We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Pralatrexate: treatment of T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma

    Terri Parker

    Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208032, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

    ,
    Lisa Barbarotta

    Yale-New Haven Hospital, 20 York Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA

    &
    Francine Foss

    * Author for correspondence

    Department of Internal Medicine (Hematology), Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208032, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.12.168

    Pralatrexate is a folate analogue metabolic inhibitor manufactured by Allos Therapeutics, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In both preclinical and clinical studies, pralatrexate demonstrated activity in lymphoma. Pralatrexate was US FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma in 2009. Approval was based on data from the PROPEL trial that demonstrated an overall response rate of 29% in a heavily pretreated patient population. The dose and schedule of pralatrexate is 30-mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks, given in 7-week cycles. Folate and vitamin B12 supplementation are required to minimize toxicity. The most common toxicities are mucositis, thrombocytopenia, nausea and fatigue.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

    References

    • Vose JM. Peripheral T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North Am.22(5),997–1005 (2008).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • Foss FM, Zinzani PL, Vose JM, Gascoyne RD, Rosen ST, Tobinai K. Peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood117(25),6756–6767 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Vose J, Armitage J, Weisenburger D, Project IT-CL. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes. J. Clin. Oncol.26(25),4124–4130 (2008).▪ Describes the outcomes for patients with aggressive T-cell lymphoma.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • AbouYabis AN, Shenoy PJ, Flowers C, Lechowicz MJ. Response and survival rates in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma treated with anthracycline-based regimens: a comprehensive meta-analysis [abstract]. Blood110(11), Abstract 3452 (2007).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • NCCN Guidelines™ Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas Panel. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Fort Washington, PA, USA (9 July 2012).Google Scholar
    • Enblad G, Hagberg H, Erlanson M et al. A pilot study of alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody) therapy for patients with relapsed or chemotherapy-refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Blood103(8),2920–2924 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Zinzani PL, Musuraca G, Tani M et al. Phase II trial of proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol.25(27),4293–4297 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Dang NH, Pro B, Hagemeister FB et al. Phase II trial of denileukin diftitox for relapsed/refractory T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol.136(3),439–447 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • Sallah S, Wan JY, Nguyen NP. Treatment of refractory T-cell malignancies using gemcitabine. Br. J. Haematol.113(1),185–187 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 10  Czuczman MS, Porcu P, Johnson J et al. Results of a Phase II study of 506U78 in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma: CALGB 59901. Leuk. Lymphoma48(1),97–103 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 11  Dueck GS, Chua N, Prasad A et al. Activity of lenalidomide in a Phase II trial for T-cell lymphoma: report on the first 24 cases. J. Clin. Oncol.27(15S), Abstract 8524 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 12  Mercieca J, Matutes E, Dearden C, Maclennan K, Catovsky D. The role of pentostatin in the treatment of T-cell malignancies: analysis of response rate in 145 patients according to disease subtype. J. Clin. Oncol.12(12),2588–2593 (1994).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13  Tsimberidou AM, Giles F, Duvic M, Fayad L, Kurzrock R. Phase II study of pentostatin in advanced T-cell lymphoid malignancies: update of an M.D. Anderson Cancer Center series. Cancer100(2),342–349 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 14  O’Connor OA, Pro B, Pinter-Brown L et al. Pralatrexate in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: results from the pivotal PROPEL study. J. Clin. Oncol.29(9),1182–1189 (2011).▪▪ Describes the PROPEL trial that led to US FDA approval of pralatrexate in peripheral T-cell lymphoma.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15  Piekarz RL, Frye R, Prince HM et al. Phase 2 trial of romidepsin in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Blood117(22),5827–5834 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16  Coiffier B, Pro B, Prince HM et al. Results from a pivotal, open-label, Phase II study of romidepsin in relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma after prior systemic therapy. J. Clin. Oncol.30(6),631–636 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17  Pro B, Advani R, Brice P et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) in patients with relapsed or refractory systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma: results of a Phase II study. J. Clin. Oncol.30(18),2190–2196 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18  Younes A, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP et al. Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. N. Engl. J. Med.363(19),1812–1821 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 19  Thompson CA. FDA approves pralatrexate for treatment of rare lymphoma. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm.66(21),1890 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 20  Sirotnak FM, Schmid FA, Samuels LL, Degraw JI. 10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin: structural design and biochemical, pharmacologic, and antitumor properties. NCI Monogr. (5),127–131 (1987).MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21  Sirotnak FM, Degraw JI. Selective antitumor action of folate analogs. In: Folate Antagonists as Therapeutic Agents. Sirotnak FM, Burchall JJ, Ensminger WD, Montgomery JA (Eds). Academic Press, Inc., NY, USA, 43–95 (1984).▪ Describes the efficacy of pralatrexate in animal models and the superiority of pralatrexate over methotrexate.Google Scholar
    • 22  Sirotnak FM, Degraw JI, Colwell WT, Piper JR. A new analogue of 10-deazaaminopterin with markedly enhanced curative effects against human tumor xenografts in mice. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.42(4),313–318 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23  Sirotnak FM, Degraw JI, Schmid FA, Goutas LJ, Moccio DM. New folate analogs of the 10-deaza-aminopterin series. Further evidence for markedly increased antitumor efficacy compared with methotrexate in ascitic and solid murine tumor models. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol.12(1),26–30 (1984).Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 24  Izbicka E, Diaz A, Campos D, Wick M, Steffen R, Saunders M. Differential activity and potential mechanism of action of pralatrexate (PDX) methotrexate, and pemetrexed (Alimta) in human cancer models in vivo and in vitro.Proceedings of AACR–NCI–EORTC International Conference Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics: Discovery, Biology, and Clinical Applications. San Francisco, CA, USA, 22–26 October 2007.Google Scholar
    • 25  Izbicka E, Diaz A, Streeper R et al. Distinct mechanistic activity profile of pralatrexate in comparison to other antifolates in in vitro and in vivo models of human cancers. Cancer Chemother. Pharm.64(5),993–999 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26  Venitz J, Brar SS, Pronk GJ et al. Pralatrexate pharmacokinetics with intravenous administration to oncology patients (poster # B211). Presented at: AACR–NCI–EORTC Internation Conference: Molecular Targets and Therapeutics. Boston, MA, USA, 15–19 November 2009.Google Scholar
    • 27  Malik SM, Liu K, Qiang X et al. Folotyn (pralatrexate injection) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: U.S. Food and Drug Administration drug approval summary. Clin. Cancer Res.16(20),4921–4927 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 28  FOLOTYN®, prescribing information/package insert. Allos Therapeutics, USA (2011).Google Scholar
    • 29  Wang ES, O’Connor O, She Y, Zelenetz AD, Sirotnak FM, Moore MA. Activity of a novel anti-folate (PDX, 10-propargyl 10-deazaaminopterin) against human lymphoma is superior to methotrexate and correlates with tumor RFC-1 gene expression. Leuk. Lymphoma44(6),1027–1035 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 30  Toner LE, Vrhovac R, Smith EA et al. The schedule-dependent effects of the novel antifolate pralatrexate and gemcitabine are superior to methotrexate and cytarabine in models of human non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Clin. Cancer Res.12(3 Pt 1),924–932 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 31  Marchi E, Paoluzzi L, Scotto L et al. Pralatrexate is synergistic with the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in in vitro and in vivo models of T-cell lymphoid malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res.16(14),3648–3658 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 32  O’Connor OA, Horwitz S, Hamlin P et al. Phase II-I-II study of two different doses and schedules of pralatrexate, a high-affinity substrate for the reduced folate carrier, in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma reveals marked activity in T-cell malignancies. J. Clin. Oncol.27(26),4357–4364 (2009).▪▪ Describes the initial Phase I/II study of patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 33  Mould DR, Sweeney K, Duffull SB et al. A population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation of pralatrexate in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin’s or Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.86(2),190–196 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 34  Horwitz SM, Vose JM, Advani R et al. Pralatrexate and gemcitabine in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoproliferative malignancies: Phase 1 results. Blood114(22),667 (Abstract 1674) (2009).▪ Describes the data from a Phase I/II study with the combination of pralatrexate and gemcitabine.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 35  Foss F, Horwitz SM, Coiffier B et al. Pralatrexate is an effective treatment for relapsed or refractory transformed mycosis fungoides: a subgroup efficacy analysis from the PROPEL Study. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk.12(4),238–243 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 36  Horwitz SM, Kim YH, Foss F et al. Identification of an active, well-tolerated dose of pralatrexate in patients with relapsed or refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Blood119(18),4115–4122 (2012).▪▪ Describes the findings of the dose-finding trial of pralatrexate in relapsed/refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar