We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Texas health educators’ practice in basic genomics education and services

    Lei-Shih Chen

    *Author for correspondence: Tel.: +979 862 2912;

    E-mail Address: lacechen@tamu.edu

    Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    ,
    Shixi Zhao

    Department of Health, Exercise & Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico

    ,
    Yu-Lyu Yeh

    Department of Health & Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    ,
    Tanya N Eble

    Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

    ,
    Shweta U Dhar

    Department of Molecular & Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

    &
    Oi-Man Kwok

    Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2020-0093

    Background: Health educators (HEs), who are specialized in health education, can provide basic genomics education/services to the public. Such practice of HEs is unknown. We examined HEs’ genomics knowledge and practice, intention, attitudes, self-efficacy and perceived barriers in providing basic genomics education/services. Materials & methods: Texas HEs (n = 662) were invited to complete the survey that was developed based on theoretical constructs (i.e., practice/behavior, intention, attitudes, self-efficacy, knowledge and perceived barriers) from various health behavior theories. Results: Among 182 HEs completed the survey, most had never/seldom provided basic genomics education/services. Participants’ practice was positively associated with their intention in performing basic genomics education/services and previous genomics training. Intention to offer such education/services was positively related to HEs’ self-efficacy and attitudes, which were correlated to previous genomics training. Conclusion: Texas HEs lacked basic genomics education/services practice. As previous genomics training was associated with HEs’ practice, providing continuing education may enhance their practice.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    Reference

    • 1. Phillips KA, Deverka PA, Hooker GW, Douglas MP. Genetic test availability and spending: where are we now? Where are we going? Health Aff. 37(5), 710–716 (2018).
    • 2. Wilson BJ, Nicholls SG. The Human Genome Project, and recent advances in personalized genomics. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 8, 9–20 (2015).
    • 3. Hoskovec JM, Bennett RL, Carey ME et al. Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: a workforce study. J. Genet. Couns. 27(1), 16–20 (2018).
    • 4. National Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine. Genetic Testing Registry. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/
    • 5. Hurle B, Citrin T, Jenkins JF et al. What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report. Genet. Med. 15(8), 658–663 (2013).
    • 6. Campion M, Goldgar C, Hopkin RJ, Prows CA, Dasgupta S. Genomic education for the next generation of health-care providers. Genet. Med. 21, 2422–2430 (2019).
    • 7. Maiese DR, Keehn A, Lyon M, Flannery D, Watson M. Current conditions in medical genetics practice. Genet. Med. 21(8), 1874–1877 (2019).
    • 8. Chapman R, Likhanov M, Selita F, Zakharov I, Smith-Woolley E, Kovas Y. New literacy challenge for the twenty-first century: genetic knowledge is poor even among well educated. J. Community Genet. 10(1), 73–84 (2019).
    • 9. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Occupational Outlook Handbook, health educators and community health workers (2020). http://www.bls.gov/ooh/community-and-social-service/health-educators.htm
    • 10. Chen L-S, Goodson P, Jung E, Popoola O, Kwok OM, Muenzenberger A. A survey of Texas health educators’ family health history-based practice. Am. J. Health Behav. 39(5), 632–639 (2015). •• Examines health educators’ (HEs’) practice in family health history.
    • 11. Chen L-S, Goodson P, Jung E et al. Effectiveness of a web-based genomics training for health educators in Texas. Genet. Med. 16, 271 (2013).
    • 12. National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. Health education profession (2020). http://www.nchec.org/profession
    • 13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Genomic Competencies for Public Health Professionals in Population-Based Health Education (2010). http://www.cdc.gov/genomics/translation/competencies/
    • 14. American Public Health Association. Advancing Cancer Genomics in Public Health (2013). http://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/23/10/25/advancing-cancer-genomics-in-public-health
    • 15. American Public Health Association. Strengthening Genetic and Genomic Literacy (2010). http://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2014/07/30/16/37/strengthening-genetic-and-genomic-literacy
    • 16. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020 (n.d.) (2020). http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/genomics
    • 17. Chen L-S, Goodson P. Entering the public health genomics era: why must health educators develop genomic competencies? Am. J. Health Ed. 38(3), 157–165 (2007). • Delineates the roles of HEs in genomics.
    • 18. Dressler LG, Jones SS, Markey JM, Byerly KW, Roberts MC. Genomics education for the public: perspectives of genomic researchers and ELSI advisors. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 18(3), 131–140 (2014).
    • 19. Wang C, Bowen DJ, Kardia SLR. Research and practice opportunities at the intersection of health education, health behavior, and genomics. Health Educ. Behav. 32(5), 686–701 (2005). • Describes the research and practice opportunities for HEs in genomics.
    • 20. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1st Edition). Prentice Hall, NJ, USA (1985).
    • 21. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991).
    • 22. Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition). Simon & Schuster, Inc., NY, USA (2003).
    • 23. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice (5th Edition). John Wiley & Sons, CA, USA (2015).
    • 24. National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. Continuing Education. http://www.nchec.org/continuing-education
    • 25. Chen L-S, Kwok OM, Goodson P. US health educators’ likelihood of adopting genomic competencies into health promotion. Am. J. Public Health 98(9), 1651–1657 (2008). • Develops an integrated theoretical model to identify factors affecting HEs’ likelihood of adopting genomics into health promotion.
    • 26. Chen L-S, Goodson P. Barriers to adopting genomics into public health education: a mixed methods study. Genet. Med. 11(2), 104–110 (2009).
    • 27. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999).
    • 28. Talwar D, Chen WJ, Yeh YL, Foster M, Al-Shagrawi S, Chen L-S. Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review. Genet. Med. 21(8), 1675–1682 (2018).
    • 29. Talwar D, Tseng TS, Foster M, Xu L, Chen L-S. Genetics/genomics education for nongenetic health professionals: a systematic literature review. Genet. Med. 19(7), 725–732 (2017). •• A systematic review study which summarized genomics education and training for nongenetic health professionals.
    • 30. Mcbride CM, Bowen D, Brody LC et al. Future health applications of genomics: priorities for communication, behavioral, and social sciences research. Am. J. Prev. Med. 38(5), 556–565 (2010).
    • 31. Ozdemir V, Burke W, Khoury MJ, Knoppers BM, Zimmern R. Genomics and public health. In: Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health. Detels RGulliford MKarim QATan CC (Eds). Oxford University Press, England, UK (2015).
    • 32. Yoon PW, Scheuner MT, Peterson-Oehlke KL, Gwinn M, Faucett A, Khoury MJ. Can family history be used as a tool for public health and preventive medicine? Genet. Med. 4(4), 304–310 (2002).
    • 33. Yoon PW, Scheuner MT, Khoury MJ. Research priorities for evaluating family history in the prevention of common chronic diseases. Am. J. Prev. Med. 24(2), 128–135 (2003).
    • 34. Yoon PW, Scheuner MT, Jorgensen C, Khoury MJ. Developing Family Healthware, a family history screening tool to prevent common chronic diseases. Prev. Chronic Dis. 6(1), A33 (2009).
    • 35. Chen L-S, Kim M. Needs assessment in genomic education: a survey of health educators in the United States. Health Promot. Pract. 15(4), 592–598 (2014). •• A study which suggested that HEs were interested in receiving genomics training.
    • 36. Santella AJ, Fraser J, Prehn AW. Willingness of certified health education specialists to conduct rapid HIV testing: results from the promoting research on methods in screening expertise study. Health Promot. Pract. 17(1), 13–20 (2016).
    • 37. Mckenzie JF, Dennis D, Auld ME et al. Health education specialist practice analysis 2015 (HESPA 2015): process and outcomes. Health Educ. Behav. 43(3), 286–295 (2016).
    • 38. Lee BA, Martin MJR, Matthews SA, Farrell CR. State-level changes in US racial and ethnic diversity, 1980 to 2015: a universal trend? Demographic Res. 37, 1031–1048 (2017).
    • 39. Molster CM, Bowman FL, Bilkey GA et al. The evolution of public health genomics: exploring its past, present and future. Front. Public Health 6, 247–247 (2018).
    • 40. Cunha A. Genomic technologies: from tools to therapies. Genome Med. 9(1), 71 (2017).
    • 41. National Commission for Health Education Credentialing. http://www.nchec.org/