Published Online:11 Aug 2009https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.09.59
Abstract
Since the use of prostate-specific antigen screening has become widespread, prostate cancer at clinical T4 stage has become rare. Most bladder invasion is actually detected on radical prostatectomy specimens as a microscopic bladder neck involvement (BNI). The 2002 TNM classification system classified prostate cancer with BNI within a unified pT4 category, and rendered it equivalent to invasion into pelvic wall musculature or external sphincter. This decision is controversial. Various series have studied the clinical relevance and the impact of BNI on prognosis. Our evidence-based review provides support to the assignment of BNI within the subset of pT3 stage, and suggests that further improvement of the actual TNM staging system should be considered. However, BNI remains strongly associated with adverse pathology and should be regarded as a factor that worsens the prognosis of the underlying tumor stage.
Keywords:
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest
Bibliography
- 1 Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al.: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin.58(2),71–96 (2008).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 2 International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 6th edition. Sobin LH, Wittekind Ch (Eds). Wiley-Liss, NY, USA, 184–187 (2002).Google Scholar
- 3 Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ: Cancer progression and survival rates following radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J. Urol.172,910–914 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 4 Epstein JI, Partin AW, Sauvageot J et al.: Prediction of progression following radical prostatectomy: a multi-variate analysis of 721 men with long term follow-up. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.20,286–292 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 5 Catalona WJ, Smith DS: 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol.152(5),1837–1842 (1994).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 6 Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC: Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer71,3582–3593 (1993).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 7 Kattan MW, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT: Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.17,1499–1507 (1999).▪ Well-established nomogram predicting the probability of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 8 Walz J, Chun FK, Klein EA et al.: Nomogram predicting the probability of early recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Urol.181(2),601–607 (2009).▪ Well-established nomogram predicting the probability of disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 9 Johnstone PA, Ward KC, Goodman M, Assikis V, Petros JA: Radical prostatectomy for clinical T4 prostate cancer. Cancer 15,106(12),2603–2609 (2006).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 10 Yossepowitch O, Sircar K, Scardino PT et al.: Bladder neck involvement in pathological stage pT4 radical prostatectomy specimens is not an independent prognostic factor. J. Urol.168,2011–2015 (2002).▪▪ Study that reported one of the largest cohorts of men and the most accurate data in terms of multivariate analyses and pathological assessment.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 11 Yossepowitch O, Engelstein D, Konichezky M et al.: Bladder neck involvement at radical prostatectomy: positive margins or advanced T4 disease? Urology56,448–452 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 12 Dash A, Sanda MG, Yu M et al.: Prostate cancer involving the bladder neck: recurrence-free survival and implications for AJCC staging modification. Urology60,276–280 (2002).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 13 Aydin H, Tsuzuki T, Hernandez D et al.: Positive proximal (bladder neck) margin at radical prostatectomy confers greater risk of biochemical progression. Urology64,551–555 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 14 Poulos CK, Koch MO, Eble JN, Daggy JK, Cheng L: Bladder neck invasion is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence. Cancer101,1563–1568 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 15 Billis A, Freitas LL, Magna LA, Samara AB, Ferreira U: Prostate cancer with bladder neck involvement: pathologic findings with application of a new practical method for tumor extent evaluation and recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy. Int. Urol. Nephrol.36,363–368 (2004).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 16 Rodríguez-Covarrubias F, Larré S, Dahan M et al.: Invasion of bladder neck after radical prostatectomy: one definition for different outcomes. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis.11,294–297 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 17 Buschemeyer WC, Hamilton RJ, Aronson WJ et al.: Is a positive bladder neck margin truly a T4 lesion in the prostate specific antigen era? Results from the SEARCH Database. J. Urol.179,124–129 (2008).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 18 Ruano T, Meirelles L, Freitas LL et al.: The significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in radical prostatectomies: pT4 disease? Int. Urol. Nephrol.41(1),71–76 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 19 Rodríguez-Covarrubias F, Larré S, Dahan M et al.: Prognostic significance of microscopic bladder neck invasion in prostate cancer. BJU Int.103(6),758–761 (2009).▪▪ Study that reported one of the largest cohorts of men and the most accurate data in terms of multivariate analyses and pathological assessment.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 20 Zhou M, Reuther AM, Levin HS et al.: Microscopic bladder neck involvement by prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens is not a significant independent prognostic factor. Mod. Pathol.22(3),385–392 (2009).▪▪ Study that reported one of the largest cohorts of men and the most accurate data in terms of multivariate analyses and pathological assessment.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 21 Bianco FJ, Grignon DJ, Sakr WA et al.: Radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: impact of a positive margin. Eur. Urol.43(5),461–466 (2003).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
- 22 Shelfo SW, Obek C, Soloway MS: Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures and continence. Urology51,73–78 (1998).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 23 Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Bergstralh EJ et al.: Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy. Urology50,733–739 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
- 24 Obek C, Sadek S, Lai S et al.: Positive surgical margins with radical retropubic prostatectomy: anatomic site-specific pathologic analysis and impact on prognosis. Urology54,682–688 (1999).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
