resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a high-resolution population-based cancer registry study. Surg. Oncol. 27(4), 759–766 (2018).
- 53. . Challenges for health systems: Australian perspectives. Public Administration and Policy 20(1), 6–17 (2017).
- 54. . Australia’s health system: some issues and challenges. J. Health Med. Econ. 2, 2 (2016).
- 55. . A review of the Australian healthcare system: a policy perspective. SAGE Open Med. 6, (2018).