We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.10.189

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an uncommon subtype of B-cell lymphomathat is characterized by monoclonal B cells that express CD5 on their surface, but not CD23, and harbor the t(11:14) chromosomal translocation that leads to dysregulated expression of cyclin D1. MCL is a biologically and clinically heterogeneous disease. It has the unfavorable characteristics of both aggressive and indolent lymphoma in that MCL is not curable with current standard therapy, yet patients have a shorter survival compared with other indolent histology. MCL is incurable, yet more intensive therapy does lead to longer disease-free intervals; therefore, treatment must be designed to optimize survival while maintaining quality of life. Thus, therapy should be individualized based on both the clinical behavior of the lymphoma and the patient’s status. While there is no clear standard therapy that can be recommended for all patients, there may be an optimal choice for each patient. Knowledge of the expected clinical benefits and toxicities of various approaches will allow the physician and patient to appropriately select the therapy.

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest

Bibliography

  • Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Stein H et al.: A revised European-American classification of lymphoid neoplasms: a proposal from the international lymphoma study group. Blood84,1361–1392 (1994).▪ First and succinct clinicopathologic description of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).
  • A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. N. Engl. J. Med.329,987–994 (1993).
  • Solal-Celigny P, Roy P, Colombat P et al.: Follicular lymphoma international prognostic index. Blood104,1258–1265 (2004).
  • Hoster E, Dreyling M, Klapper W et al.: A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma. Blood111,558–565 (2008).▪ Best prognostic index to date, particularly if Ki-67 proliferation results are included.
  • Herrmann A, Hoster E, Zwingers T et al.: Improvement of overall survival in advanced stage mantle cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.27,511–518 (2009).▪ A more realistic appraisal of expected survival shows that MCL is not as poor a prognosis as often quoted, and this is already old information that probably underestimates current outcomes.
  • Martin P, Chadburn A, Christos P et al.: Outcome of deferred initial therapy in mantle-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.27,1209–1213 (2009).
  • Fernandez V, Salamero O, Espinet B et al.: Genomic and gene expression profiling defines indolent forms of mantle-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res.70,1408–1418 (2010).
  • Williams ME, Swerdlow SH: Cyclin D1 overexpression in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma with chromosome 11 bcl-1 rearrangement. Ann. Oncol.5,71–73 (1994).
  • Rosenwald A, Wright G, Wiestner A et al.: The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle-cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell3,185–197 (2003).
  • 10  Fu K, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC et al.: Cyclin D1-negative mantle cell lymphoma: a clinicopathologic study based on gene expression profiling. Blood106,4315–4321 (2005).
  • 11  O’Connor OA, Moskowitz C, Portlock C et al.: Patients with chemotherapy-refractory mantle cell lymphoma experience high response rates and identical progression-free survivals compared with patients with relapsed disease following treatment with single agent bortezomib: results of a multicentre Phase II clinical trial. Br. J. Haematol.145,34–39 (2009).
  • 12  Pro B, Leber B, Smith M et al.: Phase II multicenter study of oblimersen sodium, a Bcl-2 antisense oligonucleotide, in combination with rituximab in patients with recurrent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol.143,355–360 (2008).
  • 13  Hwang JJ, Kuruvilla J, Mendelson D et al.: Phase I dose finding studies of obatoclax (GX15–070), a small molecule Pan-BCL-2 family antagonist, in patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res.16,4038–4045 (2010).
  • 14  Wilson WH, O’Connor OA, Czuczman MS et al.: Navitoclax, a targeted high-affinity inhibitor of BCL-2, in lymphoid malignancies: a Phase I dose-escalation study of safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumour activity. Lancet Oncol.11,1149–1159 (2010).
  • 15  Younes A, Vose JM, Zelenetz AD et al.: A Phase Ib/II trial of mapatumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 103,1783–1787 (2010).
  • 16  Spurgeon S, Yu M, Phillips JD, Epner EM: Cladribine: not just another purine analogue? Exp. Opin. Invest. Drugs.18,1169–1181 (2009).
  • 17  Inwards DJ, Fishkin PAS, Hillman DW et al.: Long-term results of the treatment of patients with mantle cell lymphoma with cladribine (2-CDA) alone (95–80–53) or 2-CDA and rituximab (N0189) in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. Cancer113,108–116 (2008).
  • 18  Rummel MJ, Chow KU, Jäger E et al.: Intermittent 2-hour-infusion of cladribine as first-line therapy or in first relapse of progressive advanced low-grade and mantle cell lymphomas. Leuk. Lymph.35,129–138 (1999).
  • 19  Leshchenko VV, Kuo P-Y, Shaknovich R et al.: Genomewide DNA methylation analysis reveals novel targets for drug development in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood116,1025–1034 (2010).
  • 20  Wang X, Asplund AC, Porwit A et al.: The subcellular Sox11 distribution pattern identifies subsets of mantle cell lymphoma: correlation to overall survival. Br. J. Haematol.143,248–252 (2008).
  • 21  Hartmann E, Fernàndez V, Moreno V et al.: Five-gene model to predict survival in mantle-cell lymphoma using frozen or formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. J. Clin. Oncol.26,4966–4972 (2008).
  • 22  Determann O, Hoster E, Ott G et al.: Ki-67 predicts outcome in advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma patients treated with anti-CD20 immunochemotherapy: results from randomized trials of the European MCL Network and the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group. Blood111,2385–2387 (2008).
  • 23  Tiemann M, Schrader C, Klapper W et al.: Histopathology, cell proliferation indices and clinical outcome in 304 patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): a clinicopathological study from the European MCL Network. Br. J. Haematol.131,29–38 (2005).
  • 24  Schaffel R, Hedvat CV, Teruya-Feldstein J et al.: Prognostic impact of proliferative index determined by quantitative image analysis and the International Prognostic Index in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Ann. Oncol.21,133–139 (2010).
  • 25  Howard OM, Gribben JG, Neuberg DS et al.: Rituximab and CHOP induction therapy for newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma: molecular complete responses are not predictive of progression-free survival. J. Clin. Oncol.20,1288–1294 (2002).
  • 26  Lenz G, Dreyling MH, Hoster E et al.: Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone significantly improves response and time to treatment failure, but not long-term outcome in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). J. Clin. Oncol.23 (2005).
  • 27  Dreyling M, Lenz G, Hoster E et al.: Early consolidation by myeloablative radiochemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission significantly prolongs progression-free survival in mantle-cell lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial of the European MCL Network. Blood105,2677–2684 (2005).
  • 28  Khouri I, Romaguera J, Kantarjian H et al.: Hyper-CVAD and high-dose methotrexate/cytarabine followed by stem-cell transplantation: an active regimen for aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.16,3803–3809 (1998).
  • 29  Romaguera JE, Fayad L, Rodriguez MA et al.: High rate of durable remissions after treatment of newly diagnosed aggressive mantle-cell lymphoma with rituximab plus hyper-CVAD alternating with rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine. J. Clin. Oncol.23,7013–7023 (2005).
  • 30  Epner EM Unger JM, Miller T et al.: A multicenter trial of hyperCVAD plus rituxan in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Blood110,A387 (2007).
  • 31  Merli F, Luminari S, Ilariucci F et al.: Rituximab plus HyperCVAD alternating with high dose methotrexate and cytarabine for patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. A multicenter trial from GISL. Blood112,A3050 (2008).
  • 32  LeCasce A, Vandergrift JL, Rodriguez MA et al.: R-CHOP, followed by high dose therapy and autologous stem cell rescue (HDT/ASCR), and R-HyperCVAD have equivalent progression-free survival and are superior to R-CHOP alone in younger patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a comparative effectiveness analysis from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma outcomes database project. Blood114,A403 (2009).
  • 33  Ganti AK, Bierman PJ, Lynch JC, Bociek RG, Vose JM, Armitage JO: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma. Ann. Oncol.16,618–624 (2005).
  • 34  Geisler CH, Kolstad A, Laurell A et al.: Long-term progression-free survival of mantle cell lymphoma after intensive front-line immunochemotherapy with in vivo-purged stem cell rescue: a nonrandomized Phase II multicenter study by the Nordic Lymphoma Group. Blood112,2687–2693 (2008).▪ Innovative approach combining dose-intensified induction, including high-dose cytarabine and rituximab, and autologous stem cell transplant consolidation, with post-stem cell transplant molecular relapses treated with rituximab. Outcomes are encouraging for these younger patients and longer follow-up will be important.
  • 35  Schulz H, Bohlius JF, Trelle S et al.: Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and overall survival in patients with indolent or mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Natl Cancer Inst.99,706–714 (2007).
  • 36  Hermine O, Hoster E, Walewski J et al.: Alternating courses of 3 × CHOP and 3 × DHAP plus rituximab followed by a high dose ARA-C containing myeloablative regimen and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is superior to six courses CHOP plus rituximab followed by myeloablative radiochemotherapy and ASCT in mantle cell lymphoma: results of the MCL Younger Trial of the European Mantle Cell Lymphoma Network (MCL Net). Blood116,A110 (2010).▪ Only in abstract form so far, but describes the potential for R-CHOP alternating with R-DHAP to become a standard pre-stem cell transplant induction. Shares some similarities in design with the Nordic trial [34], but is a regimen familiar to most oncologists.
  • 37  Pott C, Hoster E, Beldjord K et al.: R-CHOP/R-DHAP compared to R-CHOP induction followed by high dose therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation induces higher rates of molecular remission in MCL: results of the MCL Younger Intergroup Trial of the European MCL Network. Blood116,A965 (2010).
  • 38  Damon LE, Johnson JL, Niedzwiecki D et al.: Immunochemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation for untreated patients with mantle-cell lymphoma: CALGB 59909. J. Clin. Oncol.27,6101–6108 (2009).
  • 39  Romaguera JE, Fayad LE, Feng L et al.: Ten-year follow-up after intense chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab-hyperCVAD alternating with rituximab-high dose methotrexate/cytarabine (R-MA) and without stem cell transplantation in patients with untreated aggressive mantle cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol.150,200–208 (2010).▪ Despite the concerns regarding single-center data and patient selection, these data are still the gold-standard for comparison with new treatment strategies in young, fit patients.
  • 40  Meusers P, Engelhard M, Bartels H et al.: Multicentre randomized therapeutic trial for advanced centrocytic lymphoma: anthracycline does not improve the prognosis. Hematol. Oncol.7,365–380 (1989).
  • 41  Smith MR, Gordon LI, Foran J et al.: Phase II study of R-CHOP followed by 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan in untreated mantle cell lymphoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E1499. Blood110,A389 (2007).
  • 42  Kahl BS, Longo WL, Eickhoff JC et al.: Maintenance rituximab following induction chemoimmunotherapy may prolong progression-free survival in mantle cell lymphoma: a pilot study from the Wisconsin Oncology Network. Ann. Oncol.17,1418–1423 (2006).
  • 43  Kahl BS, Li H, Smith MR et al.: The VcR-CVAD regimen produces a high complete response rate in untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): first analysis of E1405 – a Phase II study of VcR-CVAD with maintenance rituximab for MCL. Blood114,A1661 (2009).
  • 44  Rummel MJ, Al-Batran SE, Kim S-Z et al.: Bendamustine plus rituximab is effective and has a favorable toxicity profile in the treatment of mantle cell and low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.23,3383–3389 (2005).
  • 45  Robinson KS, Williams ME, van der Jagt RH et al.: Phase II multicenter study of bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with relapsed indolent B-cell and mantle cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.26,4473–4479 (2008).
  • 46  Rummel MJ, Niederle N, Maschmeyer G et al.: Bendamustine plus rituximab is superior in respect of progression free survival and CR rate when compared to CHOP plus rituximab as first-line treatment of patients with advanced follicular, indolent, and mantle cell lymphomas: final results of a randomized Phase III study of the STIL (Study Group Indolent Lymphomas, Germany). Blood114,A405 (2009).▪ While we await the peer-reviewed publication for details, such as the MCL patient characteristics, for MCL these data represent a large randomized cohort and demonstrate superiority of bendamustine–rituximab to R-CHOP, forming the basis for new studies.
  • 47  Furman RR, Martin P, Ruan J et al.: Phase I trial of bortezomib plus R-CHOP in previously untreated patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer116(23),5432–5439 (2010).
  • 48  Friedberg JW, Vose JM, Kelly JL et al.: Bendamustine, bortezomib and rituximab in patients (pts) relapsed/refractory indolent and mantle cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL): a multicenter Phase II clinical trial. Blood114,A924 (2009).
  • 49  Fowler N KB, Rosen P, Matous J et al.: Bortezomib, bendamustine, and rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: encouraging activity in the Phase 2 VERTICAL study. Blood114,A933 (2009).
  • 50  Ganjoo KN, An CS, Robertson MJ et al.: Rituximab, bevacizumab and CHOP (RA-CHOP) in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: safety, biomarker and pharmacokinetic analysis. Leuk. Lymph.47,998–1005 (2006).
  • 51  Forstpointner R, Unterhalt M, Dreyling M et al.: Maintenance therapy with rituximab leads to a significant prolongation of response duration after salvage therapy with a combination of rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (R-FCM) in patients with recurring and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Blood108,4003–4008 (2006).
  • 52  Kahl BS, Williams ME, Hong F, Gascoyne R, Horning SJ: Preliminary pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol E4402: Rituximab Extended Schedule or Retreatment Trial (RESORT). Blood110,A3420 (2007).
  • 53  Ghielmini M, Schmitz SF, Cogliatti SB et al.: Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with the standard weekly × four schedule. Blood103,4416–4423 (2004).
  • 54  Habermann TM, Lossos IS, Justice G et al.: Lenalidomide oral monotherapy produces a high response rate in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol.145,344–349 (2009).
  • 55  Wu L, Adams M, Carter T et al.: Lenalidomide enhances natural killer cell and monocyte-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of rituximab-treated CD20+ tumor cells. Clin. Cancer Res.14,4650–4657 (2008).
  • 56  Zhang L, Qian Z, Cai Z et al.: Synergistic antitumor effects of lenalidomide and rituximab on mantle cell lymphoma in vitro and in vivo. Am. J. Hematol.84,553–559 (2009).
  • 57  Wang M, Oki Y, Pro B et al.: Phase II study of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.27,5213–5218 (2009).
  • 58  Gopal AK, Rajendran JG, Gooley TA et al.: High-dose [131I]tositumomab (anti-CD20) radioimmunotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for adults > or = 60 years old with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.25,1396–1402 (2007).
  • 59  Krishnan A, Nademanee A, Fung HC et al.: Phase II trial of a transplantation regimen of yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and high-dose chemotherapy in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.26,90–95 (2008).
  • 60  Kaufmann H, Raderer M, Wohrer S et al.: Antitumor activity of rituximab plus thalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Blood104,2269–2271 (2004).
  • 61  Witzig TE, Geyer SM, Ghobrial I et al.: Phase II trial of single-agent temsirolimus (CCI-779) for relapsed mantle cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.23,5347–5356 (2005).
  • 62  Haritunians T, Mori A, O’Kelly J, Luong QT, Giles FJ, Koeffler HP: Antiproliferative activity of RAD001 (everolimus) as a single agent and combined with other agents in mantle cell lymphoma. 21,333–339 (2006).
  • 63  Lenz G, Hiddemann W, Dreyling M: The role of fludarabine in the treatment of follicular and mantle cell lymphoma. Cancer101,883–893 (2004).
  • 64  Leonard JP, LaCasce A, Smith MR et al.: Cdk4/6 inhibitor PD 0332991 demonstrates cell cycle inhibition via FLT-PET imaging and tissue analysis in patients with recurrent mantle-cell lymphoma. Blood112,A264 (2008).
  • 65  Tam CS, Bassett R, Ledesma C et al.: Mature results of the MD Anderson Cancer Center risk-adapted transplantation strategy in mantle cell lymphoma. Blood113,4144–4152 (2009).
  • 66  Maris MB, Sandmaier BM, Storer BE et al.: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after fludarabine and 2 Gy total body irradiation for relapsed and refractory mantle cell lymphoma. Blood104,3535–3542 (2004).
  • 67  Shanbhag S, Smith MR, Emmons RVB: Tackling mantle cell lymphoma: potential benefit of allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Stem. Cell Clon. Adv. Appl.3,93–102 (2010).