Effects of nanoscale electric fields on the histology of liver cell dysplasia

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest

References

• 1 Andreev VP. Cytoplasmic electric fields and electroosmosis: Possible solution for the paradoxes of the intracellular transport of biomolecules. PLoS ONE 8(4), e61884 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Chernet B, Levin M. Endogenous voltage potentials and the microenvironment: bioelectric signals that reveal, induce and normalize cancer. J. Clin. Exp. Onc. (Suppl. 1), S1:002 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Sree VG, Udayakumar K, Sundararajan R. Electric field analysis of breast tumor cells. Int. J. Breast Cancer 2011, 235926 (2011). • Tumor tissue has lower electric field strength and are more susceptible to electrical-pulse-mediated drug delivery.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ross CL, Harrison BS. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on inflammatory pathway markers in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages. J. Inflamm. Res. 6, 45–51 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Jasti AC, Wetzel BJ, Aviles H, Vesper DN, Nindl G, Johnson MT. Effect of a wound healing electromagnetic field on inflammatory cytokine gene expression in rats. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 37, 209–214 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kubat NJ, Moffett J, Fray LM. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment on programmed resolution of inflammation pathway markers in human cells in culture. J. Inflamm. Res. 8, 59–69 (2015). • Use of pulsed electromagnetic field for the treatment of inflammation by mediating gene expression.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Guduru R, Liang P, Hong J et al. Magnetoelectric ‘spin’ on stimulating the brain. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 10(13), 2051–2061 (2015). • Use of magnetoelectric nanoparticles for brain stimulation.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kaushik A, Nikkhah-Moshaie R, Sinha R et al. Investigation of ac-magnetic field stimulated nanoelectroporation of magneto-electric nano-drug-carrier inside CNS cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 45663 (2017). • Use of magnetic field nanoelectroporation as nano-drugs in cancer.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Stewart TS, Nagesetti A, Guduru R et al. Magnetoelectric nanoparticles for delivery of antitumor peptides into glioblastoma cells by magnetic fields. Nanomedicine 13(4), 423–438 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Sahana B, Santra K, Basu S, Mukherjee B. Development of biodegradable polymer based tamoxifen citrate loaded nanoparticles and effect of some manufacturing process parameters on them: a physicochemical and in-vitro evaluation. Int. J. Nanomed. 5, 621–630 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Santra S, Jativa SD, Kaittanis C, Normand G, Grimm J, Perez JM. Gadolinium-encapsulating iron oxide nanoprobe as activatable NMR/MRI contrast agent. ACS Nano 6(8), 7281–7294 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Betal S, Saha AK, Ortega E et al. Core–shell magnetoelectric nanorobot – a remotely controlled probe for targeted cell manipulation. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 1755 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bueno-Baques D, Hurtado-Lopez G, Corral-Flores V, Gomez S, Diley NR, Glushchenko A. Development of a new module for the measurement of the magneto-electric direct and converse effects based on an alternating current susceptometer. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85(8), 085116 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Naveed-Ul-Haq M, Shvartsman VV, Salamon S et al. A new (Ba, Ca) (Ti, Zr)O₃-based multiferroic composite with large magnetoelectric effect. Sci. Rep. 6, 32164 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Trivedi H, Shvartsman VV, Lupascu DC et al. Local manifestations of a static magnetoelectric effect in nanostructured BaTiO3-BaFe12O9 composite multiferroics. Nanoscale 7(10), 4489–4496 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Guduru R, Liang P, Runowicz C, Nair M, Atluri V, Khizroev S. Magneto-electric nanoparticles to enable field-controlled high-specificity drug delivery to eradicate ovarian cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 3, 2953 (2013). • Effects of changes in the intensity of the applied magnetic field showed stronger influence than changes in frequency.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Deangelo AB, Daniel FB, Wong DM, George MH. The induction of hepatocellular neoplasia by trichloroacetic acid administered in the drinking water of the male B6C3F1 mouse. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Part A 71(16), 1056–1068 (2008). • Establishing the animal model for hepatocellular carcinoma.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Lin CC, Lin CJ, Hsu CW, Chen YC, Chen WT, Lin SM. Fine-needle aspiration cytology to distinguish dysplasia from hepatocellular carcinoma with different grades. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 23(7 Pt 2), e146–152 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Matar O, Posada OM, Hondow NS, Walti C et al. Barium titanate nanoparticles for biomarker applications. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 644(1), (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 20 Wang J, Chen Y, Chen B et al. Pharmacokinetic parameters and tissue distribution of magnetic Fe(3)O(4) nanoparticles in mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 5, 861–866 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Jain TK, Reddy MK, Morales MA, Leslie-Pelecky DL, Labhasetwar V. Biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles in rats. Mol. Pharm. 5(2), 316–327 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Shvartsman VV, Alawneh F, Borisov P, Kozodaev D, Lupascu DC. Converse magnetoelectric effect in CoFe₂O₄–BaTiO₃ composites with a core–shell structure. Smart Mater. Struct. 20(7), (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 23 Etier M, Gao Y, Shvartsman VV et al. Cobalt ferrite/barium titanate core/shell nanoparticles. Ferroelectrics 438(1), 115–122 (2012).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Marchini JF, Gomes WF, Moulin B et al. Very late outcomes of drug-eluting stents coated with biodegradable polymers: insights from the 5-year follow-up of the randomized PAINT trial. Cardiovasc. Diagn Ther. 4(6), 480–486 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25 Li B, Jie W, Huang L et al. Nuclear BK channels regulate gene expression via the control of nuclear calcium signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 17(8), 1055–1063 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Zhang SJ, Zou M, Lu L et al. Nuclear calcium signaling controls expression of a large gene pool: identification of a gene program for acquired neuroprotection induced by synaptic activity. PLoS Genetics 5(8), e1000604 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Calero M, Chiappi M, Lazaro-Carrillo A et al. Characterization of interaction of magnetic nanoparticles with breast cancer cells. J. Nanobiotechnol. 13(16), (2015). • Characterization of nanoparticles for use in cancer.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28 Jang M, Kim SS, Lee J. Cancer cell metabolism: implications for therapeutic targets. Exp. Mol. Med. 45, e45 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29 Freyssenet D, Di Carlo M, Hood DA. Calcium-dependent regulation of cytochrome C gene expression in skeletal muscle cells. Identification of a protein kinase C-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274(14), 9305–9311 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Pavlides S, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Mitochondrial biogenesis drives tumor cell proliferation. Am. J. Pathol. 178(5), 1949–1952 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Zhao Y, Zhan Q. Electric oscillation and coupling of chromatin regulate chromosome packaging and transcription in eukaryotic cells. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 9, 27 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Hiraoka Y, Granja AT, Fialho AM et al. Human cytochrome c enters murine J774 cells and causes G1 and G2/M cell cycle arrest and induction of apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 338(2), 1284–1290 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Kargol A, Malkinski L, Eskandari R, Carter M, Livingston D. Cellular defibrillation: interaction of micro-scale electric fields with voltage-gated ion channels. J. Biol. Phys. 41(4), 421–431 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Li G, Gao Q, Yuan S et al. Characterization of three small molecule inhibitors of enterovirus 71 identified from screening of a library of natural products. Antivir. Res. 143, 85–96 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Schmidt S, Saxenhofer M, Drewes S et al. High genetic structuring of Tula hantavirus. Arch. Virol. 161(5), 1135–1149 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Liu Y, Zhao L, Ma W et al. The blockage of KCa3.1 channel inhibited proliferation, migration and promoted apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. J. Cancer 6(7), 643–651 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Freise C, Ruehl M, Seehofer D, Hoyer J, Somasundaram R. The inhibitor of Ca(²⁺)-dependent K⁺ channels TRAM-34 blocks growth of hepatocellular carcinoma cells via downregulation of estrogen receptor alpha mRNA and nuclear factor-kappaB. Invest. New Drugs 31(2), 452–457 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Zhang P, Yang X, Yin Q et al. Inhibition of SK4 potassium channels suppresses cell proliferation, migration and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in triple-negative breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 11(4), e0154471 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39 Palmeira CM, Ferreira FM, Rolo AP et al. Histological changes and impairment of liver mitochondrial bioenergetics after long-term treatment with alpha-naphthyl-isothiocyanate (ANIT). Toxicology 190(3), 185–196 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Chopra K, Bansal S, Sachdeva AK. Phytochemicals: Potential in management of climacteric neurobiology. Curr. Pharm. Des. 22(27), 4098–4110 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Vajrala V, Claycomb JR, Sanabria H, Miller JH Jr. Effects of oscillatory electric fields on internal membranes: an analytical model. Biophys. J. 94(6), 2043–2052 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Ye H, Cotic M, Kang EE, Fehlings MG, Carlen PL. Transmembrane potential induced on the internal organelle by a time-varying magnetic field: a model study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 7, 12 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar