We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Nanoparticles in targeted cancer therapy: mesoporous silica nanoparticles entering preclinical development stage

    Jessica M Rosenholm

    Center for Functional Materials, Laboratory for Physical Chemistry, Department of Natural Sciences, Åbo Akademi University, Porthansgatan 3–5, FI-20500, Turku, Finland

    ,
    Veronika Mamaeva

    Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku & Åbo Akademi University, P.O. Box 123, FI-20521, Turku, Finland

    ,
    Cecilia Sahlgren

    * Author for correspondence

    Department of Biosciences, Cell biology, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520 Turku, Finland.

    &
    Mika Lindén

    * Author for correspondence

    Inorganic Chemistry II, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, D-89081Ulm, Germany.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.166

    Nanotechnology may help overcome persisting limitations of current cancer treatment and thus contribute to the creation of more effective, safer and more affordable therapies. While some nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems are already being marketed and others are in clinical trial, most still remain in the preclinical development stage. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles have been highlighted as an interesting drug delivery platform, due to their flexibility and high drug load potential. Although numerous reports demonstrate sophisticated drug delivery mechanisms in vitro, the therapeutic benefit of these systems for in vivo applications have been under continuous debate. This has been due to nontranslatable conditions used in the in vitro studies, as well as contradictory conclusions drawn from preclinical (in vivo) studies. However, recent studies have indicated that the encouraging cellular studies could in fact be repeated also in vivo. Here, we report on these recent advances regarding therapeutic efficacy, targeting and safety issues related to the application of mesoporous silica nanoparticles in cancer therapy.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    References

    • Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.7,771–782 (2008).
    • Davis ME, Zuckerman JE, Choi CH et al. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature464,1067–1070 (2010).
    • Hu CM, Zhang L. Therapeutic nanoparticles to combat cancer drug resistance. Curr. Drug Metab.10,836–841 (2009).
    • Gordon EM, Lopez FF, Cornelio GH et al. Pathotropic nanoparticles for cancer gene therapy Rexin-G IV: three-year clinical experience. Int. J. Oncol.29,1053–1064 (2006).
    • Libutti SK, Paciotti GF, Byrnes AA et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic studies of CYT-6091, a novel PEGylated colloidal gold-rhTNF nanomedicine. Clin. Cancer Res.16,6139–6149 (2010).
    • Wesselinova D. Current major cancer targets for nanoparticle systems. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets11,164–183 (2011).
    • Zhang L, Gu FX, Chan JM et al. Nanoparticles in medicine: therapeutic applications and developments. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.83,761–769 (2008).
    • Ali I, Rahis-Uddin, Salim K et al. Advances in nano drugs for cancer chemotherapy. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets11,135–146 (2011).
    • Davis ME, Chen ZG, Shin DM. Nanoparticle therapeutics: an emerging treatment modality for cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.7,771–782 (2008).
    • 10  Ow H, Larson D, Srivastava M et al. Bright and stable core-shell fluorescent silica nanoparticles. Nano Lett.5,113–117 (2005).
    • 11  Benezra M, Penate-Medina O, Zanzonico PB et al. Multimodal silica nanoparticles are effective cancer-targeted probes in a model of human melanoma. J. Clin. Invest.121(7),2768–2780 (2011).
    • 12  Tilocca A. Models of structure, dynamics and reactivity of bioglasses: a review. J. Mater. Chem.20,6848–6858 (2010).
    • 13  Unger KK, Rupprecht H, Valentin B et al. The use of porous and surface modified silicas as drug delivery and stabilizing agents. Drug Development Ind. Pharm.9,69–91 (1983).
    • 14  Simovic S, Ghouchu-Eskandar N, Sinn AM et al. Silica materials in drug delivery applications. Curr. Drug Deliv. Technol.8(3),269–276 (2011).
    • 15  Manzano M, Colilla M, Vallet-Regi M. Drug delivery from ordered mesoporous matrices. Expert Opin. Drug Del.6,1383–1400 (2009).
    • 16  Rosenholm JM, Sahlgren C, Lindén M. Towards multifunctional, targeted drug delivery systems using mesoporous silica nanoparticles – opportunities and challenges. Nanoscale2,1870–1883 (2010).
    • 17  He QJ, Shi JL. Mesoporous silica nanoparticle based nano drug delivery systems: synthesis, controlled drug release and delivery, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility. J. Mater. Chem.21,5845–5855 (2011)
    • 18  Vivero-Escoto JL, Slowing II, Trewyn BG et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular controlled drug delivery. Small6,1952–1967 (2010).
    • 19  Santos, HA; Salonen, J; Bimbo, LM et al. Mesoporous materials as controlled drug delivery formulations. J. Drug Delivery Sci. Tech.21,139–155 (2011).
    • 20  Mellaerts R, Mols R, Jammaer JAG et al. Increasing the oral bioavailability of the poorly water soluble drug itraconazole with ordered mesoporous silica. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.69,223–230 (2008).
    • 21  Vallet-Regi M, Balas F, Colilla M et al. Bone-regenerative bioceramic implants with drug and protein controlled delivery capability. Progr. Solid State Chem.36,163–191 (2008).
    • 22  Dai C, Yuan Y, Liu C et al. Degradable, antibacterial silver exchanged mesoporous silica spheres for hemorrhage control. Biomaterials30,5364–5374 (2009).
    • 23  López T, Basaldella EI, Ojeda MJ et al. Encapsulation of valproic acid and sodic phenytoin in ordered mesoporous SiO2 solids for the treatment of temporal lope epilepsy. Optical Mater.29,75–81 (2006).
    • 24  Wu SH, Lin YS, Hung Y et al. Multifunctional mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular labeling and animal magnetic resonance imaging studies. Chem. Bio. Chem.9,53–57 (2008).▪ The first report on in vivo application of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. MagDye@ mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) for MRI used for cellular tracking after transplantation of prelabeled cells and biodistribution after intravenous injections. Highlights the problem of elimination from specific organs.
    • 25  Lin YS, Wu SH, Hung Y et al. Multifunctional composite nanoparticles: magnetic, luminescent, and mesoporous. Chem. Mater.18,5170–5172 (2006).
    • 26  Liu HM, Wu SH, Lu CW et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles improve magnetic labeling efficiency in human stem cells. Small4,619–626 (2008).
    • 27  Lu CW, Hung Y, Hsiao JK et al. Bifunctional magnetic silica nanoparticles for highly efficient human stem cell labeling. Nano Lett.7,149 (2007).
    • 28  Hsiao JK, Tsai CP, Chung TH et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a delivery system of gadolinium for effective human stem cell tracking. Small4,1445–1452, (2008).
    • 29  Steinbacher JL, Lathrop SA, Cheng K et al. Gd-labeled microparticles in MRI: in vivo imaging of microparticles after intraperitoneal injection. Small6,2678–2682 (2010).
    • 30  Taylor KM, Kim JS, Reiter WJ et al. Mesoporous silica nanospheres as highly efficient MRI contrast agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc.130,2154–2155 (2008).
    • 31  Lee CH, Cheng SH, Wang YJ et al. Near-infrared mesoporous silica nanoparticles for optical imaging: characterization and in vivo biodistribution. Adv. Funct. Mater.19,215–222 (2009).
    • 32  He Q, Zhang Z, Gao F et al.In vivo biodistribution and urinary excretion of mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effects of particle size and PEGylation. Small7,271–280 (2011).▪▪ Continuation of the study by Lin et al. elucidating how different surface functionalizations and size affect lifetime and biodistribution. The study emphasized the need for using different techniques to determine biodistribution and tissue accumulation.
    • 33  Huang X, Li L, Liu T et al. The shape effect of Mesoporous silica nanoparticles on biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility in vivo. ACS Nano5(7),5390–5399 (2011).
    • 34  Kim J, Kim HS, Lee N et al. Multifunctional uniform nanoparticles composed of a magnetite nanocrystal core and a mesoporous silica shell for magnetic resonance and fluorescence imaging and for drug delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.47,8438–8441 (2008).
    • 35  Lee JE, Lee N, Kim H et al. Uniform mesoporous dye-doped silica nanoparticles decorated with multiple magnetite nanocrystals for simultaneous enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, fluorescence imaging, and drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc.132,552–557 (2010).
    • 36  Lu J, Liong M, Li Z et al. Biocompatibility, biodistribution, and drug-delivery efficiency of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for cancer therapy in animals. Small6,1794–1805 (2010).
    • 37  Meng H, Xue M, Xia T et al. Use of size and a copolymer design feature to improve the biodistribution and the enhanced permeability and retention effect of doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles in a murine xenograft tumor model. ACS Nano5,4131–4144 (2011).
    • 38  Mamaeva V, Rosenholm JM, Bate-Eya LT et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as drug delivery systems for targeted inhibition of notch signaling in cancer. Mol. Ther.19,1538–1546 (2011).▪ This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first study introducing a promising drug class that has not passed clinical trials due to severe side effects, where the use of targetable mesoporous silica nanoparticles proved beneficial.
    • 39  Lu J, Li Z, Zink JI, Tamanoi F. In vivo tumor suppression efficacy of mesoporous silica nanoparticles-based drug delivery system: enhanced efficacy by folate modification. Nanomed. Nanotech. Biol. Med. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2011.06.002 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
    • 40  Etienne M, Walcarius A. Analytical investigation of the chemical reactivity and stability of aminopropyl-grafted silica in aqueous medium. Talanta59,1173–1188 (2003).
    • 41  Cauda V, Schlossbauer A, Bein T. Bio-degradation study of colloidal mesoporous silica nanoparticles: effect of surface functionalization with organo-silanes and poly(ethylene glycol). Microporous Mesoporous Mater.132,60–71 (2010).
    • 42  Mortera R, Fiorilli S, Garrone E et al. Pore occlusion in MCM-41 spheres immersed in SBF and the effect on ibuprofen delivery kinetics: a quantitative model. Chem. Eng. J.156,184–192 (2010).
    • 43  Martin KR. The chemistry of silica and its potential health benefits. J. Nutr. Health Aging11,94–97 (2007).
    • 44  Souris JS, Lee CH, Cheng SH et al. Surface charge-mediated rapid hepatobiliary exretion of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials31,5564–5574 (2010).
    • 45  Hillegass JM, Blumen SR, Cheng K et al. Increased efficacy of doxorubicin delivered in multifunctional microparticles for mesothelioma therapy. Int. J. Cancer.129,233–244 (2011).
    • 46  Wang T, Chai F, Q. Fu et al. Uniform hollow mesoporous silica nanocages for drug delivery in vitro and in vivo for liver cancer therapy, J. Mater. Chem.21,5299–5306 (2011).
    • 47  Huang IP, Sun SP, Cheng SH et al. Enhanced chemotherapy of cancer using pH-sensitive mesoporous silica nanoparticles to antagonize P-glycoprotein-mediated drug resistance. Mol. Cancer Ther.10,761–769 (2011).
    • 48  Lee S, Yun H-S, Kim S-H. The comparative effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticles and colloidal silica on inflammation and apoptosis. Biomaterials32(35),9434–9443 (2011).
    • 49  Lin YS, Haynes CL. Impacts of mesoporous silica nanoparticle size, pore ordering, and pore integrity on hemolytic activity. Chem. Mater.21,3979–3986 (2009).
    • 50  Slowing II, Wu CW, Vivero-Escoto JL et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for reducing hemolytic activity towards mammalian red blood cells. Small5,57–62 (2009).
    • 51  Zhao Y, Sun X, Zhang G et al. Interaction of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with human red blood cell membranes: size and surface effects. ACS Nano5,1366–1375 (2011).
    • 52  Hudson SP, Padera RF, Langer R et al. The biocompatibility of mesoporous silicates. Biomaterials29,4045–4055 (2008).▪ Demonstrated high toxicity of nonfunctionalized silica-based particles in vivo. Later studies addressing size, methods of synthesis and surface functionalization porosity, highlighted MSNs as a technology of value and well worth considering for medical applications.
    • 53  Huang X, Zhuang J, Teng X et al. The promotion of human malignant melanoma growth by mesoporous silica nanoparticles through decreased reactive oxygen species. Biomaterials31,6142–6153 (2010).
    • 54  Liu T, Li L, Teng X et al. Single and repeated dose toxicity of mesoporous hollow silica nanoparticles in intravenously exposed mice. Biomaterials32,1657–1668 (2011).
    • 55  Tao Z, Morrow MP, Asefa T et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles inhibit cellular respiration. Nano Lett.8,1517–1526 (2008).
    • 56  Al Shamsi M, Al Samri MT, Al-Salam S et al. Biocompatibility of calcined mesoporous silica particles with cellular bioenergetics in murine tissues. Chem. Res. Toxicol.23,1796–1805 (2010).
    • 57  Huang X, Zhuang J, Teng X et al. The promotion of human malignant melanoma growth by mesoporous silica nanoparticles through decreased reactive oxygen species Biomaterials31,6142–6153 (2010).
    • 58  Luo T, Huang P, Gao G et al. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods with embedded indocyanine green for dual mode x-ray and NIR fluorescence imaging. Optics Express19,17030–17039 (2011).
    • 101  Epeius Biotechnologies. www.epeiusbiotech.com
    • 102  Silicon Dioxide GRAS Notification. www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fcn/gras_notices/GRN000321.pdf