Cost–effectiveness analysis of nivolumab in the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Abstract
Background: To investigate the cost–effectiveness of nivolumab versus chemotherapy in the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Materials & methods: A Markov model reflecting the patients in the ATTRACTION-3 trial was established. Weibull survival model was employed to fit the Kaplan–Meier progression-free survival and overall survival probabilities of the nivolumab and chemotherapy strategy, respectively. Meanwhile, one-way and PSA were performed to test the uncertainty in the model. Results: Overall, the incremental effectiveness and cost of nivolumab versus chemotherapy were 0.107 quality-adjusted life-years and $14,627.90, resulting in an incremental cost–effectiveness ratio of $136,709.35/quality-adjusted life-year. Conclusion: Nivolumab is not a cost-effective treatment option compared with chemotherapy from the perspective of Chinese society.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
References
- 1. . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 68(6), 394–424 (2018).
- 2. Potential phytochemicals in the prevention and treatment of esophagus cancer: a green therapeutic approach. Pharmacol. Rep. 71(4), 644–652 (2019).
- 3. . Epidemiology of esophageal cancer. Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am. 38(1), 17–25 (2009).
- 4. . Oesophageal carcinoma. Lancet 381(9864), 400–412 (2013).
- 5. . Epidemiology of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Gastroenterology 154(2), 360–373 (2017).
- 6. . Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 24(Suppl. 6), vi51–56 (2013). • Current guidelines on the management of esophageal cancer.
- 7. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer; a JSMO – ESMO initiative endorsed by CSCO, KACO, MOS, SSO and TOS. Ann. Oncol. 29(1), 44–70 (2018). • Current guidelines on the management of esophageal cancer.
- 8. Esophageal cancer practice guidelines 2017 edited by the Japan esophageal society: part 2. Esophagus 16(1), 25–43 (2019). • Current guidelines on the management of esophageal cancer.
- 9. . The role of taxanes in the management of gastroesphageal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2(4), 240–249 (2011).
- 10. A Phase II study of paclitaxel by weekly 1-h infusion for advanced or recurrent esophageal cancer in patients who had previously received platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer Chemoth. Pharm. 67(6), 1265–1272 (2011).
- 11. A Phase II study of single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic esophageal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 15(6), 955–959 (2004).
- 12. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. New Engl. J. Med. 373(17), 123–135 (2015).
- 13. Nivolumab alone and nivolumab plus ipilimumab in recurrent small-cell lung cancer (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, Phase I/II trial. Lancet Oncol. 17(7), 883–895 (2016).
- 14. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. New Engl. J. Med. 369(2), 122 (2013).
- 15. . Nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma: latest evidence and clinical potential. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 9(3), 171 (2017).
- 16. Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 8(18), 30175–30189 (2017).
- 17. . PD-L1 is prognostic factor of human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its association with EGFR in radiation therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. 96(2), S29 (2016).
- 18. Nivolumab treatment for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma: an open-label, multicentre, Phase II trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(5), 631–639 (2017).
- 19. Nivolumab versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory or intolerant to previous chemotherapy (ATTRACTION-3): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, Phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 20(11), 1506–1517 (2019). •• This is the full publication of the ATTRACTION3 study.
- 20. . Development of WHO guidelines on generalized cost–effectiveness analysis. Health Econ. 9(3), 235–251 (2000). •• This is the guideline on how to establish a cost–effectiveness analysis.
- 21. . Costs of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: an economic evaluation in the Chinese context. Clin. Ther. 34(2), 468–479 (2012).
- 22. . Cost–effectiveness analysis of adjuvant chemotherapies in patients presenting with gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy. BMC Cancer 14(1), 984 (2014).
- 23. Cost–utility analysis of the newly recommended adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer patients in the 2011 Chinese national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) clinical practice guidelines in oncology: gastric cancer. Pharmacoeconomics 32(3), 235–243 (2014).
- 24. . Cost–effectiveness and budget impact analysis of apatinib for advanced metastatic gastric cancer from the perspective of health insurance system. Gastroent. Res. Pract. 2017(1), 1–7 (2017).
- 25. . Cost–effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab as first-line therapy in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. J. Immunother. Cancer 6(1), 124 (2018).
- 26. . Cost–effectiveness of gefitinib, icotinib, and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy as first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China. Oncotarget 8(6), 9996–10006 (2017).
- 27. . Cost–effectiveness of paclitaxel + ramucirumab combination therapy for advanced gastric cancer progressing after first-line chemotherapy in Japan. Clin. Ther. 39(12), 2380–2388 (2017).
- 28. Future and potential spending on health 2015–40: development assistance for health, and government, prepaid private, and out-of-pocket health spending in 184 countries. Lancet 389(10083), 2005–2030 (2017). • Describes the future and potential spending on healthcare worldwide.
- 29. National spending on health by source for 184 countries between 2013 and 2040. Lancet 387(10037), 2521–2535 (2016). • Describes the future and potential spending on healthcare worldwide.
- 30. Cost–effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic gastric and esophageal tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 36(Suppl. 4), 56–56 (2018).