Attitudes of cystic fibrosis patients and their parents towards direct-to-consumer genetic testing for carrier status

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Rohlfs EM, Zhou Z, Heim RA et al. Cystic fibrosis carrier testing in an ethnically diverse US population. Clin. Chem. 57, 841–848 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Riordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 245, 1066–1073 (1989).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Human Genetics Commission. Increasing options, informing choice: a report on preconception genetic testing and screening. http://f.hypotheses.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/257/files/2011/04/2011.HGC_.-Increasing-options-informing-choice-final2.pdf.• Report describing the landscape of preconception carrier screening as well as outlines some of the important ethical issues in this context.
  Google Scholar
• 4 National Institutes of Health. Genetic testing for cystic fibrosis. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on genetic testing for cystic fibrosis. Arch. Intern. Med. 159, 1529–1539 (1999).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Cunningham F, Lewis S, Curnow L, Glazner J, Massie J. Respiratory physicians and clinic coordinators’ attitudes to population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. J. Cyst. Fibros. 13, 99–105 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Borry P, Cornel MC, Howard HC. Where are you going, where have you been: a recent history of the direct-to-consumer genetic testing market. J. Community Genet. 1, 101–106 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 Human Genetics Commission. A common framework of principles for direct-to-consumer genetic testing services. www.sashg.org/documents/HGC-UK-Policy-on-DTC-testing.pdf.
  Google Scholar
• 8 Howard HC, Borry P. Is there a doctor in the house? The presence of physicians in the direct-to-consumer genetic testing context. J. Community Genet. 3, 105–112 (2012).• Study revolving around the involvement of medical professionals in direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, which was one of the central points also in our survey.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hogarth S, Javitt G, Melzer D. The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 161–182 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Caulfield T, McGuire AL. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses. Annu. Rev. Med. 63, 23–33 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 EASAC and FEAM. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes in the European Union: the view from EASAC and FEAM. Policy Report, 18. www.easac.eu/home/reports-and-statements/detail-view/article/direct-to-co.html.•• Document focusing on policy/regulatory aspects of DTC genetic testing and pays great deal of attention to carrier screening through DTC.
  Google Scholar
• 12 Borry P, Henneman L, Lakeman P, ten Kate LP, Cornel MC, Howard HC. Preconceptional genetic carrier testing and the commercial offer directly-to-consumers. Hum. Reprod. 26, 972–977 (2011).•• Discusses many important issues related to direct-to-consumer genetic testing for reproductive purposes.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13 Godard B, Raeburn S, Pembrey M, Bobrow M, Farndon P, Ayme S. Genetic information and testing in insurance and employment: technical, social and ethical issues. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 11(Suppl. 2), S123–S142 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Finney Rutten LJ, Gollust SE, Naveed S, Moser RP. Increasing public awareness of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: health care access, internet use, and population density correlates. J. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012, 309109 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kolor K, Duquette D, Zlot A et al. Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests from four state population-based surveys, and implications for clinical and public health practice. Genet. Med. 14, 860–867 (2012).• Investigated awareness of DTC genetic tests among the general public. It may be interesting to compare results with the findings of our study.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16 Goddard KA, Duquette D, Zlot A et al. Public awareness and use of direct-to-consumer genetic tests: results from 3 state population-based surveys, 2006. Am. J. Public Health 99, 442–445 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Vayena E, Gourna E, Streuli J, Hafen E, Prainsack B. Experiences of early users of direct-to-consumer genomics in Switzerland: an exploratory study. Public Health Genomics 15, 352–362 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Bollinger JM, Green RC, Kaufman D. Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 17, 424–428 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 McBride CM, Wade CH, Kaphingst KA. Consumers’ views of direct-to-consumer genetic information. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 11, 427–446 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Howard HC, Borry P. To ban or not to ban? Clinical geneticists’ views on the regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. EMBO Rep. 13, 791–794 (2012).• Explored clinical geneticists’ views on issues similar to those discussed in the present paper.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Bernhardt BA, Zayac C, Gordon ES, Wawak L, Pyeritz RE, Gollust SE. Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians. Per. Med. 9, 683–692 (2012).• Assessed primary care physicians’ attitudes toward some of the issues discussed in the present paper. More specifically, attitudes toward genetic counseling and information provision were explored.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hock KT, Christensen KD, Yashar BM, Roberts JS, Gollust SE, Uhlmann WR. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an assessment of genetic counselors’ knowledge and beliefs. Genet. Med. 13, 325–332 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 McGuire AL, Diaz CM, Wang T, Hilsenbeck SG. Social networkers’ attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am. J. Bioethics 9(6–7), 3–10 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24 Almeling R, Gadarian SK. Public opinion on policy issues in genetics and genomics. Genet. Med. 16(6), 491–494 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25 Henneman L, Bramsen I, Van Os TA et al. Attitudes towards reproductive issues and carrier testing among adult patients and parents of children with cystic fibrosis (CF). Prenat. Diagn. 21, 1–9 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Kolor K, Liu T, St Pierre J, Khoury MJ. Health care provider and consumer awareness, perceptions, and use of direct-to-consumer personal genomic tests, United States, 2008. Genet. Med. 11, 595 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Cherkas LF, Harris JM, Levinson E, Spector TD, Prainsack B. A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS ONE 5, e13473 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28 Henneman L, Vermeulen E, van El CG, Claassen L, Timmermans DR, Cornel MC. Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 793–799 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29 Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C et al. Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics 15, 22–30 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Brett GR, Metcalfe SA, Amor DJ, Halliday JL. An exploration of genetic health professionals’ experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20, 825–830 (2012).• Although not limited to carrier testing, this paper investigated some relevant issues in DTC genetic testing.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Borry P, Fryns JP, Schotsmans P, Dierickx K. Carrier testing in minors: a systematic review of guidelines and position papers. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 133–138 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 The British Society for Human Genetics. Report on the Genetic Testing of Children 2010. www.ethox.org.uk/Documents%20and%20images/GTOC_2010_BSHG.pdf.
  Google Scholar