We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Research Article

Characterization of biomolecular nanoconjugates by high-throughput delivery and spectroscopic difference

    Robert K DeLong

    * Author for correspondence

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA.

    ,
    Azure Risor

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Masaaki Kanomata

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Amanda Laymon

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Brooke Jones

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Scott D Zimmerman

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Joseph Williams

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Colette Witkowski

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    Mathew Warner

    Washington University, DNA Vector Core, St Louis, MO 63130, USA

    ,
    Michael Ruff

    University of Missouri-Columbia, School of Medicine, Columbia, MO 65212, USA

    ,
    Richard Garrad

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    ,
    John K Fallon

    University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    ,
    Anthony J Hickey

    University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA

    &
    Reza Sedaghat-Herati

    Missouri State University, Cell & Molecular Biology Program, Springfield, MO 65897, USA

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.12.70

    Aim: Nanoparticle conjugates have the potential for delivering siRNA, splice-shifting oligomers or nucleic acid vaccines, and can be applicable to anticancer therapeutics. This article compares tripartite conjugates with gold nanoparticles or synthetic methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-block-polyamidoamine dendrimers. Materials & methods: Interactions with model liposomes of a 1:1 molar ratio of tripalmitin:cholesterol or phospholipid:cholesterol were investigated by high-throughput absorbance, as well as fluorescence difference and cellular luminescence assays. Results: Spectral differences and dynamic light-scattering spectroscopy shifts demonstrated the interaction of conjugates with liposomes. Biological activity was demonstrated by upregulation of gene expression via splice-shifting oligomers, delivery of anti-B-Raf siRNA in cultured human cancer cells or tuberculosis antigen 85B plasmid expression vector in a coculture model of antigen presentation. Conclusion: The data suggests that gold nanoparticles and methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-block-polyamidoamine dendrimer nanoconjugates may have potential for binding, stabilization and delivery of splice-shifting oligomers, siRNA and nucleic acid vaccines for preclinical trials.

    Original submitted 19 December 2011; Revised submitted 3 April 2012; Published online 3 September 2012

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    References

    • Bárány-Wallje E, Keller S, Serowy S et al. A critical reassessment of penetratin translocation across lipid membranes. Biophys. J.89(4),2513–2521 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Shoemaker RH, Scudiero DA, Melillo G et al. Application of high-throughput, molecular-targeted screening to anticancer drug discovery. Curr. Top. Med. Chem.2(3),229–246 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Chithrani DB. Intracellular uptake, transport and processing of gold nanostructures. Mol. Membr. Biol.27(7),299–311 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Vijayanathan V, Thomas T, Thomas TJ. DNA nanoparticles and development of DNA delivery vehicles for gene therapy. Biochemistry41(48),14085–14094 (2002).▪▪ Describes the importance of polyamines and polymers as DNA delivery vehicles.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Brewer LR, Corzett M, Balhorn R. Protamine-induced condensation and decondensation of the same DNA molecule. Science286(5437),120–123 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Reynolds F, Weissleder R, Josephson L. Protamine as an efficient membrane-translocating peptide. Bioconjug. Chem.16(5),1240–1245 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Cheng Y, Xu Z, Ma M, Xu T. Dendrimers as drug carriers: applications in different routes of drug administration. J. Pharm. Sci.97(1),123–143 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Veronese FM, Pasut G. PEGylation, successful approach to drug delivery. Drug Discov. Today10(21),1451–1458 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Froehlich E, Mandeville JS, Jennings, CJ, Segadhat-Herati R, Tajmir-Riahi HA. Dendrimers bind human serum albumin. J. Phys. Chem. B113(19),6986–6993 (2009).▪ Supports the authors’ reasoning for using generation 3 methoxypoly(ethylene glycol)-block-polyamidoamine dendrimer in their studies.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 10  Davis ME, Zuckerman JE, Choi CHJ et al. Evidence of RNAi in humans from systemically administered siRNA via targeted nanoparticles. Nature464(7291),1067–1070 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 11  Kutzler MA Weiner DB. DNA vaccines: ready for the prime time. Nat. Gen.9(10),776–788 (2008).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 12  Navabi H, Jasani B, Reece A et al. A clinical grade poly I:C-analogue (Ampligen) promotes optimal DC maturation and Th1-type T cell responses of healthy donors and cancer patients in vitro. Vaccine27(1),107–115 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13  Liu MA. DNA vaccines: a historical perspective and view to the future. Immunol. Rev.239(1),62–84 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 14  Bauman JA, Li SD, Yang A, Huang L, Kole R. Anti-tumor activity of splice-switching oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res.38(22),8348–8356 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15  Garcia-Blanco MA, Baraniak AP, Lasda EL. Alternative splicing in disease and therapy. Nat. Biotechnol.22(5),535–546 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16  Hingorani SR, Jacobetz MA, Robertson GP, Herlyn M, Tuveson DA. Suppression of BRAF(V599E) in human melanoma abrogates transformation. Cancer Res.63(17),5198–5202 (2003).Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17  Aagaard C, Hoang TT, Izzo A et al. Protection and polyfunctional T cells induced by Ag85B-TB10.4/IC31 against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is highly dependent on the antigen dose. PLoS ONE4(6),e5930 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 18  DeLong RK, Akhtar U, Sallee M et al. Characterization and performance of nucleic acid nanoparticles combined with protamine and gold. Biomaterials30(32),6451–6459 (2009).▪▪ Former research carried out by our group, which underlies the basis of the current study.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19  DeLong RK, Cillessen L, Reynolds C et al. Biomolecular triconjugates formed between gold, protamine and nucleic acid: comparative characterization on the nanoscale. J. Nanotechnol. doi:10.1155/2012/954601 (2012) (Epub ahead of print).Google Scholar
    • 20  Arvizo RR, Miranda OR, Thompson MA et al. Effect of nanoparticle surface charge at the plasma membrane and beyond. Nano Lett.10(7),2543–2548 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 21  Iyer J, Fleming K, Hammond PT. Synthesis and solution properties of new linear-dendritic diblock copolymers. Macromolecules31,8757–8765 (1998).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22  Ramachandra L, Smialek JL, Shank SS et al. Phagosomal processing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigen85B is modulated independently of mycobacterial viability and phagosome maturation. Infect. Immun.73(2),1097–1105 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23  Sharma A, Desai A, Ali R, Tomalia D. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis separation and detection of polyamidoamine dendrimers possessing various cores and terminal groups. J. Chromatogr A.1081(2),238–244 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 24  Luo D, Haverstick K, Belcheva N, Han E, Saltzman WM. Poly(ethylene glycol)-conjugated PAMAM dendrimer for biocompatible, high-efficiency DNA delivery. Macromolecules35(9),3456–3462 (2002).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 25  Chittimalla C, Zammut-Italiano L, Zuber G, Behr JP. Monomolecular DNA nanoparticles for intravenous delivery of genes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.127(32),11436–11441 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26  Tombaccini D, Fallani A, Mugnai G, Ruggieri S. Lipid composition of Balb/c3T3, SV3T3, and concanavalin A-selected revertant cells grown in media containing lipid-depleted serum. J. Lip. Res.22(4),590–597 (1981).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar