We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Novel immunologic adjuvants

    Rino Rappuoli

    Rino Rappuoli is Global Head of Vaccines Research at Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics and is based in Siena, Italy. He earned his PhD in Biological Sciences at the University of Siena and has served as visiting scientist at Rockefeller University and Harvard Medical School. He was elected member of the US National Academy of Sciences and the European Molecular Biology Organization. Awards conferred include: Paul Ehrlich and Ludwig Darmstaedter Prize (1991), the Gold Medal by the Italian President (2005), the Albert B Sabin Gold Medal (2009), the Lifetime Achievement Award from the Institute of Human Virology in Maryland (2010), and the Excellence Award from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (2011). He has introduced several novel scientific concepts (genetic detoxification [1987], cellular microbiology [1996], reverse vaccinology [2000] and the pangenome [2005]).

    &
    Ennio De Gregorio

    Ennio De Gregorio is Head of Novartis Vaccine Research in Siena, Italy, where he also leads the Immunology Function. Prior to this position, he was project leader of two research programs at Novartis Vaccines. Between 2000 and 2003 he worked on the innate immune response as a post-doctoral fellow of the Human Frontier Science Program at the CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France. Between 1996 and 2000, he performed his PhD work at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) Gene Expression Program in Heidelberg, Germany. De Gregorio received his degree on Molecular Biology from the University of Rome, Italy in 1994.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/ebo.11.41

    After a century when aluminium salts have been the only vaccine adjuvants approved for human use, the field of adjuvants has become one of the fastest growing disciplines in immunology and vaccine development. The scope of this book is to review the state-of-the-art of development of novel adjuvants and the science that supports them.

    Immunological adjuvants are substances that are added to vaccine formulations to increase their efficacy. Adjuvants can increase the magnitude and duration of the immune response induced by vaccination and allow for antigen sparing. In addition, adjuvants can modulate the quality of the adaptive immunity favoring protective cellular and humoral responses, such as viral neutralization, bacterial opsonization and killing of infected cells. Finally, adjuvants can increase the breadth of protection of vaccines directed against pathogens, such as influenza, that are characterized by antigen variability or that circulate in different strains or clades.

    There is an increasing need of novel adjuvants for preventive vaccines targeting infectious diseases for which conventional formulations have failed. New adjuvants are also needed to improve existing vaccines in the elderly, infants and chronically infected subjects that mount a suboptimal immune response. In addition, adjuvants could be very useful for the development of effective therapeutic vaccines against chronic infections and cancer. This book gives an overview of vaccine adjuvants with a special focus on their composition and mechanism of action.

    The rationales for including adjuvants in subunit vaccine formulations are described by Schijns and Lavelle in Chapter 1. The authors highlight the ability of adjuvants to dictate the quality of the immune response to the coadministered antigen and propose that different vaccines may require a diverse adjuvant depending on the correlate of protection.

    Despite the strong impact of adjuvants on vaccine efficacy, only few adjuvanted vaccines are licensed for human use. The first adjuvant to be licensed worldwide is alum, which has been used in several pediatric vaccine formulations for the last 70 years. In Chapter 2, Mutwiri and coworkers describe alum composition and mechanism of action. Several decades after the introduction of alum, other particulate adjuvants, called virosomes and oil-in-water emulsions, have been licensed in Europe to increase the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines. These adjuvants are described in great detail in Chapters 3 and 4. Special attention was dedicated to the squalene-based oil-in-water emulsions (MF59, AS03 and AF03) that were largely used to improve the efficacy of the vaccines against the recent H1N1 pandemic influenza outbreak and that are also licenses for the avian H5N1 prepandemic vaccines. In the last few years, the knowledge of the human innate immune system has rapidly progressed leading to the identification of a novel class of receptors called Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are validated targets for the development of new immunomodulators. The TLR4 agonist monophosphoryl lipid A adsorbed to alum has been recently licensed for a human papillomavirus vaccine in Europe and USA (Chapters 2 and 6). Although no other TLR agonist has been licensed as human vaccine adjuvant, many have been extensively studied in preclinical and clinical studies, among them the TLR9 agonist CpG oligonucleotides (Chapter 9) and small molecules of the imidazoquinoline class targeting TLR7 and 8 (Chapter 7). The CD8 T cell cytotoxic response has been traditionally associated to protection against intracellular pathogens and cancer. However, subunit vaccines generally induce very poor CD8 responses. Ragupathi and coworkers in Chapter 5 describe the structure and the clinical applications in cancer vaccine trials of an adjuvant of the saponin class called QS21, which is able to induce CD8 responses when formulated with subunit vaccines. In the last chapter of this book Schijns and Lavelle describe the future trends in adjuvant discovery. Interestingly, they suggest that in the future TLR agonists or novel immunepotentiators targeting alternative receptors (e.g., C-type lectins, Rig-I and Nod-like receptors) may be combined with novel synthetic antigen delivery systems, such as biodegradable nanoparticles. These novel formulations would allow for co-delivery of antigen and immunopotentiator to the same antigen-presenting cell, greatly enhancing the final adjuvant effect.

    Pharmaceutical ResearchIs There an Optimal Formulation and Delivery Strategy for Subunit Vaccines?
      2016Sep15 July 201633920782097