Blood clearance and tissue distribution of PEGylated and non-PEGylated gold nanorods after intravenous administration in rats
Abstract
Aims: To develop and determine the safety of gold nanorods, whose aspect ratios can be tuned to obtain plasmon peaks between 650 and 850 nm, as contrast enhancing agents for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Materials & methods: In this study we compared the blood clearance and tissue distribution of cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB)-capped and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated gold nanorods after intravenous injection in the tail vein of rats. The gold content in blood and various organs was measured quantitatively with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Results & discussion: The CTAB-capped gold nanorods were almost immediately (<15 min) cleared from the blood circulation whereas the PEGylation of gold nanorods resulted in a prolonged blood circulation with a half-life time of 19 h and more wide spread tissue distribution. While for the CTAB-capped gold nanorods the tissue distribution was limited to liver, spleen and lung, the PEGylated gold nanorods also distributed to kidney, heart, thymus, brain and testes. PEGylation of the gold nanorods resulted in the spleen being the organ with the highest exposure, whereas for the non-PEGylated CTAB-capped gold nanorods the liver was the organ with the highest exposure, per gram of organ. Conclusion: The PEGylation of gold nanorods resulted in a prolongation of the blood clearance and the highest organ exposure in the spleen. In view of the time frame (up to 48 h) of the observed presence in blood circulation, PEGylated gold nanorods can be considered to be promising candidates for therapeutic and diagnostic imaging purposes.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest
Bibliography
- 1 Rayavarapu RG, Petersen W, Ungureanu C, Post JN, Van Leeuwen TG, Manohar S: Synthesis and bioconjugation of gold nanoparticles as potential molecular probes for light-based imaging techniques. Int. J. Biomed Imaging29817 (2007).Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 De Jong WH, Borm PJA: Drug delivery and nanoparticles: applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomedicine3,133–149 (2008).▪ Review with focus on toxicological evaluation of nanoparticles for drug delivery.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 3 Duncan R: The dawning era of polymer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc.2,347–360 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 4 Ferrari M: Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Cancer5,161–171 (2005).▪ Comprehensive overview of possibilities for use of nanomaterials for cancer treatment.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 5 Li S-D, Huang L: Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. Mol. Pharmac.5,496–504 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 6 Alexis F, Pridgen E, Molnar LK, Farokhzad OC: Factors affecting the clearance and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Mol. Pharm.5,505–515 (2008).▪ Review dealing with factors affecting blood clearance of nanoparticles.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 7 De Jong WH, Hagens WI, Krystek P, Burger MC, Sips AJAM, Geertsma RE: Particle size dependent organ distribution of gold nanoparticles after intravenous administration. Biomaterials29,1912–1919 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 8 Demoy M, Gibaud S, Andreux JP, Weingarten C, Gouritin B, Couvreur P: Splenic trapping of nanoparticles: complementary approaches for in situ studies. Pharm. Res.14,463–468 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 9 Gibaud S, Demoy M, Andreux JP, Weingarten C, Gouritin B, Couvreur P: Cells involved in the capture of nanoparticles in hematopoietic organs. J. Pharm. Sci.85,944–950 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 10 Lenaerts V, Nagelkerke JF, Van Berkel TJ et al.: In vivo uptake of polyisobutyl cyanoacrylate nanopartuicles by rat liver Kupffer, endothelial, and parenchyma cells. J. Pharm. Sci.73,980–982 (1984).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 11 Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC: Long circulating and target specific nanoparticles: theory and practice. Pharmacol. Rev.53,283–318 (2001).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 12 Sadauskas E, Wallin H, Stoltenberg M et al.: Kupffer cells are central in the removal of nanoparticles from the organism. Part Fibre Toxicol.4,10 (2007).▪ Study clearly demonstrating localization of nanoparticles in Kupffer cells of liver.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 Weissenbrock A, Wirth M, Gabor F: WGA grafted PLGA-nanospheres: preparation and association with Caco-2 cells. J. Control. Release99,383–392 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14 Nobs L, Buchegger F, Gurny R, Allémann E: Poly(lactic acid) nanoparticles labeled with biologically active Neutravidin™ for active targeting. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.58,483–490 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 15 Prinzen L, Miserus R, Dirksen A et al.: Optical and magnetic resonance imaging of cell death and platelet activation using annexin A5-functionalized quantum dots. Nano. Lett.7,93–100 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 16 Niidome T, Yamagata M, Okamoto Y et al.: PEG-modified gold nanorods with a stealth character for in vivo application. J. Control. Release114,343–347 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 17 Akiyama Y, Mori T, Katayama Y, Niidome T: The effects of PEG grafting level and injection dose on gold nanorod biodistribution in the tumor bearing mice. J. Control. Release139,81–84 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 18 Von Maltzahn G, Park J-H, Agrawal A et al.: Computationally guided photothermal tumor therapy using long-circulating gold nanorod antennas. Cancer Res.69,3892–3900 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 19 Eghtedari M, Liopo AV, Copland JA, Oraevsky AA, Motamedi M: Engineering of hetero-functional gold nanorods for the in vivo molecular targeting of breast cancer cells. Nano. Lett.9,287–291 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 20 Balogh L, Nigavekar SS, Nair BM et al.: Significant effect of size on the in vivo biodistribution of gold composite nanodevices in mouse tumor models. Nanomedicine3,281–296 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 21 Semmler-Behnke M, Kreyling WG, Lipka J et al.: Biodistribution of 1.4- and 18-nm gold particles in rats. Small4,2108–2111 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 22 Lin AWH, Lewinski NA, West JL, Halas NJ, Drezek RA: Optically tunable nanoparticle contrast agents for early cancer detection: model-based analysis of gold nanoshells. J. Biomed. Opt.10,064035 (2005).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 23 Perez-Juste J, Pastoriza-Santos I, Liz-Marzan L, Mulvaney P: Gold nanorods: synthesis, characterization and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev.249,1870–1901 (2005).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 24 Sokolov K, Follen M, Aaron J et al.: Real-time vital optical imaging of precancer using anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies conjugated to gold nanoparticles. Cancer Res.63,1999–2004 (2003).Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 25 Stuart DA, Haes AJ, Yonzon CR, Hicks EM, Van Duyne RP: Biological applications of localised surface plasmonic phenomenae. IEE Proc. Nanobiotechnol.152,13–32 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 26 Nikoobakht B, El-Sayed MA: Preparation and growth mechanism of gold nanorods (NRs) using seed-mediated growth method. Chem. Mater.15,1957–1962 (2003).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 27 Liu M, Guyot-Sionnest P: Mechanism of silver(I)-assisted growth of gold nanorods and bipyramids. J. Physic. Chem. B109,22192–22200 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 28 Takahashi H, Niidome Y, Niidome T, Kaneko K, Kawasaki H, Yamada S: Modification of gold nanorods using phosphatidylcholine to reduce cytotoxicity. Langmuir22,2–5 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 29 Alkilany AM, Nagaria PK, Hexel CR, Shaw TJ, Murphy CJ, Wyatt MD: Cellular uptake and cytotoxicity of gold nanorods: molecular origin of cytotoxicity and surface effects. Small5,701–708 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 30 Rayavarapu RG, Petersen W, Hartsuiker L et al.: In vitro toxicity studies of polymer-coated gold nanorods. Nanotechnology21, No. 145101 (2010)Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 31 Aggarwal P, Hall JB, McLeland CB, Dobrovolskaia MA, McNeil SE: Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv. Drug Del. Rev.61,428–437 (2009).▪ Review on nanoparticle–protein interaction.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 32 Dobrovolskaia MA, Patri AK, Zheng J et al.: Interaction of colloidal gold nanoparticles with human blood: effects on particle size and analysis of plasma protein binding profiles. Nanomedicine5,106–117 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 33 De Paoli Lacerda SH, Park JJ, Meuse C et al.: Interaction of gold nanoparticles with common human blood proteins. ACS Nano.4,365–379 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 34 Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, Dawson KA: The nanoparticle–protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st Century. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.134–135, 167–174 (2007).Google Scholar
- 35 Lynch I, Dawson KA: Protein–nanoparticle interactions. Nano. Today3,40–47 (2008).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 36 Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D et al.: Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater.8,543–557 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 37 Liao H, Hafner JH: Gold nanorod bioconjugates. Chem. Mater.17,4636–4641 (2005).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 38 Storm G, Belliot SO, Daemen T, Lasic DD: Surface modification of nanoparticles to oppose uptake by the mononuclear phagocyte system. Adv. Drug Del. Rev.17,31–48 (1995).▪ Early review on possibilities to avoid uptake of nanoparticles by phagocytic cells by surface modification.Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 39 Gref R, Lück M, Quellec P et al.: ‘Stealth’ corona-core nanoparticles surface modified by polyethylene glycol (PEG): influences of the corona (PEG chain length and surface density) and of the core composition on phagocytic uptake and plasma protein adsorption. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces18,301–313 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 40 Owens III DE, Peppas NA: Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. Int. J. Pharm.307,93–102 (2006).▪ Review on serum protein and polymer-coated nanoparticle interaction, and influence on in vivo fate of the particles.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 41 Moghimi SM: Mechanisms of splenic clearance of blood cells and particles: towards development of new splenotropic agents. Adv. Drug Del. Rev.17,103–115 (1995).▪ The anatomy and function of the spleen as a blood filter.Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 42 Sadauskas E, Danscher G, Stoltenberg M, Vogel U, Larsen A, Wallin H: Protracted elimination of gold nanoparticles from mouse liver. Nanomedicine5,162–169 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 43 Yu LE, Yung L-YL, Ong C-N et al.: Translocation and effects of gold nanoparticles after inhalation exposure in rats. Nanotoxicology1,235–242 (2007).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar
- 44 Xia T, Kovonich M, Liong M et al.: Comparison of the mechanism of toxicity of zinc oxide and cerium oxide nanoparticles based on dissolution and oxidative stress. ACS Nano.2,2121–21334 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 45 Nemmar A, Hoet PH, Vanquickenborne B et al.: Passage of inhaled particles into the blood circulation in humans. Circulation105,411–414 (2002).▪ Study showing nanoparticle translocation form lung to blood, but debated because of loss of radiolabel.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 46 Kreyling WG, Semmler M, Moller W: Dosimetry and toxicology of ultrafine particles. J. Aerosol Med.17,140–152 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 47 Mills NL, Amin N, Robinson SD et al.: Do inhaled carbon nanoparticles translocate directly into the circulation in humans? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.173,426–431 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

