Nanotechnology-assisted microfluidic systems: from bench to bedside

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1. Ahmadi S, Kamaladini H, Haddadi F, Sharifmoghadam MR. Thiol-capped gold nanoparticle biosensors for rapid and sensitive visual colorimetric detection of klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Fluoresc. 28(4), 987–998 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2. Maghsoudi S, Shahraki BT, Rabiee N et al. Burgeoning polymer nano blends for improved controlled drug release: a review. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 4363 (2020). • This is a great review article regarding the use of microfluidics/nanofluidics in different drug/gene delivery and synthesis applications.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3. Rabiee N, Yaraki MT, Garakani SM et al. Recent advances in porphyrin-based nanocomposites for effective targeted imaging and therapy. Biomaterials 232, 119707 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4. Ghadiri AM, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. Green synthesis of CuO-and Cu2O-NPs in assistance with high-gravity: the flowering of nanobiotechnology. Nanotechnology 31(42), 425101 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5. Kiani M, Bagherzadeh M, Meghdadi S et al. Development of a novel carboxamide-based off–on switch fluorescence sensor: Hg 2+, Zn 2+ and Cd 2+. N. J. Chem. 44(27), 11841–11852 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 6. Yang RJ, Chang CC, Chen JK, Pan YJ. Microfluidic sample manipulation. In: Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics. Li D (Ed.). Springer, MA, USA, 1189–1194 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 7. Maia FR, Reis RL, Oliveira JM. Finding the perfect match between nanoparticles and microfluidics to respond to cancer challenges. Nanomedicine 24, 102139 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8. Ahmadi S, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. Stimulus-responsive sequential release systems for drug and gene delivery. Nano Today 34, 100914 (2020). • This is a great review article regarding the use of microfluidics/nanofluidics in different drug/gene delivery and synthesis applications.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Ghasemi A et al. Point-of-use rapid detection of sars-cov-2: nanotechnology-enabled solutions for the covid-19 pandemic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21(14), 5126 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 10. Kiani M, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. High-gravity-assisted green synthesis of palladium nanoparticles: the flowering of nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 30, 102297 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11. Chandrasekaran A, Abduljawad M, Moraes C. Have microfluidics delivered for drug discovery? Expert. Opin. Drug. Discov. 11(8), 745–748 (2016). •• This is a great paper that describes different commercialization and applications of microfluidics.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 12. Nasr SM, Rabiee N, Hajebi S et al. Biodegradable nanopolymers in cardiac tissue engineering: from concept towards nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 4205 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Hasanzadeh A, Jahromi MaM, Abdoli A et al. Photoluminescent carbon quantum dot/poly-l-lysine core-shell nanoparticles: a novel candidate for gene delivery. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102118 (2020) (In Press).
  Google Scholar
• 14. Kiani M, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. Improved green biosynthesis of chitosan decorated Ag-and Co3O4-nanoparticles: a relationship between surface morphology, Photocatalytic and biomedical applications. Nanomedicine doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102331 (2020) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar
• 15. Kharati M, Foroutanparsa S, Rabiee M, Salarian R, Rabiee N, Rabiee G. Early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis based on optical and electrochemical biosensors: comprehensive perspective. Curr. Anal. Chem. 16(5), 557–569 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 16. Su H, Li S, Jin Y et al. Nanomaterial-based biosensors for biological detections. Adv. Health Care Technol. 3, 19–29 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 17. Shahraki BT, Maghsoudi S, Fatahi Y et al. The flowering of mechanically interlocked molecules: novel approaches to the synthesis of rotaxanes and catenanes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 423, 213484 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 18. Nik AB, Zare H, Razavi SS et al. Smart drug delivery: capping strategies for mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 299, 110115 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 19. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Tavakolizadeh M, Pourjavadi A, Atarod M, Webster TJ. Synthesis, characterization and mechanistic study of nano chitosan tetrazole as a novel and promising platform for CRISPR delivery. Int. J. Polymer. Mater. Polymer. Biomater. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2020.1809405 (2020) (Epub ahead of print).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 20. Rabiee N, Ahmadvand S, Ahmadi S et al. Carbosilane dendrimers: drug and gene delivery applications. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 59, 101879 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 21. Ghasemi A, Rabiee N, Ahmadi S et al. Optical assays based on colloidal inorganic nanoparticles. Analyst 143(14), 3249–3283 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22. Arduini F, Cinti S, Scognamiglio V, Moscone D. Nanomaterial-based sensors. In: Handbook of Nanomaterials in Anal. Chem. Hussain CM (Ed.). Elsevier, doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-816699-4.00013-X, 329–359 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 23. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Ghadiri AM et al. High-gravity-assisted green synthesis of NiO-NPs anchored on the surface of biodegradable nanobeads with potential biomedical applications. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 16(4), 520–530 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Kiani M et al. High gravity-assisted green synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles via allium ursinum: conjoining nanochemistry to neuroscience. Nano Express 1(2), 020025 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 25. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Ghadiri AM et al. Green synthesis of ZnO NPs via salvia hispanica: evaluation of potential antioxidant, antibacterial, mammalian cell viability, H1N1 influenza virus inhibition and photocatalytic activities. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 16(4), 456–466 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26. Choi S, Goryll M, Sin LYM, Wong PK, Chae J. Microfluidic-based biosensors toward point-of-care detection of nucleic acids and proteins. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 10(2), 231–247 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27. Kharati M, Rabiee M, Rostami-Nejad M et al. Development of a nano biosensor for anti-gliadin detection for Celiac disease based on suspension microarrays. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 6(5), 055015 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Kiani M, Ghadiri AM. Rosmarinus officinalis directed palladium nanoparticle synthesis: Investigation of potential anti-bacterial, anti-fungal and Mizoroki-Heck catalytic activities. Adv. Powder Technol. 31(4), 1402–1411 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 29. Nasseri B, Turk M, Kosemehmetoglu K et al. The pimpled gold nanosphere: A superior candidate for plasmonic photothermal therapy. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 2903 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30. Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M, Kiani M et al. Biosynthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles with potential biomedical applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 3983–3999 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31. Nasimi P, Haidari M. Medical use of nanoparticles: drug delivery and diagnosis diseases. Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. 1, (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1943089213506978
  Google Scholar
• 32. Jarrige V, Nieuwenhuis JH, Van Son JPHF, Martens MFWC, Vissers JLM. A fast intraoperative PTH point-of-care assay on the philips handheld magnotech system. Langenbecks Arch. Chir. 396(3), 337–343 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 33. Hajebi S, Mohammadi Nasr S, Rabiee N et al. Bioresorbable composite polymeric materials for tissue engineering applications. Int. J. Polymer. Mater. Polymer. Biomater. 1–15 (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 34. Rabiee N, Ahmadi S, Arab Z et al. Aptamer hybrid nanocomplexes as targeting components for antibiotic/gene delivery systems and diagnostics: a review. Int. J. Nanomed. 15, 4237 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35. Rabiee N, Rabiee M, Bagherzadeh M, Rezaei N. COVID-19 and picotechnology: potential opportunities. Med. Hypotheses 144, 109917 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36. Ahmadi S, Rabiee N, Fatahi Y et al. Controlled gene delivery systems: nanomaterials and chemical approaches. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 16(5), 553–582 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37. Giacomini KM, Huang S-M, Tweedie DJ et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. 9(3), 215 (2010).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 38. Kinch MS, Haynesworth A, Kinch SL, Hoyer D. An overview of FDA-approved new molecular entities: 1827–2013. Drug Discov. Today 19(8), 1033–1039 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39. Ozsvári B, Lamb R, Lisanti MP. Repurposing of FDA-approved drugs against cancer–Focus on metastasis. Aging (Albany NY) 8(4), 567 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40. Mullard A. 2013 FDA drug approvals. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13(2), 85–89 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41. Munos B. Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nat. Rev. 8(12), 959–968 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 42. Force LM, Abdollahpour I, Advani SM et al. The global burden of childhood and adolescent cancer in 2017: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Oncol. 20(9), 1211–1225 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 43. Nasseri B, Soleimani N, Rabiee N, Kalbasi A, Karimi M, Hamblin MR. Point-of-care microfluidic devices for pathogen detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 117, 112–128 (2018). • A complete and comprehensive review article regarding the advantages of microfluidic devices in pathogen detection.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44. Chang AY, Cowling K, Micah AE et al. Past, present, and future of global health financing: a review of development assistance, government, out-of-pocket, and other private spending on health for 195 countries, 1995–2050. Lancet 393(10187), 2233–2260 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 45. Frank TD, Carter A, Jahagirdar D et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and mortality of HIV, 1980–2017, and forecasts to 2030, for 195 countries and territories: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017. Lancet HIV 6(12), e831–e859 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 46. Stanaway JD, Parisi A, Sarkar K et al. The global burden of non-typhoidal salmonella invasive disease: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19(12), 1312–1324 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 47. Hajebi S, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. Stimulus-responsive polymeric nanogels as smart drug delivery systems. Acta Biomater. 92, 1–18 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48. Rabiee N, Kiani M, Bagherzadeh M, Rabiee M, Ahmadi S. Nanoparticle (NP)-Based Delivery Vehicles. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Ca, USA, (2019).
  Google Scholar
• 49. Romero FA, Jones C, Xu Y, Fenaux M, Halcomb RL. The race to bash NASH: emerging targets and drug development in a complex liver disease. J. Med. Chem. 63(10), 5031–5073 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50. Ploetz E, Engelke H, Lächelt U, Wuttke S. The chemistry of reticular framework nanoparticles: MOF, ZIF, and COF materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(41), 1909062 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 51. Shaikh FA, Kurtys E, Kubassova O, Roettger D. Reporter gene imaging and its role in imaging-based drug development. Drug Discov. Today 25(3), 582–592 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52. Zhang B, Radisic M. Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market. Lab on a Chip 17(14), 2395–2420 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53. Hansen CE, Lam WA. Clinical implications of single-cell microfluidic devices for hematological disorders. Anal. Chem. 89(22), 11881–11892 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54. Greenberg HM, Dwyer EM, Hochman JS, Steinberg JS, Echt DS, Peters RW. Interaction of ischaemia and encainide/flecainide treatment: a proposed mechanism for the increased mortality in CAST I. Heart 74(6), 631–635 (1995).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 55. Culp DR, Berry I. Merck and the Vioxx debacle: deadly loyalty. J. Civl Rights Econ. Dev. 22(1), 1 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 56. Waxman HA. The lessons of Vioxx – drug safety and sales. N. Engl. J. Med. 352(25), 2576–2578 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57. Gale KB, Jafek RA, Lambert JC et al. A review of current methods in microfluidic device fabrication and future commercialization prospects. Inventions 3(3), 60 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 58. Cui P, Wang S. Application of microfluidic chip technology in pharmaceutical analysis: a review. J. Pharm. Anal. 9(4), 238–247 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 59. Balslev S, Jorgensen AM, Bilenberg B et al. Lab-on-a-chip with integrated optical transducers. Lab Chip 6(2), 213–217 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60. Kim L. Overview of the microfluidic diagnostics commercial landscape. Methods. Mol. Biol. 949, 65–83 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61. Mark D, Haeberle S, Roth G, Von Stetten F, Zengerle R. Microfluidic lab-on-a-chip platforms: requirements, characteristics and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39(3), 1153–1182 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62. Ren K, Zhou J, Wu H. Materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Acc. Chem. Res. 46(11), 2396–2406 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63. Zhu K, Yu Y, Cheng Y, Tian C, Zhao G, Zhao Y. All-aqueous-phase microfluidics for cell encapsulation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(5), 4826–4832 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64. Gao R, Lv Z, Mao Y et al. SERS-based pump-free microfluidic chip for highly sensitive immunoassay of prostate-specific antigen biomarkers. ACS Sens. 4(4), 938–943 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65. Gao R, Tian X, Li Q et al. Artificial blood vessel frameworks from 3D printing-based super-assembly as in vitro models for early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Chem. Mater. 32(7), 3188–3198 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 66. Park J, Han DH, Park JK. Towards practical sample preparation in point-of-care testing: user-friendly microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 20(7), 1191–1203 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67. Gao R, Song X, Zhan C et al. Light trapping induced flexible wrinkled nanocone SERS substrate for highly sensitive explosive detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 314, 128081 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 68. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Whitesides GM, Carrilho E. Diagnostics for the developing world: microfluidic paper-based analytical devices. Anal. Chem. 82(1), 3–10 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69. Huang L, Chen J, Yu Z, Tang D. Self-powered temperature sensor with seebeck effect transduction for photothermal–thermoelectric coupled immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 92(3), 2809–2814 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70. Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK. Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12(12), 2118–2134 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71. Gao H, Yan C, Wu W, Li J. Application of microfluidic chip technology in food safety sensing. Sensors 20(6), 1792 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 72. Zarrintaj P, Bakhshandeh B, Rezaeian I, Heshmatian B, Ganjali M. A novel electroactive agarose-aniline pentamer platform as a potential candidate for neural tissue engineering. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–12 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73. Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK. Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12(12), 2118–2134 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74. Ranjit Prakash A, Adamia S, Sieben V, Pilarski P, Pilarski LM, Backhouse CJ. Small volume PCR in PDMS biochips with integrated fluid control and vapour barrier. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 113(1), 398–409 (2006).
  Google Scholar
• 75. Mastrangeli M, Millet S, Partners T, Raaij J. Organ-on-chip in development:towards a roadmap for organs-on-chip. ALTEX 36(4), 650–668 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 76. Nilghaz A, Guan L, Tan W, Shen W. Advances of paper-based microfluidics for diagnostics: the original motivation and current status. ACS Sens. 1(12), 1382–1393 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 77. Ahmadi S, Rabiee N, Bagherzadeh M et al. Stimulus-responsive sequential release systems for drug and gene delivery. Nano Today 34, 100914 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78. Miernicki M, Hofmann T, Eisenberger I, Von Der Kammer F, Praetorius A. Legal and practical challenges in classifying nanomaterials according to regulatory definitions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14(3), 208–216 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 79. Mcneil SE. Nanotechnology for the biologist. J. Leukoc. Biol. 78(3), 585–594 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80. El-Sayed A, Kamel M. Advances in nanomedical applications: diagnostic, therapeutic, immunization, and vaccine production. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(16), 19200–19213 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81. Zhang J, Misra RDK. Nanomaterials in microfluidics for disease diagnosis and therapy development. Mater. Technol. 34(2), 92–116 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 82. Choi J-H, Lee J, Oh B-K. Nanomaterial-based in vitro analytical system for diagnosis and therapy in microfluidic device. Biochip J. 10(4), 331–345 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 83. Wang M, Xiao Y, Lin L, Zhu X, Du L, Shi X. A microfluidic chip integrated with hyaluronic acid-functionalized electrospun chitosan nanofibers for specific capture and nondestructive release of CD44-overexpressing circulating tumor cells. Bioconjug. Chem. 29(4), 1081–1090 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 84. Xu T, Yu H, Xu P et al. Real-time enzyme-digesting identification of double-strand DNA in a resonance-cantilever embedded micro-chamber. Lab Chip 14(6), 1206–1214 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 85. Nunna BB, Mandal D, Lee JU et al. Detection of cancer antigens (CA-125) using gold nano particles on interdigitated electrode-based microfluidic biosensor. Nano Converg. 6(1), 3 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 86. Singh N, Rai P, Ali MA et al. A hollow-nanosphere-based microfluidic biosensor for biomonitoring of cardiac troponin I. J. Mater. Chem. B 7(24), 3826–3839 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 87. Mottaghitalab F, Farokhi M, Fatahi Y, Atyabi F, Dinarvand R. New insights into designing hybrid nanoparticles for lung cancer: Diagnosis and treatment. J. Control. Release 295, 250–267 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88. Gorjikhah F, Davaran S, Salehi R et al. Improving “lab-on-a-chip” techniques using biomedical nanotechnology: a review. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 44(7), 1609–1614 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89. Garcia-Cordero JL, Ricco AJ. Lab-on-a-chip (general philosophy). In: Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Li D (Ed.). Springer, MA, USA, 962–969 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 90. Medina-Sánchez M, Miserere S, Merkoçi A. Nanomaterials and lab-on-a-chip technologies. Lab Chip 12(11), 1932–1943 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91. Singh P, Pandey SK, Singh J, Srivastava S, Sachan S, Singh SK. Biomedical perspective of electrochemical nanobiosensor. Nanomicro Lett. 8(3), 193–203 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 92. Hong Y, Huh Y-M, Yoon DS, Yang J. Nanobiosensors based on localized surface plasmon resonance for biomarker detection. J. Nanomater. 2012, 759830 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 93. Amendola V. Surface plasmon resonance of silver and gold nanoparticles in the proximity of graphene studied using the discrete dipole approximation method. Phys. Chem. 18(3), 2230–2241 (2016).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 94. Wang J, Lin W, Cao E, Xu X, Liang W, Zhang X. Surface plasmon resonance sensors on raman and fluorescence spectroscopy. Sensors 17(12), 2719 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 95. Escobedo C, Chou Y-W, Rahman M et al. Quantification of ovarian cancer markers with integrated microfluidic concentration gradient and imaging nanohole surface plasmon resonance. Analyst 138(5), 1450–1458 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96. Tsao CW. Polymer microfluidics: simple, low-Cost fabrication process bridging academic lab research to commercialized production. Micromachines 7(12), 255 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 97. Gong X, Wen W. Polydimethylsiloxane-based conducting composites and their applications in microfluidic chip fabrication. Biomicrofluidics 3, 12007 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 98. Sadabadi H, Badilescu S, Packirisamy M, Wüthrich R. Integration of gold nanoparticles in PDMS microfluidics for lab-on-a-chip plasmonic biosensing of growth hormones. Biosens. Bioelectron. 44, 77–84 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 99. Ghasemi A, Amiri H, Zare H et al. Carbon nanotubes in microfluidic lab-on-a-chip technology: current trends and future perspectives. Microfluidics Nanofluidics 21(9), 151 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 100. Venkatanarayanan A, Crowley K, Lestini E, Keyes TE, Rusling JF, Forster RJ. High sensitivity carbon nanotube based electrochemiluminescence sensor array. Biosens. Bioelectron. 31(1), 233–239 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101. Chałupniak A, Merkoçi A. Graphene oxide–poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based lab-on-a-chip platform for heavy-metals preconcentration and electrochemical detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(51), 44766–44775 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102. Li X, Zhao C, Liu X. A paper-based microfluidic biosensor integrating zinc oxide nanowires for electrochemical glucose detection. Microsyst. Nanoeng. 1(1), 15014 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 103. Upasham Sayali, Tanak Ambalika, Prasad S. Cardiac troponin biosensors: where are we now? Adv. Health Care Technol. 4, 1–13 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 104. Tate JR, Panteghini M.. Measurement of cardiac troponins revisited. Biochim. Clin. 32, 535–546 (2008).
  Google Scholar
• 105. Kauffman DR, Star A. Graphene versus carbon nanotubes for chemical sensor and fuel cell applications. Analyst 135(11), 2790–2797 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106. Yuan G-J, Xie J-F, Li H-H et al. Thermally reduced graphene oxide/carbon nanotube composite films for thermal packaging applications. Materials 13(2), 317 (2020).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 107. Pandora Genomics LLC. US9417210 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 108. Labrador Diagnostics LLC. US8822167 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 109. Lin G, Zhang H, Huang L. Smart polymeric nanoparticles for cancer gene delivery. Mol. Pharm. 12(2), 314–321 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 110. Giouroudi I, Keplinger F. Microfluidic biosensing systems using magnetic nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14(9), 18535–18556 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 111. Wang S, Liu N, Zheng L, Cai G, Lin J. A lab-on-chip device for the sample-in-result-out detection of viable Salmonella using loop-mediated isothermal amplification and real-time turbidity monitoring. Lab Chip 20(13), 2296–2305 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 112. Goluch E, Stoeva S, Lee J-S, Shaikh K, Mirkin C, Liu C. A microfluidic detection system based upon a surface immobilized biobarcode assay. Biosens. Bioelectron. 24, 2397–2403 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113. Zhang C, Lv X, Yasmeen S, Qing H, Deng Y. Integrated microfluidic chip with nanobiosensor for rapid and label-free detection of a specific gene. Anal. Methods 9(24), 3619–3625 (2017).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 114. Zhao J, Hashmi A, Xu J, Xue W. A compact lab-on-a-chip nanosensor for glycerol detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 3109 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 115. Kim J, Elsnab J, Gehrke C, Li J, Gale BK. Microfluidic integrated multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) sensor for electrochemical nucleic acid concentration measurement. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 185, 370–376 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 116. Yang J, Yu J-H, Rudi Strickler J, Chang W-J, Gunasekaran S. Nickel nanoparticle–chitosan-reduced graphene oxide-modified screen-printed electrodes for enzyme-free glucose sensing in portable microfluidic devices. Biosens. Bioelectro. 47, 530–538 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 117. Van Den Berg A, Mummery CL, Passier R, Van Der Meer AD. Personalised organs-on-chips: functional testing for precision medicine. Lab Chip 19(2), 198–205 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 118. Huh D, Hamilton GA, Ingber DE. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 21(12), 745–754 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119. Lin A, Sved Skottvoll F, Rayner S et al. 3D cell culture models and organ-on-a-chip: meet separation science and mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 41(1–2), 56–64 (2020).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 120. Rigat-Brugarolas LG, Elizalde-Torrent A, Bernabeu M et al. A functional microengineered model of the human splenon-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 14(10), 1715–1724 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121. Park J, Lee BK, Jeong GS, Hyun JK, Lee CJ, Lee SH. Three-dimensional brain-on-a-chip with an interstitial level of flow and its application as an in vitro model of alzheimer's disease. Lab Chip 15(1), 141–150 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 122. Stucki AO, Stucki JD, Hall SRR et al. A lung-on-a-chip array with an integrated bio-inspired respiration mechanism. Lab Chip 15(5), 1302–1310 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 123. Abaci HE, Gledhill K, Guo Z, Christiano AM, Shuler ML. Pumpless microfluidic platform for drug testing on human skin equivalents. Lab Chip 15(3), 882–888 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124. Giacomelli E, Bellin M, Sala L et al. Three-dimensional cardiac microtissues composed of cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells co-differentiated from human pluripotent stem cells. Development 144(6), 1008–1017 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 125. Yasotharan S, Pinto S, Sled JG, Bolz S-S, Günther A. Artery-on-a-chip platform for automated, multimodal assessment of cerebral blood vessel structure and function. Lab Chip 15(12), 2660–2669 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 126. Zhang B, Radisic M. Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market. Lab Chip 17(14), 2395–2420 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 127. Wevers NR, Van Vught R, Wilschut KJ et al. High-throughput compound evaluation on 3D networks of neurons and glia in a microfluidic platform. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 38856 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 128. Lanz HL, Saleh A, Kramer B et al. Therapy response testing of breast cancer in a 3D high-throughput perfused microfluidic platform. BMC Cancer 17(1), 017–3709 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 129. Beaurivage C, Naumovska E, Chang XY et al. Development of a gut-on-a-chip model for high throughput disease modeling and drug discovery. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(22), (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 130. Iontox LLC. US9631167 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 131. Maoz BM, Herland A, Henry OYF et al. Organs-on-Chips with combined multi-electrode array and transepithelial electrical resistance measurement capabilities. Lab Chip 17(13), 2294–2302 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 132. Kratz SRA, Höll G, Schuller P, Ertl P, Rothbauer M. Latest trends in biosensing for microphysiological organs-on-a-chip and body-on-a-chip systems. Biosensors 9(3), 110 (2019).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 133. Weltin A, Hammer S, Noor F, Kaminski Y, Kieninger J, Urban G. Accessing 3D microtissue metabolism: lactate and oxygen monitoring in hepatocyte spheroids. Biosens. Bioelectron. 87, 941–948 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 134. Weltin A, Slotwinski K, Kieninger J et al. Cell culture monitoring for drug screening and cancer research: a transparent, microfluidic, multi-sensor microsystem. Lab Chip 14(1), 138–146 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 135. Shin SR, Kilic T, Zhang YS et al. Label-free and regenerative electrochemical microfluidic biosensors for continual monitoring of cell secretomes. Adv. Sci. 4(5), 1600522 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 136. Zhang Y, Bai X, Wang X, Shiu K-K, Zhu Y, Jiang H. Highly sensitive graphene–Pt nanocomposites amperometric biosensor and its application in living cell H2O2 detection. Anal. Chem. 86(19), 9459–9465 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 137. Liu J, Bo X, Zhao Z, Guo L. Highly exposed Pt nanoparticles supported on porous graphene for electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide in living cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 74, 71–77 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 138. Ju J, Chen W. In situ growth of surfactant-free gold nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for electrochemical detection of hydrogen peroxide in biological environments. Anal. Chem. 87(3), 1903–1910 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 139. Duarte Y, Márquez-Miranda V, Miossec MJ, González-Nilo F. Integration of target discovery, drug discovery and drug delivery: a review on computational strategies. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 11(4), e1554 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 140. Neužil P, Giselbrecht S, Länge K, Huang TJ, Manz A. Revisiting lab-on-a-chip technology for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. 11(8), 620–632 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 141. Choi J-H, Lee J, Shin W, Choi J-W, Kim HJ. Priming nanoparticle-guided diagnostics and therapeutics towards human organs-on-chips microphysiological system. Nano Converg. 3(1), 24 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 142. Valencia PM, Pridgen EM, Rhee M, Langer R, Farokhzad OC, Karnik R. Microfluidic platform for combinatorial synthesis and optimization of targeted nanoparticles for cancer therapy. ACS Nano 7(12), 10671–10680 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 143. Li LL, Li X, Wang HJSM. Microfluidic synthesis of nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Small Methods 1(8), 1700140 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• 144. Shawgo RS, Richards Grayson AC, Li Y, Cima MJ. Biomems for drug delivery. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 6(4), 329–334 (2002).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 145. Song P, Tng DJH, Hu R, Lin G, Meng E, Yong K-T. An electrochemically actuated mems device for individualized drug delivery: an in vitro study. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2(8), 1170–1178 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 146. Jackson J, Chen A, Zhang H, Burt H, Chiao M. Design and near-infrared actuation of a gold nanorod–polymer microelectromechanical device for on-demand drug delivery. Micromachines 9(1), 28 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 147. Yang X, Li K, Zhang X et al. Nanofiber membrane supported lung-on-a-chip microdevice for anti-cancer drug testing. Lab Chip 18(3), 486–495 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar