From helices to health: undergraduate medical education in genetics and genomics

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Phillips KA, Deverka PA, Hooker GW, Douglas MP. Genetic test availability and spending: where are we now? Where are we going? Health Aff. 37(5), 710–716 (2018).Crossref, Google Scholar
• 2 Andrews M. National Public Radio. Routine DNA screening moves into primary care. (2018). www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2018/05/22/613090774/routine-dna-screening-moves-into-primary-care.Google Scholar
• 3 NIH. All of Us Research Program. (2018). https://allofus.nih.gov.Google Scholar
• 4 Cichon M, Feldman GL. Opportunities to improve recruitment into medical genetics residency programs: survey results of program directors and medical genetics residents. Genet. Med. 16(5), 413–418 (2014). • Addresses the shortage of medical geneticists in the training pipeline. Summarizes results of surveys of medical genetics program directors and residents to identify successful recruiting methods. Results of these surveys spurred the development of the Task Force on Medical Genetics Education and Training of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 5 Pan V, Yashar BM, Pothast R, Wicklund C. Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: Program directors’ views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs. Genet. Med. 18(8), 842–849 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 6 Cooksey JA, Forte G, Benkendorf J, Blitzer MG. The state of the medical geneticist workforce: findings of the 2003 survey of American Board of Medical Genetics certified geneticists. Genet. Med. 7(6), 439–443 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 7 Care M, Chauhan V, Spears D. Genetic testing in inherited heart diseases: Practical considerations for clinicians. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 19(9), 88 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 8 Haspel RL, Saffitz JE. Genomic oncology education: An urgent need, a new approach. Cancer J. 20(1), 91–95 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 9 Slade I, Burton H. Preparing clinicians for genomic medicine. Postgrad. Med. J. 92(1089), 369–371 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 10 Mikat-Stevens NA, Larson IA, Tarini BA. Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: a systematic review of the literature. Genet. Med. 17(3), 169–176 (2015). • This large-scale systematic review of the literature identified unique barriers and common themes perceived by primary-care providers that inhibit integration of genetic medicine into routine patient care. These specific barriers and themes can be used to target the development of practical guidelines, risk assessment tools, tailored educational tools and other systems-level strategies to assist primary-care physicians provide genetic services to their patientsCrossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 11 Hauser D, Obeng AO, Fei K, Ramos MA, Horowitz CR. Views of primary care providers on testing patients for genetic risks for common chronic diseases. Health Aff. (Millwood). 37(5), 793–800 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 12 Vorderstrasse A, Katsanis SH, Minear MA et al. Perceptions of personalized medicine in an academic health system: Educational findings. J. Contemp. Med. Educ. 3(1), 14–19 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 13 Korf BR, Blitzer MG, Boulware DW et al. AAMC Medical School Objectives Project Report V – contemporary issues in medicine: genetics education. DC, USA (2004). •• This report proposed comprehensive genetics objectives and educational strategies for medical training across the continuum, organized by knowledge, attitudes and skills, which expanded the training paradigm from a focus on rare Mendelian disease to include common disorders, population genetics and molecular foundations of genetic disease.Google Scholar
• 14 Bauerle C, Dennis EA, Desnick RJ et al. Committee Report. Scientific foundations for future physicians. (2009) DC, US. www.aamc.org/download/271072/data/scientificfoundationsforfuturephysicians.pdf. •• This report proposed comprehensive scientific competencies for future medical school graduates and for undergraduate students interested in pursuing a career in medicine, and paved the way for large-scale innovation in the design of premedical and medical curricula.Google Scholar
• 15 Hyland K, Dasgupta S, Garber K et al. Medical school core curriculum in genetics. Association of Professors of Human and Medical Genetics. www.aphmg.org/pdf/med-competencies.pdf. • This white paper outlines updated guidelines for a core curriculum in medical genetics in North American medical schools that reflect advances in genetics and genomics, as well as broader changes in medical training, including the movement toward competency-based education.Google Scholar
• 16 Plunkett-Rondeau J, Hyland K, Dasgupta S. Training future physicians in the era of genomic medicine: trends in undergraduate medical genetics education. Genet. Med. 17(11), 927–934 (2015). • This study examines trends in medical genetics curricula across North America, including topics added and eliminated, format of curricula, when topics are taught and by who. It provides an update on how genetics and genomics is taught at US and Canadian medical schools, and provides guidance to curriculum developers and genetics educators.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 17 Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Practitioner Education in Genomics (ISCC). Natl Hum. Genome Res. Inst. www.genome.gov/27554614/intersociety-coordinating-committee-for-practitioner-education-in-genomics-iscc/Google Scholar
• 18 Korf BR, Berry AB, Limson M et al. Framework for development of physician competencies in genomic medicine: Report of the competencies working group of the inter-society coordinating committee for physician education in genomics. Genet. Med. 16(11), 804–809 (2014). • The National Human Genome Research Institute convened the Inter-Society Coordinating Committee for Physician Education in Genomics (ISCC) to develop and share best practices in the use of genomics in medicine. This ISCC consensus paper provides a framework for development of genomics practice competencies for formulation of competencies for physicians in various medical disciplines and assessment of current practice or knowledge base.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 19 Hyland K, Dasgupta S. Medical genetics and genomics education and its impact on genomic literacy of the clinical workforce. Genet. Med. doi 10.1038/gim.2017.127 (2017) (Epub ahead of print).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 20 Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, Kokotailo P, Gruppen L. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med. Educ. 42(3), 248–255 (2008). • Identifies the characteristics that define a competency and proposes criteria that can be applied to distinguish between competencies, goals, objectives and outcomes.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 21 Frank JR, Mungroo R, Ahmad Y, Wang M, De Rossi S, Horsley T. Toward a definition of competency-based education in medicine: a systematic review of published definitions. Med. Teach. 32(8), 631–637 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 22 Saltman D. Flipping for beginners: inside the new classroom craze. Harvard Educ. Lett. 27(6), 1–2 (2011).Google Scholar
• 23 Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures – a proposal for medical education. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(18), 1657–1659 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 24 Hagiwara N. Application of active learning modalities to achieve medical genetics competencies and their learning outcome assessments. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 8, 817–829 (2017). •• Summarizes multiple active learning strategies for teaching genetics in UME and proposes a more standardized framework for assessing their outcomes.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 25 Chen F, Lui AM, Martinelli SM. A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Med. Educ. 51(6), 585–597 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 26 Neville AJ. Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. A review of its effects on knowledge and clinical performance. Med. Princ. Pract. 18(1), 1–9 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 27 Reimschisel T, Herring AL, Huang J, Minor TJ. A systematic review of the published literature on team-based learning in health professions education. Med. Teach. 39(12), 1227–1237 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 28 Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M et al. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111(23), 8410–8415 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 29 Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med. Educ. 41(12), 1173–1177 (2007). •• Describes evidence to support the role of biomedical knowledge as an integral part of the expert knowledge base for clinicians, particularly in clinical reasoning, and emphasizes the importance of making explicit connections between biomedical knowledge and clinical facts during training. This fundamental study paved the way for important future work on cognitive integration.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 30 Lisk K, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Exploring cognitive integration of basic science and its effect on diagnostic reasoning in novices. Perspect. Med. Educ. 5(3), 147–153 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 31 Wolyniak MJ, Bemis LT, Prunuske AJ. Improving medical students’ knowledge of genetic disease: a review of current and emerging pedagogical practices. Adv. Med. Educ. Pract. 6, 597–607 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 32 Makransky G, Bonde MT, Wulff JSG et al. Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education. BMC Med. Educ. 16(1), 98 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 33 Salari K, Pizzo PA, Prober CG. To genotype or not to genotype? Addressing the debate through the development of a genomics and personalized medicine curriculum. Acad. Med. 86(8), 925–927 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 34 Linderman MD, Bashir A, Diaz GA et al. Preparing the next generation of genomicists: a laboratory-style course in medical genomics. BMC Med. Genomics 8(1), 47 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 35 Perry C, Maloney K, Beitelshees A et al. Educational innovations in clinical pharmacogenomics. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 99(6), 582–584 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 36 Salari K, Karczewski KJ, Hudgins L, Ormond KE. Evidence that personal genome testing enhances student learning in a course on genomics and personalized medicine. PLoS ONE 8(7), e68853 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 37 Vernez SL, Salari K, Ormond KE, Lee SS-J. Personal genome testing in medical education: student experiences with genotyping in the classroom. Genome Med. 5(3), 24 (2013).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 38 Walt DR, Kuhlik A, Epstein SK et al. Lessons learned from the introduction of personalized genotyping into a medical school curriculum. Genet. Med. 13(1), 63–66 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 39 Linderman MD, Sanderson SC, Bashir A et al. Impacts of incorporating personal genome sequencing into graduate genomics education: a longitudinal study over three course years. BMC Med. Genomics 11(1), 5 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 40 Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Zinberg R et al. How do students react to analyzing their own genomes in a whole-genome sequencing course?: outcomes of a longitudinal cohort study. Genet. Med. 17(11), 866–874 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 41 Garber KB, Hyland KM, Dasgupta S. Participatory genomic testing as an educational experience. Trends Genet. 32(6), 317–320 (2016). • Summarizes examples of using participatory genomic testing in the classroom, ethical concerns raised, strategies for managing these concerns and evidence of the influence of this experiential approach on student knowledge and attitudes toward genomics.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 42 Callier SL. Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing? Am. J. Bioeth. 12(4), 32–40 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 43 Sanderson SC, Linderman MD, Kasarskis A et al. Informed decision-making among students analyzing their personal genomes on a whole genome sequencing course: a longitudinal cohort study. Genome Med. 5(12), 113 (2013).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 44 Salari K, Pizzo PA, Prober CG. Commentary: to genotype or not to genotype? Addressing the debate through the development of a genomics and personalized medicine curriculum. Acad. Med. 86(8), 925–927 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 45 Gerhard GS, Paynton B, Popoff SN. Integrating cadaver exome sequencing into a first-year medical student curriculum. JAMA 315(6), 555–556 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 46 Gerhard GS, Jin Q, Paynton BV, Popoff SN. The Anatomy to Genomics (ATG) Start Genetics medical school initiative: incorporating exome sequencing data from cadavers used for anatomy instruction into the first year curriculum. BMC Med. Genomics. 9(1), 62 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 47 Cornwall J, Winkelmann A, Hildebrandt S. Cadaver exome sequencing for teaching first-year medical students. JAMA 316(1), 102–103 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 48 Demmer LA, Waggoner DJ. Professional medical education and genomics. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 15(1), 507–516 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
• 49 Wilcox RL, Adem PV, Afshinnekoo E et al. The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era. Per. Med. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017–0077 (2018). (Epub ahead of print).Link, Google Scholar
• 50 Haspel RL, Arnaout R, Briere L et al. A call to action: training pathology residents in genomics and personalized medicine. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 133(6), 832–834 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 51 NIH. Inter-society Coordinating Committee for Practitioner Education in Genomics www.genome.gov/27554614/intersociety-coordinating-committee-for-practitioner-education-in-genomics-iscc/.Google Scholar
• 52 Smolkin M, Wenger S. TBL: genetic testing and personalized medicine. MedEdPortal. 10, 9824 (2014).Google Scholar
• 53 Dasgupta S, Tuttle K. Human genetic variation: a flipped classroom exercise in cultural competency. MedEdPortal. 9, 9621 (2013).Crossref, Google Scholar
• 54 Martinez IL, Ilangovan K, Whisenant EB, Pedoussaut M, Lage OG. Breast health disparities: a primer for medical students. MedEdPortal. 12, 10471 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 55 Dasgupta S. Medical genetics ethics case collection: Discussion materials for medical students in the genomic era. MedEdPORTAL Publ. 13, 10562 (2017).Medline, Google Scholar
• 56 ACMG Special Interest Groups (2018) =http://www.acmg.net/ACMG/Education-and-Events/Student-Opportunities/ACMG/Education/Student_Opportunities.aspx?hkey=06e79058-8c0d-41fa-ad37-af17a698d114.Google Scholar
• 57 ACMG Foundation Summer Scholars Program (2018) www.acmgfoundation.org/ACMGFound/ACMGF_Programs/Summer_Scholars/ACMGFound/ACMGF_Programs/Summer_Scholars_Program.aspx?hkey=e235b4f9-2775-4de3-a042-ca4c2f58b1c7.Google Scholar
• 58 Weiler T, Landa-Galindez A. Evolving genetics education in medical school: advancing curriculum, competence and student confidence in the clinical years. In: ACMG Annual Meeting. AZ, USA, (2016).Google Scholar
• 59 Pace T, Saul R, Wagner P, Cass A, Best R, LeClair R. A two-pronged approach to genetics curriculum. In: APHMG 20th Annual Meeting. AZ, USA, (2016).Google Scholar
• 60 Hyland KM, Tenney J, Kirsch H et al. Spiraling genetics/genomics into third year: Promoting transfer of foundational science knowledge. In: APHMG 22nd Annual Meeting. NM, USA, (2018).Google Scholar
• 61 Dahlman KB, Weinger MB, Lomis KD et al. Integrating foundational sciences in a clinical context in the post-clerkship curriculum. Med. Sci. Educ. 28(1), 145–154 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 62 Hoffman JD, Thompson R, Swenson KB, Dasgupta S. An interprofessional, multi-faceted, case-based clinial genetics curriculum for the pediatrics clerkship. In: APHMG 22nd Annual Meeting. NM, USA, (2018).Google Scholar
• 63 Mylopoulos M, Woods N. Preparing medical students for future learning using basic science instruction. Med. Educ. 48, 667–673 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 64 Harvey EK, Fogel CE, Peyrot M, Christensen KD, Terry SF, McInerney JD. Providers’ knowledge of genetics: A survey of 5915 individuals and families with genetic conditions. Genet. Med. 9(5), 259–267 (2007).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 65 Burke S, Stone A, Bedward J, Thomas H, Farndon P. A ‘neglected part of the curriculum’ or ‘of limited use’? Views on genetics training by nongenetics medical trainees and implications for delivery. Genet. Med. 8(2), 109–115 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 66 Eden C, Johnson KW, Gottesman O, Bottinger EP, Abul-Husn NS. Medical student preparedness for an era of personalized medicine: findings from one US medical school. Per. Med. 13(2), 129–141 (2016).Link, CAS, Google Scholar
• 67 Precision Medicine CME from The AMA Education Center. Am. Med. Assoc. https://education.ama-assn.org/precision-medicine.htmlGoogle Scholar
• 68 Jackson Lab. Clinical and Continuing Education. www.jax.org/education-and-learning/clinical-and-continuing-education Google Scholar
• 69 Young A, Chaudhry HJ, Pei X, Arnhart K, Dugan M, Snyder GB. A census of actively licensed physicians in the United States, 2016. J. Med. Regul. 103(2), 7–21 (2017).Crossref, Google Scholar
• 70 Roberts DH, Newman LR, Schwartzstein RM. Twelve tips for facilitating millennials’ learning. Med. Teach. 34(4), 274–278 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 71 Booher D. What older employees can learn from younger executives. Huffington Post (2017). www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/what-older-employees-can-learn-from-younger-executives_us_5971f4e5e4b0545a5c30ff51.Google Scholar
• 72 Barrows J. Why a Gen-X CEO hired a millennial to help him keep a learning mindset. Harv. Bus. Rev. (2017). https://hbr.org/2017/11/why-a-gen-x-ceo-hired-a-millennial-to-help-him-keep-a-learning-mindset?autocomplete=true.Google Scholar
• 73 Eckstrand KL, Bayer CR, Dreger A et al. Implementing curricular and institutional climate changes to improve health care for individuals who are LGBT, gender nonconforming, or born with DSD. AAMC DC, USA (2014). https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/ExecutiveLGBTFINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
• 74 Burk-Rafel J, Santen SA, Purkiss J. Study behaviors and USMLE Step 1 performance: Implications of a student self-directed parallel curriculum. Acad. Med. 92(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions), S67–S74 (2017).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 75 Manolio T (NHGRI). Personal Communication. (2018).Google Scholar
• 76 Slade I, Subramanian DN, Burton H. Genomics education for medical professionals the current UK landscape. Clin. Med. 16(4), 347–352 (2016).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
• 77 Polivka J, Polivka J, Karlikova M, Topolcan O. Pre-graduate and post-graduate education in personalized medicine in the Czech Republic: statistics, analysis and recommendations. EPMA J. 5(1), 22 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar