Long-term clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1. Claessen BE, Mehran R, Mintz GS et al. Impact of intravascular ultrasound imaging on early and late clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent. 4(9), 974–981 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2. Hachinohe D, Mitomo S, Candilio L, Latib A. A practical approach to assessing stent results with IVUS or OCT. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc. J. 14(1), 32–41 (2018). •• Presents a comprehensive and practical approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography to optimize stent deployment and assess procedural complications after stent implantation.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3. Ali ZA, Karimi GK, Maehara A et al. Outcomes of optical coherence tomography compared with intravascular ultrasound and with angiography to guide coronary stent implantation: one-year results from the ILUMIEN III: OPTIMIZE PCI trial. EuroIntervention 16(13), 1085–1091 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4. Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N. Engl. J. Med. 388(18), 1668–1679 (2023). • Trial assessing IVUS-guided implantation in association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) in complex lesions.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5. Räber L, Mintz GS, Koskinas KC et al. Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. Eur. Heart J. 39(35), 3281–3300 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6. Jones DA, Rathod KS, Koganti S et al. Angiography alone versus angiography plus optical coherence tomography to guide percutaneous coronary intervention: outcomes from the Pan-London PCI cohort. JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent. 11(14), 1313–1321 (2018). •• Reports that optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided PCI was associated with improved procedural outcomes, in-hospital events, and long-term survival compared with standard angiography-guided PCI.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339, b2700 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343, d5928 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9. Jakabcin J, Spacek R, Bystron M et al. Long-term health outcome and mortality evaluation after invasive coronary treatment using drug eluting stents with or without the IVUS guidance. Randomized control trial. HOME DES IVUS. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 75(4), 578–583 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10. Chieffo A, Latib A, Caussin C et al. A prospective, randomized trial of intravascular-ultrasound guided compared to angiography guided stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: the AVIO trial. Am. Heart J. 165(1), 65–72 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11. Kim JS, Kang TS, Mintz GS et al. Randomized comparison of clinical outcomes between intravascular ultrasound and angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for long coronary artery stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent. 6(4), 369–376 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12. Tian NL, Gami SK, Ye F et al. Angiographic and clinical comparisons of intravascular ultrasound- versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with chronic total occlusion lesions: two-year results from a randomised AIR-CTO study. EuroIntervention 10(12), 1409–1417 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Kim BK, Shin DH, Hong MK et al. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound-guided chronic total occlusion intervention with zotarolimus-eluting versus biolimus-eluting stent implantation: randomized study. Circ. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 8(7), e002592 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14. Hong SJ, Mintz GS, Ahn CM et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: 5-year follow-up of the IVUS-XPL randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent. 13(1), 62–71 (2020). •• Trial assessing IVUS-guided implantation in association with MACE and TVR in complex lesions.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15. Tan Q, Wang Q, Liu D, Zhang S, Zhang Y, Li Y. Intravascular ultrasound-guided unprotected left main coronary artery stenting in the elderly. Saudi Med. J. 36(5), 549–553 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16. Liu XM, Yang ZM, Liu XK et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesions: a single-center randomized trial. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 21(2), 83–90 (2019). • Possible feasibility of IVUS-guided drug-eluting stent implantation for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis was supported by this study.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17. Gao XF, Ge Z, Kong XQ et al. 3-year outcomes of the ULTIMATE trial comparing intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc. Intervent. 14(3), 247–257 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18. Chamié D, Costa JR Jr, Damiani LP et al. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound and angiography to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: the iSIGHT randomized trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 14(3), (2021).
  Google Scholar
• 19. Niu Y, Bai N, Ma Y, Zhong PY, Shang YS, Wang ZL. Efficacy of intravascular imaging-guided drug-eluting stent implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 22(1), 327 (2022). •• A previous meta-analysis.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20. Baber U, Kini AS, Sharma SK. Stenting of complex lesions: an overview. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 7(9), 485–496 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21. Bavishi C, Sardar P, Chatterjee S et al. Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am. Heart J. 185, 26–34 (2017). •• A systematic meta-analysis comparing the use of angiography with drug-eluting stent implantation.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Chandra P, Sethuraman S, Roy S et al. Effectiveness and safety of optical coherence tomography-guided PCI in Indian patients with complex lesions: a multicenter, prospective registry. Indian Heart J. 75(4), 236–242 (2023).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. Gil RJ, Pawłowski T, Dudek D et al. Comparison of angiographically guided direct stenting technique with direct stenting and optimal balloon angioplasty guided with intravascular ultrasound. The multicenter, randomized trial results. Am. Heart J. 154(4), 669–675 (2007). • Randomized controlled trial that hypothesized that the optimal coronary stenting outcomes might be compromised by employing appropriate stenting techniques.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar