Anti-PD-1 versus anti-PD-L1 therapy in patients with pretreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: At present three immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), two anti-PD-1 (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and one anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) can be used in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients. The aim of this meta-analysis is an indirect comparison between anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 inhibitors. Methods: Seven studies (>4000 patients) were considered. Results: Considering the overall survival ICIs showed very robust efficacy over docetaxel, while in terms of progression-free survival the therapy with ICIs is slightly favored. Anti-PD-1 gives a more significant benefit than anti-PD-L1; however, excluding the KEYNOTE 010 trial that enrolled only PD-L1-positive patients, the subgroup difference remains only in terms of progression-free survival. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms the superiority of ICIs over docetaxel in pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients and would indicate a slight benefit from anti-PD-1 than from anti-PD-L1 inhibitors, always keeping in mind the possible biases of this indirect comparison.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
References
- 1. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum based chemotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 18, 2095–2103 (2000).
- 2. PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 677–704 (2008).
- 3. . The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 252–264 (2012).
- 4. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous cell non small cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 123–135 (2015). •• Key study demonstrating a greater efficacy with the anti-PD-1 nivolumab compared with standard chemotherapy in pretreated squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
- 5. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non small cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 373, 1627–1639 (2015). •• Key study demonstrating a greater efficacy with the anti-PD-1 nivolumab compared with standard chemotherapy in pretreated nonsquamous NSCLC patients.
- 6. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated PD-L1 positive advanced non small cell lung cancer (KEINOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387, 1540–1550 (2016). •• Key study demonstrating a greater efficacy with the anti-PD-1 pembrolizumab compared with standard chemotherapy in pretreated NSCLC patients.
- 7. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non small cell lung cancer (OAK): a Phase 3, open-label, multicenter randomized controlled trial. Lancet 389, 255–265 (2017). •• Key study demonstrating a greater efficacy with the anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab compared with standard chemotherapy in pretreated NSCLC patients.
- 8. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer: two-year outcomes from two randomized, open-label, Phase III trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3924–3933 (2017).
- 9. Long-term survival in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in the KEYNOTE-010 study overall and in pts who completed 2 years of pembrolizumab (pembro). Ann. Oncol. 29 (Suppl. 8), LBA63 (2018).
- 10. Updated efficacy analysis including secondary population results for OAK: a randomized Phase III study of atezolizumab vs docetaxel in patients with previously treated advanced non small cell lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 13, 1156–1170 (2018).
- 11. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non small cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387, 1837–1846 (2016).
- 12. et al. Avelumab versus docetaxel in patients with platinum-treated advanced non small cell lung cancer (JAVELIN Lung 200): an open-label, randomized, Phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 19(11), 1468–1479 (2018).
- 13. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 6, e1000097 (2009).
- 14. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control. Clin. Trials 17, 1–12 (1996).
- 15. R Core Team. R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2017).
- 16. . Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36(3), 1–48 (2010).
- 17. . A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 14(4), 395–411 (1995).
- 18. . Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat. Med. 21(4), 589–624 (2002).
- 19. . Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Academic Press, CA, USA (1985).
- 20. . Analyzing effect sizes: random effects models. In: The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis (2nd Edition). Cooper H Hedges LV Valentine JC (Eds). Russel Sage Foundation, NY, USA, 295–315 (2009).
- 21. . Confidence intervals for the amount of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 26(1), 37–52 (2007).
- 22. . Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin. Trials 7(3), 177–188 (1986).
- 23. . The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10, 101–129 (1954).
- 24. . Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327, 557–560 (2003).
- 25. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in a predominantly Chinese patient population with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of the Phase 3 CheckMate 078 study. Cancer Res. 78(13 Suppl.) Abstract CT114 (2018). • Key study demonstrating a greater efficacy with the anti-PD-1 nivolumab compared with standard chemotherapy in an Asian population.
- 26. Metastatic non small cell lung cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 29(Suppl. 4), iv192–iv237 (2018).
- 27. Clinical and molecular characteristics associated with survival among patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors for advanced non small cell lung carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 4(2), 210–216 (2018).
- 28. A molecular and preclinical comparison of the PD-1 targeted T-cell checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Semin. Oncol. 44, 136–140 (2017).
- 29. Programmed death-1 ligand 1 interacts specifically with the B7-1 costimulatory molecule to inhibit T cell responses. Immunity 27, 111–122 (2007).
- 30. Interaction of human PD-L1 and B7-1. Mol. Immunol. 45, 3567–3572 (2008).
- 31. The novel costimulatory programmed death ligand 1/B7.1 pathway is functional in inhibiting alloimmune responses in vivo . J. Immunol. 187, 1113–1119 (2011).
- 32. A network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 with anti-PD-L1 in non small cell lung cancer. J. Cancer 9, 1200–1206 (2018).
- 33. Looking for the best immune-checkpoint inhibitor in pre-treated NSCLC patients: an indirect comparison between nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab. Int. J. Cancer 142, 1277–1284 (2018).
- 34. Comparison of the toxicity profile of PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors in non small cell lung cancer: a systematic analysis of the literature. Cancer 124, 271–277 (2018).
- 35. Incidence of pneumonitis with use of programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 152, 271–281 (2017).