We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine
Research Article

The influence of silica nanoparticles on small mesenteric arterial function

    Ali Shukur

    School of Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    School of Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    ,
    Debra Whitehead

    School of Science & the Environment, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    School of Science & the Environment, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    ,
    Alexander Seifalian

    Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK

    Centre for Nanotechnology & Regenerative Medicine, UCL Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK

    &
    May Azzawi

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: m.azzawi@mmu.ac.uk

    School of Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    School of Healthcare Science, Faculty of Science & Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nnm-2016-0124

    Aim: To determine the influence of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) on small arterial function; both ex vivo and in vivo. Methods: Mono-dispersed dye-encapsulated SiNPs (97.85 ± 2.26 nm) were fabricated and vasoconstrictor and vasodilator responses of mesenteric arteries assessed. Results: We show that while exposure to SiNPs under static conditions, attenuated endothelial dependent dilator responses ex vivo, attenuation was only evident at lower agonist concentrations, when exposed under flow conditions or after intravenous administration in vivo. Pharmacological inhibition studies suggest that SiNPs may interfere with the endothelial dependent hyperpolarizing factor vasodilator pathway. Conclusion: The dosage dependent influence of SiNPs on arterial function will help identify strategies for their safe clinical administration.

    Graphical abstract

    A schematic illustration summarizing the effect of silica nanoparticles on the vasodilator function of endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells of the mesenteric artery and the potential associated mechanisms involved in mediating their behavior ex vivo.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1 Kim J, Cao L, Shvartsman D, Silva EA, Mooney DJ. Targeted delivery of nanoparticles to ischemic muscle for imaging and therapeutic angiogenesis. Nano Lett. 11(21192718), 694–700 (2011). •• Describes the delivery of silica nanoparticles for improved tissue perfusion.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Motwani MS, Rafiei Y, Tzifa A, Seifalian AM. In situ endothelialization of intravascular stents from progenitor stem cells coated with nanocomposite and functionalized biomolecules. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 58(21446954), 2–13 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Jokerst JV, Khademi C, Gambhir SS. Intracellular aggregation of multimodal silica nanoparticles for ultrasound-guided stem cell implantation. Sci. Transl. Med. 5(177), 177ra35 (2013).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Liberman A, Mendez N, Trogler WC, Kummel AC. Synthesis and surface functionalization of silica nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Surf. Sci. Rep. 69(2–3), 132–158 (2014). • Comprehensive review article on the use of silica nanoparticles for imaging diagnostics and therapy.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Diaconu M, Tache A, Eremia SAV et al. Structural characterization of chitosan coated silicon nanoparticles – a FT-IR approach. U.P.B. Sci. Bull., Series B 72(3), 15–122 (2010).Google Scholar
    • 6 Du Z, Zhao D, Jing L et al. Cardiovascular toxicity of different sizes amorphous silica nanoparticles in rats after intratracheal instillation. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 13(3), 194–207 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Kim IY, Joachim E, Choi H, Kim K. Toxicity of silica nanoparticles depends on size, dose, and cell type. Nanomedicine 11(6), 1407–1416 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Corbalan JJ, Medina C, Jacoby A, Malinski T, Radomski MW. Amorphous silica nanoparticles trigger nitric oxide/peroxynitrite imbalance in human endothelial cells: inflammatory and cytotoxic effects. Int. J. Nanomedicine 6, 2821–2835 (2011).Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Corbalan JJ, Medina C, Jacoby A, Malinski T, Radomski MW. Amorphous silica nanoparticles aggregate human platelets: potential implications for vascular homeostasis. Int. J. Nanomedicine 7, 631–639 (2012).Link, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Akbar N, Mohamed T, Whitehead D, Azzawi M. Biocompatibility of amorphous silica nanoparticles: size and charge effect on vascular function, in vitro. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 58(5), 353–362 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Farooq A, Whitehead D, Azzawi M. Attenuation of endothelial-dependent vasodilator responses, induced by dye-encapsulated silica nanoparticles, in aortic vessels. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 9(3), 413–425 (2013).LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Luksha L, Agewall S, Kublickiene K. Endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in vascular physiology and cardiovascular disease. Atherosclerosis 202(2), 330–344 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Hilgers RH, Webb RC. Reduced expression of SKCa and IKCa channel proteins in rat small mesenteric arteries during angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 292(5), H2275–H2284 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Honing ML, Smits P, Morrison PJ, Rabelink TJ. Bradykinin-induced vasodilation of human forearm resistance vessels is primarily mediated by endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization. Hypertension 35(6), 1314–1318 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Hinton JM, Langton PD. Inhibition of EDHF by two new combinations of K+-channel inhibitors in rat isolated mesenteric arteries. Br. J. Pharmacol. 138(6), 1031–1035 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Hilgers RH, Todd J Jr, Webb RC. Regional heterogeneity in acetylcholine-induced relaxation in rat vascular bed: role of calcium-activated K+ channels. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 291(1), H216–H222 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Edwards G, Dora KA, Gardener MJ, Garland CJ, Weston AH. K+ is an endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor in rat arteries. Nature 396(9834033), 269–272 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Sandow SL, Tare M, Coleman HA, Hill CE, Parkington HC. Involvement of myoendothelial gap junctions in the actions of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor. Circul. Res. 90(10), 1108–1113 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Hald BO, Jacobsen JC, Braunstein TH et al. BKCa and KV channels limit conducted vasomotor responses in rat mesenteric terminal arterioles. Pflugers Arch. 463(2), 279–295 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Little TL, Xia J, Duling BR. Dye tracers define differential endothelial and smooth-muscle coupling patterns within the arteriolar wall. Circul. Res. 76(3), 498–504 (1995).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Itoh T, Seki N, Suzuki S, Ito S, Kajikuri J, Kuriyama H. Membrane hyperpolarization inhibits agonist-induced synthesis of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in rabbit mesenteric artery. J. Physiol. 451(1), 307–328 (1992).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Stöber W, Fink A, Bohn E. Controlled growth of monodisperse silica spheres in the micron size range. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 26(1), 62–69 (1968).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Ismail AMI, A.A.F. Z, Mohamed AS. Preparation of spherical silica nanoparticles: stober silica. J. Am. Sci. 6(11), 985–989 (2010).Google Scholar
    • 24 Breslow NE, Clayton DG. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88(421), 9–25 (1993).Google Scholar
    • 25 Gamucci O, Bertero A, Gagliardi M, Bardi G. Biomedical nanoparticles: overview of their surface immune-compatibility. Coatings 4(1), 139–159 (2014).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Barbé C, Bartlett J, Kong L et al. Silica particles: a novel drug-delivery system. Adv. Mater. 16(21), 1959–1966 (2004).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Kasper J, Hermanns MI, Bantz C et al. Interactions of silica nanoparticles with lung epithelial cells and the association to flotillins. Arch. Toxicol. 87(6), 1053–1065 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Kitazawa T, Kitazawa K. Size-dependent heterogeneity of contractile Ca2+ sensitization in rat arterial smooth muscle. J. Physiol. 590(Pt 21), 5401–5423 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S et al. Nanoparticle size Is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9), 7155–7167 (2011). • Comprehensive study on the protein corona which has implications for nanoparticle uptake and interaction with intracellular components in vivo.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 30 Soloviev A, Zholos A, Ivanova I et al. Plasmonic gold nanoparticles possess the ability to open potassium channels in rat thoracic aorta smooth muscles in a remote control manner. Vascul. Pharmacol. 72, 190–196 (2015). •• Provides the first direct evidence of the effect of nanoparticles (gold) on potassium ion channels.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Nemmar A, Albarwani S, Beegam S et al. Amorphous silica nanoparticles impair vascular homeostasis and induce systemic inflammation. Int. J. Nanomedicine 9, 2779–2789 (2014).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Yang L, Yan Q, Zhao J et al. The role of potassium channel in silica nanoparticle-induced inflammatory effect in human vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Toxicol. Lett. 223(1), 16–24 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 33 Liu X, Sun JA. Endothelial cells dysfunction induced by silica nanoparticles through oxidative stress via JNK/P53 and NF-kappa B pathways. Biomaterials 31(32), 8198–8209 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Passagne I, Morille M, Rousset M, Pujalte I, L'azou B. Implication of oxidative stress in size-dependent toxicity of silica nanoparticles in kidney cells. Toxicology 299(2–3), 112–124 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Zhao L, Wang Y, Ma X, Deng X. Oxidative stress impairs IKCa- and SKCa-mediated vasodilatation in mesenteric arteries from diabetic rats. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 33(7), 939–944 (2013).Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Joshi A, Woodman OL. Increased nitric oxide activity compensates for increased oxidative stress to maintain endothelial function in rat aorta in early type 1 diabetes. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch. Pharmacol. 385(11), 1083–1094 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 37 De Wit C, Griffith TM. Connexins and gap junctions in the EDHF phenomenon and conducted vasomotor responses. Pflugers Arch. 459(6), 897–914 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 38 Chaytor AT, Taylor HJ, Griffith TM. Gap junction-dependent and -independent EDHF-type relaxations may involve smooth muscle cAMP accumulation. Am. J. Physiol. Heart C 282(4), H1548–H1555 (2002).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 39 Nurkiewicz TR, Porter DW, Hubbs AF et al. Pulmonary nanoparticle exposure disrupts systemic microvascular nitric oxide signaling. Toxicol. Sci. 110(1), 191–203 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 40 Leblanc AJ, Cumpston JL, Chen BT, Frazer D, Castranova V, Nurkiewicz TR. Nanoparticle inhalation impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation in subepicardial arterioles. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 72(24), 1576–1584 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Duan JC, Yu YB, Yu Y et al. Silica nanoparticles enhance autophagic activity, disturb endothelial cell homeostasis and impair angiogenesis. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11, 50 (2014).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Shukur A, Rizvi SB, Whitehead D, Seifalian A, Azzawi M. Altered sensitivity to nitric oxide donors, induced by intravascular infusion of quantum dots, in murine mesenteric arteries. Nanomedicine 9(4), 532–539 (2013). • Description of the influence of quantum dots on dilator responses and the implication for patients with cardiovascular disease.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 43 Oner G, Cirrik S, Bulbul M, Yuksel S. Dietary silica modifies the characteristics of endothelial dilation in rat aorta. Endothelium 13(1), 17–23 (2006).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44 Ang JC, Henderson MJ, Campbell RA et al. Human serum albumin binding to silica nanoparticles - effect of protein fatty acid ligand. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16(21), 10157–10168 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 45 Freese C, Schreiner D, Anspach L et al. In vitro investigation of silica nanoparticle uptake into human endothelial cells under physiological cyclic stretch. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 11(1), 1 (2014). • Description of the influence of flow on nanoparticle uptake, in vitro.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46 Hu J, Liu Y. Cyclic strain enhances cellular uptake of nanoparticles. J. Nanomater. 2015, 8 (2015).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 47 Borak B, Biernat P, Prescha A, Baszczuk A, Pluta J. In vivo study on the biodistribution of silica particles in the bodies of rats. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 21(1), 13–18 (2012).MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 48 Ivanov S, Zhuravsky S, Yukina G, Tomson V, Korolev D, Galagudza M. In vivo toxicity of intravenously administered silica and silicon nanoparticles. Materials 5(10), 1873 (2012).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 49 Lee C-H, Cheng S-H, Wang Y-J et al. Near-infrared mesoporous silica nanoparticles for optical imaging: characterization and in vivo biodistribution. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(2), 215–222 (2009).Crossref, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 50 Yu T, Hubbard D, Ray A, Ghandehari H. In vivo biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of silica nanoparticles as a function of geometry, porosity and surface characteristics. J. Control. Release 163(1), 46–54 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar