We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Treatment of Déjerine–Roussy syndrome pain with scrambler therapy

    Paul J Christo

    Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine-Pain Medicine (PJC), Neuro-oncology (DOK), & Palliative Care Programs Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (TJS), all at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

    ,
    David O Kamson

    Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine-Pain Medicine (PJC), Neuro-oncology (DOK), & Palliative Care Programs Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (TJS), all at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

    &
    Thomas J Smith

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: tsmit136@jhmi.edu

    Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine-Pain Medicine (PJC), Neuro-oncology (DOK), & Palliative Care Programs Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (TJS), all at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2019-0065

    Aim: Déjerine–Roussy syndrome or central thalamic pain can be devastating, and treatment with drugs and even deep brain stimulation can be unsatisfactory. Scrambler therapy is a form of neuromodulation that uses external skin electrodes to send a ‘non-pain’ signal to the brain, with some success in difficult-to-treat syndromes such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. We used scrambler therapy to treat a patient with 6 years of disabling Déjerine–Roussy syndrome pain. Methods: A 56-year-old man received multiple daily then monthly treatments with electrode pairs placed just above the area of distal pain. Each treatment was for 40 min. Results: His allodynia and hyperalgesia resolved within 10 min, and his pain score fell to almost zero after 30 min. Months later, he resumed normal activity and is off all his pain medications. No side effects were noted. Conclusion: Scrambler therapy appeared to reverse 6 years of disabling pain safely and economically, and continues to be effective. Further multi-institutional trials are warranted for this rare syndrome.

    References

    • 1. Dejerine J, Roussy G. Le syndrome thalamique. Rev. Neurol. 14, 521–532 (1906).
    • 2. Ward M, Mammis A. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Dejerine–Roussy Syndrome. Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 95(5), 298–306 (2017).
    • 3. Flaster M, Meresh E, Rao M, Biller J. Central poststroke pain: current diagnosis and treatment. Top Stroke Rehabil. 20(2), 116–123 (2013).
    • 4. Gonzales GR. Central pain: diagnosis and treatment strategies. Neurology 45(9 Suppl. 12), S11–S16 (1995).
    • 5. Kim JS. Pharmacological management of central post-stroke pain: a practical guide. CNS Drugs 28(9), 787–797 (2014).
    • 6. Mulla SM, Wang L, Khokhar R et al. Management of central poststroke pain: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Stroke 46(10), 2853–2860 (2015).
    • 7. Rasche D, Rinaldi PC, Young RF, Tronnier VM. Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of various chronic pain syndromes. Neurosurg. Focus 21(6), E8 (2006).
    • 8. D'Amato SJ, Mealy MA, Erdek MA, Kozachik S, Smith TJ. Scrambler therapy for the treatment of chronic central pain: a case report. A A Pract. 10(12), 313–315 (2018).
    • 9. Marineo G, Iorno V, Gandini C, Moschini V, Smith TJ. Scrambler therapy may relieve chronic neuropathic pain more effectively than guideline-based drug management: results of a pilot, randomized, controlled trial. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 43(1), 87–95 (2012).
    • 10. Moon JY, Kurihara C, Beckles JP, Williams KE, Jamison DE, Cohen SP. Predictive factors associated with success and failure for Calmare (scrambler) therapy: a multi-center analysis. Clin. J. Pain 31(8), 750–756 (2015).
    • 11. Smith TJ, Auwaerter P, Knowlton A, Saylor D, McArthur J. Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus-related peripheral neuropathy with scrambler therapy: a case report. Int. J. STD AIDS 28(2), 202–204 (2017).
    • 12. Marineo G. Inside the scrambler therapy, a noninvasive treatment of chronic neuropathic and cancer pain: from the gate control theory to the active principle of information. Integr. Cancer Ther. doi:10.1177/1534735419845143 (2019) (Epub ahead of print).
    • 13. Henry JL, Lalloo C, Yashpal K. Central poststroke pain: an abstruse outcome. Pain Res. Manag. 13(1), 41–49 (2008).
    • 14. Mealy MA, Newsome SD, Kozachik SL, Levy M, Smith TJ. Case report: scrambler therapy for treatment-resistant central neuropathic pain in a patient with transverse myelitis. Int. J. MS Care 21(2), 76–80 (2019).
    • 15. Mealy MA, Kozachik SL, Cook LJ PhD et al. Scrambler therapy is a safe and feasible intervention that improves neuropathic pain in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a Phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurology 94(18), e1900–e1907 (In press).
    • 16. Klit H, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. Central post-stroke pain: clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and management. Lancet Neurol. 8(9), 857–868 (2009).
    • 17. Kumar B, Kalita J, Kumar G, Misra UK. Central poststroke pain: a review of pathophysiology and treatment. Anesth. Analg. 108(5), 1645–1657 (2009).
    • 18. Rossi PJ, Giordano J, Okun MS. The problem of funding off-label deep brain stimulation: bait-and-switch tactics and the need for policy reform. JAMA Neurol. 74(1), 9–10 (2017).