Antibiofilm activity of natural zeolite supported NanoZnO: inhibition of Esp gene expression of Enterococcus faecalis

References

• 1 Mohamed JA, Huang DB. Biofilm formation by Enterococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 56(Pt 12), 1581–1588 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cancio V, Carvalho Ferreira D, Cavalcante FS et al. Can the Enterococcus faecalis identified in the root canals of primary teeth be a cause of failure of endodontic treatment? Acta Odontol. Scand. 75(6), 423–428 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3 Zilm PS, Butnejski V, Rossi-Fedele G, Kidd SP, Edwards S, Vasilev K. D-amino acids reduce Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in vitro and in the presence of antimicrobials used for root canal treatment. PLoS ONE 12(2), e0170670 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4 Frosinski JJ, Brunkhorst FM. Peripheral venous catheter-related E. faecalis sepsis with fatal outcome. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 138(34-35), 1723–1726 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Padmavathy K, Praveen S, Madhavan R, Krithika N, Kiruthiga A. Clinico-microbiological investigation of catheter associated urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis: vanA genotype. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 9(8), DD05–06 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gurenlian JR. The role of dental plaque biofilm in oral health. Am. Dent. Hygien. Assoc. 81(Suppl. 1), 116–116 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• 7 Tendolkar PM, Baghdayan AS, Gilmore MS, Shankar N. Enterococcal surface protein, Esp, enhances biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect. Immun. 72(10), 6032–6039 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Kim MH. Nanoparticle-based therapies for wound biofilm infection: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 15(3), 294–304 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9 Lee JH, Kim YG, Cho MH, Lee J. ZnO nanoparticles inhibit Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence factor production. Microbiol. Res. 169(12), 888–896 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Bhattacharyya P, Agarwal B, Goswami M, Maiti D, Baruah S, Tribedi P. Zinc oxide nanoparticle inhibits the biofilm formation of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 111(1), 89–99 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Jesline A, John NP, Narayanan P, Vani C, Murugan S. Antimicrobial activity of zinc and titanium dioxide nanoparticles against biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Nanosci. 5(2), 157–162 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Huh AJ, Kwon YJ. ‘Nanoantibiotics’: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. J. Control. Release 156(2), 128–145 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Sawai J. Quantitative evaluation of antibacterial activities of metallic oxide powders (ZnO, MgO and CaO) by conductimetric assay. J. Microbiol. Methods 54(2), 177–182 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Verma SK, Jha E, Panda PK et al. Molecular aspects of core–shell intrinsic defect induced enhanced antibacterial activity of ZnO nanocrystals. Nanomedicine (Lond) 13(1), 43–68 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kianvash N, Bahador A, Pourhajibagher M et al. Evaluation of propylene glycol nanoliposomes containing curcumin on burn wound model in rat: biocompatibility, wound healing, and anti-bacterial effects. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 7(5), 654–663 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Choi J, Kim H, Kim P et al. Toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in rats treated by two different routes: single intravenous injection and single oral administration. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 78(4), 226–243 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Razavi S, Partoazar A, Takzaree N, Fasihi-Ramandi M, Bahador A, Darvishi MH. Silver sulfadiazine nanoethogel for burn healing: characterization and investigation of its in vivo effects. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 13(11), 1319–1331 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Nagy A, Harrison A, Sabbani S, Munson RS Jr, Dutta PK, Waldman WJ. Silver nanoparticles embedded in zeolite membranes: release of silver ions and mechanism of antibacterial action. Int. J. Nanomedi. 6, 1833–1852 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Alswat AA, Ahmad MB, Saleh TA, Hussein MZB, Ibrahim NA. Effect of zinc oxide amounts on the properties and antibacterial activities of zeolite/zinc oxide nanocomposite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. Mater. Biol. Appl. 68, 505–511 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Iskander A, Khald E, Sheta A. Zinc and manganese sorption behavior by natural zeolite and bentonite. Ann. Agri. Sci. 56(1), 43–48 (2011).
  Google Scholar
• 21 Malekshah RE, Mahjub R, Rastgarpanah M et al. Effect of zeolite nano-materials and artichoke (Cynara scolymus L.) leaf extract on increase in urinary clearance of systematically absorbed nicotine. Arzneimittelforschung 62(12), 650–654 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Spanakis M, Bouropoulos N, Theodoropoulos D et al. Controlled release of 5-fluorouracil from microporous zeolites. Nanomedicine 10(1), 197–205 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23 Sanatgar-Delshade E, Habibi-Yangjeh A, Khodadadi-Moghaddam M. Hydrothermal low-temperature preparation and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles supported on natural zeolite as a highly efficient photocatalyst. Monatsh. Chem. 142(2), 119–129 (2011).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Li M, Li G, Jiang J, Zhang Z, Dai X, Mai K. Ultraviolet resistance and antimicrobial properties of ZnO in the polypropylene materials: a review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 31(4), 331–339 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 25 Chiniforush N, Pourhajibagher M, Parker S, Shahabi S, Bahador A. The in vitro effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with indocyanine green on Enterococcus faecalis: Influence of a washing vs non-washing procedure. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 16, 119–123 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 Gupta A. Biofilm quantification and comparative analysis of MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) & MBIC (minimum biofilm inhibitory concentration) value for different antibiotics against E. coli. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci 4(2), 198–224 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Pourhajibagher M, Chiniforush N, Shahabi S et al. Monitoring gene expression of rcpA from Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans versus antimicrobial photodynamic therapy by relative quantitative real-time PCR. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 19, 51–55 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4), 402–408 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Simsir H, Eltugral N, Karagoz S. Hydrothermal carbonization for the preparation of hydrochars from glucose, cellulose, chitin, chitosan and wood chips via low-temperature and their characterization. Bioresour. Technol. 246, 82–87 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Hossein-Nia B, Khorram S, Rezazadeh H, Safaiyan A, Ghiasi R, Tarighat-Esfanjani A. The effects of natural Clinoptilolite and nano-sized Clinoptilolite supplementation on lipid profile, food intakes and bodyweight in rats with Streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 8(2), 211–216 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Ellersdorfer M. The ion-exchanger-loop-stripping process: ammonium recovery from sludge liquor using NaCl-treated clinoptilolite and simultaneous air stripping. Water Sci. Technol. 77(3-4), 695–705 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32 Yosefi L, Haghighi M, Allahyari S, Ashkriz S. The beneficial use of HCl-activated natural zeolite in ultrasound assisted synthesis of Cu/clinoptilolite – CeO₂ nanocatalyst used for catalytic oxidation of diluted toluene in air at low temperature. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 90(4), 765–774 (2015).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lipovsky A, Tzitrinovich Z, Friedmann H, Applerot G, Gedanken A, Lubart R. EPR study of visible light-induced ROS generation by nanoparticles of ZnO. J. Phys. Chem. C 113(36), 15997–16001 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 34 Xie Y, He Y, Irwin PL, Jin T, Shi X. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Campylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(7), 2325–2331 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Gao P, Nie X, Zou M, Shi Y, Cheng G. Recent advances in materials for extended-release antibiotic delivery system. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 64(9), 625–634 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 De Gennaro B, Catalanotti L, Cappelletti P et al. Surface modified natural zeolite as a carrier for sustained diclofenac release: a preliminary feasibility study. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 130, 101–109 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Vyas N, Sammons RL, Addison O, Dehghani H, Walmsley AD. A quantitative method to measure biofilm removal efficiency from complex biomaterial surfaces using SEM and image analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 32694 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Athanassiadis B, Abbott P, Walsh LJ. The use of calcium hydroxide, antibiotics and biocides as antimicrobial medicaments in endodontics. Austr. Dent. J. 52, S64–S82 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Siddiqi KS, Ur Rahman A, Husen A. Properties of zinc oxide nanoparticles and their activity against microbes. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 13(1), 141 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 40 Seneviratne CJ, Suriyanarayanan T, Swarup S, Chia KHB, Nagarajan N, Zhang C. Transcriptomics analysis reveals putative genes involved in biofilm formation and biofilm-associated drug resistance of Enterococcus faecalis. J. Endod. 43(6), 949–955 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41 Toledo-Arana A, Valle J, Solano C et al. The enterococcal surface protein, Esp, is involved in Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67(10), 4538–4545 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Lellouche J, Friedman A, Gedanken A, Banin E. Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of yttrium fluoride nanoparticles. Int. J. Nanomedi. 7, 5611–5624 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar