Spinal intervertebral disc regeneration versus repair: cost, outcomes and future considerations
References
- 1. The state of US health, 1990–2010: burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors. JAMA 310(6), 591–608 (2013).
- 2. . A brief review of the degenerative intervertebral disc disease. Med. Arch. 73(6), 421–424 (2019).
- 3. Combined nucleus pulposus augmentation and annulus fibrosus repair prevents acute intervertebral disc degeneration after discectomy. Sci. Transl. Med. 12(534), (2020).
- 4. . Intervertebral disc regeneration: do nutrients lead the way? Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 10(9), 561–566 (2014).
- 5. . Cost-effectiveness study of one-stage treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with bioactive glass S53P4. Materials 12(19), 1–11 (2019).
- 6. . Enhanced biomaterials: systematic review of alternatives to supplement spine fusion including silicon nitride, bioactive glass, amino peptide bone graft, and tantalum. Neurosurg. Focus 50(6), E10 (2021).
- 7. A tough act to follow: collagen hydrogel modifications to improve mechanical and growth factor loading capabilities. Mater. Today Bio. 10, 100098 (2021).
- 8. . Cell-based strategies for IVD repair: clinical progress and translational obstacles. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 17(3), 158–175 (2021).
- 9. Notochordal cell-based treatment strategies and their potential in intervertebral disc regeneration. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 9, 9 (2022).
- 10. . Cell sources proposed for nucleus pulposus regeneration. JOR Spine 4(4), e1175 (2021).
- 11. Mesenchymal stem cell homing into intervertebral discs enhances the tie2-positive progenitor cell population, prevents cell death, and induces a proliferative response. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 44(23), 1613–1622 (2019).
- 12. Ultra-purified alginate gel implantation decreases inflammatory cytokine levels, prevents intervertebral disc degeneration, and reduces acute pain after discectomy. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 638 (2021).
- 13. Gellan gum-based hydrogels for intervertebral disc tissue-engineering applications. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 5(6), e97–107 (2011).
- 14. . Cost-effectiveness of lumbar artificial intervertebral disc replacement: driven by the choice of comparator. ANZ J. Surg. 83(9), 669–675 (2013).
- 15. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies. J. Neurosurg. Spine 24(5), 760–768 (2016).
- 16. Comparison of radiographic reconstruction and clinical improvement between artificial cervical disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Pain Res. Manage. 2022, 3353810 (2022).
- 17. Risk factors for high-grade heterotopic ossification after total disc replacement: a single-center experience of 394 cases. Neurosurgery 89(5), 852–861 (2021).
- 18. Assessment of the self-reported dysphagia in patients undergoing one-level versus two-level cervical disc replacement with the Prestige-LP prosthesis. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 207, 106759 (2021).
- 19. An eight-year follow-up study on the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis through intervertebral disc replacement and anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Orthop. Surg. 12(3), 717–726 (2020).
- 20. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk. Neurosurg. 30(1), 1–10 (2020).
- 21. Novel use of robotics and navigation for anterior lumbar total disc replacement surgery. N. Am. Spine Soc. J. 9, 100097 (2022).
- 22. . Future perspectives of cell-based therapy for intervertebral disc disease. Eur. Spine J. 17(Suppl. 4), 452–458 (2008).