Recent advances and future perspectives of porous materials for biomedical applications

References

• 1. Liu X, Song N, Qian D et al. Porous inorganic materials for bioanalysis and diagnostic applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00733 (2021) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar
• 2. Thommes M, Kaneko K, Neimark AV et al. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 87(9–10), 1051–1069 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 3. Cai G, Yan P, Zhang L, Zhou H-C, Jiang H-L. Metal–organic framework-based hierarchically porous materials: synthesis and applications. Chem. Rev. 121(20), 12278–12326 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4. Limongi T, Susa F, Allione M, di Fabrizio E. Drug delivery applications of three-dimensional printed (3DP) mesoporous scaffolds. Pharmaceutics 12(9), 851 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 5. Schlumberger C, Thommes M. Characterization of hierarchically ordered porous materials by physisorption and mercury porosimetry – a tutorial review. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 8(4), 2002181 (2021).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 6. Klobes P, Meyer K, Munro RG. Porosity and Specific Surface Area Measurements for Solid Materials. NIST Recommended Practice Guide. (960th Edition). National Institute of Standards and Technology, DC, USA (2006).
  Google Scholar
• 7. Gregg SJ, Sing KSW. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity. (Second Edition). Academic Press, London, UK (1982).
  Google Scholar
• 8. Bertier P, Schweinar K, Stanjek H et al. On the use and abuse of N₂ physisorption for the characterization of the pore structure of shales. In: The Clay Mineral Society Workshop Lectures Series (Volume 21. Chapter 12). The Clay Minerals Society, VA, USA, 151–161 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 9. Elshaer D, Moniruzzaman M, Ong YT et al. Facile synthesis of dendrimer like mesoporous silica nanoparticles to enhance targeted delivery of interleukin-22. Biomater. Sci. 9(22), 7402–7411 (2021).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10. Witting M, Molina M, Obst K et al. Thermosensitive dendritic polyglycerol-based nanogels for cutaneous delivery of biomacromolecules. Nanomedicine 11(5), 1179–1187 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11. Navarro L, Theune LE, Calderón M. Effect of crosslinking density on thermoresponsive nanogels: a study on the size control and the kinetics release of biomacromolecules. Eur. Polym. J. 124, 109478 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 12. Yan R, Ren J, Wen J et al. Enzyme therapeutic for ischemia and reperfusion injury in organ transplantation. Adv. Mater. doi.org/10.1002/adma.202105670 (2021) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar
• 13. Qin M, Cao Z, Wen J et al. An antioxidant enzyme therapeutic for COVID‐19. Adv.Mater. 32(43), 2004901 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 14. Beloqui A, Kobitski AY, Nienhaus GU, Delaittre G. A simple route to highly active single-enzyme nanogels. Chem. Sci. 9(4), 1006–1013 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21(24), 2529–2543 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16. Di Luca A, Lorenzo-Moldero I, Mota C et al. Tuning cell differentiation into a 3D scaffold presenting a pore shape gradient for osteochondral regeneration. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5(14), 1753–1763 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17. Walthers CM, Nazemi AK, Patel SL, Wu BM, Dunn JCY. The effect of scaffold macroporosity on angiogenesis and cell survival in tissue-engineered smooth muscle. Biomaterials 35(19), 5129–5137 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18. Iturriaga L, Van Gordon KD, Larrañaga-Jaurrieta G, Camarero‐Espinosa S. Strategies to introduce topographical and structural cues in 3D‐printed scaffolds and implications in tissue regeneration. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 1(12), 2100068 (2021).
  Google Scholar
• 19. Pinelli F, Ortolà ÓF, Makvandi P, Perale G, Rossi F. In vivo drug delivery applications of nanogels: a review. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 15(27), 2707–2727 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 20. Rodriguez-Abetxuko A, Sánchez-deAlcázar D, Muñumer P, Beloqui A. Tunable polymeric scaffolds for enzyme immobilization. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 830 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21. Echeverria Molina MI, Malollari KG, Komvopoulos K. Design challenges in polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 617141 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar