We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm.11.26

Using scaffolds with autologous stem cells is a golden strategy for the treatment of bone defects. In this strategy, human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) have often been isolated and expanded in vitro on a plastic surface to obtain a sufficient cell number before seeding on a suitable scaffold. Materials & Methods: Investigating the influence of serial passages (from passage two to passage eight) on the abilities of proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs on 24-well tissue culture polystyrene plates and poly L-lactic acid electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds was performed to determine how prolonged culture affected these cellular abilities and how the nanofibrous scaffolds supported the osteogenic differentiation potential of hMSCs. Results & Conclusion: Serial passage caused adverse changes in hMSCs characteristics, which were indicated by the decline in both proliferation and osteogenic differentiation abilities. Interestingly, the poly L-lactic acid nanofibrous scaffolds showed a significant support in recovering the osteogenic abilities of hMSCs, which had been severely affected by prolonged culture.

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

Bibliography

  • Friedenstein AJ, Latzinik NW, Grosheva AG, Gorskaya UF: Marrow microenvironment transfer by heterotopic transplantation of freshly isolated and cultured cells in porous sponges. Exp. Hematol.10(2),217–227 (1982).Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Wexler SA, Donaldson C, Denning-Kendall P, Rice C, Bradley B, Hows JM: Adult bone marrow is a rich source of human mesenchymal ‘stem’ cells but umbilical cord and mobilized adult blood are not. Br. J. Haematol.121(2),368–374 (2003).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Bonab MM, Alimoghaddam K, Talebian F, Ghaffari SH, Ghavamzadeh A, Nikbin B: Aging of mesenchymal stem cell in vitro. BMC Cell Biol.7,14 (2006).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • Rubin H: Cell aging in vivo and in vitro. Mech. Ageing Dev.98(1),1–35 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Coelho MJ, Cabral AT, Fernande MH: Human bone cell cultures in biocompatibility testing. Part I: osteoblastic differentiation of serially passaged human bone marrow cells cultured in alpha-MEM and in DMEM. Biomaterials21(11),1087–1094 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Agata H, Asahina I, Watanabe N et al.: Characteristic change and loss of in vivo osteogenic abilities of human bone marrow stromal cells during passage. Tissue Eng. Part A16(2),663–673 (2010).▪ Highlights the loss of osteogenic abilities caused by serial passage in studies in vivo.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Wairiuko GM et al.: High passage number of stem cells adversely affects stem cell activation and myocardial protection. Shock26(6),575–580 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Khoo MLM, Shen B, Tao H, Ma DD: Long-term serial passage and neuronal differentiation capability of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Dev.17(5),883–896 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • Pal R, Hanwate M, Jan M, Totey S: Phenotypic and functional comparison of optimum culture conditions for upscaling of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med.3(3),163–174 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 10  Estes BT, Wu AW, Storms RW, Guilak F: Extended passaging, but not aldehyde dehydrogenase activity, increases the chondrogenic potential of human adipose-derived adult stem cells. J. Cell. Physiol.209(3),987–995 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 11  Allen KD, Erickson K, Athanasiou KA: The effects of protein-coated surfaces on passaged porcine TMJ disc cells. Arch. Oral Biol.53(1),53–59 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 12  Gunja NJ, Athanasiou KA: Passage and reversal effects on gene expression of bovine meniscal fibrochondrocytes. Arthritis Res. Ther.9(5),R93 (2007).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 13  Murphy CL, Sambanis A: Effect of oxygen tension and alginate encapsulation on restoration of the differentiated phenotype of passaged chondrocytes. Tissue Eng.7(6),791–803 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 14  Borge L, Lemare F, Demignot S, Adolphe M: Restoration of the differentiated functions of serially passaged chondrocytes using staurosporine. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim.33(9),703–709 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 15  Yeong WY, Chua CK, Leong KF, Chandrasekaran M: Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. Trends Biotechnol.22(12),643–652 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 16  Bartolo PJ, Chua CK, Almeida HA, Chou SM, Lim ASC: Biomanufacturing for tissue engineering: present and future trends. Virtual and Physical Prototyping4(4),203–216 (2009).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17  Liao S, Li B, Ma Z, Wei H, Chan C, Ramakrishna S: Biomimetic electrospun nanofibers for tissue regeneration. Biomed. Mater.1(3),R45–R53 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 18  Kim K, Fisher JP: Nanoparticle technology in bone tissue engineering. J. Drug Target15(4),241–252 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 19  Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M: Tissue engineered Scaffolds for stem cells and regenerative medicine. In: Trends in Stem Cell Biology and Technology. Baharvand H (Ed.), Humana Press, NY, USA, 413 (2009).Google Scholar
  • 20  Jayasinghe SN, Irvine S, McEwan JR: Cell electrospinning highly concentrated cellular suspensions containing primary living organisms into cell-bearing threads and scaffolds. Nanomedicine (Lond.)2(4),555–567 (2007).Link, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 21  Townsend-Nicholson A, Jayasinghe SN: Cell electrospinning: a unique biotechnique for encapsulating living organisms for generating active biological microthreads/scaffolds. Biomacromolecules7(12),3364–3369 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 22  Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE, Caplan AI, Bruder SP: Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. J. Cell Biochem.64(2),295–312 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 23  Grayson WL, Ma T, Bunnell B: Human mesenchymal stem cells tissue development in 3D PET matrices. Biotechnol. Prog.20(3),905–912 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 24  Park YB, Kim YY, Oh SK et al.: Alterations of proliferative and differentiation potentials of human embryonic stem cells during long-term culture. Exp. Mol. Med.40(1),98–108 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 25  Yao KL, Todescan R, Sodek J: Temporal changes in matrix protein synthesis and mRNA expression during mineralized tissue formation by adult rat bone marrow cells in culture. J. Bone Miner. Res.9(2),231–240 (1994).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 26  Chen J, Sotome S, Wang J, Orii H, Uemura T, Shinomiya K: Correlation of in vivo bone formation capability and in vitro differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. J. Med. Dent. Sci.52(1),27–34 (2005).MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 27  Both SK, van der Muijsenberg AJC, van Blitterswijk CA, de Boer J, de Bruijn JD: A rapid and efficient method for expansion of human mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng.13(1),3–9 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 28  Campisi J: Replicative senescence: an old lives’ tale ? Cell84(4),497–500 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 29  Rattan SI: Ageing – a biological perspective. Mol. Aspects Med.16(5),439–508 (1995).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 30  Wang XF, Cui JZ, Nie W, Prasad SS, Matsubara JA: Differential gene expression of early and late passage retinal pigment epithelial cells. Exp. Eye Res.79(2),209–221 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 31  Lin Z, Fitzgerald JB, Xu J et al.: Gene expression profiles of human chondrocytes during passaged monolayer cultivation. J. Orthop. Res.26(9),1230–1237 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 32  Lian JB, Stein GS: Concepts of osteoblast growth and differentiation: basis for modulation of bone cell development and tissue formation. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.3(3),269–305 (1992).▪ Basic concepts in osteoblast growth and differentiation.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 33  Hunter GK, Hauschka PV, Poole AR, Rosenberg LC, Goldberg HA: Nucleation and inhibition of hydroxyapatite formation by mineralized tissue proteins. Biochem J.317(Part 1),59–64 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 34  Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX: Nano-fibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A67(2),531–537 (2003).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
  • 35  Yim EKF, Leong KW: Significance of synthetic nanostructures in dictating cellular response. Nanomedicine1(1),10–21 (2005).▪▪ Demonstrates the importance of nanofibrous structures to adsorption of serum fibronectin and vitronectin.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 36  Smith LA, Liu X, Hu J, Wang P, Ma PX: Enhancing osteogenic differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells by nanofibers. Tissue Eng. Part A15(7),1855–1864 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 37  Yang JT, Bader BL, Kreidberg JA, Ullman-Culleré M, Trevithick JE, Hynes RO: Overlapping and independent functions of fibronectin receptor integrins in early mesodermal development. Dev. Biol.215(2),264–277 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 38  Yim EKF, Darling EM, Kulangara K, Guilak F, Leong KW: Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials31(6),1299–1306 (2010).▪▪ Highlights the importance of nanotopography to focal adhesions and cytoskeletal organization.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 39  Geiger B, Spatz JP, Bershadsky AD: Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.10(1),21–33 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 40  McNamara L, McMurray R, Biggs M, Kantawong F, Oreffo R, Dalby M: Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J. Tissue Eng.2010,1–3 (2010).Google Scholar
  • 41  Salasznyk RM, Klees RF, Williams WA, Boskey A, Plopper GE: Focal adhesion kinase signaling pathways regulate the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Exp. Cell. Res.313(1),22–37 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 42  Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL: Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science310(5751),1139–1143 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 43  Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, Gimble JM, Liedtke W, Chen CS: Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell. Stem Cell5(1),17–26 (2009).▪ Indicated the role of physical interactions with extracellular matrix in controlling stem cell fate.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
  • 44  Petite H, Viateau V, Bensaïd W et al.: Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nat. Biotechnol.18(9),959–963 (2000).▪ Demonstrated success of using in vitro-expanded marrow in the treatment of massive bone defects.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar