Does the use of interferential current prior to pilates exercises accelerate improvement of chronic nonspecific low back pain?

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 64(6), 2028–2037 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2 Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J. 8(1), 8–20 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Delitto A, George SZ, van Dillen LR et al. Low back pain. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 42(4), A1–A57 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Wells C, Kolt GS, Marshall P, Hill B, Bialocerkowski A. The effectiveness of pilates exercise in people with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 9(7), e100402 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Yamato TP, Maher CG, Saragiotto BT et al. Pilates for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7, CD010265 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 6 Beatti A, Tucker K, Chipchase LS. A double-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the effects of interferential therapy on experimentally induced pain using a cross-over design. Int. Musculoskelet. Med. 34(3), 115–122 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 7 Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Survey Anesthesiol. 11(2), 89–90 (1967).
  Google Scholar
• 8 Fuentes JP, Olivo SA, Magee DJ, Gross DP. Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys. Ther. 90(9), 1219–1238 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9 Poitras S, Brosseau L. Evidence-informed management of chronic low back pain with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, interferential current, electrical muscle stimulation, ultrasound, and thermotherapy. Spine J. 8(1), 226–233 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10 Vance CG, Dailey DL, Rakel BA, Sluka KA. Using TENS for pain control: the state of the evidence. Pain Manag. 4(3), 197–209 (2014). •• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are emerging, indicating that both high-frequency and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) provide analgesia, specifically when applied at a strong, but nonpainful intensity.
  Google Scholar
• 11 Resende L, Merriwether E, Rampazo EP et al. Meta-analysis of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relief of spinal pain. Eur. J. Pain 22(4), 663–678 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Werners R, Pynsent PB, Bulstrode CJ. Randomized trial comparing interferential therapy with motorized lumbar traction and massage in the management of low back pain in a primary care setting. Spine 24(15), 1579 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lara-Palomo IC, Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA et al. Short-term effects of interferential current electro-massage in adults with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Rehabil. 27(5), 439–449 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Hurley DA, Mcdonough SM, Dempster M, Moore AP, Baxter GD. A randomized clinical trial of manipulative therapy and interferential therapy for acute low back pain. Spine 29(20), 2207–2216 (2004).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15 Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Martin DC, Schoenfeld LS, Ramamurthy S. A controlled trial of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and exercise for chronic low back pain. N. Engl. J. Med. 322(23), 1627–1634 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Johnson MI, Tabasam G. An investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free volunteers. Phys. Ther. 83(3), 208–223 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17 Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential currents on heat pain in healthy subjects. J. Rehabil. Med. 35(1), 15–19 (2003).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18 Fuentes CJ, Armijo-Olivo S, Magee DJ, Gross DP. A preliminary investigation into the effects of active interferential current therapy and placebo on pressure pain sensitivity: a random crossover placebo controlled study. Physiotherapy 97(4), 291–301 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys. Ther. 94(4), 477–489 (2014). • Therapeutic alliance combined with active interferential current appears to lead to clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes of patients with chronic low back pain.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20 Franco KM, Franco YD, Oliveira NB et al. Is interferential current before pilates exercises more effective than Placebo in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain?: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 98(2), 320–328 (2017). • Active interferential current before pilates exercises is not more effective than placebo interferential current for clinical outcomes of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain at short and medium terms.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21 Franco YR, Liebano RE, Moura KF et al. Efficacy of the addition of interferential current to pilates method in patients with low back pain: a protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 15(1), 420–427 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22 Pantaleao MA, Laurino MF, Gallego NL et al. Adjusting pulse amplitude during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) application produces greater hypoalgesia. J. Pain 12(5), 581–590 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Ostelo RW, De Vet HC. Clinically important outcomes in low back pain. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 19(4), 593–607 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 24 Carvalho TD, Nóbrega AD, Lazzoli JK et al. Posição oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte: atividade física e saúde. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte 2(4), 79–81 (1996).
  Google Scholar
• 25 Costa LO, Maher CG, Latimer J et al. Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: which one is the best? Spine 33(22), 2459–2463 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26 Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: toward international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine 33(1), 90–94 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27 Williamson OD, Schroer M, Ruff DD et al. Onset of response with duloxetine treatment in patients with osteoarthritis knee pain and chronic low back pain: a posthoc analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Clin. Ther. 36(4), 544–551 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53(282), 457–481 (1958).
  Google Scholar
• 29 Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data (2nd Edition). Springer Science & Business Media, NY, USA (2003).
  Google Scholar
• 30 Sluka KA, Bjordal JM, Marchand S, Rakel BA. What makes transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation work?: making sense of the mixed results in the clinical literature. Phys. Ther. 93(10), 1397–1402 (2013). •• A number of variables related to TENS application are not being considered in the systematic reviews that show that TENS is inconclusive or ineffective to treat low back pain.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31 Vong SK, Cheing GL, Chan F, So EM, Chan CC. Motivational enhancement therapy in addition to physical therapy improves motivational factors and treatment outcomes in people with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 92(2), 176–183 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Correa JB, Costa LO, Oliveira NT, Lima WP, Sluka KA, Liebano RE. Effects of the carrier frequency of interferential current on pain modulation and central hypersensitivity in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur. J. Pain 20(10), 1653–1666 (2016). • The interferential current has changed some physiological mechanisms of pain and showed a decrease in the use of pain medication, but there was no change in the pain intensity at short and medium terms.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Facci LM, Nowotny JP, Tormem F, Trevisani VF. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. Sao Paulo Med. J. 129(4), 206–216 (2011). • There is no difference in pain reduction between TENS and IFC in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain, but both currents were significantly better than the control group.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34 Meeus M, Nijs J. Central sensitization: a biopsychosocial explanation for chronic widespread pain in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome. Clin. Rheumatol. 26(4), 465–473 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35 Goubert D, Danneels L, Graven-Nielsen T, Descheemaeker F, Coppieters I, Meeus M. Differences in pain processing between patients with chronic low back pain, recurrent low back pain and fibromyalgia. Pain Physician 20(4), 307–318 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar