We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Micafungin sodium, the second of the echinocandin class of antifungals: theory and practice

    Jörg J Vehreschild

    † Author for correspondence

    Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Klinisches Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Köln, Germany.

    &
    Oliver A Cornely

    Klinikum der Universität zu Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin, Klinisches Studienzentrum Infektiologie II, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937 Köln, Germany.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/17460913.1.2.161

    Micafungin is a new drug in the echinocandin class and is currently being investigated in Phase III clinical trials. Like other echinocandins, it inhibits 1,3-β-D-glucan synthesis, thus achieving fungicidal activity against virtually all Candida spp., including those resistant to fluconazole, and fungistatic activity against Aspergillus spp. Micafungin sodium is available for intravenous administration only. It has a favorable safety and drug–drug interaction profile. Micafungin has been approved by the US FDA for treatment of esophageal candidiasis and for antifungal prophylaxis during the pre-engraftment phase in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Considering the competitive pricing as well as the good tolerability and efficacy, at present micafungin seems to be another choice for both of these indications. Current research has proven micafungin sodium to add a rational and effective option to the antifungal armamentarium, especially in esophageal candidiasis refractory to fluconazole treatment, in those intolerant to triazoles or in patients needing concomitant therapy interacting with triazoles. In addition to the current indications, recent uncontrolled clinical trials have demonstrated a marked success in the treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis. Results from in vitro studies, animal models, small clinical trials, as well as the obvious comparison with the more established caspofungin, hint at possible future indications such as invasive aspergillosis and empirical antifungal therapy. However, preclinical data on micafungin is inconsistent and published well-designed clinical studies are scarce. More controlled and sufficiently scaled trials are imperative in order to establish micafungin as a reliable and safe option in clinical practice.

    Bibliography

    • Nucci M, Anaissie E: Revisiting the source of candidemia: skin or gut? Clin. Infect. Dis.33(12),S1959–S1967 (2001).
    • Barrett D: From natural products to clinically useful antifungals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1587(2–3),S224–S233 (2002).
    • Mycamine (micafungin sodium) For Injection. Fujisawa (2005).
    • Angiolella L, Maras B, Stringaro AR et al.: Glucan-associated protein modulations and ultrastructural changes of the cell wall in Candida albicans treated with micafungin, a water-soluble, lipopeptide antimycotic. J. Chemother.17(4),S409–S416 (2005).
    • Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H: Morphological changes of Candida albicans induced by micafungin (FK463), a water-soluble echinocandin-like lipopeptide. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo)51(4),S247–S255 (2002).
    • Borg-von Zepelin M, Zaschke K, Gross U, Monod M, Muller FM: Effect of micafungin (FK463) on Candida albicans adherence to epithelial cells. Chemotherapy48(3),S148–S153 (2002).
    • Calderone R, Suzuki S, Cannon R et al.: Candida albicans: adherence, signaling and virulence. Med. Mycol.38(Suppl. 1),S125–S137 (2000).
    • Ernst EJ, Roling EE, Petzold CR, Keele DJ, Klepser ME: In vitro activity of micafungin (FK-463) against Candida spp.: microdilution, time-kill, and postantifungal-effect studies. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46(12),S3846–S3853 (2002).
    • Mikamo H, Sato Y, Tamaya T: In vitro antifungal activity of FK463, a new water-soluble echinocandin-like lipopeptide. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.46(3),S485–S487 (2000).
    • 10  Tawara S, Ikeda F, Maki K et al.: In vitro activities of a new lipopeptide antifungal agent FK463, against a variety of clinically important fungi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44(1),S57–S62 (2000).
    • 11  Uchida K, Nishiyama Y, Yokota N, Yamaguchi H: In vitro antifungal activity of a novel lipopeptide antifungal agent FK463, against various fungal pathogens. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo)53(10),S1175–S1181 (2000).
    • 12  Takakura S, Fujihara N, Saito T et al.: National surveillance of species distribution in blood isolates of Candida species in Japan and their susceptibility to six antifungal agents including voriconazole and micafungin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.53(2),S283–S289 (2004).
    • 13  Heyn K, Tredup A, Salvenmoser S, Muller FM: Effect of voriconazole combined with micafungin against CandidaAspergillus, and Scedosporium spp. and Fusarium solani. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(12),S5157–S5159 (2005).
    • 14  Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Rex JH, Pappas PG et al.: Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(10),S3149–S3154 (2003).
    • 15  Messer SA, Diekema DJ, Boyken L et al.: Activities of micafungin against 315 invasive clinical isolates of fluconazole-resistant Candida spp. J. Clin. Microbiol.44(2),S324–S326 (2006).
    • 16  Nakai T, Hatano K, Ikeda F, Shibuya K: Electron microscopic findings for micafungin-treated experimental pulmonary aspergillosis in mice. Med. Mycol.43(5),S439–S445 (2005).
    • 17  Nishiyama Y, Hasumi Y, Ueda K, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H: Effects of micafungin on the morphology of Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo)54(1),S67–S77 (2005).
    • 18  Watabe E, Nakai T, Matsumoto S, Ikeda F, Hatano K: Killing activity of micafungin against Aspergillus fumigatus hyphae assessed by specific fluorescent staining for cell viability. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(6),S1995–S1998 (2003).
    • 19  Nakai T, Uno J, Ikeda F et al.: In vitro antifungal activity of micafungin (FK463) against dimorphic fungi: comparison of yeast-like and mycelial forms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47(4),S1376–S1381 (2003).
    • 20  Choi JH, Brummer E, Stevens DA: Combined action of micafungin, a new echinocandin, and human phagocytes for antifungal activity against Aspergillus fumigatus. Microbes Infect.6(4),S383–S389 (2004).
    • 21  Gil-Lamaignere C, Salvenmoser S, Hess R, Muller FM: Micafungin enhances neutrophil fungicidal functions against Candida pseudohyphae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.48(7),S2730–S2732 (2004).
    • 22  Chandrasekar PH, Cutright JL, Manavathu EK: Efficacy of voriconazole plus amphotericin B or micafungin in a guinea-pig model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(10),S925–S928 (2004).
    • 23  Petraitis V, Petraitiene R, Groll AH et al.: Comparative antifungal activities and plasma pharmacokinetics of micafungin (FK463) against disseminated candidiasis and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in persistently neutropenic rabbits. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.46(6),S1857–S1869 (2002).
    • 24  Clemons KV, Espiritu M, Parmar R, Stevens DA: Comparative efficacies of conventional amphotericin B, liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome), caspofungin, micafungin, and voriconazole alone and in combination against experimental murine central nervous system aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(12),S4867–S4875 (2005).
    • 25  Graybill JR, Bocanegra R, Gonzalez GM, Najvar LK: Combination antifungal therapy of murine aspergillosis: liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.52(4),S656–S662 (2003).
    • 26  Hiraoka T, Wakabayashi T, Kaji Y et al.: Toxicological evaluation of micafungin ophthalmic solution in rabbit eyes. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther.21(2),S149–S156 (2005).
    • 27  Ito M, Nozu R, Kuramochi T et al.: Prophylactic effect of FK463, a novel antifungal lipopeptide, against Pneumocystis carinii infection in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.44(9),S2259–S2262 (2000).
    • 28  Seidler M, Salvenmoser S, Müller F-M: Effect of micafungin against biofilm of six different Candida spp. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.11(2),S364 (2005).
    • 29  Hiemenz J, Cagnoni P, Simpson D et al.: Pharmacokinetic and maximum tolerated dose study of micafungin in combination with fluconazole versus fluconazole alone for prophylaxis of fungal infections in adult patients undergoing a bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplant. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(4),S1331–S1336 (2005).
    • 30  Steinbach WJ, Benjamin DK: New antifungal agents under development in children and neonates. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.18(6),S484–S489 (2005).
    • 31  Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A et al.: Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.49(8),S3317–S3324 (2005).
    • 32  Ugazio G, Artizzu M, Pani P, Dianzani MU: The changes in some hydrolytic enzymes in carbon tetrachloride-induced fatty livers. Biochem. J.90(1),S109–S116 (1964).
    • 33  Dufour JF, Zimmermann A, Reichen J: Increased hepatic lysosomal activity in biliary cirrhosis originates from hepatocytes rather than from macrophages. J. Hepatol.20(4),S524–S530 (1994).
    • 34  Alvarez-Leal M, Contreras-Hernandez D, Chavez A et al.: Leukocyte arylsulfatase A activity in patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis. Am. J. Hum. Biol.13(3),S297–S300 (2001).
    • 35  Tenhunen J, Salminen M, Lundstrom K et al.: Genomic organization of the human catechol O-methyltransferase gene and its expression from two distinct promoters. Eur. J. Biochem.223(3),S1049–S1059 (1994).
    • 36  Hebert MF, Smith HE, Marbury TC et al.: Pharmacokinetics of micafungin in healthy volunteers, volunteers with moderate liver disease, and volunteers with renal dysfunction. J. Clin. Pharmacol.45(10),S1145–S1152 (2005).
    • 37  Sakaeda T, Iwaki K, Kakumoto M et al.: Effect of micafungin on cytochrome P450 3A4 and multidrug resistance protein 1 activities, and its comparison with azole antifungal drugs. J. Pharm. Pharmacol.57(6),S759–S764 (2005).
    • 38  Shimoeda S, Ohta S, Kobayashi H et al.: Analysis of the blood level of micafungin involving patients with hematological diseases: new findings regarding combination therapy with tacrolimus. Biol. Pharm. Bull.28(3),S477–S480 (2005).
    • 39  Hebert MF, Blough DK, Townsend RW et al.: Concomitant tacrolimus and micafungin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol.45(9),S1018–S1024 (2005).
    • 40  Hebert MF, Townsend RW, Austin S et al.: Concomitant cyclosporine and micafungin pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers. J. Clin. Pharmacol.45(8),S954–S960 (2005).
    • 41  Undre NA, Stevenson P, Amakye DD: Rifampicin and ritonavir do not affect the pharmacokinetics of micafungin (FK463), an echinocandin antifungal. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.10(3),S279 (2004).
    • 42  Niwa T, Yokota Y, Tokunaga A et al.: Tissue distribution after intravenous dosing of micafungin, an antifungal drug, to rats. Biol. Pharm. Bull.27(7),S1154–S1156 (2004).
    • 43  Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Kontoyiannis D, Raffalli J et al.: International, open-label, noncomparative, clinical trial of micafungin alone and in combination for treatment of newly diagnosed and refractory candidemia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.24(10),S654–S661 (2005).
    • 44  de Wet NT, Bester AJ, Viljoen JJ et al.: A randomized, double blind, comparative trial of micafungin (FK463) vs fluconazole for the treatment of oesophageal candidiasis. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther.21(7),S899–S907 (2005).
    • 45  Krause DS, Simjee AE, van Rensburg C, et al.: A randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Clin. Infect. Dis.39(6),S770–S775 (2004)
    • 46  Villanueva A, Gotuzzo E, Arathoon EG et al.: A randomized double-blind study of caspofungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis. Am. J. Med.113(4),S294–S299 (2002).
    • 47  Pettengell K, Mynhardt J, Kluyts T et al.: Successful treatment of oesophageal candidiasis by micafungin: a novel systemic antifungal agent. Aliment Pharmacol. Ther.20(4),S475–S481 (2004).
    • 48  Sirohi B, Powles RL, Chopra R et al.: A study to determine the safety profile and maximum tolerated dose of micafungin (FK463) in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant38(1),S47–S51 (2006).
    • 49  van Burik JA, Ratanatharathorn V, Stepan DE et al.: Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis.39(10),S1407–S1416 (2004).
    • 50  Lortholary O, Kuse E, Chetchotisakd P et al.: Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B in the treatment of invasive candidiasis in neutropenic and non-neutropenic patients. Presented at: 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID). Nice, France, 1–4 April 2006.
    • 51  Nucci M, Colombo AL, Silveira F et al.: Risk factors for death in patients with candidemia. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.19(11),S846–S850 (1998)
    • 52  Betts R, Glasmacher A, Maertens J et al.: Efficacy of caspofungin against invasive Candida or invasive Aspergillus infections in neutropenic patients. Cancer106(2),S466–S473 (2006).
    • 53  Keating G, Figgitt D: Caspofungin: a review of its use in oesophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis and invasive aspergillosis. Drugs63(20),S2235–S2263 (2003).
    • 54  Kohno S, Masaoka T, Yamaguchi H et al.: A multicenter, open-label clinical study of micafungin (FK463) in the treatment of deep-seated mycosis in Japan. Scand. J. Infect. Dis.36(5),S372–S379 (2004).
    • 55  Ullmann AJ, van Burik JA, McSweeney P et al.: An open Phase II study of the efficacy of micafungin (FK463) alone and in combination for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in adults and children. Presented at: 13th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Glasgow, UK, 10–13 April 2003.
    • 56  Denning DW, Marr KA, Lau WM et al.: Micafungin (FK463), alone or in combination with other systemic antifungal agents, for the treatment of acute invasive aspergillosis. J. Infect. DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2006.03.003 (2006) (In Press).
    • 57  Matsue K, Uryu H, Koseki M, Asada N, Takeuchi M: Breakthrough trichosporonosis in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving micafungin. Clin. Infect. Dis.42(6),S753–S757 (2006).
    • 58  Laverdiere M, Lalonde RG, Baril JG et al.: Progressive loss of echinocandin activity following prolonged use for treatment of Candida albicans oesophagitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.57(4),S705–S708 (2006).
    • 59  Powles MA, Liberator P, Anderson J et al.: Efficacy of MK-991 (L-743,872), a semisynthetic pneumocandin, in murine models of Pneumocystis carinii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.42(8),S1985–S1989 (1998).
    • 60  Annaloro C, Della Volpe A, Usardi P, Lambertenghi Deliliers G: Caspofungin treatment of Pneumocystis pneumonia during conditioning for bone marrow transplantation. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis.25(1),S52–S54 (2006).
    • 101  US clinical trials website www.clinicaltrials.gov