Bone tissue engineering in the greater omentum is enhanced by a periosteal transplant in a miniature pig model

References

• 1 Wang KH, Inman JC, Hayden RE. Modern concepts in mandibular reconstruction in oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 19(2), 119–124 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Berzofsky C, Shin E, Mashkevich G. Leg compartment syndrome after fibula free flap. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 148(1), 172–173 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Zimmermann CE, Borner BI, Hasse A, Sieg P. Donor site morbidity after microvascular fibula transfer. Clin. Oral. Investig. 5(4), 214–219 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Discher DE, Mooney DJ, Zandstra PW. Growth factors, matrices, and forces combine and control stem cells. Science 324(5935), 1673–1677 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Heliotis M, Ripamonti U, Ferretti C, Kerawala C, Mantalaris A, Tsiridis E. The basic science of bone induction. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 47(7), 511–514 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Xu T, Yu CY, Sun JJ et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-4-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition and invasiveness through Smad1-mediated signal pathway in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch. Med. Res. 42(2), 128–137 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Haubner F, Ohmann E, Pohl F, Strutz J, Gassner HG. Wound healing after radiation therapy: review of the literature. Radiat. Oncol. 7(7), 162 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8 Warnke PH, Springer IN, Wiltfang J et al. Growth and transplantation of a custom vascularised bone graft in a man. Lancet 364(9436), 766–770 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Terheyden H, Knak C, Jepsen S, Palmie S, Rueger DR. Mandibular reconstruction with a prefabricated vascularized bone graft using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1: an experimental study in miniature pigs. Part I: prefabrication. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 30(5), 373–379 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Terheyden H, Menzel C, Wang H, Springer IN, Rueger DR, Acil Y. Prefabrication of vascularized bone grafts using recombinant human osteogenic protein-1–part 3: dosage of rhOP-1, the use of external and internal scaffolds. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 33(2), 164–172 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Warnke PH, Springer IN, Acil Y et al. The mechanical integrity of in vivo engineered heterotopic bone. Biomaterials 27(7), 1081–1087 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Becker ST, Bolte H, Schunemann K et al. Endocultivation: the influence of delayed vs. simultaneous application of BMP-2 onto individually formed hydroxyapatite matrices for heterotopic bone induction. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 41(9), 1153–1160 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Beck-Broichsitter BE, Becker ST, Seitz H, Wiltfang J, Warnke PH. Endocultivation: Histomorphological effects of repetitive rhBMP-2 application into prefabricated hydroxyapatite scaffolds at extraskeletal sites. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 43(6), 981–988 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Heliotis M, Lavery KM, Ripamonti U, Tsiridis E, Di Silvio L. Transformation of a prefabricated hydroxyapatite/osteogenic protein-1 implant into a vascularised pedicled bone flap in the human chest. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 35(3), 265–269 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kokemueller H, Spalthoff S, Nolff M et al. Prefabrication of vascularized bioartificial bone grafts in vivo for segmental mandibular reconstruction: experimental pilot study in sheep and first clinical application. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 39(4), 379–387 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bayles SW, Hayden RE. Gastro-omental free flap reconstruction of the head and neck. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 10(4), 255–259 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Patel RS, Gilbert RW. Utility of the gastro-omental free flap in head and neck reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 17(4), 258–262 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18 Kamei Y, Toriyama K, Takada T, Yagi S. Tissue-engineering bone from omentum. Nagoya J. Med. Sci. 72(3-4), 111–117 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bigham-Sadegh A, Mirshokraei P, Karimi I, Oryan A, Aparviz A, Shafiei-Sarvestani Z. Effects of adipose tissue stem cell concurrent with greater omentum on experimental long-bone healing in dog. Connect Tissue Res. 53(4), 334–342 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Sadegh AB, Basiri E, Oryan A, Mirshokraei P. Wrapped omentum with periosteum concurrent with adipose derived adult stem cells for bone tissue engineering in dog model. Cell Tissue Bank 15(1), 127–137 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Birkenfeld F, Sengebusch A, Volschow C et al. Endocultivation of scaffolds with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and VEGF165 in the omentum majus in a rabbit model. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 23(12), 842–849 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hönig JF, Merten HA. Das Göttinger Miniaturschwein (GMS) als Versuchstier in der humanmedizinischen osteologischen Grundlagenforschung. Z. Zahnärztl. Implantol. 2(1), 237–243 (1993).
  Google Scholar
• 23 Accorsi-Mendonca T, Conz MB, Barros TC, De Sena LA, Soares Gde A, Granjeiro JM. Physicochemical characterization of two deproteinized bovine xenografts. Braz. Oral Res. 22(1), 5–10 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24 Figueiredo M, Henriques J, Martins G, Guerra F, Judas F, Figueiredo H. Physicochemical characterization of biomaterials commonly used in dentistry as bone substitutes – comparison with human bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 92(2), 409–419 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25 Warnke PH. In vivo tissue engineering of biological joint replacements. Lancet 376(9739), 394–396 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26 Lee KT, Mun GH. A systematic review of functional donor-site morbidity after latissimus dorsi muscle transfer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 134(2), 303–314 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Warnke PH, Bolte H, Schunemann K et al. Endocultivation: does delayed application of BMP improve intramuscular heterotopic bone formation? J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 38(1), 54–59 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28 Liu Y, Moller B, Wiltfang J, Warnke PH, Terheyden H. Tissue engineering of a vascularized bone graft of critical size with an osteogenic and angiogenic factor-based in vivo bioreactor. Tissue Eng. Part A 20(23–24), 3189–3197 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Beck-Broichsitter BE, Becker ST, Seitz H, Wiltfang J, Warnke PH. Endocultivation: continuous application of rhBMP-2 via mini-osmotic pumps to induce bone formation at extraskeletal sites. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 46(5), 655–661 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Losken A, Carlson GW, Culbertson JH et al. Omental free flap reconstruction in complex head and neck deformities. Head Neck 24(4), 326–331 (2002).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Shah S, Lowery E, Braun RK et al. Cellular basis of tissue regeneration by omentum. PLoS ONE 7(6), e38368 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Litbarg NO, Gudehithlu KP, Sethupathi P, Arruda JA, Dunea G, Singh AK. Activated omentum becomes rich in factors that promote healing and tissue regeneration. Cell Tissue Res. 328(3), 487–497 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Singh AK, Patel J, Litbarg NO et al. Stromal cells cultured from omentum express pluripotent markers, produce high amounts of VEGF, and engraft to injured sites. Cell Tissue Res. 332(1), 81–88 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Mohammadi R, Azizi S, Amini K. Effects of undifferentiated cultured omental adipose-derived stem cells on peripheral nerve regeneration. J. Surg. Res. 180(2), 91–97 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 35 Shelton EL, Poole SD, Reese J, Bader DM. Omental grafting: a cell-based therapy for blood vessel repair. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 7(6), 421–433 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury 36(3), 20–27 (2005).
  Google Scholar
• 37 Wiltfang J, Rohnen M, Egberts JH et al. Man as a living bioreactor: prefabrication of a custom vascularized bone graft in the gastrocolic omentum. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 22(8), 740–746 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 De Witte TM, Fratila-Apachitei LE, Zadpoor AA, Peppas NA. Bone tissue engineering via growth factor delivery: from scaffolds to complex matrices. Regen. Biomater. 5(4), 197–211 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Becker ST, Bolte H, Krapf O et al. Endocultivation: 3D printed customized porous scaffolds for heterotopic bone induction. Oral Oncol. 45(11), 181–188 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40 Warnke PH, Seitz H, Warnke F et al. Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigations. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 93(1), 212–217 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41 Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 125(5), 315–337 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42 Chang H, Knothe Tate ML. Concise review: the periosteum: tapping into a reservoir of clinically useful progenitor cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 1(6), 480–491 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Ferretti C, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Periosteum derived stem cells for regenerative medicine proposals: boosting current knowledge. World J. Stem Cells 6(3), 266–277 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44 Roberts SJ, Van Gastel N, Carmeliet G, Luyten FP. Uncovering the periosteum for skeletal regeneration: the stem cell that lies beneath. Bone 70(1), 10–18 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45 Nakazato K, Toriyama K, Hishida M et al. Free calvarial periosteum graft vascularized by an omental flap in a rat model. Ann. Plast. Surg. 67(6), 649–654 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Beck-Broichsitter BE, Christofzik DW, Daschner F et al. Endocultivation: metabolism during heterotopic osteoinduction in vivo – monitoring with fiber optic detection devices. Tissue Eng. Part C Methods 18(10), 740–746 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Naujokat H, Acil Y, Gulses A, Birkenfeld F, Wiltfang J. Man as a living bioreactor: long-term histological aspects of a mandibular replacement engineered in the patient's own body. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.1005.1006 (2018) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar