Diagnostic performances and therapeutic impact of the Unyvero Implant and Tissue Infection multiplex PCR in periprosthetic joint infections

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1. Beam E, Osmon D. Prosthetic joint infection update. Infect. Dis. Clin. North Am. 32(4), 843–859 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 2. Kurtz SM, Lau E, Watson H et al. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States. J. Arthroplasty 27(8), 61–65.e1 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3. Grammatico-Guillon L, Baron S, Gettner S et al. Bone and joint infections in hospitalized patients in France, 2008: clinical and economic outcomes. J. Hosp. Infect. 82(1), 40–48 (2012). • Description of the economical burden of bone and joint infections in France.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4. Atkins BL, Athanasou N, Deeks JJ et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36(10), 2932–2939 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5. Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 27(2), 302–345 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6. Kandel CE, Jenkinson R, Daneman N et al. Predictors of treatment failure for hip and knee prosthetic joint infections in the setting of 1- and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty: a multicenter retrospective cohort. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 6(11), ofz452 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7. Senneville E, Joulie D, Legout L et al. Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in total hip/knee prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 53(4), 334–340 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial Resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) – Annual Epidemiological Report 2019. ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden (2020).
  Google Scholar
• 9. WHO. Antimicrobial Resistance: Global Report on Surveillance 2014. WHO, Geneva,Switzerland. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/112642 (2014)
  Google Scholar
• 10. Li Z, Yu A. Diagnostic value of a PCR-based technique for prosthetic joint infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52(6), 2281–2282 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 11. Qu X, Zhai Z, Li H et al. PCR-based diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51(8), 2742–2746 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12. Bémer P, Plouzeau C, Tande D et al. Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 52(10), 3583–3589 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13. Marin M, Garcia-Lechuz JM, Alonso P et al. Role of universal 16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50(3), 583–589 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14. Metso L, Mäki M, Tissari P et al. Efficacy of a novel PCR- and microarray-based method in diagnosis of a prosthetic joint infection. Acta Orthop. 85(2), 165–170 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 15. Pasticci MB, Bozza S, De Socio GV et al. Improving the etiological diagnosis of osteoarticular infections with the commercial multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction SeptiFast^®. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 97(1), 115002 (2020). • Evaluation of another multiplex PCR in bone and joint infection.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16. Borde JP, Häcker GA, Guschl S et al. Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections using UMD-Universal Kit and the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI^® cartridge system: a pilot study. Infection 43(5), 551–560 (2015). • First pilot study on Unyvero Implant and Tissue Infection (ITI) performances in prosthetic joint infections.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17. Prieto-Borja L, Rodriguez-Sevilla G, Auñon A et al. Evaluation of a commercial multiplex PCR (Unyvero i60^®) designed for the diagnosis of bone and joint infections using prosthetic-joint sonication. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 35(4), 236–242 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18. Malandain D, Bémer P, Leroy AG et al. Assessment of the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI^® cartridge system to diagnose prosthetic joint infection: a multicentre study. Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 24(1), 83.e1–83.e6 (2018). •• The largest study evaluating the Unyvero ITI performances, with 440 samples included. Comparison with culture and 16S rRNA PCR.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19. Morgenstern C, Cabric S, Perka C et al. Synovial fluid multiplex PCR is superior to culture for detection of low-virulent pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infection. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 90(2), 115–119 (2018). • Interesting study on the performances of the Unyvero ITI system, highlighting the difficulties in interpreting low-virulent pathogens detection.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20. Lausmann C, Kolle KN, Citak M et al. How reliable is the next generation of multiplex-PCR for diagnosing prosthetic joint infection compared to the MSIS criteria? Still missing the ideal test. Hip Int. 30(Suppl. 1), 72–77 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 21. Renz N, Feihl S, Cabric S et al. Performance of automated multiplex PCR using sonication fluid for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a prospective cohort. Infection 45(6), 877–884 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22. Hischebeth GTR, Randau TM, Buhr JK et al. Unyvero i60 Implant and Tissue Infection (ITI) multiplex PCR system in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. J. Microbiol. Meth. 121, 27–32 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23. Villa F, Toscano M, De Vecchi E et al. Reliability of a multiplex PCR system for diagnosis of early and late prosthetic joint infections before and after broth enrichment. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 307(6), 363–370 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24. Lafeuille E, Jauréguiberry S, Devriese F et al. First evaluation of the automated-multiplex-PCR Unyvero ITI G2 cartridge for rapid diagnosis of osteo-articular infections. Infect. Dis. Now 51(2), 179–186 (2021). • An interesting evaluation of the second version of the Unyvero ITI system. Evaluation of the performances on polymicrobial samples.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25. Sigmund IK, Windhager R, Sevelda F et al. Multiplex PCR Unyvero i60 ITI application improves detection of low-virulent microorganisms in periprosthetic joint infections. Int.Orthop. 43(8), 1891–1898 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26. Zannoli S, Sambri A, Morotti M et al. Unyvero ITI^® system for the clinical resolution of discrepancies in periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis. Musculoskelet. Surg. 105(1), 39–42 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. Lüdemann M, Sulastyanto S, Raab P et al. Periprosthetic joint infection: comparison of automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI cartridge system with bacterial culture and real-time PCR. Technol. Health Care 30(4), 1005–1015 (2022).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Gauduchon V, Chalabreysse L, Etienne J et al. Molecular diagnosis of infective endocarditis by PCR amplification and direct sequencing of DNA from valve tissue. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41(2), 763–766 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29. Lausmann C, Zahar A, Citak M et al. Are there benefits in early diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with multiplex polymerase chain reaction? J. Bone Jt Infect. 2(4), 175–183 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30. Suda AJ, Tinelli M, Beisemann ND et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection using alpha-defensin test or multiplex-PCR: ideal diagnostic test still not found. Int. Orthop. 41(7), 1307–1313 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31. Suren C, Feihl S, Cabric S et al. Improved pre-operative diagnostic accuracy for low-grade prosthetic joint infections using second-generation multiplex polymerase chain reaction on joint fluid aspirate. Int. Orthop. 44(9), 1629–1637 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32. Jacobs AME, Heesterbeek PJC, Bovendeert FAT et al. Ruling out underlying infection in 200 presumed aseptic knee and hip revision arthroplasties using a multiplex PCR system. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 40(6), 1283–1290 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33. Aamot HV, Johnsen BO, Skråmm I. Rapid diagnostics of orthopedic implant-associated infections using Unyvero ITI Implant and Tissue Infection application is not optimal for Staphylococcus species identification. BMC Res. Notes 12(1), 725 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34. Titécat M, Wallet F, Robineau O et al. Focus on MRSA/SA SSTI assay failure in prosthetic joint infections: 213 consecutive patients later. J. Clin. Microbiol. 55(2), 635–637 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35. Melendez DP, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Berbari EF et al. Evaluation of a genus- and group-specific rapid PCR assay panel on synovial fluid for diagnosis of prosthetic knee infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54(1), 120–126 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36. Monteix A, Dupieux-Chabert C, Abad L et al. Preliminary evaluation of the development version of FilmArray BJI panel: a fast way for the detection of bacteria and fungi in bone and joint infections. Poster presented at: 27th ECCMID (European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases). Vienna, Austria, 22–25 Apr 2017 (Poster no. EV0257).
  Google Scholar
• 37. Torres C, Oyagüez I, Prieto L et al. Costs analysis of PCR Unyvero™ i60-ITI technique for detecting microorganisms in patients with suspected chronic infection at musculoskeletal implants. Value Health 18(7), A351 (2015).
  Google Scholar