Research Article

Effect of multidisciplinary cooperative continuous nursing and psychological nursing on multiple myeloma with a peripherally inserted central catheter

Dongliang Li

Fengfeng Sun

Yan Yang

Hematology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Fengfeng Sun

https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2224-8843

Intravenous Therapy Clinic, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Yan Yang

*Author for correspondence: Tel.: +86 0518 8560 5029;

E-mail Address: Yangyan5029@163.com

https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1321-4227

Nursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang), Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China

Search for more papers by this author

Published Online:14 Mar 2024https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2023-0757

View article

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to analyze the effectiveness of multidisciplinary cooperative continuous nursing combined with psychological nursing intervention in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Methods: The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Anxiety Self-Assessment Scale (SAS), Depression Self-Assessment Scale (SDS) and Revised Piper Fatigue Scale (PFS-R), Self-Care Ability Scale (ESCA), Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), incidence of unplanned extubation of PICC, total incidence of catheter-related complications and satisfaction with nursing were compared between the two groups of patients in a prospective study. Results: Patients in the observation group had reduced NPRS, SAS, SDS and PFS-R scores, total incidence of unplanned extubation of PICC and the total incidence of catheter-related complications, and a higher nursing satisfaction rate in comparison to those in the control group. Conclusion: Multidisciplinary cooperative continuous nursing combined with psychological nursing interventions can relieve pain in MM patients.

Keywords:

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

1. Cowan AJ, Green DJ, Kwok M et al. Diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma: a review. JAMA 327(5), 464–477 (2022).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
2. Michels TC, Petersen KE. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Am. Fam. Physician 95(6), 373–383 (2017).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
3. Levin A, Hari P, Dhakal B. Novel biomarkers in multiple myeloma. Transl. Res. 201, 49–59 (2018).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
4. Rodriguez-Otero P, Paiva B, San-Miguel JF. Roadmap to cure multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat. Rev. 100, 102284 (2021).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
5. McAuliffe E, O'Shea S, Khan MI. PO-02 – Retrospective audit of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) associated thrombosis in patients with haematological malignancies at Cork University Hospital. Thromb. Res. 140(Suppl. 1), S176 (2016). • Discusses the role of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
6. Duwadi S, Zhao Q, Budal BS. Peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients - complications and its prevention: a review. Int. J. Nurs. Sci. 6(1), 99–105 (2019). • Discusses the role of PICCs.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
7. Chopra V, Ratz D, Kuhn L et al. PICC-associated bloodstream infections: prevalence, patterns, and predictors. Am. J. Med. 127(4), 319–28 (2014). • Discusses the role of PICCs.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
8. Xu H, Yang W, Liu Y et al. Analysis of nursing effect and impact of narrative nursing model on anxiety of tumor patients with PICC under chemotherapy. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2021, 3698845 (2021). • Discusses the role of PICCs.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
9. Hu Y, Ling Y, Ye Y et al. Analysis of risk factors of PICC-related bloodstream infection in newborns: implications for nursing care. Eur. J. Med. Res. 26(1), 80 (2021). • Discusses the complications of PICCs.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
10. Lacostena-Perez ME, Buesa-Escar AM, Gil-Alos AM. Complications related to the insertion and maintenance of peripheral venous access central venous catheter. Enferm. Intensiva (Engl. Ed.) 30(3), 116–126 (2019). • Discusses the complications of PICCs.
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
11. Faiman B. Clinical updates and nursing considerations for patients with multiple myeloma. Clin. J. Oncol. Nurs. 11(6), 831–40 (2007).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
12. Epstein M, Morrison C. Practical guidance for new multiple myeloma treatment regimens: a nursing perspective. Semin. Oncol. 49(1), 103–117 (2022).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
13. Gong Y, Zhou J, Ding F. Investigating the demands for mobile internet-based home nursing services for the elderly. J. Investig. Med. 70(3), 844–852 (2022).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
14. Du J, Hou J. The guidelines for the diagnosis and management of multiple myeloma in China (2015 revision): interpretation of diagnosis. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 55(2), 91–2 (2016).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
15. Von Korff M, Jensen MP, Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine (Phila. PA 1976) 25(24), 3140–51 (2000).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
16. Zung WW. A rating instrument for anxiety disorders. Psychosomatics 12(6), 371–9 (1971).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
17. Zung WW, Richards CB, Short MJ. Self-rating depression scale in an outpatient clinic. Further validation of the SDS. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 13(6), 508–15 (1965).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
18. Piper BF, Dibble SL, Dodd MJ et al. The revised Piper Fatigue Scale: psychometric evaluation in women with breast cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 25(4), 677–84 (1998).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
19. Kearney BY, Fleischer BJ. Development of an instrument to measure exercise of self-care agency. Res. Nurs. Health 2(1), 25–34 (1979).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
20. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 85(5), 365–76 (1993).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
21. Minnie SA, Hill GR. Immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Invest. 130(4), 1565–1575 (2020).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
22. Caers J, Garderet L, Kortum KM et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when. Haematologica 103(11), 1772–1784 (2018).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
23. Qian H, Liu J, Xu C et al. Predisposing factors and effect of bundle nursing in PICC-related upper extremity deep venous thrombosis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy. Am. J. Transl. Res. 13(8), 9679–9686 (2021). •• Describes the functions of nursing.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
24. Health Quality O. Continuity of care to optimize chronic disease management in the community setting: an evidence-based analysis. Ont. Health Technol. Assess. Ser. 13(6), 1–41 (2013). •• Describes the functions of nursing.
Google Scholar
25. Bahr SJ, Weiss ME. Clarifying model for continuity of care: a concept analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 25(2), e12704 (2019). •• Describes the functions of nursing.
MedlineGoogle Scholar
26. Jackson C, Ball L. Continuity of care: vital, but how do we measure and promote it? Aust. J. Gen. Pract. 47(10), 662–664 (2018).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
27. Gulliford M, Naithani S, Morgan M. What is ‘continuity of care’? J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 11(4), 248–50 (2006).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
28. Comerford D, Shah R. Ambulatory approach to cancer care. Part 2: the role of nurses and the multidisciplinary team and safety. Br. J. Nurs. 28(4), S20–S26 (2019).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
29. Tariman JD, Estrella SM. The changing treatment paradigm in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: implications for nursing. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 32(6), E127–38 (2005).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
30. Jamal N, Young VN, Shapiro J et al. Patient safety/quality improvement primer, part IV: Psychological safety-drivers to outcomes and well-being. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 168(4), 881–888 (2023).
MedlineGoogle Scholar

Vol. 20, No. 8

Metrics

Downloaded 46 times

History

Received 31 August 2023

Accepted 19 February 2024

Published online 14 March 2024

Published in print March 2024

Information

Keywords

Financial disclosure

The authors have no financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Competing interests disclosure

The authors have no competing interests or relevant affiliations with any organization or entity with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, stock ownership or options and expert testimony.

Writing disclosure

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained institutional review board approval from the Ethic Committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang; approval number: 20201204). In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

PDF download