Development and evaluation of an exome sequencing training course for medical interpreters

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest

References

• 1. United States Census Bureau. MDAT. ACS 5-Year Estimates 5-Year Estimates – Public Use Microdata Sample. https://data.census.gov/mdat/#/search?ds=ACSPUMS5Y2018&cv=ENG&wt=PWGTP
  Google Scholar
• 2. Berdahl TA, Kirby JB. Patient-provider communication disparities by limited English proficiency (LEP): Trends from the US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2006–2015. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 34(8), 1434–1440 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 3. Hilder J, Gray B, Stubbe M, Hilder J, Gray B, Stubbe M. Health navigation and interpreting services for patients with limited English proficiency: a narrative literature review. J. Prim. Health Care 11(3), 217–226 (2019).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 4. Pérez-Stable EJ, El-Toukhy S. Communicating with diverse patients: how patient and clinician factors affect disparities. Patient Educ. Couns. 101(12), 2186–2194 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 5. Becerra BJ, Arias D, Becerra MB. Low health literacy among immigrant Hispanics. J. Racial Ethn. Health Disparities 4(3), 480–483 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6. Hickey KT, Masterson Creber RM, Reading M et al. Low health literacy: implications for managing cardiac patients in practice. Nurse Pract. 43(8), 49–55 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 7. Ha VTD, Frizzo-Barker J, Chow-White P. Adopting clinical genomics: a systematic review of genomic literacy among physicians in cancer care. BMC Med. Genom. 11(1), 18 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 8. Kaphingst KA, Blanchard M, Milam L, Pokharel M, Elrick A, Goodman MS. Relationships between health literacy and genomics-related knowledge, self-efficacy, perceived importance, and communication in a medically underserved population. J. Health Commun. 21(Suppl. 1), 58–68 (2016).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 9. Lewis MA, Bonhomme N, Bloss CS. A new era, new strategies: education and communication strategies to manage greater access to genomic information. Hastings Cent. Rep. 48(S2), S25–S27 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10. Hindorff LA, Bonham VL, Brody LC et al. Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19(3), 175–185 (2018). • Describes the need for prioritizing diversity in genomics research and strategies for achieving this goal.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11. Hindorff LA, Bonham VL, Ohno-Machado L. Enhancing diversity to reduce health information disparities and build an evidence base for genomic medicine. Pers. Med. 15(5), 403–412 (2018).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 12. Basu G, Costa VP, Jain P. Clinicians' obligations to use qualified medical interpreters when caring for patients with limited English proficiency. AMA J. Ethics 19(3), 245–252 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 13. Brandl EJ, Schreiter S, Schouler-Ocak M. Are trained medical interpreters worth the cost? A review of the current literature on cost and cost-effectiveness. J. Immigr. Minor. Health. 22(1), 175–181 (2020). • Provides evidence that the medical interpreters offer benefits to patients and health systems at limited costs.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 14. Espinoza J, Derrington S. How should clinicians respond to language barriers that exacerbate health inequity? AMA J. Ethics 23(2), 109–116 (2021).
  Google Scholar
• 15. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv. Res. 42(2), 727–754 (2007). • Systemic review that demonstrates the value of professional medical interpreters in providing quality care for patients with limited English proficiency.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 16. Youdelman M. The development of certification for healthcare interpreters in the United States. Transl. Interpret. 5(1), 114–126 (2013). • Describes the rationale for and rigorous development of a national certification program for healthcare interpreters in USA.
  Google Scholar
• 17. California Healthcare Interpreting Association. Roat C, Joseph G, Guerra C, Cheng J, Lee R, Lara-Otero K. Interpreting for cancer genetics (2015). https://chia.wildapricot.org/Interpreting-for-Cancer-Genetics/
  Google Scholar
• 18. National Coordinating Center for Regional Genetics Networks. Roat C, Applegate C, Williamson Dean L, Hasegawa-Evans L, Weaver M. Interpreting for pediatric genetics: a workshop for interpreters in health care (2019). https://nccrcg.org/focus-areas/genetics-and-genomics-education/interpreting-for-genetics/
  Google Scholar
• 19. National Coordinating Center for Regional Genetics Networks. Roat C, Aiyar L, Williamson Dean L, Bovee Terry A, Weaver M. Interpreting for prenatal genetics: a workshop for interpreters in health care (2019). https://nccrcg.org/focus-areas/genetics-and-genomics-education/interpreting-for-genetics/
  Google Scholar
• 20. Suwinski P, Ong C, Ling MHT, Poh YM, Khan AM, Ong HS. Advancing personalized medicine through the application of whole exome sequencing and big data analytics. Front. Genet. 10, 49 (2019). • Explains why whole exome sequencing has become common as genomic medicine has evolved.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21. Vears DF, Sénécal K, Borry P. Genetic health professionals' experiences returning results from diagnostic genomic sequencing to patients. J. Genet. Couns. 29(5), 807–815 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 22. Gutierrez AM, Statham EE, Robinson JO et al. Agents of empathy: how medical interpreters bridge sociocultural gaps in genomic sequencing disclosures with Spanish-speaking families. Patient Educ. Couns. 102(5), 895–901 (2019). • Pioneering article examining the role of medical interpreters in genomic medicine.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23. Hsieh E, Nicodemus B. Conceptualizing emotion in healthcare interpreting: a normative approach to interpreters' emotion work. Patient Educ. Couns. S0738–3991(15), 30001-X (2015).
  Google Scholar
• 24. Krieger M, Agather A, Douglass K, Reiser CA, Petty EM. Working with the Hmong population in a genetics setting: an interpreter perspective. J. Genet. Couns. 27(3), 565–573 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 25. Lara-Otero K, Weil J, Guerra C, Cheng JKY, Youngblom J, Joseph G. Genetic counselor and healthcare interpreter perspectives on the role of interpreters in cancer genetic counseling. Health Commun. 34(13), 1608–1618 (2019). • Examines the role of interpreters in cancer genetic counseling from the perspectives of both counselors and interpreters and elucidates the challenges in current practice as well as opportunities for improvement.
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 26. Theys L, Krystallidou D, Salaets H, Wermuth C, Pype P. Emotion work in interpreter-mediated consultations: a systematic literature review. Patient Educ. Couns. 103(1), 33–43 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 27. Zhang CX, Crawford E, Marshall J, Bernard A, Walker-Smith K. Developing interprofessional collaboration between clinicians, interpreters, and translators in healthcare settings: outcomes from face-to-face training. J. Interprof. Care 35(4), 521–531 (2020).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 28. Cheng JKY, Guerra C, Pasick RJ, Schillinger D, Luce J, Joseph G. Cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Chinese immigrants. J. Community Genet. 9(3), 263–276 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29. Joseph G, Pasick RJ, Schillinger D, Luce J, Guerra C, Cheng JKY. Information mismatch: cancer risk counseling with diverse underserved patients. J. Genet. Couns. 26(5), 1090–1104 (2017).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 30. Joseph G, Guerra C. To worry or not to worry: breast cancer genetic counseling communication with low-income Latina immigrants. J. Community Genet. 6(1), 63–76 (2015).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 31. Kamara D, Weil J, Youngblom J, Guerra C, Joseph G. Cancer counseling of low-income limited English proficient Latina women using medical interpreters: implications for shared decision-making. J. Genet. Couns. 27(1), 155–168 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32. Mittendorf KF, Kauffman TL, Amendola LM et al. Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM): a clinical trial assessing a multimodal cancer genetics services delivery program and its impact on diverse populations. Contemp. Clin. Trials. 106, 106432 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 33. Amendola LM, Berg JS, Horowitz CR et al. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: integrating genomic sequencing in diverse and medically underserved populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 103(3), 319–327 (2018).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34. Riddle L, Amendola LM, Gilmore MJ et al. Development and early implementation of an Accessible, Relational, Inclusive and Actionable approach to genetic counseling: The ARIA model. Patient Educ. Couns. 104(5), 969–978 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 35. Trivette CM, Dunst CJ, Hamby DW, O'Herin CE. Characteristics and Consequences of Adult Learning Methods and Strategies. Practical Evaluation Reports, Volume 2, Number 1 (2009). Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute ED565253 https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565253
  Google Scholar
• 36. McNett G. Using stories to facilitate learning. Coll. Teach. 64(4), 184–193 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• 37. Sabatini R. How to read the genome and build a human being. TED2016 (2016). www.ted.com/talks/riccardo_sabatini_how_to_read_the_genome_and_build_a_human_being
  Google Scholar
• 38. Karliner LS, Auerbach A, Nápoles A, Schillinger D, Nickleach D, Pérez-Stable EJ. Language barriers and understanding of hospital discharge instructions. Med. Care 50(4), 283–289 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39. Rajiv P, Riggs E, Brown S, Szwarc J, Yelland J. Communication interventions to support people with limited English proficiency in healthcare: a systematic review. J. Commun. Healthc. 14(2), 176–187 (2021).
  Google Scholar
• 40. Joseph C, Garruba M, Melder A. Patient satisfaction of telephone or video interpreter services compared with in-person services: a systematic review. Aust. Health Rev. Publ. Aust. Hosp. Assoc. 42(2), 168–177 (2018).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41. Pathak S, Gregorich SE, Diamond LC et al. Patient perspectives on the quality of professional interpretation: Results from LASI study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 36(8), 2386–2391 (2021).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 42. Wang J. ‘Telephone interpreting should be used only as a last resort.’ Interpreters' perceptions of the suitability, remuneration and quality of telephone interpreting. Perspectives (Montclair). 26(1), 100–116 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• 43. Andresen L, Boud D, Cohen R. Experience-based learning. In: Understanding Adult Education and Training (2nd Ed.). Foley G (Ed.).Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Australia, 225–239 (2000).
  Google Scholar