We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Biomarkers in the evolution of multiple sclerosis

    Thomas Berger

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: thomas.berger@i-med.ac.at

    Clinical Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2017-0033

    Nonimaging biomarkers can be applied in differential diagnosis, evaluation of disease progression and therapy monitoring of multiple sclerosis (MS). Presence of oligoclonal IgG bands in cerebrospinal fluid is a diagnostic element and a negative predictor of MS evolution. AQP4 antibodies are pathogenic and diagnostic for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein develop in about 50% of predominantly pediatric patients with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, but their possible role in pathogenesis is unknown. Currently, there are no individualized biomarkers suitable to track disease progression. Neutralizing antibodies against IFN-β, natalizumab and daclizumab arise with variable frequency and reduce treatment efficacy. The anti-John Cunningham virus antibody index has potential as a biomarker for risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

    References

    • 1 Filippi M, Agosta F. Imaging biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31(4), 770–788 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Comabella M, Montalban X. Body fluid biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 13(1), 113–126 (2014).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Holmøy T. The discovery of oligoclonal bands: a 50 year anniversary. Eur. Neurol. 62(5), 311–315 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Andersson M, Alvarez-Cermeño J, Bernardi G et al. Cerebrospinal fluid in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus report. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 57(8), 897–902 (1994).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Solomon AJ, Klein EP, Bourdette D. “Undiagnosing” multiple sclerosis: the challenge of misdiagnosis in MS. Neurology 78(24), 1986–1991 (2012).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 69(2), 292–302 (2011).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Miller DH, Weinshenker BG, Filippi M et al. Differential diagnosis of suspected multiple sclerosis: a consensus approach. Mult. Scler. 14(9), 1157–1174 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Wingerchuk DM, Banwell B, Bennett JL et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Neurology 85(2), 177–189 (2015).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Mader S, Gredler V, Schanda K et al. Complement activating antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in neuromyelitis optica and related disorders. J. Neuroinflammation 8, 184 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Rostasy K, Mader S, Schanda K et al. Anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in pediatric patients with optic neuritis. Arch. Neurol. 69(6), 752–756 (2012).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Di Pauli F, Mader S, Rostasy K et al. Temporal dynamics of anti-MOG antibodies in CNS demyelinating diseases. Clin. Immunol. 138(3), 247–254 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Baumann M, Sahin K, Lechner C et al. Clinical and neuroradiological differences of paediatric acute disseminating encephalomyelitis with and without antibodies to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 86(3), 265–272 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Di Pauli F, Höftberger R, Reindl M et al. Fulminant demyelinating encephalomyelitis: insights from antibody studies and neuropathology. Neurol. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2(6), e175 (2015).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Tintoré M, Rovira A, Río J et al. Do oligoclonal bands add information to MRI in first attacks of multiple sclerosis? Neurology 70(13 Pt 2), 1079–1083 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Comabella M, Fernández M, Martin R et al. Cerebrospinal fluid chitinase 3-like 1 levels are associated with conversion to multiple sclerosis. Brain 133(Pt 4), 1082–1093 (2010).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Hinsinger G, Galéotti N, Nabholz N et al. Chitinase 3-like proteins as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. 21(10), 1251–1261 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Kuhle J, Barro C, Andreasson U et al. Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 54(10), 1655–1661 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Arrambide G, Espejo C, Eixarch H et al. Neurofilament light chain level is a weak risk factor for the development of MS. Neurology 87(11), 1076–1084 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Deisenhammer F, Mayringer I, Harvey J et al. A comparative study of the relative bioavailability of different interferon beta preparations. Neurology 54(11), 2055–2060 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Gneiss C, Tripp P, Reichartseder F et al. Differing immunogenic potentials of interferon beta preparations in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 12(6), 731–737 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Polman CH, O'Connor PW, Havrdova E et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 354(9), 899–910 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Calabresi PA et al. Natalizumab plus interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 354(9), 911–923 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Sørensen PS, Jensen PE, Haghikia A et al. Occurrence of antibodies against natalizumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab. Mult. Scler. 17(9), 1074–1078 (2011).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 24 US Food and Drug Administration. Highlights of prescribing information: ZINBRYTA® (daclizumab) injection, for subcutaneous use. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/761029s000lbl.pdf.Google Scholar
    • 25 Kuesters G, Plavina T, Lee S et al. Anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody index differentiates risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients with no prior immunosuppressant use: an updated analysis. Neurology 84(14), Supplement P4.031 (2015).Google Scholar
    • 26 Hegen H, Auer M, Bsteh G et al. Stability and predictive value of anti-JCV antibody index in multiple sclerosis: a 6 year longitudinal study. PLoS ONE 12(3), e0174005 (2017).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar