Regorafenib in patients with refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study (RESOUND)
Abstract
Aim: Regorafenib may be active in different cancer types. This Phase II trial included patients with various refractory cancer types treated with regorafenib. Here, we report the results of the pancreatic adenocarcinoma cohort. Methods: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 8 weeks; further investigation of regorafenib would be warranted with a PFS rate ≥50%. Results: A total of 20 patients were enrolled. The best response was stable disease in four patients (20%). The 8-week PFS rate was 25% with a median PFS of 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.5–2.0). A total of 13 patients (65%) experienced grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusion: The study did not meet its primary end point. Further investigation of regorafenib monotherapy in this setting is not recommended.
Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02307500
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
References
- 1. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int. J. Cancer 136(5), E359–E386 (2015).
- 2. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(6), 2403–2413 (1997). • Provides first relevant insights on the management of advanced pancreatic cancer. Results on a randomized trial performed to assess the effectiveness of gemcitabine in patients with newly diagnosed advanced pancreas cancer have been reported.
- 3. Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E2297. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3270–3275 (2002).
- 4. Biweekly high-dose gemcitabine alone or in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized Phase II trial. Ann. Oncol. 14, 97–104 (2003).
- 5. Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 3776–3783 (2004).
- 6. A Phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Ann. Oncol. 16, 1639–1645 (2005).
- 7. Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD Phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3509–3516 (2005).
- 8. Randomized Phase III study of exatecan and gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 4441–4447 (2006).
- 9. Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 1960–1966 (2007).
- 10. Randomized Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 3946–3952 (2006).
- 11. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 1817–1825 (2011).
- 12. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1691–1703 (2013).
- 13. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, Phase III trial. Lancet 387, 545–557 (2016).
- 14. Second-line oxaliplatin, folinic acid, and fluorouracil versus folinic acid and fluorouracil alone for gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer: outcomes from the CONKO-003 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 2423–2429 (2014).
- 15. Pancreatic cancer growth is inhibited by blockade of VEGF-RII. Surgery 134, 772–782 (2003).
- 16. Concomitant over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Cancer 85, 27–34 (2000).
- 17. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an autocrine growth factor for VEGF receptor-positive human tumors. Blood 98, 1904–1913 (2001).
- 18. De novo expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic cancer: evidence for an autocrine mitogenic loop. Gastroenterology 119, 358–1372 (2000).
- 19. Inhibition of growth and metastasis of human pancreatic cancer growing in nude mice by PTK 787/ZK222584, an inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases. Cancer Biother. Radiopharm. 16, 359–370 (2001).
- 20. Enhanced expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human pancreatic cancer correlates with local disease progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 3, 1309–1316 (1997).
- 21. Phase III trial of bevacizumab in combination with gemcitabine and erlotinib in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2231–2237 (2009).
- 22. Bevacizumab combined with gemcitabine and capecitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase II study. Br. J. Cancer 100, 1842–1845 (2009).
- 23. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: Phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J. Clin. Oncol. 28, 3617–3622 (2010).
- 24. Axitinib plus gemcitabine versus placebo plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a double-blind randomised Phase III study. Lancet Oncol. 12, 256–262 (2011).
- 25. BAYPAN study: a double-blind Phase III randomized trial comparing gemcitabine plus sorafenib and gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann. Oncol. 23, 2799–2805 (2012).
- 26. A prospective randomized Phase II trial with gemcitabine versus gemcitabine plus sunitinib in advanced pancreatic cancer: a study of the CESAR Central European Society for Anticancer Drug Research-EWIV. Eur. J. Cancer 51, 27–36 (2015).
- 27. Sorafenib does not improve efficacy of chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer: a GISCAD randomized Phase II study. Dig. Liver Dis. 46, 182–186 (2014).
- 28. Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506): a new oral multikinase inhibitor of angiogenic, stromal and oncogenic receptor tyrosine kinases with potent preclinical antitumor activity. Int. J. Cancer 129(1), 245–255 (2011).
- 29. Regorafenib promotes antitumor immunity via inhibiting PDL-1 and IDO1 expression in melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res.
doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2840 (2019) (Epub ahead of print). - 30. Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial. Lancet 381, 303–312 (2013). •• Reports data on efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib in patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer, which are relevant for the marketing authorization of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer.
- 31. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial. Lancet 381, 295–302 (2013). •• Reports data on efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib in patients with gastrointestinal tumors, which are relevant for the marketing authorization of regorafenib in patients with gastrointestinal tumors.
- 32. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial. Lancet 389, 56–66 (2017). •• Reports data on efficacy and toxicity of regorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma used for marketing authorization of regorafenib in this setting.
- 33. Regorafenib compared with lomustine in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (REGOMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, Phase II trial. Lancet Oncol. 20(1), 110–119 (2019).
- 34. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in adult patients with metastatic osteosarcoma: a non-comparative, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II study. Lancet Oncol. 20(1), 120–133 (2019).
- 35. Regorafenib after failure of gemcitabine and platinum-based chemotherapy for locally advanced (nonresectable) and metastatic biliary tumors: a randomized double-blinded Phase II trial – the REACHIN trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 37(Suppl.4), 345 Abstract (2019).
- 36. Regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) or colorectal cancer (CRC): an open-label, dose-finding and dose-expansion Phase Ib trial (REGONIVO, EPOC1603). J. Clin. Oncol. 37(Suppl. 15), 2522–2522 (2019).
- 37. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1. 1). Eur. J. Cancer 45(2), 228–247 (2009).
- 38. A marginal anticancer effect of regorafenib on pancreatic carcinoma cells in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch. Pharmacol. 390(11), 1125–1134 (2017).
- 39. . In vitro elucidation of drug combination synergy in treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Anticancer Res. 38(4), 1967–1977 (2018).
- 40. Phase II study of regorafenib (Reg) in patients with previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). J. Clin. Oncol. 35(Suppl.), e15751 Abstract (2017).