Antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation in nanomedicine: small light strides against bad bugs

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Guyer B, Freedman MA, Strobino DM, Sondik EJ. Annual summary of vital statistics: trends in the health of Americans during the 20th century. Pediatrics 106(6), 1307–1317 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Fauci AS, Morens DM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(5), 454–461 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Youngblood WJ, Gryko DT, Lammi RK, Bocian DF, Holten D, Lindsey JS. Glaser-mediated synthesis and photophysical characterization of diphenylbutadiyne-linked porphyrin dyads. J. Org. Chem. 67(7), 2111–2117 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Smith R, Coast J. The true cost of antimicrobial resistance. Br. Med. J. 346, f1493 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kraus CN. Low hanging fruit in infectious disease drug development. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11(5), 434–438 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Munoz-Price LS, Poirel L, Bonomo RA et al. Clinical epidemiology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 13(9), 785–796 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7 Yoneyama H, Katsumata R. Antibiotic resistance in bacteria and its future for novel antibiotic development. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 70(5), 1060–1075 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hamblin MR, Hasan T. Photodynamic therapy: a new antimicrobial approach to infectious disease? Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 3(5), 436–450 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Maisch T. Anti-microbial photodynamic therapy: useful in the future? Lasers Med. Sci. 22(2), 83–91 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10 Maisch T, Hackbarth S, Regensburger J et al. Photodynamic inactivation of multi-resistant bacteria (PIB) – a new approach to treat superficial infections in the 21st century. J. Dtsch Dermatol. Ges. 9(5), 360–366 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bush K, Courvalin P, Dantas G et al. Tackling antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9(12), 894–896 (2011).•• Influential review highlighting the growing danger of microbial drug resistance.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Almeida RD, Manadas BJ, Carvalho AP, Duarte CB. Intracellular signaling mechanisms in photodynamic therapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1704(2), 59–86 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Johnson GA, Ellis EA, Kim H, Muthukrishnan N, Snavely T, Pellois JP. Photoinduced membrane damage of E. coli and S. aureus by the photosensitizer-antimicrobial peptide conjugate eosin-(KLAKLAK)2. PLoS ONE 9(3), e91220 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14 Pereira MA, Faustino MA, Tome JP et al. Influence of external bacterial structures on the efficiency of photodynamic inactivation by a cationic porphyrin. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 13(4), 680–690 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Malik Z, Hanania J, Nitzan Y. Bactericidal effects of photoactivated porphyrins – an alternative approach to antimicrobial drugs. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 5(3–4), 281–293 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Minnock A, Vernon DI, Schofield J, Griffiths J, Parish JH, Brown ST. Photoinactivation of bacteria. Use of a cationic water-soluble zinc phthalocyanine to photoinactivate both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 32(3), 159–164 (1996).• Paper highlighting the importance of cationic charges in efficient photosensitizers to kill Gram-negative bacteria.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Malik Z, Ladan H, Nitzan Y. Photodynamic inactivation of Gram-negative bacteria: problems and possible solutions. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 14(3), 262–266 (1992).•• One of the first papers highlighting the difficulty faced by attempts to use photosensitizers normally used to kill cancer cells, to kill Gram-negative bacteria.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Lambert PA. Cellular impermeability and uptake of biocides and antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92(Suppl.), S46–S54 (2002).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 19 Minnock A, Vernon DI, Schofield J, Griffiths J, Parish JH, Brown SB. Mechanism of uptake of a cationic water-soluble pyridinium zinc phthalocyanine across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44(3), 522–527 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Nitzan Y, Gutterman M, Malik Z, Ehrenberg B. Inactivation of gram-negative bacteria by photosensitized porphyrins. Photochem. Photobiol. 55(1), 89–96 (1992).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Valduga G, Bertoloni G, Reddi E, Jori G. Effect of extracellularly generated singlet oxygen on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 21(1), 81–86 (1993).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Nishiyama N, Nakagishi Y, Morimoto Y et al. Enhanced photodynamic cancer treatment by supramolecular nanocarriers charged with dendrimer phthalocyanine. J. Control. Release 133(3), 245–251 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Mills A, Le Hunte S. An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 108(1), 1–35 (1997).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Hashimoto K. TiO₂ photocatalysis: a historical overview and future prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 44(12), 8269–8285 (Pt 8261) (2005).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Wong CC, Chu W. The hydrogen peroxide-assisted photocatalytic degradation of alachlor in TiO₂ suspensions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(10), 2310–2316 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Spesia MB, Milanesio ME, Durantini EN. Synthesis, properties and photodynamic inactivation of Escherichia coli by novel cationic fullerene C60 derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 43(4), 853–861 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Jori G, Brown SB. Photosensitized inactivation of microorganisms. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 3(5), 403–405 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Soncin M, Fabris C, Busetti A et al. Approaches to selectivity in the Zn(II)-phthalocyanine-photosensitized inactivation of wild-type and antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 1(10), 815–819 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Lauro FM, Pretto P, Covolo L, Jori G, Bertoloni G. Photoinactivation of bacterial strains involved in periodontal diseases sensitized by porphycene-polylysine conjugates. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 1(7), 468–470 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Huang L, Terakawa M, Zhiyentayev T et al. Innovative cationic fullerenes as broad-spectrum light-activated antimicrobials. Nanomedicine 6(3), 442–452 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Perni S, Prokopovich P, Pratten J, Parkin IP, Wilson M. Nanoparticles: their potential use in antibacterial photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10(5), 712–720 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Felgentrager A, Maisch T, Spath A, Schroder JA, Baumler W. Singlet oxygen generation in porphyrin-doped polymeric surface coating enables antimicrobial effects on Staphylococcus aureus. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(38), 20598–20607 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33 Zerdin K, Scully AD. Inactivation of food-borne spoilage and pathogenic micro-organisms on the surface of a photoactive polymer. Photochem. Photobiol. 86(5), 1109–1117 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Bezman SA, Burtis PA, Izod TP, Thayer MA. Photodynamic inactivation of E. coli by rose bengal immobilized on polystyrene beads. Photochem. Photobiol. 28(3), 325–329 (1978).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Kendall CA, Morton CA. Photodynamic therapy for the treatment of skin disease. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2(4), 283–288 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Moan J, Peng Q, Sorensen R, Iani V, Nesland JM. The biophysical foundations of photodynamic therapy. Endoscopy 30(4), 387–391 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Paszko E, Ehrhardt C, Senge MO, Kelleher DP, Reynolds JV. Nanodrug applications in photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 8(1), 14–29 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Derycke AS, De Witte PA. Liposomes for photodynamic therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56(1), 17–30 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Zhang GD, Harada A, Nishiyama N et al. Polyion complex micelles entrapping cationic dendrimer porphyrin: effective photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy of cancer. J. Control. Release 93(2), 141–150 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Van Nostrum CF. Polymeric micelles to deliver photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 56(1), 9–16 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41 Li B, Moriyama EH, Li F, Jarvi MT, Allen C, Wilson BC. Diblock copolymer micelles deliver hydrophobic protoporphyrin IX for photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. 83(6), 1505–1512 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Nishiyama N, Morimoto Y, Jang WD, Kataoka K. Design and development of dendrimer photosensitizer-incorporated polymeric micelles for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61(4), 327–338 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Narsireddy A, Vijayashree K, Irudayaraj J, Manorama SV, Rao NM. Targeted in vivo photodynamic therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor-specific peptide linked nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm. 471(1–2), 421–429 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44 Yang Y, Hu Y, Du H, Wang H. Intracellular gold nanoparticle aggregation and their potential applications in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 50(55), 7287–7290 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Ricci-Junior E, Marchetti JM. Preparation, characterization, photocytotoxicity assay of PLGA nanoparticles containing zinc (II) phthalocyanine for photodynamic therapy use. J. Microencapsul. 23(5), 523–538 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Roy I, Ohulchanskyy TY, Pudavar HE et al. Ceramic-based nanoparticles entrapping water-insoluble photosensitizing anticancer drugs: a novel drug-carrier system for photodynamic therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125(26), 7860–7865 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Wang L, Shi J, Liu R et al. Photodynamic effect of functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes: a potential sensitizer for photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale 6(9), 4642–4651 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48 Xing Y, Dai L. Nanodiamonds for nanomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 4(2), 207–218 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Zhang XQ, Chen M, Lam R, Xu X, Osawa E, Ho D. Polymer-functionalized nanodiamond platforms as vehicles for gene delivery. ACS Nano 3(9), 2609–2616 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Griffiths G, Nystrom B, Sable SB, Khuller GK. Nanobead-based interventions for the treatment and prevention of tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8(11), 827–834 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kateb B, Chiu K, Black KL et al. Nanoplatforms for constructing new approaches to cancer treatment, imaging, and drug delivery: what should be the policy? Neuroimage 54(Suppl. 1), S106–S124 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 52 Casas A, Battah S, Di Venosa G et al. Sustained and efficient porphyrin generation in vivo using dendrimer conjugates of 5-ALA for photodynamic therapy. J. Control. Release 135(2), 136–143 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Alarcon E, Edwards AM, Aspee A, Borsarelli CD, Lissi EA. Photophysics and photochemistry of rose bengal bound to human serum albumin. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 8(7), 933–943 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Guo Y, Rogelj S, Zhang P. Rose Bengal-decorated silica nanoparticles as photosensitizers for inactivation of Gram-positive bacteria. Nanotechnology 21(6), 065102 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 55 Tang W, Xu H, Kopelman R, Philbert MA. Photodynamic characterization and in vitro application of methylene blue-containing nanoparticle platforms. Photochem. Photobiol. 81(2), 242–249 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Khdair A, Gerard B, Handa H, Mao G, Shekhar MP, Panyam J. Surfactant-polymer nanoparticles enhance the effectiveness of anticancer photodynamic therapy. Mol. Pharm. 5(5), 795–807 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Suppan P. Chemistry and Light. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 295 (1994).
  Google Scholar
• 58 Fujishima A, Honda K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238(5358), 37–38 (1972).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Herrmann JM. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: fundamentals and applications to the removal of various types of aqueous pollutants. Catal. Today 53(1), 115–129 (1999).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 60 Kashyout AB, Soliman M, El-Haleem DA. Disinfection of bacterial suspensions by photocatalytic oxidation using TiO₂ nanoparticles under ultraviolet illumination. Alexandria Eng. 45(3), 367–371 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 61 Cheng CL, Sun DS, Chu WC et al. The effects of the bacterial interaction with visible-light responsive titania photocatalyst on the bactericidal performance. J. Biomed. Sci. 16, 7 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 62 Tatsuma T, Takeda S, Saitoh S, Ohko Y, Fujishima A. Bactericidal effect of an energy storage TiO₂–WO₃ photocatalyst in dark. Electrochem. Commun. 5(9), 793–796 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 63 Vohra A, Goswami DY, Deshpande DA, Block SS. Enhanced photocatalytic disinfection of indoor air. Appl Catalysis B Environ 64(1–2), 57–65 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 64 Sapkota A, Dutta J. Zinc oxide nanorod mediated visible light photoinactivation of model microbes in water. Nanotechnology 22(21), 215703 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 65 Rodriguez J. Solar water disinfection studies with supported TiO₂ and polymer-supported R(II) sensitizer in a compound parabolic collector. J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans ASME 132(1), 0110011–0110015 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 66 Ditta IB, Steele A, Liptrot C et al. Photocatalytic antimicrobial activity of thin surface films of TiO(₂), CuO and TiO(₂)/CuO dual layers on Escherichia coli and bacteriophage T4. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 79(1), 127–133 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67 Sato T, Koizumi Y, Taya M. Photocatalytic deactivation of airborne microbial cells on TiO₂-loaded plate. Biochem. Eng. J. 14(2), 149–152 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 68 Kuhn KP, Chaberny IF, Massholder K et al. Disinfection of surfaces by photocatalytic oxidation with titanium dioxide and UVA light. Chemosphere 53(1), 71–77 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Luo L, Miao L, Tanemura S, Tanemura M. Photocatalytic sterilization of TiO₂ films coated on Al fiber. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 148(1–3), 183–186 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 70 Yao Y, Ohko Y, Sekiguchi Y, Fujishima A, Kubota Y. Self-sterilization using silicone catheters coated with Ag and TiO₂ nanocomposite thin film. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 85(2), 453–460 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 71 Block SS, Seng VP, Goswami DW. Chemically enhanced sunlight for killing bacteria. J. Sol. Energy Eng. 119(1), 85 (1997).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Goswami T. Photocatalytic system to destroy bioaerosols in air. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol. 4, 185–188 (1999).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 73 Song S. Fabrication of TiO₂ impregnated stainless steel fiber photocatalyts and evaluation of photocatalytic activity. J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem. 19(6), 674–679 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 74 Cho M, Choi Y, Park H, Kim K, Woo GJ, Park J. Titanium dioxide/UV photocatalytic disinfection in fresh carrots. J. Food Prot. 70(1), 97–101 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75 Armon R. Disinfection of Bacillus spp. spores in drinking water by TiO₂ photocatalysis as a model for Bacillus anthracis. Waterborne Pathog. 4(2), 7–14 (2004).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 76 Butterfield IM. Water disinfection using an immobilised titanium dioxide film in a photochemical reactor with electric field enhancement. Water Res. 31(3), 675–677 (1997).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 77 Guimarães JR, Barretto AS. Photocatalytic inactivation of Clostridium perfringens and coliphages in water. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 20, 403–411 (2003).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 78 Singh A. Photocatalytic disinfection of water using immobilized titanium dioxide. Poll. Res. 24(1), 29–33 (2005).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 79 Vidal A, DíAz AI, El Hraiki A et al. Solar photocatalysis for detoxification and disinfection of contaminated water: pilot plant studies. Catal. Today 54(2–3), 283–290 (1999).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 80 Chen WJ, Tsai PJ, Chen YC. Functional Fe₃O₄/TiO₂ core/shell magnetic nanoparticles as photokilling agents for pathogenic bacteria. Small 4(4), 485–491 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81 Oka Y, Kim WC, Yoshida T et al. Efficacy of titanium dioxide photocatalyst for inhibition of bacterial colonization on percutaneous implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 86(2), 530–540 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 82 Chen F, Yang X, Wu Q. Antifungal capability of TiO₂ coated film on moist wood. Build. Environ. 44(5), 1088–1093 (2009).
  Google Scholar
• 83 Wolfrum EJ, Huang J, Blake DM et al. Photocatalytic oxidation of bacteria, bacterial and fungal spores, and model biofilm components to carbon dioxide on titanium dioxide-coated surfaces. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(15), 3412–3419 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84 Erkan A. Photocatalytic microbial inactivation over Pd doped SnO₂ and TiO₂ thin films. J. Photoch. Photobiol. A Chem. 184(3), 313–321 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 85 Sokmen M, Degerli S, Aslan A. Photocatalytic disinfection of Giardia intestinalis and Acanthamoeba castellani cysts in water. Exp. Parasitol. 119(1), 44–48 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 86 Ryu H. Photocatalytic inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum with TiO₂ and low-pressure ultraviolet irradiation. Water. Res. 42(6–7), 1523–1530 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87 Guillard C, Bui T-H, Felix C, Moules V, Lina B, Lejeune P. Microbiological disinfection of water and air by photocatalysis. C. R. Chim. 11(1–2), 107–113 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88 Zan L, Fa W, Peng T, Gong ZK. Photocatalysis effect of nanometer TiO₂ and TiO₂-coated ceramic plate on hepatitis B virus. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 86(2), 165–169 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89 Lin Z. Inactivation efficiency of TiO₂ on H1N1 influenza virus. Gaodeng Xuexiao Huaxue Xuebao Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 27(4), 721–725 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 90 Kozlova EA, Safatov AS, Kiselev SA et al. Inactivation and mineralization of aerosol deposited model pathogenic microorganisms over TiO₂ and Pt/TiO₂. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44(13), 5121–5126 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91 Watts RJ, Kong S, Orr MP, Miller GC, Henry BE. Photocatalytic inactivation of coliform bacteria and viruses in secondary wastewater effluent. Water Res. 29(1), 95–100 (1995).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 92 Han W, Zhang B, Cao W et al. The inactivation effect of photocatalytic titanium apatite filter on SARS virus. Sheng wu hua xue yu sheng wu wu li jin zhan 31(11), 982–985 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• 93 Sekiguchi Y, Yao Y, Ohko Y et al. Self-sterilizing catheters with titanium dioxide photocatalyst thin films for clean intermittent catheterization: basis and study of clinical use. Int. J. Urol. 14(5), 426–430 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94 Nakamura H, Tanaka M, Shinohara S, Gotoh M, Karube I. Development of a self-sterilizing lancet coated with a titanium dioxide photocatalytic nano-layer for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Biosens. Bioelectron. 22(9–10), 1920–1925 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 95 Chawengkijwanich C, Hayata Y. Development of TiO₂ powder-coated food packaging film and its ability to inactivate Escherichia coli in vitro and in actual tests. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 123(3), 288–292 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96 Suketa N, Sawase T, Kitaura H et al. An antibacterial surface on dental implants, based on the photocatalytic bactericidal effect. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 7(2), 105–111 (2005).• Useful application of titania photocatalysis to make self-sterilizing dental implants.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 97 Lilja M, Forsgren J, Welch K, Astrand M, Engqvist H, Stromme M. Photocatalytic and antimicrobial properties of surgical implant coatings of titanium dioxide deposited though cathodic arc evaporation. Biotechnol. Lett. 34(12), 2299–2305 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98 Sharma SK, Chiang LY, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy with fullerenes in vivo: reality or a dream? Nanomedicine (Lond.) 6(10), 1813–1825 (2011).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 99 Liu Q, Cui Q, Li XJ, Jin L. The applications of buckminsterfullerene C60 and derivatives in orthopaedic research. Connect. Tissue Res. 55(2), 71–79 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 100 Gunes S, Neugebauer H, Sariciftci NS. Conjugated polymer-based organic solar cells. Chem. Rev. 107(4), 1324–1338 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 101 Arias AC, Mackenzie JD, Mcculloch I, Rivnay J, Salleo A. Materials and applications for large area electronics: solution-based approaches. Chem. Rev. 110(1), 3–24 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102 Kang H, Cho CH, Cho HH et al. Controlling number of indene solubilizing groups in multiadduct fullerenes for tuning optoelectronic properties and open-circuit voltage in organic solar cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 4(1), 110–116 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 103 Mizuno K, Zhiyentayev T, Huang L et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with functionalized fullerenes: quantitative structure-activity relationships. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2(2), 1–9 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 104 Mroz P, Pawlak A, Satti M et al. Functionalized fullerenes mediate photodynamic killing of cancer cells: type I versus type II photochemical mechanism. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 43(5), 711–719 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105 Mroz P, Tegos GP, Gali H, Wharton T, Sarna T, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy with fullerenes. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 6(11), 1139–1149 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106 Tegos GP, Demidova TN, Arcila-Lopez D et al. Cationic fullerenes are effective and selective antimicrobial photosensitizers. Chem. Biol. 12(10), 1127–1135 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107 Lu Z, Dai T, Huang L et al. Photodynamic therapy with a cationic functionalized fullerene rescues mice from fatal wound infections. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 5(10), 1525–1533 (2010).•• One of the few papers to use fullerenes to save the life of mice used antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 108 Huang L, Wang M, Sharma SK et al. Decacationic [70]fullerene approach for efficient photokilling of infectious bacteria and cancer cells. ECS Trans. 45(20), doi:10.1149/04520.0065ecst (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 109 Wang M, Maragani S, Huang L et al. Synthesis of decacationic [60]fullerene decaiodides giving photoinduced production of superoxide radicals and effective PDT-mediation on antimicrobial photoinactivation. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 63C, 170–184 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 110 Wang M, Huang L, Sharma SK et al. Synthesis and photodynamic effect of new highly photostable decacationically armed [60]- and [70]fullerene decaiodide monoadducts to target pathogenic bacteria and cancer cells. J. Med. Chem. 55(9), 4274–4285 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 111 Manjon F, Santana-Magana M, Garcia-Fresnadillo D, Orellana G. Are silicone-supported [C60]-fullerenes an alternative to Ru(II) polypyridyls for photodynamic solar water disinfection? Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 13(2), 397–406 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 112 Aoshima H, Kokubo K, Shirakawa S, Ito M, Yamana S, Oshima T. Antimicrobial activity of fullerenes and their hydroxylated derivatives. Biocontrol. Sci. 14(2), 69–72 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113 Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. Nature 354(6348), 56–58 (1991).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 114 Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, De Heer WA. Carbon nanotubes – the route toward applications. Science 297(5582), 787–792 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 115 Chen P, Wu X, Lin J, Tan KL. High H2 uptake by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes under ambient pressure and moderate temperatures. Science 285(5424), 91–93 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116 Hussain CM, Saridara C, Mitra S. Microtrapping characteristics of single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Chromatogr. A 1185(2), 161–166 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 117 Jolles P, Jolles J. What's new in lysozyme research? Always a model system, today as yesterday. Mol. Cell Biochem. 63(2), 165–189 (1984).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 118 Nepal D, Balasubramanian S, Simonian AL, Davis VA. Strong antimicrobial coatings: single-walled carbon nanotubes armored with biopolymers. Nano Lett. 8(7), 1896–1901 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119 Banerjee I, Douaisi MP, Mondal D, Kane RS. Light-activated nanotube-porphyrin conjugates as effective antiviral agents. Nanotechnology 23(10), 105101 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 120 Oza G, Pandey S, Gupta A et al. Photocatalysis-assisted water filtration: using TiO₂-coated vertically aligned multi-walled carbon nanotube array for removal of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 33(7), 4392–4400 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121 Dinu CZ, Zhu G, Bale SS et al. Enzyme-based nanoscale composites for use as active decontamination surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 20(3), 392–398 (2010).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 122 Wang Y, Li Z, Wang J, Li J, Lin Y. Graphene and graphene oxide: biofunctionalization and applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 29(5), 205–212 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 123 Sun X, Liu Z, Welsher K et al. Nano-graphene oxide for cellular imaging and drug delivery. Nano Res. 1(3), 203–212 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124 Huang YY, Sharma SK, Dai T et al. Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy? Nanotech. Rev. 10(2), 111–146 (2012).• Interesting critical review examinaing the role of nanotechnology in potentiating photodynamic therapy (PDT) both against cancer and against infections.
  Google Scholar
• 125 Rong P, Yang K, Srivastan A et al. Photosensitizer loaded nano-graphene for multimodality imaging guided tumor photodynamic therapy. Theranostics 4(3), 229–239 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126 Zhou L, Zhou L, Wei S et al. Combination of chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy using graphene oxide as drug delivery system. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 135, 7–16 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 127 Sahu A, Choi WI, Lee JH, Tae G. Graphene oxide mediated delivery of methylene blue for combined photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 34(26), 6239–6248 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 128 Ristic BZ, Milenkovic MM, Dakic IR et al. Photodynamic antibacterial effect of graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials 35(15), 4428–4435 (2014).• Study using graphene quantum dots to mediate PDT killing of bacteria.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 129 Sun H, Gao N, Dong K, Ren J, Qu X. Graphene quantum dots-band-AIDS used for wound disinfection. ACS Nano 8(6), 6202–6210 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 130 Bangham AD. A correlation between surface charge and coagulant action of phospholipids. Nature 192, 1197–1198 (1961).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131 Sadasivam M, Avci P, Gupta GK et al. Self-assembled liposomal nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Eur. J. Nanomed. 5(3), 115–129 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 132 Kozlowska D, Foran P, Macmahon P, Shelly MJ, Eustace S, O'Kennedy R. Molecular and magnetic resonance imaging: the value of immunoliposomes. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61(15), 1402–1411 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 133 Vemuri S, Rhodes CT. Preparation and characterization of liposomes as therapeutic delivery systems: a review. Pharm. Acta Helv. 70(2), 95–111 (1995).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 134 Samad A, Sultana Y, Aqil M. Liposomal drug delivery systems: an update review. Curr. Drug Deliv. 4(4), 297–305 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 135 Kim HJ, Jones MN. The delivery of benzyl penicillin to Staphylococcus aureus biofilms by use of liposomes. J. Liposome Res. 14(3–4), 123–139 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 136 Mugabe C, Azghani AO, Omri A. Liposome-mediated gentamicin delivery: development and activity against resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 55(2), 269–271 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 137 Pinto-Alphandary H, Andremont A, Couvreur P. Targeted delivery of antibiotics using liposomes and nanoparticles: research and applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 13(3), 155–168 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 138 Ferro S, Ricchelli F, Mancini G, Tognon G, Jori G. Inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) by liposome-delivered photosensitising agents. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 83(2), 98–104 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 139 Ferro S, Ricchelli F, Monti D, Mancini G, Jori G. Efficient photoinactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a novel porphyrin incorporated into a poly-cationic liposome. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 39(5), 1026–1034 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 140 Bombelli C, Bordi F, Ferro S et al. New cationic liposomes as vehicles of m-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin in photodynamic therapy of infectious diseases. Mol. Pharm. 5(4), 672–679 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 141 Haldar J, Kondaiah P, Bhattacharya S. Synthesis and antibacterial properties of novel hydrolyzable cationic amphiphiles. Incorporation of multiple head groups leads to impressive antibacterial activity. J. Med. Chem. 48(11), 3823–3831 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 142 Yang YT, Chien HF, Chang PH et al. Photodynamic inactivation of chlorin e6-loaded CTAB-liposomes against Candida albicans. Lasers Surg. Med. 45(3), 175–185 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 143 Yang K, Gitter B, Ruger R et al. Antimicrobial peptide-modified liposomes for bacteria targeted delivery of temoporfin in photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 10(10), 1593–1601 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 144 Brancaleon L, Moseley H. Laser and non-laser light sources for photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med. Sci. 17(3), 173–186 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 145 Phillip MJ, Maximuke PP. Chemiluminescence and hematoporphyrin derivative: a novel therapy for mammary adenocarcinomas in mice. Oncology 46(4), 266–272 (1989).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 146 Carpenter S, Fehr MJ, Kraus GA, Petrich JW. Chemiluminescent activation of the antiviral activity of hypericin: a molecular flashlight. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91(25), 12273–12277 (1994).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 147 Nakonechny F, Firer MA, Nitzan Y, Nisnevitch M. Intracellular antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: a novel technique for efficient eradication of pathogenic bacteria. Photochem. Photobiol. 86(6), 1350–1355 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 148 Langer R. Biomaterials in drug delivery and tissue engineering: one laboratory's experience. Acc. Chem. Res. 33(2), 94–101 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 149 Zhang Z, Ortiz O, Goyal R, Kohn J. Biodegradable polymers. Princip. Tissue Eng. (23), 441–490 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• 150 Coenye T, Honraet K, Rigole P, Nadal Jimenez P, Nelis HJ. In vitro inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation on hydroxyapatite by subinhibitory concentrations of anthraquinones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51(4), 1541–1544 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 151 Nafee N, Youssef A, El-Gowelli H, Asem H, Kandil S. Antibiotic-free nanotherapeutics: hypericin nanoparticles thereof for improved in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and wound healing. Int. J. Pharm. 454(1), 249–258 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 152 Pagonis TC, Chen J, Fontana CR et al. Nanoparticle-based endodontic antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. J. Endod. 36(2), 322–328 (2010).• Points out an interesting clinical application of nanotechnology-enabled antimicrobial PDT in endodontic therapy.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 153 Harris F, Chatfield LK, Phoenix DA. Phenothiazinium based photosensitisers – photodynamic agents with a multiplicity of cellular targets and clinical applications. Curr. Drug Targets 6(5), 615–627 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 154 Helander IM, Nurmiaho-Lassila EL, Ahvenainen R, Rhoades J, Roller S. Chitosan disrupts the barrier properties of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 71(2–3), 235–244 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 155 Muzzarelli R, Tarsi R, Filippini O, Giovanetti E, Biagini G, Varaldo PE. Antimicrobial properties of N-carboxybutyl chitosan. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34(10), 2019–2023 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 156 Ueno H, Mori T, Fujinaga T. Topical formulations and wound healing applications of chitosan. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 52(2), 105–115 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 157 Ueno H, Yamada H, Tanaka I et al. Accelerating effects of chitosan for healing at early phase of experimental open wound in dogs. Biomaterials 20(15), 1407–1414 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 158 Wang XH, Li DP, Wang WJ et al. Crosslinked collagen/chitosan matrix for artificial livers. Biomaterials 24(19), 3213–3220 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 159 Shimono N, Takatori T, Ueda M, Mori M, Higashi Y, Nakamura Y. Chitosan dispersed system for colon-specific drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 245(1–2), 45–54 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 160 Raafat D, Von Bargen K, Haas A, Sahl HG. Insights into the mode of action of chitosan as an antibacterial compound. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(12), 3764–3773 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 161 Calvo P, Remuñán-López C, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J. Appl. Poly Sci. 63(1), 125–132 (1997).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 162 Shrestha A, Kishen A. Antibacterial efficacy of photosensitizer functionalized biopolymeric nanoparticles in the presence of tissue inhibitors in root canal. J. Endod. 40(4), 566–570 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 163 Shrestha A, Kishen A. Polycationic chitosan-conjugated photosensitizer for antibacterial photodynamic therapy. Photochem. Photobiol. 88(3), 577–583 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 164 Chen CP, Chen CT, Tsai T. Chitosan nanoparticles for antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation: characterization and in vitro investigation. Photochem. Photobiol. 88(3), 570–576 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 165 Choi S, Lee H, Chae H. Synergistic in vitro photodynamic antimicrobial activity of methylene blue and chitosan against Helicobacter pylori 26695. Photodiagnosis Photodyn. Ther. 11(4), 526–532 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 166 Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem. Rev. 110(6), 3479–3500 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 167 Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T. Flow properties of microcrystalline cellulose suspension prepared by acid treatment of native cellulose. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 142(1), 75–82 (1998).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 168 Araki J, Wada M, Kuga S, Okano T. Influence of surface charge on viscosity behavior of cellulose microcrystal suspension. J. Wood. Sci. 45(3), 258–261 (1999).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 169 Beck-Candanedo S, Roman M, Gray DG. Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromolecules 6(2), 1048–1054 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 170 Filpponen EI. The synthetic strategies for unique properties in cellulose nanocrystal materials. http://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/ir/bitstream/1840.16/4626/1/etd.pdf.
  Google Scholar
• 171 Rånby BG. Fibrous macromolecular systems. Cellulose and muscle. The colloidal properties of cellulose micelles. Discuss Faraday Soc. 11, 158–164 (1951).
  Google Scholar
• 172 Filpponen I, Argyropoulos DS. Regular linking of cellulose nanocrystals via click chemistry: synthesis and formation of cellulose nanoplatelet gels. Biomacromolecules 11(4), 1060–1066 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 173 Feese E, Sadeghifar H, Gracz HS, Argyropoulos DS, Ghiladi RA. Photobactericidal porphyrin-cellulose nanocrystals: synthesis, characterization, and antimicrobial properties. Biomacromolecules 12(10), 3528–3539 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 174 Carpenter BL, Feese E, Sadeghifar H, Argyropoulos DS, Ghiladi RA. Porphyrin-cellulose nanocrystals: a photobactericidal material that exhibits broad spectrum antimicrobial activity. Photochem. Photobiol. 88(3), 527–536 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 175 Bhattacharya R, Mukherjee P. Biological properties of “naked” metal nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60(11), 1289–1306 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 176 Daniel MC, Astruc D. Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev. 104(1), 293–346 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 177 Kuo WS, Chang CN, Chang YT, Yeh CS. Antimicrobial gold nanorods with dual-modality photodynamic inactivation and hyperthermia. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) (32), 4853–4855 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 178 Pissuwan D, Cortie CH, Valenzuela SM, Cortie MB. Functionalised gold nanoparticles for controlling pathogenic bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 28(4), 207–213 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 179 Zharov VP, Mercer KE, Galitovskaya EN, Smeltzer MS. Photothermal nanotherapeutics and nanodiagnostics for selective killing of bacteria targeted with gold nanoparticles. Biophys. J. 90(2), 619–627 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 180 Norman RS, Stone JW, Gole A, Murphy CJ, Sabo-Attwood TL. Targeted photothermal lysis of the pathogenic bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 8(1), 302–306 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 181 Simon-Deckers A, Brun E, Gouget B, Carrière M, Sicard-Roselli C. Impact of gold nanoparticles combined to x-ray irradiation on bacteria. Gold Bull. 41(2), 187–194 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 182 Huang WC, Tsai PJ, Chen YC. Functional gold nanoparticles as photothermal agents for selective-killing of pathogenic bacteria. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2(6), 777–787 (2007).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 183 Gil-Tomás J, Tubby S, Parkin IP et al. Lethal photosensitisation of Staphylococcus aureus using a toluidine blue O-tiopronin-gold nanoparticle conjugate. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 3739–3746 (2007).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 184 Perni S, Piccirillo C, Pratten J et al. The antimicrobial properties of light-activated polymers containing methylene blue and gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials 30(1), 89–93 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 185 Hongwei G, Ho PL, Edmond T, Ling W, Bing X. Presenting vancomycin on nanoparticles to enhance antimicrobial activities. Nano Lett. 3(9), 1261–1263 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• 186 Nath S, Kaittanis C, Tinkham A, Perez JM. Dextran-coated gold nanoparticles for the assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility. Anal. Chem. 80(4), 1033–1038 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 187 Burygin GL, Khlebtsov BN, Shantrokha AN, Dykman LA, Bogatyrev VA, Khlebtsov NG. On the enhanced antibacterial activity of antibiotics mixed with gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 4(8), 794–801 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 188 Nirmala Grace A, Pandian K. Antibacterial efficacy of aminoglycosidic antibiotics protected gold nanoparticles – a brief study. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 297(1), 63–70 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 189 Rai A, Prabhune A, Perry CC. Antibiotic mediated synthesis of gold nanoparticles with potent antimicrobial activity and their application in antimicrobial coatings. J. Mater. Chem. 20, 6789–6798 (2010).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 190 Chamundeeswari M, Sobhana SS, Jacob JP et al. Preparation, characterization and evaluation of a biopolymeric gold nanocomposite with antimicrobial activity. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 55(1), 29–35 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 191 Khan S, Alam F, Azam A, Khan AU. Gold nanoparticles enhance methylene blue-induced photodynamic therapy: a novel therapeutic approach to inhibit Candida albicans biofilm. Int. J. Nanomedicine 7, 3245–3257 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 192 Di Gianvincenzo P, Marradi M, Martinez-Avila OM, Bedoya LM, Alcami J, Penades S. Gold nanoparticles capped with sulfate-ended ligands as anti-HIV agents. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20(9), 2718–2721 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 193 Lara HH, Ayala-Nunez NV, Ixtepan-Turrent L, Rodriguez-Padilla C. Mode of antiviral action of silver nanoparticles against HIV-1. J. Nanobiotechnol. 8, 1 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 194 Ravishankar Rai V, Jamuna Bai A. Nanoparticles and their potential application as antimicrobials. In: Science Against Microbial Pathogens: Communicating Current Research And Technological Advances. Méndez-Vilas A (Ed.). Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, Spain, 197–209 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 195 Gupta A, Silver S. Silver as a biocide: will resistance become a problem? Nat. Biotechnol. 16(10), 888 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 196 Matsumura Y, Yoshikata K, Kunisaki S, Tsuchido T. Mode of bactericidal action of silver zeolite and its comparison with that of silver nitrate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69(7), 4278–4281 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 197 Gogoi SK, Gopinath P, Paul A, Ramesh A, Ghosh SS, Chattopadhyay A. Green fluorescent protein-expressing Escherichia coli as a model system for investigating the antimicrobial activities of silver nanoparticles. Langmuir 22(22), 9322–9328 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 198 Smetana AB, Klabunde KJ, Marchin GR, Sorensen CM. Biocidal activity of nanocrystalline silver powders and particles. Langmuir 24(14), 7457–7464 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 199 Shrivastava S, Bera T, Roy A, Singh G, Ramachandrarao P, Dash D. Characterization of enhanced antibacterial effects of novel silver nanoparticles. Nanotech 18(22), 225103 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 200 Holt KB, Bard AJ. Interaction of silver(I) ions with the respiratory chain of Escherichia coli: an electrochemical and scanning electrochemical microscopy study of the antimicrobial mechanism of micromolar Ag⁺. Biochemistry 44(39), 13214–13223 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 201 Dibrov P, Dzioba J, Gosink KK, Hase CC. Chemiosmotic mechanism of antimicrobial activity of Ag(⁺) in Vibrio cholerae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 46(8), 2668–2670 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 202 Sondi I, Salopek-Sondi B. Silver nanoparticles as antimicrobial agent: a case study on E. coli as a model for Gram-negative bacteria. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 275(1), 177–182 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 203 Panacek A, Kvitek L, Prucek R et al. Silver colloid nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and their antibacterial activity. J. Phys. Chem. B 110(33), 16248–16253 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 204 Cho KH, Park JE, Osaka T, Park SG. The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient. Electrochim. Acta 51(5), 956–960 (2005).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 205 Baker C, Pradhan A, Pakstis L, Pochan DJ, Shah SI. Synthesis and antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 5(2), 244–249 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 206 Martinez-Castanon GA, Nino-Martinez N, Martinez-Gutierrez F, Martinez-Mendoza JR, Ruiz F. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles with different sizes. J. Nanopart. Res. 10(8), 1343–1348 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 207 Pal S, Tak YK, Song JM. Does the antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles depend on the shape of the nanoparticle? A study of the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73(6), 1712–1720 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 208 Brett DW. A discussion of silver as an antimicrobial agent: alleviating the confusion. Ostomy Wound Manage. 52(1), 34–41 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 209 Hernandez-Sierra JF, Ruiz F, Pena DC et al. The antimicrobial sensitivity of Streptococcus mutans to nanoparticles of silver, zinc oxide, and gold. Nanomedicine 4(3), 237–240 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 210 Besinis A, De Peralta T, Handy RD. The antibacterial effects of silver, titanium dioxide and silica dioxide nanoparticles compared with the dental disinfectant chlorhexidine on Streptococcus mutans using a suite of bioassays. Nanotoxicology 8(1), 1–16 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 211 Feng QL, Wu J, Chen GQ, Cui FZ, Kim TN, Kim JO. A mechanistic study of the antibacterial effect of silver ions on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 52(4), 662–668 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 212 Jung WK, Koo HC, Kim KW, Shin S, Kim SH, Park YH. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of the silver ion in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(7), 2171–2178 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 213 Aymonier C, Schlotterbeck U, Antonietti L et al. Hybrids of silver nanoparticles with amphiphilic hyperbranched macromolecules exhibiting antimicrobial properties. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) (24), 3018–3019 (2002).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 214 Melaiye A, Sun Z, Hindi K et al. Silver(I)-imidazole cyclophane gem-diol complexes encapsulated by electrospun tecophilic nanofibers: formation of nanosilver particles and antimicrobial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127(7), 2285–2291 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 215 Banerjee M, Mallick S, Paul A, Chattopadhyay A, Ghosh SS. Heightened reactive oxygen species generation in the antimicrobial activity of a three component iodinated chitosan-silver nanoparticle composite. Langmuir 26(8), 5901–5908 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 216 Lok CN, Ho CM, Chen R et al. Proteomic analysis of the mode of antibacterial action of silver nanoparticles. J. Proteome Res. 5(4), 916–924 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 217 Otani M, Tabata J, Ueki T, Sano K, Inouye S. Heat-shock-induced proteins from Myxococcus xanthus. J. Bacteriol. 183(21), 6282–6287 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 218 Kitagawa M, Matsumura Y, Tsuchido T. Small heat shock proteins, IbpA and IbpB, are involved in resistances to heat and superoxide stresses in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 184(2), 165–171 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 219 Nanda A, Saravanan M. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles from Staphylococcus aureus and its antimicrobial activity against MRSA and MRSE. Nanomedicine 5(4), 452–456 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 220 Brown AN, Smith K, Samuels TA, Lu J, Obare SO, Scott ME. Nanoparticles functionalized with ampicillin destroy multiple-antibiotic-resistant isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacter aerogenes and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78(8), 2768–2774 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 221 Baram-Pinto D, Shukla S, Perkas N, Gedanken A, Sarid R. Inhibition of herpes simplex virus type 1 infection by silver nanoparticles capped with mercaptoethane sulfonate. Bioconjug. Chem. 20(8), 1497–1502 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 222 Lu L, Sun RW, Chen R et al. Silver nanoparticles inhibit hepatitis B virus replication. Antivir. Ther. 13(2), 253–262 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 223 Sun L, Singh AK, Vig K, Pillai SR, Singh SR. Silver nanoparticles inhibit replication of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Biomed. Nanotech. 4(2), 149–158 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 224 Rogers JV, Parkinson CV, Choi YW, Speshock JL, Hussain SM. A preliminary assessment of silver nanoparticle inhibition of monkeypox virus plaque formation. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 3(4), 129–133 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 225 Kim KJ, Sung WS, Moon SK, Choi JS, Kim JG, Lee DG. Antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on dermatophytes. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18(8), 1482–1484 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 226 Kim KJ, Sung WS, Suh BK et al. Antifungal activity and mode of action of silver nano-particles on Candida albicans. Biometals 22(2), 235–242 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 227 Gajbhiye M, Kesharwani J, Ingle A, Gade A, Rai M. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic fungi in combination with fluconazole. Nanomedicine 5(4), 382–386 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 228 Couleaud P, Morosini V, Frochot C, Richeter S, Raehm L, Durand JO. Silica-based nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy applications. Nanoscale 2(7), 1083–1095 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 229 Walter WG, Stober A. Probe method for the microbial sampling of hospital carpets. Health Lab. Sci. 5(3), 162–170 (1968).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 230 Brevet D, Gary-Bobo M, Raehm L et al. Mannose-targeted mesoporous silica nanoparticles for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) (12), 1475–1477 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 231 Cheng Y, CS A, Meyers JD, Panagopoulos I, Fei B, Burda C. Highly efficient drug delivery with gold nanoparticle vectors for in vivo photodynamic therapy of cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130(32), 10643–10647 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 232 Carpenter AW, Worley BV, Slomberg DL, Schoenfisch MH. Dual action antimicrobials: nitric oxide release from quaternary ammonium-functionalized silica nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 13(10), 3334–3342 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 233 Tassa C, Shaw SY, Weissleder R. Dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles: a versatile platform for targeted molecular imaging, molecular diagnostics, and therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 44(10), 842–852 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 234 Mccarthy JR, Kelly KA, Sun EY, Weissleder R. Targeted delivery of multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2(2), 153–167 (2007).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 235 Choi KH, Lee HJ, Park BJ et al. Photosensitizer and vancomycin-conjugated novel multifunctional magnetic particles as photoinactivation agents for selective killing of pathogenic bacteria. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 48(38), 4591–4593 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 236 Lim ME, Lee YL, Zhang Y, Chu JJ. Photodynamic inactivation of viruses using upconversion nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33(6), 1912–1920 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 237 Wainwright M. Local treatment of viral disease using photodynamic therapy. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 21(6), 510–520 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 238 Haase M, Schafer H. Upconverting nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50(26), 5808–5829 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 239 Feynman RP. There's plenty of room at the bottom. Eng. Sci. 23(5), 22–36 (1960).
  Google Scholar
• 240 Von Tappeiner H. Uber die Wirkung fluoreszierender Stoffe auf Infusorien nach Versuchen von O. Raab. Muench. Med. Wochenschr. 47(5), (1900).
  Google Scholar
• 241 Kharkwal GB, Sharma SK, Huang YY, Dai T, Hamblin MR. Photodynamic therapy for infections: clinical applications. Lasers Surg. Med. 43(7), 755–767 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 242 Etheridge ML, Campbell SA, Erdman AG, Haynes CL, Wolf SM, Mccullough J. The big picture on nanomedicine: the state of investigational and approved nanomedicine products. Nanomedicine 9(1), 1–14 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar