A 3D vascularized bone remodeling model combining osteoblasts and osteoclasts in a CaP nanoparticle-enriched matrix

References

• 1 Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GR, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS. Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 421746 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Parfitt AM. The cellular basis of bone remodeling: the quantum concept reexamined in light of recent advances in the cell biology of bone. Calcif. Tissue Int. 36(Suppl. 1), S37–S45 (1984).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Portal-Nunez S, Lozano D, Esbrit P. Role of angiogenesis on bone formation. Histol. Histopathol. 27(5), 559–566 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Akatsu T et al. Origin of osteoclasts: mature monocytes and macrophages are capable of differentiating into osteoclasts under a suitable microenvironment prepared by bone marrow-derived stromal cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87(18), 7260–7264 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kusumbe AP, Adams RH. Osteoclast progenitors promote bone vascularization and osteogenesis. Nat. Med. 20(11), 1238–1240 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kusumbe AP, Ramasamy SK, Adams RH. Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone. Nature 507(7492), 323–328 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Jeon JS, Bersini S, Whisler JA et al. Generation of 3D functional microvascular networks with human mesenchymal stem cells in microfluidic systems. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 6(5), 555–563 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Armulik A, Abramsson A, Betsholtz C. Endothelial/pericyte interactions. Circ. Res. 97(6), 512–523 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Maes C. Role and regulation of vascularization processes in endochondral bones. Calcif. Tissue Int. 92(4), 307–323 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Bongio M, Van Den Beucken JJ, Leeuwenburgh SC, Jansen JA. Preclinical evaluation of injectable bone substitute materials. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 9(3), 191–209 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Rao RR, Peterson AW, Ceccarelli J, Putnam AJ, Stegemann JP. Matrix composition regulates three-dimensional network formation by endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen/fibrin materials. Angiogenesis 15(2), 253–264 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Jeon JS, Bersini S, Gilardi M et al. Human 3D vascularized organotypic microfluidic assays to study breast cancer cell extravasation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112(1), 214–219 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Bersini S, Gilardi M, Arrigoni C et al. Human in vitro 3D co-culture model to engineer vascularized bone-mimicking tissues combining computational tools and statistical experimental approach. Biomaterials 76, 157–172 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Papadimitropoulos A, Scherberich A, Guven S et al. A 3D in vitro bone organ model using human progenitor cells. Eur. Cells Mater. 21, 445–458 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Sinclair SS, Burg KJ. Effect of osteoclast co-culture on the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells grown on bone graft granules. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 22(4–6), 789–808 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rao RR, Ceccarelli J, Vigen ML et al. Effects of hydroxyapatite on endothelial network formation in collagen/fibrin composite hydrogels in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 10(7), 3091–3097 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Heinemann S, Heinemann C, Wenisch S, Alt V, Worch H, Hanke T. Calcium phosphate phases integrated in silica/collagen nanocomposite xerogels enhance the bioactivity and ultimately manipulate the osteoblast/osteoclast ratio in a human co-culture model. Acta Biomater. 9(1), 4878–4888 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Arrigoni C, Bongio M, Talò G et al. Rational design of prevascularized large 3D tissue constructs using computational simulations and biofabrication of geometrically controlled microvessels. Adv. Healthc. Mater. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500958(2016) (Epub ahead of print).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Vallet-Regí M, González-Calbet JM. Calcium phosphates as substitution of bone tissues. Prog. Solid State Chem. 32 (1), 1–31 (2004).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Pepla E, Besharat LK, Palaia G, Tenore G, Migliau G. Nano-hydroxyapatite and its applications in preventive, restorative and regenerative dentistry: a review of literature. Ann. Stomatol. (Roma) 5(3), 108–114 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21 Moriarty P. Nanostructured materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 64(3), 297–381 (2001).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Padilla S, Izquierdo-Barba I, and Vallet-Regí M. High specific surface area in nanometric carbonated hydroxyapatite. Chem. Mater. 20(19), 3 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 23 Narayan RJ, Kumta PN, Sfeir C, Lee D, Choi D, Olton D. Nanostructured ceramics in medical devices: applications and prospects. Overview Nanomaterials And Surfaces JOM 56(10), 38–43 (2004).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kandori K, Kuroda T, Togashi S, Katayama E. Preparation of calcium hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using microreactor and their characteristics of protein adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. B 115(4), 653–659 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Bongio M, Van Den Beucken JJ, Nejadnik MR et al. Biomimetic modification of synthetic hydrogels by incorporation of adhesive peptides and calcium phosphate nanoparticles: in vitro evaluation of cell behavior. Eur. Cells Mater. 22 359–376 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4), 677–689 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Tan S, Fang JY, Yang Z, Nimni ME, Han B. The synergetic effect of hydrogel stiffness and growth factor on osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials 35(20), 5294–5306 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Costa-Rodrigues J, Silva A, Santos C, Almeida MM, Costa ME, Fernandes MH. Complex effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on the differentiation and functional activity of human pre-osteoclastic cells. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 10(12), 3590–3600 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 He J, Genetos DC, Leach JK. Osteogenesis and trophic factor secretion are influenced by the composition of hydroxyapatite/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng. A 16(1), 127–137 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 He J, Decaris ML, Leach JK. Bioceramic-mediated trophic factor secretion by mesenchymal stem cells enhances in vitro endothelial cell persistence and in vivo angiogenesis. Tissue Eng. A 18(13–14), 1520–1528 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Wang H, Bongio M, Farbod K et al. Development of injectable organic/inorganic colloidal composite gels made of self-assembling gelatin nanospheres and calcium phosphate nanocrystals. Acta Biomater. 10(1), 508–519 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Leeuwenburgh SC, Jansen JA, Mikos AG. Functionalization of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate) hydrogels with finely dispersed calcium phosphate nanocrystals for bone-substituting purposes. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 18(12), 1547–1564 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lopa S, Mercuri D, Colombini A et al. Orthopedic bioactive implants: hydrogel enrichment of macroporous titanium for the delivery of mesenchymal stem cells and strontium. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 101(12), 3396–3403 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34 Lopa S, Colombini A, Stanco D, De Girolamo L, Sansone V, Moretti M. Donor-matched mesenchymal stem cells from knee infrapatellar and subcutaneous adipose tissue of osteoarthritic donors display differential chondrogenic and osteogenic commitment. Eur. Cells Mater. 27, 298–311 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Yazid MD, Ariffin SH, Senafi S, Razak MA, Wahab RM. Determination of the differentiation capacities of murines’ primary mononucleated cells and MC3T3-E1 cells. Cancer Cell Int. 10, 42 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 36 Kini U, Nandeesh BN. Physiology of bone formation, remodeling, and metabolism. In: Radionuclide and Hybrid Bone Imaging. Fogelman I, Gnanasegaran G, van der Wall H (Eds). Springer-Verlag. Berlin Heidelberg, 29–55 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 37 Compston JE, Vedi S, Kaptoge S, Seeman E. Bone remodeling rate and remodeling balance are not co-regulated in adulthood: implications for the use of activation frequency as an index of remodeling rate. J. Bone Miner. Res. 22(7), 1031–1036 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 38 Hong H, Stegemann JP. 2D and 3D collagen and fibrin biopolymers promote specific ECM and integrin gene expression by vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 19(10), 1279–1293 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Turner CH. Bone strength: current concepts. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1068 429–446 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40 Laurens N, Koolwijk P, De Maat MP. Fibrin structure and wound healing. J. Thromb. Haemost. 4(5), 932–939 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Stein GS, Lian JB, Owen TA. Relationship of cell growth to the regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 4(13), 3111–3123 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Motiur Rahman M, Takeshita S, Matsuoka K et al. Proliferation-coupled osteoclast differentiation by RANKL: cell density as a determinant of osteoclast formation. Bone 81, 392–399 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Forte L, Torricelli P, Boanini E et al. Antioxidant and bone repair properties of quercetin-functionalized hydroxyapatite: an in vitro osteoblast-osteoclast-endothelial cell co-culture study. Acta Biomater. 32, 298–308 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44 Ryu J, Kim HJ, Chang EJ, Huang H, Banno Y, Kim HH. Sphingosine 1-phosphate as a regulator of osteoclast differentiation and osteoclast-osteoblast coupling. EMBO J. 25(24), 5840–5851 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Lotinun S, Kiviranta R, Matsubara T et al. Osteoclast-specific cathepsin K deletion stimulates S1P-dependent bone formation. J. Clin. Invest. 123(2), 666–681 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Zhao C, Irie N, Takada Y et al. Bidirectional ephrinB2-EphB4 signaling controls bone homeostasis. Cell Metab. 4(2), 111–121 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Bernhardt A, Thieme S, Domaschke H, Springer A, Rosen-Wolff A, Gelinsky M. Crosstalk of osteoblast and osteoclast precursors on mineralized collagen--towards an in vitro model for bone remodeling. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 95(3), 848–856 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48 Tortelli F, Pujic N, Liu Y, Laroche N, Vico L, Cancedda R. Osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in an in vitro three-dimensional model of bone. Tissue Eng. A 15(9), 2373–2383 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Chim SM, Tickner J, Chow ST et al. Angiogenic factors in bone local environment. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 24(3), 297–310 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Pang H, Wu XH, Fu SL et al. Co-culture with endothelial progenitor cells promotes survival, migration, and differentiation of osteoclast precursors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430(2), 729–734 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Mayer H, Bertram H, Lindenmaier W, Korff T, Weber H, Weich H. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF-A) expression in human mesenchymal stem cells: autocrine and paracrine role on osteoblastic and endothelial differentiation. J. Cell. Biochem. 95(4), 827–839 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Street J, Bao M, Deguzman L et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates bone repair by promoting angiogenesis and bone turnover. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99(15), 9656–9661 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Bersini S, Moretti M. 3D functional and perfusable microvascular networks for organotypic microfluidic models. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 26(5), 180 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 54 Castillo Diaz LA, Saiani A, Gough JE, Miller AF. Human osteoblasts within soft peptide hydrogels promote mineralisation in vitro. J. Tissue Eng. 5, 2041731414539344 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55 Wakatsuki T, Elson EL. Reciprocal interactions between cells and extracellular matrix during remodeling of tissue constructs. Biophys. Chem. 100(1–3), 593–605 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Tautzenberger A, Kovtun A, Ignatius A. Nanoparticles and their potential for application in bone. Int. J. Nanomedicine 7, 4545–4557 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Gratton SE, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105(33), 11613–11618 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Cai Y, Tang R. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles in biomineralization and biomaterials. J. Mater. Chem. 18 3775–3787 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Motskin M, Wright DM, Muller K et al. Hydroxyapatite nano and microparticles: correlation of particle properties with cytotoxicity and biostability. Biomaterials 30(19), 3307–3317 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60 Golub EE, Boesze-Battaglia K. The role of alkaline phosphatase in mineralization. Curr. Opin. Orthop. 18, 444–448 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 61 Matsuoka F, Takeuchi I, Agata H et al. Morphology-based prediction of osteogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One 8(2), e55082 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62 Mulari MT, Zhao H, Lakkakorpi PT, Vaananen HK. Osteoclast ruffled border has distinct subdomains for secretion and degraded matrix uptake. Traffic 4(2), 113–125 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63 Vaananen HK, Laitala-Leinonen T. Osteoclast lineage and function. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 473(2), 132–138 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar