Biosurfactants of Lactobacillus helveticus for biodiversity inhibit the biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus and cell invasion

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1. Maeda T, Yoshimura T, Garcia-Contreras R, Ogawa HI. Purification and characterization of a serine protease secreted by Brevibacillus sp. KH3 for reducing waste activated sludge and biofilm formation. Bioresour. Technol. 102(22), 10,650–10,656 (2011). • The development of biofilm resistant strains and the development of alternative therapeutic agents.
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 2. Laverty G, Gorman SP, Gilmore BF. Biomolecular mechanisms of staphylococcal biofilm formation. Future Microbiol. 8(4), 509–524 (2013).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 3. Girard LP, Ceri H, Gibb AP, Olson M, Sepandj F. MIC versus MBEC to determine the antibiotic sensitivity of Staphylococcus aureus in peritoneal dialysis peritonitis. Perit. Dial. Int. 30(6), 652–656 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4. Howlin RP, Brayford MJ, Webb JS, Cooper JJ, Aiken SS, Stoodley P. Antibiotic-loaded synthetic calcium sulfate beads for prevention of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation in periprosthetic infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59(1), 111–120 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5. Cao Z, Wang P, Gao X, Shao B, Zhao S, Li Y. Lycopene attenuates aluminum-induced hippocampal lesions by inhibiting oxidative stress-mediated inflammation and apoptosis in the rat. J. Inorg. Biochem. 193, 143–151 (2019).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6. Freitas AI, Lopes N, Oliveira F et al. Comparative analysis between biofilm formation and gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Future Microbiol. 13, 415–427 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 7. Kiran GS, Priyadharsini S, Sajayan A, Priyadharsini GB, Poulose N, Selvin J. Production of lipopeptide biosurfactant by a marine Nesterenkonia sp. and its application in food industry. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1138 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. Coronel-Leon J, Marques AM, Bastida J, Manresa A. Optimizing the production of the biosurfactant lichenysin and its application in biofilm control. J. Appl. Microbiol. 120(1), 99–111 (2016).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9. Elshikh M, Funston S, Chebbi A, Ahmed S, Marchant R, Banat IM. Rhamnolipids from non-pathogenic Burkholderia thailandensis E264: physicochemical characterization, antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy against oral hygiene related pathogens. N. Biotechnol. 36, 26–36 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10. Carpino S, Randazzo CL, Pino A et al. Influence of PDO Ragusano cheese biofilm microbiota on flavour compounds formation. Food Microbiol. 61, 126–135 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11. Rich JO, Leathers TD, Bischoff KM, Anderson AM, Nunnally MS. Biofilm formation and ethanol inhibition by bacterial contaminants of biofuel fermentation. Bioresour. Technol. 196, 347–354 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12. Saran S, Mukherjee S, Dalal J, Saxena RK. High production of erythritol from Candida sorbosivorans SSE-24 and its inhibitory effect on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Bioresour. Technol. 198, 31–38 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13. Zhu B, Macleod LC, Kitten T, Xu P. Streptococcus sanguinis biofilm formation & interaction with oral pathogens. Future Microbiol. 13, 915–932 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 14. Rodrigues L, Van Der Mei H, Teixeira JA, Oliveira R. Biosurfactant from Lactococcus lactis 53 inhibits microbial adhesion on silicone rubber. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 66(3), 306–311 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15. Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J, Oliveira R. Strategies for the prevention of microbial biofilm formation on silicone rubber voice prostheses. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 81(2), 358–370 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16. Josse J, Laurent F, Diot A. Staphylococcal adhesion and host cell invasion: fibronectin-binding and other mechanisms. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2433 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17. Walencka E, Rozalska S, Sadowska B, Rozalska B. The influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus-derived surfactants on staphylococcal adhesion and biofilm formation. Folia Microbiol. (Praha) 53(1), 61–66 (2008). • Shows the function of surfactants produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus inhibited the biofilm formation, but not sure about the difference in the same strains.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18. Wiegand S, Dietrich S, Hertel R et al. RNA-Seq of Bacillus licheniformis: active regulatory RNA features expressed within a productive fermentation. BMC Genomics 14, 667 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19. Luis A, Silva F, Sousa S, Duarte AP, Domingues F. Antistaphylococcal and biofilm inhibitory activities of gallic, caffeic, and chlorogenic acids. Biofouling 30(1), 69–79 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20. Xue T, Zhao L, Sun B. LuxS/AI-2 system is involved in antibiotic susceptibility and autolysis in Staphylococcus aureus NCTC 8325. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 41(1), 85–89 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21. Yu D, Zhao L, Xue T, Sun B. Staphylococcus aureus autoinducer-2 quorum sensing decreases biofilm formation in an icaR-dependent manner. BMC Microbiol. 12, 288 (2012). • he anti-adhesive properties of L. acidophilus biosurfactant was used against microorganisms, through the LuxS/AI-2 single sensing decreases biofilm formation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22. Zhang H, Zhou W, Zhang W et al. Inhibitory effects of citral, cinnamaldehyde, and tea polyphenols on mixed biofilm formation by food-borne Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis. J. Food Prot. 77(6), 927–933 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23. Arocho A, Chen B, Ladanyi M, Pan Q. Validation of the 2-DeltaDeltaCt calculation as an alternate method of data analysis for quantitative PCR of BCR-ABL P210 transcripts. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 15(1), 56–61 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24. Yan X, Gu S, Cui X et al. Antimicrobial, anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm potential of biosurfactants isolated from Pediococcus acidilactici and Lactobacillus plantarum against Staphylococcus aureus CMCC26003. Microb. Pathog. 127, 12–20 (2019). • Purifies some microbes against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm-related infections.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25. Lee JH, Park JH, Cho HS, Joo SW, Cho MH, Lee J. Anti-biofilm activities of quercetin and tannic acid against Staphylococcus aureus. Biofouling 29(5), 491–499 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26. Reddinger RM, Luke-Marshall NR, Hakansson AP, Campagnari AA. Host physiologic changes induced by influenza A virus lead to Staphylococcus aureus biofilm dispersion and transition from asymptomatic colonization to invasive disease. MBio 7(4), e01235-16 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. Reddinger RM, Luke-Marshall NR, Sauberan SL, Hakansson AP, Campagnari AA. Streptococcus pneumoniae modulates Staphylococcus aureus biofilm dispersion and the transition from colonization to invasive disease. MBio 9(1), e02089-17 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Prabhakara R, Harro JM, Leid JG, Harris M, Shirtliff ME. Murine immune response to a chronic Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection. Infect. Immun. 79(4), 1789–1796 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29. Prabhakara R, Harro JM, Leid JG, Keegan AD, Prior ML, Shirtliff ME. Suppression of the inflammatory immune response prevents the development of chronic biofilm infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 79(12), 5010–5018 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30. Shokouhfard M, Kermanshahi RK, Shahandashti RV, Feizabadi MM, Teimourian S. The inhibitory effect of a Lactobacillus acidophilus derived biosurfactant on biofilm producer Serratia marcescens. Iran J. Basic Med. Sci. 18(10), 1001–1007 (2015). • Uses the anti-adhesive properties of L. acidophilus biosurfactant against microorganisms responsible for infections.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31. Tahmourespour A, Salehi R, Kasra Kermanshahi R. Lactobacillus Acidophilus-derived biosurfactant effect on GTFB and GTFC expression level in Streptococcus Mutans biofilm cells. Braz. J. Microbiol. 42(1), 330–339 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32. Ciandrini E, Campana R, Casettari L et al. Characterization of biosurfactants produced by Lactobacillus spp. and their activity against oral streptococci biofilm. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 100(15), 6767–6777 (2016). •• Study on the biosurfactants against oral streptococci biofilm infection.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33. Gudina EJ, Rocha V, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR. Antimicrobial and antiadhesive properties of a biosurfactant isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei A20. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 50(4), 419–424 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34. Madhu AN, Prapulla SG. Evaluation and functional characterization of a biosurfactant produced by Lactobacillus plantarum CFR 2194. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 172(4), 1777–1789 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35. Lorena Rodríguez-López MR-F, Xanel Vecino, José Manuel Cruz, Ana Belén Moldes. Biological surfactants vs polysorbates: comparison of their emulsifier and surfactant properties. Tenside Surfact. Det. 55(4), 273–280 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 36. Wen ZT, Liao S, Bitoun JP et al. Streptococcus mutans displays altered stress responses while enhancing biofilm formation by Lactobacillus casei in mixed-species consortium. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 7, 524 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 37. Ma R, Qiu S, Jiang Q et al. AI-2 quorum sensing negatively regulates rbf expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 307(4-5), 257–267 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38. Bao Y, Li Y, Jiang Q et al. Methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase (Pfs) of Staphylococcus aureus is essential for the virulence independent of LuxS/AI-2 system. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303(4), 190–200 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39. Doherty N, Holden MT, Qazi SN, Williams P, Winzer K. Functional analysis of luxS in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a role in metabolism but not quorum sensing. J. Bacteriol. 188(8), 2885–2897 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40. Reis RS, Pereira AG, Neves BC, Freire DM. Gene regulation of rhamnolipid production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa–a review. Bioresour. Technol. 102(11), 6377–6384 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41. Das ND, Jung KH, Chai YG. The role of NF-kappaB and H3K27me3 demethylase, Jmjd3, on the anthrax lethal toxin tolerance of RAW 264.7 cells. PLoS ONE 5(3), e9913 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42. Peschel A, Otto M, Jack RW, Kalbacher H, Jung G, Gotz F. Inactivation of the dlt operon in Staphylococcus aureus confers sensitivity to defensins, protegrins, and other antimicrobial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 274(13), 8405–8410 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43. Harapanahalli AK, Chen Y, Li J, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC. Influence of adhesion force on icaA and cidA gene expression and production of matrix components in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81(10), 3369–3378 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44. Reyes D, Andrey DO, Monod A, Kelley WL, Zhang G, Cheung AL. Coordinated regulation by AgrA, SarA, and SarR to control agr expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 193(21), 6020–6031 (2011). • Uses biofilm-relative genes to study with the biosurfactants.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45. Rice KC, Mann EE, Endres JL et al. The cidA murein hydrolase regulator contributes to DNA release and biofilm development in Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104(19), 8113–8118 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46. Foster TJ, Geoghegan JA, Ganesh VK, Hook M. Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12(1), 49–62 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47. Moormeier DE, Bayles KW. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm: a complex developmental organism. Mol. Microbiol. 104(3), 365–376 (2017).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48. Xu F, Ji Q, Zhang J, Huang W, Cao Z, Li Y. AlCl3 inhibits LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1beta production through suppressing NF-kappaB signaling pathway in murine peritoneal macrophages. Chemosphere 209, 972–980 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49. Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 13(1), 16–34 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50. Song L, Hobaugh MR, Shustak C, Cheley S, Bayley H, Gouaux JE. Structure of staphylococcal alpha-hemolysin, a heptameric transmembrane pore. Science 274(5294), 1859–1866 (1996).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51. Caiazza NC, O'toole GA. Alpha-toxin is required for biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 185(10), 3214–3217 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52. Cho HS, Lee JH, Cho MH, Lee J. Red wines and flavonoids diminish Staphylococcus aureus virulence with anti-biofilm and anti-hemolytic activities. Biofouling 31(1), 1–11 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53. Lee K, Lee JH, Ryu SY, Cho MH, Lee J. Stilbenes reduce Staphylococcus aureus hemolysis, biofilm formation, and virulence. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 11(9), 710–717 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54. Lee JH, Kim YG, Lee K, Kim SC, Lee J. Temperature-dependent control of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and virulence by thermoresponsive oligo(N-vinylcaprolactam). Biotechnol. Bioeng. 112(4), 716–724 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55. Vecino X, Rodriguez-Lopez L, Ferreira D, Cruz JM, Moldes AB, Rodrigues LR. Bioactivity of glycolipopeptide cell-bound biosurfactants against skin pathogens. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 109, 971–979 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56. Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J, Oliveira R. Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 57(4), 609–618 (2006). •• Reviews the importance of biosurfactants in the medicine, especially the research of probiotic inhibition of the biofilm.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar