Recent advances in copper sulfide nanoparticles for phototherapy of bacterial infections and cancer

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71(3), 209–249 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2. Behranvand N, Nasri F, Zolfaghari Emameh R et al. Chemotherapy: a double-edged sword in cancer treatment. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 71(3), 507–526 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3. Zhang Z, Liu X, Chen D, Yu J. Radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy: the dawn of cancer treatment. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7(1), 258 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4. Gong L, Zhang Y, Liu C, Zhang M, Han S. Application of radiosensitizers in cancer radiotherapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 16(2021), 8139–8140 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5. Esfahani K, Roudaia L, Buhlaiga N, Del Rincon S, Papneja N, Miller W. A review of cancer immunotherapy: from the past, to the present, to the future. Curr. Oncol. 27(Suppl. 2), 87–97 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6. Hegde PS, Chen DS. Top 10 challenges in cancer immunotherapy. Immunity 52(1), 17–35 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7. Bukowski K, Kciuk M, Kontek R. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(9), 3233 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8. Emran TB, Shahriar A, Mahmud AR et al. Multidrug resistance in cancer: understanding molecular mechanisms, immunoprevention and therapeutic approaches. Front. Oncol. 12, 891652 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9. Loria R, Vici P, Di Lisa FS, Soddu S, Maugeri-Saccà M, Bon G. Cross-resistance among sequential cancer therapeutics: an emerging issue. Front. Oncol. 12, 877380 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10. Diazzi S, Tartare-Deckert S, Deckert M. The mechanical phenotypic plasticity of melanoma cell: an emerging driver of therapy cross-resistance. Oncogenesis 12(1), 7 (2023).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11. Şen Karaman D, Ercan UK, Bakay E, Topaloğlu N, Rosenholm JM. Evolving technologies and strategies for combating antibacterial resistance in the advent of the postantibiotic era. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(15), 1908783 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 12. Theuretzbacher U, Outterson K, Engel A, Karlén A. The global preclinical antibacterial pipeline. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18(5), 275–285 (2020). •• Describes the urgent needs for the development of new-generation antibiotic strategies.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Nirmal K, Saini V, Singh NP. Antibacterial resistance menace: a global cause of concern? Int. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Res. 2(9), 71–77 (2022).
  Google Scholar
• 14. Butler MS, Gigante V, Sati H et al. Analysis of the clinical pipeline of treatments for drug-resistant bacterial infections: despite progress, more action is needed. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66(3), e01991–01921 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15. Maliki M, Ifijen IH, Ikhuoria EU et al. Copper nanoparticles and their oxides: optical, anticancer and antibacterial properties. Int. Nano Lett. 12(4), 379–398 (2022).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 16. Poudel K, Gautam M, Jin SG, Choi H-G, Yong CS, Kim JO. Copper sulfide: an emerging adaptable nanoplatform in cancer theranostics. Int. J. Pharm. 562, 135–150 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17. Goel S, Chen F, Cai W. Synthesis and biomedical applications of copper sulfide nanoparticles: from sensors to theranostics. Small 10(4), 631–645 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18. Shamraiz U, Hussain RA, Badshah A. Fabrication and applications of copper sulfide (CuS) nanostructures. J. Solid State Chem. 238, 25–40 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 19. Kumar AVP, Dubey SK, Tiwari S et al. Recent advances in nanoparticles mediated photothermal therapy induced tumor regression. Int. J. Pharm. 606, 120848 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20. Sun J, Kormakov S, Liu Y, Huang Y, Wu D, Yang Z. Recent progress in metal-based nanoparticles mediated photodynamic therapy. Molecules 23(7), 1704 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21. Norouzi H, Khoshgard K, Akbarzadeh F. In vitro outlook of gold nanoparticles in photo-thermal therapy: a literature review. Lasers Med. Sci. 33, 917–926 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Chen J, Ning C, Zhou Z et al. Nanomaterials as photothermal therapeutic agents. Prog. Mater. Sci. 99, 1–26 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. Inasawa S, Sugiyama M, Yamaguchi Y. Laser-induced shape transformation of gold nanoparticles below the melting point: the effect of surface melting. J. Phys. Chem. B 109(8), 3104–3111 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24. Yao C, Liang XX, Wang S, Xin J, Zhang L, Zhang Z. Optical theranostics based on gold nanoparticles. J. Biomed. Photonics Eng. 245–284 (2023).
  Google Scholar
• 25. Guo L, Yan DD, Yang D et al. Combinatorial photothermal and immuno cancer therapy using chitosan-coated hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8(6), 5670–5681 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26. Guo L, Panderi I, Yan DD et al. A comparative study of hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles and hollow gold nanospheres on degradability and toxicity. ACS Nano 7(10), 8780–8793 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27. Naskar A, Kim K-S. Photo-stimuli-responsive CuS nanomaterials as cutting-edge platform materials for antibacterial applications. Pharmaceutics 14(11), 2343 (2022). • Describes the importance of using phototherapies for antibacterial applications.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28. Wu C, Zhu A, Li D et al. Photosensitizer-assembled PEGylated graphene–copper sulfide nanohybrids as a synergistic near-infrared phototherapeutic agent. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 13(1), 155–165 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29. Zhu YX, Jia HR, Duan QY, Wu FG. Nanomedicines for combating multidrug resistance of cancer. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 13(5), e1715 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30. Xie Z, Fan T, An J et al. Emerging combination strategies with phototherapy in cancer nanomedicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(22), 8065–8087 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31. Wang Y, Jin Y, Chen W et al. Construction of nanomaterials with targeting phototherapy properties to inhibit resistant bacteria and biofilm infections. Chem. Eng. J. 358, 74–90 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 32. Lemire JA, Harrison JJ, Turner RJ. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11(6), 371–384 (2013). • Describes the main mechanisms of antibacterial effects of metals.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33. Lai J, Niu W, Luque R, Xu G. Solvothermal synthesis of metal nanocrystals and their applications. Nano Today 10(2), 240–267 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 34. Hosokawa S. Synthesis of metal oxides with improved performance using a solvothermal method. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn 124(9), 870–874 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 35. Zhou S-L, Gong L-G, Zhao X-Y et al. Synthesis and photocatalytic performance of copper sulfide by a simple solvothermal method. Chem. Phys. Lett. 759, 138034 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 36. Jiang J, Jiang Q, Deng R, Xie X, Meng J. Controllable preparation, formation mechanism and photocatalytic performance of copper base sulfide nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. Phys. 254, 123504 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 37. Tamadoni Saray M, Yurkiv V, Shahbazian-Yassar R. In situ thermolysis of a Ni salt on amorphous carbon and graphene oxide substrates. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33(28), 2213747 (2023).
  Google Scholar
• 38. Hanif MA, Lee I, Akter J et al. Enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial performance of ZnO nanoparticles prepared by an efficient thermolysis method. Catalysts 9(7), 608 (2019).
  Google Scholar
• 39. Zhou P, Li N, Chao Y et al. Thermolysis of noble metal nanoparticles into electron-rich phosphorus-coordinated noble metal single atoms at low temperature. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(40), 14184–14188 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40. Marin R, Lifante J, Besteiro LV et al. Plasmonic copper sulfide nanoparticles enable dark contrast in optical coherence tomography. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 9(5), 1901627 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 41. ul Ain N, Aamir A, Khan Y, Rehman M-u, Lin D-J. Catalytic and photocatalytic efficacy of hexagonal CuS nanoplates derived from copper (II) dithiocarbamate. Mater. Chem. Phys. 242, 122408 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 42. Kwon SG, Hyeon T. Formation mechanisms of uniform nanocrystals via hot-injection and heat-up methods. Small 7(19), 2685–2702 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43. de Mello Donegá C, Liljeroth P, Vanmaekelbergh D. Physicochemical evaluation of the hot-injection method, a synthesis route for monodisperse nanocrystals. Small 1(12), 1152–1162 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 44. Senthilkumar M, Mary CI, Manobalaji G, Babu SM. Ligand assisted tunability of morphological and optical properties of copper sulfide nanocrystals. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 104, 104685 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 45. Siddharthan A, Seshadri S, Kumar TS. Rapid synthesis of calcium deficient hydroxyapatite nanoparticles by microwave irradiation. Trends Biomater. Artif. Organs 18(2), 110–114 (2005).
  Google Scholar
• 46. Hasany S, Ahmed I, Rajan J, Rehman A. Systematic review of the preparation techniques of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2(6), 148–158 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 47. Chin CD-W, Treadwell LJ, Wiley JB. Microwave synthetic routes for shape-controlled catalyst nanoparticles and nanocomposites. Molecules 26(12), 3647 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48. Wang Z, Zhu Y, Peng H, Du C, Ma X, Cao C. Microwave-induced phase engineering of copper sulfide nanosheets for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 374, 137965 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 49. Zabihollahpoor A, Rahimnejad M, Najafpour G, Moghadamnia AA. Gold nanoparticle prepared by electrochemical deposition for electrochemical determination of gabapentin as an antiepileptic drug. J. Electroanal. Chem. 835, 281–286 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 50. Meng Q, Wang Z, Chai X, Weng Z, Ding R, Dong L. Fabrication of hematite (α-Fe₂O₃) nanoparticles using electrochemical deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 368, 303–308 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 51. Kar P, Farsinezhad S, Zhang X, Shankar K. Anodic Cu₂S and CuS nanorod and nanowall arrays: preparation, properties and application in CO₂ photoreduction. Nanoscale 6(23), 14305–14318 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52. Wang F, Dong H, Pan J, Li J, Li Q, Xu D. One-step electrochemical deposition of hierarchical CuS nanostructures on conductive substrates as robust, high-performance counter electrodes for quantum-dot-sensitized solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 118(34), 19589–19598 (2014).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 53. Ghahremaninezhad A, Asselin E, Dixon D. One-step template-free electrosynthesis of 300 μm long copper sulfide nanowires. Electrochem. Commun. 13(1), 12–15 (2011).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 54. Butcher K, Hirshy H, Perks RM, Wintrebert-Fouquet M, Chen PPT. Stoichiometry effects and the Moss–Burstein effect for InN. Phys. Status Solidi 203(1), 66–74 (2006).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 55. Zhao Y, Pan H, Lou Y, Qiu X, Zhu J, Burda C. Plasmonic Cu_2-xS nanocrystals: optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper (I) sulfides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(12), 4253–4261 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56. Chen YB, Chen L, Wu LM. The structure-controlling solventless synthesis and optical properties of uniform Cu₂S nanodisks. Chem. Eur. J. 14(35), 11069–11075 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57. Li C, Chen G, Zhang Y, Wu F, Wang Q. Advanced fluorescence imaging technology in the near-infrared-II window for biomedical applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142(35), 14789–14804 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58. Liu T-M, Conde J, Lipiński T, Bednarkiewicz A, Huang C-C. Revisiting the classification of NIR-absorbing/emitting nanomaterials for in vivo bioapplications. NPG Asia Mater. 8(8), e295–e295 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 59. Tao W, Farokhzad OC. Theranostic nanomedicine in the NIR-II window: classification, fabrication, and biomedical applications. Chem. Rev. 122(6), 5405–5407 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60. Luther JM, Jain PK, Ewers T, Alivisatos AP. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 10(5), 361–366 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61. Liu X, Wang X, Zhou B, Law WC, Cartwright AN, Swihart MT. Size-controlled synthesis of Cu_2-xE (E=S, Se) nanocrystals with strong tunable near-infrared localized surface plasmon resonance and high conductivity in thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(10), 1256–1264 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• 62. Mutalik C, Okoro G, Krisnawati DI et al. Copper sulfide with morphology-dependent photodynamic and photothermal antibacterial activities. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 607, 1825–1835 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63. Shalabayev Z, Baláz M, Daneu N et al. Sulfur-mediated mechanochemical synthesis of spherical and needle-like copper sulfide nanocrystals with antibacterial activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7(15), 12897–12909 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 64. Bekhit M, Abo El Naga AO, El Saied M, Abdel Maksoud MI. Radiation-induced synthesis of copper sulfide nanotubes with improved catalytic and antibacterial activities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 44467–44478 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65. Wang W, Li B, Yang H et al. Efficient elimination of multidrug-resistant bacteria using copper sulfide nanozymes anchored to graphene oxide nanosheets. Nano Res. 13, 2156–2164 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 66. Liu L, Lai Y, Cao J, Peng Y, Tian T, Fu W. Exploring the antibacterial and biosensing applications of peroxidase-mimetic Ni_0.1Cu_0.9S nanoflower. Biosensors 12(10), 874 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 67. Bai Q, Liang M, Wu W et al. Plasmonic nanozyme of graphdiyne nanowalls wrapped hollow copper sulfide nanocubes for rapid bacteria-killing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(20), 2112683 (2022).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 68. Qiao Y, Ping Y, Zhang H et al. Laser-activatable CuS nanodots to treat multidrug-resistant bacteria and release copper ion to accelerate healing of infected chronic nonhealing wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(4), 3809–3822 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69. Kwon Y-T, Lim G-D, Kim S, Ryu SH, Lim H-R, Choa Y-H. Effect of localized surface plasmon resonance on dispersion stability of copper sulfide nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 477, 204–210 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 70. Lesyuk R, Klein E, Yaremchuk I, Klinke C. Copper sulfide nanosheets with shape-tunable plasmonic properties in the NIR region. Nanoscale 10(44), 20640–20651 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71. Woods-Robinson R, Han Y, Zhang H et al. Wide band gap chalcogenide semiconductors. Chem. Rev. 120(9), 4007–4055 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72. Huang F, Wang X, Xu J, Chen D, Wang Y. A plasmonic nano-antenna with controllable resonance frequency: Cu_1.94S–ZnS dimeric nanoheterostructure synthesized in solution. J. Mater. Chem. 22(42), 22614–22618 (2012).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 73. Hussein ON, AL-Jawad SM, Imran NJ. Structural, morphological, optical, and antibacterial properties of Mn and (Ag, Mn) co-doped copper sulfide nanostructures. Opt. Quantum Electron. 55(6), 503 (2023).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 74. Pelgrift RY, Friedman AJ. Nanotechnology as a therapeutic tool to combat microbial resistance. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(13–14), 1803–1815 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75. Abo-zeid Y, Amer A, El-Houssieny B, Mahmoud M, Sakran W. Overview on bacterial resistance and nanoparticles to overcome bacterial resistance. J. Adv. Pharm. Res. 5(3), 312–326 (2021).
  Google Scholar
• 76. Gómez-Núñez MF, Castillo-López M, Sevilla-Castillo F et al. Nanoparticle-based devices in the control of antibiotic resistant bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 11, 563821 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 77. Hans M, Mathews S, Mücklich F, Solioz M. Physicochemical properties of copper important for its antibacterial activity and development of a unified model. Biointerphases 11(1), doi: 10.1116/1.4935853 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 78. Chatterjee AK, Chakraborty R, Basu T. Mechanism of antibacterial activity of copper nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 25(13), 135101 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 79. Sun Y, Tian P, Ding D et al. Revealing the active species of Cu-based catalysts for heterogeneous Fenton reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 258, 117985 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 80. Wardman P, Candeias LP. Fenton chemistry: an introduction. Radiat. Res. 145(5), 523–531 (1996).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81. Sutton HC, Winterbourn CC. On the participation of higher oxidation states of iron and copper in Fenton reactions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 6(1), 53–60 (1989).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 82. Srinivas US, Tan BW, Vellayappan BA, Jeyasekharan AD. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 25, 101084 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83. Hemnani T, Parihar M. Reactive oxygen species and oxidative DNA damage. Indian J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 42, 440–452 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84. Midander K, Cronholm P, Karlsson HL et al. Surface characteristics, copper release, and toxicity of nano-and micrometer-sized copper and copper (II) oxide particles: a cross-disciplinary study. Small 5(3), 389–399 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 85. Strauch BM, Hubele W, Hartwig A. Impact of endocytosis and lysosomal acidification on the toxicity of copper oxide nano-and microsized particles: uptake and gene expression related to oxidative stress and the DNA damage response. Nanomaterials 10(4), 679 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 86. Li Z, Xie C-J, Ren X-W, Zhang Q, Ma B-J. CuS nanoenzyme against bacterial infection by in situ hydroxyl radical generation on bacteria surface. Rare Metals 42(6), 1899–1911 (2023).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 87. Spielman-Sun E, Lombi E, Donner E et al. Temporal evolution of copper distribution and speciation in roots of Triticum aestivum exposed to CuO, Cu(OH)₂, and CuS nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52(17), 9777–9784 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88. Wang L, Ma X, Cai K, Li X. Morphological effect of copper sulfide nanoparticles on their near infrared laser activated photothermal and photodynamic performance. Mater. Res. Express 6(10), 105406 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 89. Barwinska-Sendra A, Waldron KJ. The role of intermetal competition and mis-metalation in metal toxicity. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 70, 315–379 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 90. Cobine PA, Moore SA, Leary SC. Getting out what you put in: copper in mitochondria and its impacts on human disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1868(1), 118867 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91. Yougbaré S, Mutalik C, Krisnawati DI et al. Nanomaterials for the photothermal killing of bacteria. Nanomaterials 10(6), 1123 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 92. Huo J, Jia Q, Huang H et al. Emerging photothermal-derived multimodal synergistic therapy in combating bacterial infections. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(15), 8762–8789 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 93. Kuo C-L, Ponneri Babuharisankar A, Lin Y-C et al. Mitochondrial oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment and cancer immunoescape: foe or friend? J. Biomed. Sci. 29(1), 74 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 94. Sosa V, Moliné T, Somoza R, Paciucci R, Kondoh H, Leonart ME. Oxidative stress and cancer: an overview. Ageing Res. Rev. 12(1), 376–390 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 95. Jan R. Understanding apoptosis and apoptotic pathways targeted cancer therapeutics. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 9(2), 205 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96. Sadeghi S, Davoodvandi A, Pourhanifeh MH et al. Anti-cancer effects of cinnamon: insights into its apoptosis effects. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 178, 131–140 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 97. Gao L, Loveless J, Shay C, Teng Y. Targeting ROS-mediated crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1260, 1–12 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98. Fontana F, Raimondi M, Marzagalli M, Di Domizio A, Limonta P. The emerging role of paraptosis in tumor cell biology: perspectives for cancer prevention and therapy with natural compounds. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1873(2), 188338 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 99. Ji P, Wang P, Chen H et al. Potential of copper and copper compounds for anticancer applications. Pharmaceuticals 16(2), 234 (2023).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100. Hanson S, Dharan A, P V J et al. Paraptosis: a unique cell death mode for targeting cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 14, 1159409 (2023).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101. Kma L, Baruah TJ. The interplay of ROS and the PI3K/Akt pathway in autophagy regulation. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 69(1), 248–264 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102. Roca-Agujetas V, de Dios C, Lestón L, Marí M, Morales A, Colell A. Recent insights into the mitochondrial role in autophagy and its regulation by oxidative stress. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/3809308 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 103. Tang D, Chen X, Kroemer G. Cuproptosis: a copper-triggered modality of mitochondrial cell death. Cell Res. 32(5), 417–418 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 104. Wang Y, Zhang L, Zhou F. Cuproptosis: a new form of programmed cell death. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 19(8), 867–868 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105. Zou Z, Sun J, Li Q et al. Vancomycin modified copper sulfide nanoparticles for photokilling of vancomycin-resistant enterococci bacteria. Colloids Surf. B 189, 110875 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106. Hyun JY, Lee C-H, Lee H, Jang W-D, Shin I. Bacterial lectin-targeting glycoconjugates for selective elimination of pathogenic bacteria. ACS Macro Lett. 9(10), 1429–1432 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107. Hou S, Mahadevegowda SH, Mai VC, Chan-Park MB, Duan H. Glycosylated copper sulfide nanocrystals for targeted photokilling of bacteria in the near-infrared II window. Adv. Ther. 2(8), 1900052 (2019).
  Google Scholar
• 108. Xie Y, Qian Y, Li Z et al. Near-infrared-activated efficient bacteria-killing by lignin-based copper sulfide nanocomposites with an enhanced photothermal effect and peroxidase-like activity. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9(18), 6479–6488 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 109. Low J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, Wageh S, Al-Ghamdi AA. Heterojunction photocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 29(20), 1601694 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 110. Wang Z, Lin Z, Shen S, Zhong W, Cao S. Advances in designing heterojunction photocatalytic materials. Chinese J. Catal. 42(5), 710–730 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 111. Liu X, Li X, Shan Y et al. CuS nanoparticles anchored to g-C₃N₄ nanosheets for photothermal ablation of bacteria. RSC Adv. 10(21), 12183–12191 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 112. Li Y, Su M, Yan T, Wang Z, Zhang J. Near-infrared copper sulfide hollow nanostructures with enhanced photothermal and photocatalytic performance for effective bacterial sterilization. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2468–2476 (2023).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 113. Lin X, Fang Y, Hao Z et al. Bacteria-triggered multifunctional hydrogel for localized chemodynamic and low-temperature photothermal sterilization. Small 17(51), 2103303 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 114. Yamamoto K, Imaoka T, Tanabe M, Kambe T. New horizon of nanoparticle and cluster catalysis with dendrimers. Chem. Rev. 120(2), 1397–1437 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 115. Ouyang Z, Li D, Xiong Z et al. Antifouling dendrimer-entrapped copper sulfide nanoparticles enable photoacoustic imaging-guided targeted combination therapy of tumors and tumor metastasis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(5), 6069–6080 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116. Zhang Y, Ouyang Z, Zhan M et al. An intelligent vascular disrupting dendritic nanodevice incorporating copper sulfide nanoparticles for immune modulation-mediated combination tumor therapy. Small. 19(39), 2301914 (2023).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 117. Pan X, Li P, Bai L et al. Biodegradable nanocomposite with dual cell–tissue penetration for deep tumor chemo-phototherapy. Small 16(22), 2000809 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 118. Yang J, Dai D, Lou X, Ma L, Wang B, Yang Y-W. Supramolecular nanomaterials based on hollow mesoporous drug carriers and macrocycle-capped CuS nanogates for synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy. Theranostics 10(2), 615 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119. Hu H, Zhang W, Lei L et al. Combination losartan with hyaluronic acid modified diethyldithiocarbamate loaded hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles for the treatment of breast cancer and metastasis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 108765 (2023).
  Google Scholar
• 120. Ning S, Mo J, Huang R et al. Injectable thermo-sensitive hydrogel loaded hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles for ROS burst in TME and effective tumor treatment. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1191014 (2023).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 121. Wang S, Pang Y, Hu S, Lv J, Lin Y, Li M. Copper sulfide engineered covalent organic frameworks for pH-responsive chemo/photothermal/chemodynamic synergistic therapy against cancer. J. Chem. Eng. 451, 138864 (2023).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 122. Yan T, Yang K, Chen C et al. Synergistic photothermal cancer immunotherapy by Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-based copper sulfide nanotherapeutic platform targeting PTPN2. Biomaterials 279, 121233 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 123. Poudel K, Thapa RK, Gautam M et al. Multifaceted NIR-responsive polymer-peptide-enveloped drug-loaded copper sulfide nanoplatform for chemo-phototherapy against highly tumorigenic prostate cancer. Nanomedicine 21, 102042 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124. Wu Z, Zhang P, Wang P, Wang Z, Luo X. Using copper sulfide nanoparticles as cross-linkers of tumor microenvironment responsive polymer micelles for cancer synergistic photo-chemotherapy. Nanoscale 13(6), 3723–3736 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 125. Gholami M, Hekmat A, Khazaei M, Darroudi M. OXA-CuS@ UiO-66-NH₂ as a drug delivery system for oxaliplatin to colorectal cancer cells. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 33(3), 26 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126. Tang H-X, Liu C-G, Zhang J-T et al. Biodegradable quantum composites for synergistic photothermal therapy and copper-enhanced chemotherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(42), 47289–47298 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 127. Lim JH, Choi HW, Mo SJ, Chung BG. Dual-stimuli responsive mesoporous copper (II) sulfide nanocomposite for chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 302, 110228 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 128. Li X, Pan Y, Zhou J et al. Hyaluronic acid-modified manganese dioxide-enveloped hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles as a multifunctional system for the co-delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs and photosensitizers for efficient synergistic antitumor treatments. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 605, 296–310 (2022).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 129. Zhang Z, Zhou J, Liu C et al. Emerging biomimetic nanotechnology in orthopedic diseases: progress, challenges, and opportunities. Trends Chem. (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 130. Harris JC, Scully MA, Day ES. Cancer cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for cancer management. Cancers 11(12), 1836 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131. Zhan Z, Zeng W, Liu J et al. Engineered biomimetic copper sulfide nanozyme mediates ‘don't eat me’ signaling for photothermal and chemodynamic precision therapies of breast cancer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2023).
  Google Scholar
• 132. Huang Y, Gao X, Chen J. Leukocyte-derived biomimetic nanoparticulate drug delivery systems for cancer therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 8(1), 4–13 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 133. Li J, Cheng Q, Yue L et al. Macrophage-hitchhiking supramolecular aggregates of CuS nanoparticles for enhanced tumor deposition and photothermal therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 6(11), 907–912 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 134. Cai H, Dai X, Guo X et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated inhibitor-loaded copper sulfide nanoparticles for low-temperature photothermal therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Acta Biomater. 127, 276–286 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 135. Wang Z, von dem Bussche A, Kabadi PK, Kane AB, Hurt RH. Biological and environmental transformations of copper-based nanomaterials. ACS Nano 7(10), 8715–8727 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 136. Li L, Hu L, Zhou Q et al. Sulfidation as a natural antidote to metallic nanoparticles is overestimated: CuO sulfidation yields CuS nanoparticles with increased toxicity in medaka (Oryzias latipes) embryos. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49(4), 2486–2495 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 137. Jiang T, Guo H, Xia Y-N et al. Hepatotoxicity of copper sulfide nanoparticles towards hepatocyte spheroids using a novel multi-concave agarose chip method. Nanomedicine 16(17), 1487–1504 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 138. Venditto VJ, Szoka FC Jr. Cancer nanomedicines: so many papers and so few drugs! Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 65(1), 80–88 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 139. Mofokeng T, Moloto M, Shumbula P, Tetyana P. Synthesis, characterization and cytotoxicity of alanine-capped CuS nanoparticles using human cervical carcinoma HeLa cells. Anal. Biochem. 580, 36–41 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 140. Kong L, Wang X, Li X et al. Aggravated toxicity of copper sulfide nanoparticles via hypochlorite-induced nanoparticle dissolution. Environ. Sci. Nano 9(4), 1439–1452 (2022).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 141. Zhou M, Tian M, Li C. Copper-based nanomaterials for cancer imaging and therapy. Bioconjugate Chem. 27(5), 1188–1199 (2016). • Describes the potential applications of copper-based nanomaterials for anticancer treatments.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 142. Wan X, Liu M, Ma M et al. The ultrasmall biocompatible CuS@BSA nanoparticle and its photothermal effects. Front. Pharmacol. 10, 141 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar