We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Plain Language Summary of PublicationOpen Accesscc iconby iconnc iconnd icon

Plain language summary of the EMPEROR-Preserved study looking at the effect of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with and without diabetes

    Javed Butler

    Baylor Scott & White Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA

    Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi School of Medicine, Jackson, MS, USA

    &
    Gerasimos Filippatos

    National & Kapodistrian University of Athens School of Medicine, Athens University Hospital Attikon, Greece

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/fca-2023-0080

    Abstract

    What is this study about?

    The EMPEROR-Preserved study looked at the effects of empagliflozin in participants with heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This is when the lower left part of the heart (left ventricle) squeezes normally or near normally but does not fill with enough blood between heartbeats. Therefore, not enough blood is pumped around the body. For this study, HFpEF was defined as a condition in which more than 40% of blood in the left ventricle was pumped around the body.

    When researchers started the EMPEROR-Preserved study, there was no treatment for HFpEF. Also, researchers did not know if empagliflozin was more or less effective in people with and without diabetes, a condition where there are high levels of sugar (glucose) in the blood. This study included participants with HFpEF with and without diabetes to see if empagliflozin had a positive effect on the heart compared with a placebo (a pill that looked like empagliflozin but did not contain any active medication). Nearly 50% of participants had diabetes.

    The researchers looked at:

    • How many people needed to be hospitalized for heart failure (HF) or died from conditions that affect the heart and blood vessels (cardiovascular disease)

    • If peoples' kidneys worked less over time (the decline in kidney function)

    • The side effects of empagliflozin

    What were the study results?

    Empagliflozin reduced the risk of either being hospitalized for HF or dying from cardiovascular disease. The decrease in this risk was due to fewer hospitalizations for HF. This was true regardless of whether or not participants had diabetes. Empagliflozin also slowed the decline in kidney function, regardless of whether the participant had diabetes, but the effect was larger in participants with diabetes. There were no differences in side effects in participants taking empagliflozin or placebo, and the results were similar regardless of whether or not participants had diabetes.

    What do these study results mean?

    The results showed that treatment with empagliflozin reduced the risk of hospitalization for HF and there were no major side effects in participants with HFpEF, regardless of whether or not they had diabetes.

    This is an abstract of the Plain Language Summary of Publication article.

    To read the full Plain Language Summary of this article, click here to view the PDF.

    Link to original article here

    Acknowledgments

    The authors and the study sponsors thank all the people who participated in the study.

    Financial & competing interests disclosure

    Javed Butler: consulting fees from 3live, Abbott, American Regent, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardior, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Element Science, Eli Lilly and Company, Imbria, Impulse Dynamics, Innolife, Inventiva, Janssen, Lexicon, LivaNova, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Occlutech, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, PharmaIN, Roche, Sequana Medical, SQ Innovation, Vifor. Gerasimos Filippatos: lecture fees and/or committee member contributions in clinical trials sponsored by Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Impulse Dynamics, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier, Vifor; research support from the European Union.

    Writing disclosure

    Writing support was provided by Nikita Vekaria, PhD of Elevate Scientific Solutions, which was contracted and compensated by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. (BIPI) and Lilly USA, LLC. BIPI and Lilly were given the opportunity to review the poster for medical and scientific accuracy as well as intellectual property considerations.

    Open access

    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/