Abstract
Two areas that remain the focus of improvement in pancreatic cancer include high post-operative morbidity and inability to uniformly translate surgical success into long-term survival. This narrative review addresses specific aspects of pancreatic cancer surgery, including neoadjuvant therapy, vascular resections, extended pancreatectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy and current status of minimally invasive surgery. R0 resection confers longer disease-free survival and overall survival. Vascular and adjacent organ resections should be undertaken after neoadjuvant therapy, only if R0 resection can be ensured based on high-quality preoperative imaging, and that too, with acceptable post-operative morbidity. Extended lymphadenectomy does not offer any advantage over standard lymphadenectomy. Although minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies offers some short-term benefits over open distal pancreatectomy, safety remains a concern with minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy. Strict adherence to principles and judicious utilization of surgery within a multimodality framework is the way forward.
Lay abstract
Two main areas of focus in pancreatic cancer research are the high rates of post-surgery complications and poor survival despite completely removing the tumor. Complete, margin-negative resection (where some healthy tissue is removed to ensure the whole tumor is cut out) is the only way to ensure long-term survival. However, such extensive resections, especially when they involve nearby blood vessels and/or organs, should only be undertaken if the imaging done pre-surgery indicates the possibility that a complete, margin-negative resection can be achieved. It should be noted that the removal of lymph nodes, in addition to the ones normally removed during a pancreatic resection, does not confer a survival benefit. Distal pancreatectomy (performed for tumors involving the body or tail of the pancreas) is safe and feasible using minimal access methods; however, the safety of minimally-invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (performed for tumors of the head of the pancreas) remains to be proven. The oncological benefit of minimally-invasive distal pancreatectomy over open surgery has not been established.
Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest
References
- 1. . Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin. 70, 7–30 (2020).
- 2. Pancreatic cancer. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2(1), 1–22 (2016).
- 3. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 10(10), 1338–1346 (2006).
- 4. The impact of positive resection margins on survival and recurrence following resection and adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 269(3), 520–529 (2019).
- 5. Pancreatic cancer surgery. Ann. Surg. 265(3), 565–573 (2017).
- 6. Validation of at least 1 mm as cut-off for resection margins for pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the body and tail. Br. J. Surg. 105(9), 1171–1181 (2018).
- 7. Comparison of adjuvant gemcitabine and capecitabine with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer (ESPAC-4): a multicenter, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389(10073), 1011–1024 (2017). •• Multicenter, randomized control trial with reasonable large sample size. It showed that R0 resection conferred significant benefit in overall survival, despite use of combination chemotherapy, which underlines the importance of margin-negative resection.
- 8. . The concept of ‘borderline resectable’ pancreatic cancer: limited foundations and limited future? J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 8(1), 189–193 (2017).
- 9. Postoperative complications reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use in resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 260(2), 372–377 (2014).
- 10. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer: neoadjuvant therapy with FOLFIRINOX results in resectability in 60% of the patients. Ann. Surg. 264(3), 457–463 (2016).
- 11. Neoadjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) and borderline resectable (BRPC) adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(4), 1153–1159 (2015).
- 12. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 364(19), 1817–1825 (2011).
- 13. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: an intention to treat analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 44(10), 1619–1623 (2018).
- 14. Role of surgical resection in the era of FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer. J. Hepatobiliary. Pancreat. Sci. 26(9), 416–425 (2019).
- 15. FOLFIRINOX-based neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable or unresectable pancreatic cancer: a meta-analytical review of published studies. Pancreas 44(4), 515–521 (2015).
- 16. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen. Oncotarget 8(28), 46337–46347 (2017).
- 17. ESPAC-5F: Four-arm, prospective, multicenter, international randomized phase II trial of immediate surgery compared with neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEMCAP) or FOLFIRINOX or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 38(Suppl. 15), 4505 (2020).
- 18. Survival outcomes associated with clinical and pathological response following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in resected pancreatic cancer. Ann. Surg. 270(3), 400–413 (2019).
- 19. Influence of resection margins on survival for patients with pancreatic cancer treated by adjuvant chemoradiation and/or chemotherapy in the ESPAC-1 randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 234(6), 758–768 (2001).
- 20. Surgery improves survival after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single institution experience. Ann. Surg. 273(3), 579–586 (2021).
- 21. Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX treatment in a series of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Acta. Oncologica. 52(6), 1231–1233 (2013).
- 22. Resectability after first-line FOLFIRINOX in initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-center experience. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(3), 1212–1220 (2015).
- 23. The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(7), 2352–2358 (2015).
- 24. Neoadjuvant GTX chemotherapy and IMRT-based chemoradiation for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 104(2), 155–161 (2011).
- 25. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 38(16), 1763–1773 (2020). •• Multicenter, randomized control trial which showed that addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy led to significant increase in R0 resection and disease-free-survival, though overall survival was not different.
- 26. Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 310(14), 1473–1481 (2013).
- 27. Adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid vs gemcitabine following pancreatic cancer resection: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 304(10), 1073–1081 (2010).
- 28. Neoadjuvant therapy of pancreatic cancer: the emerging paradigm? Oncologist 17(2), 192–200 (2012).
- 29. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy potentially improves outcome for (borderline) resectable pancreatic cancer: preliminary results of the Dutch randomized phase III PREOPANC trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 102(5), 1606–1607 (2018).
- 30. . S-1: a promising new oral fluoropyrimidine derivative. Expert. Opin. Investig. Drugs 18(3), 335–348 (2009).
- 31. Randomized phase II/III trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 versus upfront surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer (Prep-02/JSAP05). Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 49(2), 190–194 (2019).
- 32. Neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection versus upfront resection for resectable pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J. Clin Oncol. 35(5), 515–522 (2017).
- 33. Neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Reports 9(1), 1–8 (2019).
- 34. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines version 1. 2020. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
- 35. Is a pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation associated with prolonged survival in patients with pancreatic cancer? Ann. Surg. 268(1), 1–8 (2018).
- 36. Detecting tumor response and predicting resectability after neoadjuvant therapy for borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. ANZ J. Surg. 89(5), 481–487 (2019). •• Explores the accuracy of imaging modalities to predict resectability in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer/locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
- 37. Randomized multicenter phase II/III study with adjuvant gemcitabine versus neoadjuvant/adjuvant FOLFIRINOX in resectable pancreatic cancer: The NEPAFOX trial. J. Clin Oncol. 33(Suppl. 15), TPS4152–TPS4152 (2015).
- 38. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus surgery first for resectable pancreatic cancer (Norwegian Pancreatic Cancer Trial-1 (NorPACT-1))–study protocol for a national multicenter randomized controlled trial. BMC Surg. 17(1), 1–7 (2017).
- 39. Adjuvant gemcitabine versus Neoadjuvant gemcitabine/oxaliplatin plus adjuvant gemcitabine in resectable pancreatic cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III study (NEOPAC study). BMC Cancer. 11(1), 1–7 (2011).
- 40. Reconsideration about the aggressive surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer: a focus on real pathological portosplenomesenteric venous invasion. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 400(4), 487–494 (2015).
- 41. Pancreatectomy with mesenteric and portal vein resection for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: multicenter study of 406 patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23(6), 2028–2037 (2016).
- 42. A safe technique for radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with venous resection for pancreatic cancer. J. Am Coll. Surg. 217(5), e35–e39 (2013).
- 43. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with venous involvement: is up-front synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection still justified? A survey of the Association Française de Chirurgie. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(6), 1874–1883 (2015).
- 44. Preoperative indications for extended pancreatectomy for locally advanced pancreas cancer involving the portal vein. Ann. Surg. 215(3), 231–236 (1992).
- 45. Correlation between radiographic classification and pathological grade of portal vein wall invasion in pancreatic head cancer. Ann. Surg. 255(1), 103–108 (2012).
- 46. Planned versus unplanned portal vein resections during pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 100(10), 1349–1356 (2013).
- 47. . Justifying vein resection with pancreatoduodenectomy. The Lancet Oncol. 17(3), e118–e224 (2016).
- 48. Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a consensus statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 155(6), 977–988 (2014).
- 49. En-bloc resection for locally advanced cancer of the pancreas: is it worthwhile? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 6(2), 147–158 (2002).
- 50. Is extended resection for adenocarcinoma of the body or tail of the pancreas justified? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 7(8), 946–952 (2003).
- 51. Vein resection without reconstruction (VROR) in pancreatoduodenectomy: expanding the surgical spectrum for locally advanced pancreatic tumors. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 405(7), 929–937 (2020).
- 52. Venous occlusion test applied to the tributaries of the superior mesenteric veins of the pancreas head infiltrated by tumor. J. Surg. Case. Rep. 2017(6), rjx109 (2017).
- 53. Pattern of venous collateral development after splenic vein occlusion in an extended Whipple procedure (Whipple at the splenic artery) and long-term results. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 21(3), 516–526 (2017).
- 54. Sinistral portal hypertension after pancreaticoduodenectomy with splenic vein ligation. Br. J. Surg. 102(3), 219–228 (2015).
- 55. Splenic vein reconstruction is unnecessary in pancreatoduodenectomy combined with resection of the superior mesenteric vein–portal vein confluence according to short-term outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 19(9), 785–792 (2017).
- 56. Impact of portal vein resection with splenic vein reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy on sinistral portal hypertension: who needs reconstruction? Surgery 165(2), 291–297 (2019).
- 57. Splenic vein–inferior mesenteric vein anastomosis to lessen left-sided portal hypertension after pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant vascular resection. Arch. Surg. 146(12), 1375–1381 (2011).
- 58. Retroperitoneal dissection in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: operative principles and techniques. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 215(2), e11–e18 (2012).
- 59. Distal splenorenal and temporary mesocaval shunting at the time of pancreatectomy for cancer: initial experience from the Medical College of Wisconsin. Surgery 154(1), 123–131 (2013).
- 60. Vascular reconstruction during pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas improves resectability but does not achieve cure. World J. Surg. 34(11), 2648–2861 (2010).
- 61. Factors influencing outcome in patients undergoing portal vein resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 38(1), 72–79 (2012).
- 62. Benefit of portal or superior mesenteric vein resection with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 107(4), 414–421 (2013).
- 63. Portal vein resection in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a United Kingdom multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 218(3), 401–411 (2014).
- 64. Adverse tumor biology associated with mesenterico-portal vein resection influences survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 21(6), 1937–1947 (2014).
- 65. Perioperative and long-term outcome after standard pancreaticoduodenectomy, additional portal vein and multivisceral resection for pancreatic head cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 19(3), 438–444 (2015).
- 66. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection for patients with pancreatic cancer with venous invasion. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. 14(4), 429–435 (2015).
- 67. Significance of portal vein invasion and extent of invasion in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 20(3), 479–487 (2016).
- 68. Segmental portal/superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with the iliac vein after pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Int. Med. Res. 44(6), 1339–1348 (2016).
- 69. Prognostic value of venous invasion in resected T3 pancreatic adenocarcinoma: depth of invasion matters. Surgery 162(2), 264–274 (2017).
- 70. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma with histologically proven portal vein infiltration: what is the outcome? Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 30(12), 1507–1513 (2018).
- 71. Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection favors the survival time of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Oncol. Lett. 18(5), 4563–4572 (2019).
- 72. Outcomes of resections for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with suspected venous involvement: a single center experience. BMC Surg. 15(1), 1–8 (2015).
- 73. Impact of portal vein involvement from pancreatic cancer on metastatic pattern after surgical resection. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23(5), 730–736 (2016).
- 74. Vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: patency rates and outcomes associated with thrombosis. J. Surg. Oncol. 117(8), 1648–1654 (2018).
- 75. Pancreatectomy with vein reconstruction: technique matters. HPB (Oxford) 17(9), 824–831 (2015).
- 76. Impact of portal vein infiltration and type of venous reconstruction in surgery for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 104(11), 1539–1548 (2017).
- 77. Vein resections >3 cm during pancreatectomy are associated with poor 1-year patency rates. Surgery 157(4), 708–715 (2015).
- 78. Technical risk factors for portal vein reconstruction thrombosis in pancreatic resection. J. Vasc. Surg. 62(2), 424–433 (2015).
- 79. Anticoagulation policy after venous resection with a pancreatectomy: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 16(8), 691–698 (2014).
- 80. . Extended pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 14(9), 1442–1452 (2010).
- 81. . Long term results of pancreatectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection for pancreatic carcinoma: a systematic review. Hepatogastroenterology 58(106), 623–631 (2011).
- 82. Pancreatectomy combined with superior mesenteric vein–portal vein resection for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. World J. Surg. 36(4), 884–891 (2012).
- 83. Benefit from synchronous portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 40(4), 371–378 (2014).
- 84. Meta-analysis of benefits of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 103(3), 179–191 (2016).
- 85. Meta-analysis and cost-effective analysis of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection during pancreatoduodenectomy: impact on margin status and survival. Surg. Oncol. 26(1), 53–62 (2017).
- 86. The value of combined vein resection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma: a meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 19(1), 1–3 (2019).
- 87. The impact on survival and morbidity of portal–mesenteric resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Cancers 12(7), 1976 (2020). •• Latest meta-anlaysis comparing PD with PD-SVR, which emphasised that though SVR has increased the R0 resection rates, it has not uniformly led to a benefit in survival, thus emphasizing on further research is to evaluate the role of PD with SVR in the context of multimodality treatment of PC.
- 88. . The classification of anatomic variations in the perigastric vessels by dual-phase CT to reduce intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic gastrectomy. Surg. Endosc. 25(5), 1420–1424 (2011).
- 89. . Reinsertion of the gastric coronary vein to avoid venous gastric congestion in pancreatic surgery. HPB (Oxford) 17(4), 368–370 (2015).
- 90. International consensus on definition and criteria of borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 2017. Pancreatology 18(1), 2–11 (2018).
- 91. Perineural invasion in cancer: a review of the literature. Cancer 115(15), 3379–3391 (2009).
- 92. Systematic review of outcomes after distal pancreatectomy with coeliac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 103(8), 941–949 (2016).
- 93. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 95(10), e3061 (2016).
- 94. Outcomes and risk score for distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR): an international multicenter analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26(3), 772–781 (2019).
- 95. . Our experience of resection of carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas by Appleby's procedure. Shujutsu 15, 885–9 (1976).
- 96. Preservation of the left gastric artery on the basis of anatomical features in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis en-bloc resection (DP-CAR). World J. Surg. 38(11), 2980–2985 (2014).
- 97. Total pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection and hepatic artery restoration using splenic artery autograft interposition. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 20(3), 644–647 (2016).
- 98. Left gastric artery reconstruction after distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis en-bloc resection: how we do it. Gastrointest. Tumors 4(1–2), 28–35 (2017).
- 99. Is hepatic artery coil embolization useful in distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer? World J. Surg. Oncol. 17(1), 124 (2019).
- 100. Appleby operation for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 44(14), 387–393 (1997).
- 101. . Clinical effect of modified Appleby operation in the treatment of carcinoma of body and tail of the pancreas. J. Surg. Concepts. Pract. 18, 142–146 (2013).
- 102. Monitoring hepatic venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation during Appleby operation for pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 49(45), 817–821 (2002).
- 103. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection performed while monitoring hepatic arterial flow by using a transonic flowmeter during operation. Hepatogastroenterology 59(117), 1498–1500 (2012).
- 104. Ischemic gastropathy after distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection versus distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic body/tail cancer. Surg. Open. Sci. 1(1), 14–19 (2019).
- 105. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (modified Appleby procedure) for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer: a single-center review of 80 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23(5), 969–975 (2016).
- 106. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac Axis resection combined with reconstruction of the left gastric artery. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 21(5), 910–917 (2017).
- 107. Important technical remarks on distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic body cancer (with video). J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 19(2), 141–147 (2012).
- 108. Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc resection of the celiac trunk for extended pancreatic tumor disease: an interdisciplinary approach. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 34(5), 1058–1064 (2011).
- 109. Postoperative bowel function and nutritional status following distal pancreatectomy with en-bloc celiac axis resection. Dig. Surg. 27(3), 212–216 (2010).
- 110. Distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection for carcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J. Surg. 35(11), 2535–2542 (2011).
- 111. Detailed analysis of margin positivity and the site of local recurrence after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 28(1), 539–549 (2021).
- 112. . Radical pancreatic cancer surgery—with arterial resection. Transl. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4, 8 (2019).
- 113. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) resection during pancreatectomy for malignant disease of the pancreas: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 19(6), 483–490 (2017).
- 114. Survival after pancreatectomy with major arterial resection and reconstruction. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15(5), 1399–1406 (2008).
- 115. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular resection for local advanced pancreatic head cancer: a single center retrospective study. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12(12), 2183 (2008).
- 116. Is celiac axis resection justified for T4 pancreatic body cancer? Surgery 151(1), 61–9 (2012).
- 117. Pancreaticoduodenetomy combined with hepatic artery resection following preoperative hepatic arterial embolization. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 21(12), 850–855 (2014).
- 118. Outcomes of arterial resection during pancreatectomy for tumor. J. Vasc. Surg. 63(3), 722–729 (2016).
- 119. Combined hepatic arterial resection in pancreatic resections for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 402(3), 447–456 (2017).
- 120. Neoadjuvant therapy and major arterial resection for potentially reconstructable arterial involvement by stage 3 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. HPB (Oxford) 21(6), 643–652 (2019).
- 121. Indications and perioperative outcomes for pancreatectomy with arterial resection. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 227(2), 255–269 (2018).
- 122. Pancreatectomy with arterial resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: how can it be done safely and with which outcomes: a single institution's experience with 118 patients. Ann. Surg. 271(5), 932–940 (2020).
- 123. Arterial resection during pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 254(6), 882–893 (2011).
- 124. Arterial resections in pancreatic cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 22(7), 961–968 (2020).
- 125. Pancreatoduodenectomy with arterial resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer of the head: a systematic review. Pancreas 49(5), 621–628 (2020).
- 126. Systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary pancreas surgery with arterial resection. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 405(7), 903–919 (2020). •• Latest comprehensive meta-analysis on arterial resections in pancreatic cancer.
- 127. ‘Artery-first’ approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. Br. J. Surg. 99(8), 1027–1035 (2012).
- 128. Arterial resection at the time of pancreatectomy for cancer. Surgery 155(5), 919–926 (2014).
- 129. Pancreatoduodenectomy with systematic mesopancreas dissection using a supracolic anterior artery-first approach. Ann. Surg. 262(6), 1092–1101 (2015).
- 130. Periarterial divestment in pancreatic cancer surgery. Surgery 169(5), 1019–1025 (2021).
- 131. The TRIANGLE operation–radical surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer: a single arm observational study. HPB (Oxford) 19(11), 1001–1007 (2017).
- 132. . Synchronous arterial resections in pancreatic cancer–still a matter of debate? Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 47(2), 480–482 (2021). • Highlights why arterial resections have not translated into improved survival beyond technical feasilbility.
- 133. Metabolic consequences of (regional) total pancreatectomy. Ann. Surg. 214(2), 131–140 (1991).
- 134. Multivisceral resections in pancreatic cancer: identification of risk factors. World J. Surg. 35(12), 2756–2763 (2011).
- 135. Extended pancreatectomy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: definition and consensus of the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(1), 1–4 (2014).
- 136. Distal pancreatectomy combined with multivisceral resection is associated with postoperative complication rates and survival comparable to those after standard procedures. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 22(9), 1549–1556 (2018).
- 137. Risk factors for complications after pancreatic head resection. Am. J. Surg. 187(2), 201–208 (2004).
- 138. Resection of the colon simultaneously with pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the pancreas and periampullary region: short-term and long-term results. World J. Surg. 28(10), 1007–1010 (2004).
- 139. Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139(5), 591–598 (2006).
- 140. Multivisceral and extended resections during pancreatoduodenectomy increase morbidity and mortality. Surgery 155(3), 567–574 (2014).
- 141. . Multivisceral Pancreatic Resections: Worth the Risk? Clin. Surg. 3, 1869 (2018).
- 142. Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 245(4), 573–582 (2007).
- 143. Distal pancreatectomy is not associated with increased perioperative morbidity when performed as part of a multivisceral resection. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12(12), 2177–2182 (2008).
- 144. Risk factors for surgical complications in distal pancreatectomy. Am. J. Surg. 200(3), 311–317 (2010).
- 145. Extended distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with splenic vein thrombosis and/or adjacent organ invasion. Am. J. Surg. 209(3), 564–569 (2015).
- 146. Distal pancreatectomy associated with multivisceral resection: results from a single center experience. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 402(3), 457–464 (2017).
- 147. Extended laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: a single-center experience. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 403(8), 941–948 (2018).
- 148. Distal pancreatectomy with multivisceral resection: A retrospective multicenter study–Case series. Int. J. Surg. 82, 123–129 (2020).
- 149. Multivisceral resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail—a retrospective single-center analysis. World J. Surg. Oncol. 18(1), 218 (2020).
- 150. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: number of positive nodes allows to distinguish several N categories. Ann. Surg. 261(5), 961–969 (2015).
- 151. Radical pancreatectomy for ductal cell carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Cancer 64(5), 1132–1137 (1989).
- 152. Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann. Surg. 208(2), 215–220 (1988).
- 153. . New Japanese classification of pancreatic cancer. In: Text book of Pancreatic Cancer. Neoptolemos JP (Ed.). 1–7 (2016).
- 154. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3), 591–600 (2014).
- 155. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group. Ann. Surg. 228(4), 508–517 (1998).
- 156. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann. Surg. 236(3), 355–366 (2002).
- 157. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy. Long term results of randomized trial. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 19, 230–241 (2012).
- 158. A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138(4), 618–630 (2005).
- 159. A prospective randomized controlled study comparing outcomes of standard resection and extended resection, including dissection of the nerve plexus and various lymph nodes, in patients with pancreatic head cancer. Ann. Surg. 259(4), 656–664 (2014).
- 160. Extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: a prospective randomized single center trial. Eur. Surg. 48(1), 26–33 (2016).
- 161. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy in radical surgical treatment for pancreatic head carcinoma. J. BUON. 22(1), 232–238 (2017).
- 162. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 94(3), 265–273 (2007).
- 163. A comparison of pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of 1909 patients. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 35(1), 79–86 (2009).
- 164. Meta-analysis of the efficacies of extended and standard pancreatoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. World J. Surg. 38(10), 2708–2715 (2014).
- 165. Too much water drowned the miller: does extended pancreaticoduodenectomy benefit the long-term survival outcomes in the treatment of pancreatic cancer? Ann. Surg. 265(4), e39–41 (2017).
- 166. Efficacy of extended versus standard lymphadenectomy in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: an update meta-analysis. Pancreatology 19(8), 1074–1080 (2019).
- 167. Extended lymph node resection versus standard resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 1(1), CD011490 (2021). •• Latest Cochrane review/meta-analysis of randomized control trials which highlights absence of survival benefit with extended lymphadenectomy.
- 168. Feasibility of a randomized trial of extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Arch. Surg. 140(6), 584–591 (2005).
- 169. . Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: information from a large US population database. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 13(9), 1189–1200 (2006).
- 170. Number of lymph nodes evaluated: prognostic value in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 16(5), 920–926 (2012).
- 171. Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas. HPB (Oxford) 16(6), 582–591 (2014).
- 172. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy change the role of regional lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer survival? Pancreas 48(6), 823–831 (2019).
- 173. Impact of total lymph node count and lymph node ratio on staging and survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a large, population-based analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15(1), 165–174 (2008).
- 174. The impact of lymph node number on survival in patients with lymph node-negative pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 37(1), 19–24 (2008).
- 175. Accuracy of staging node-negative pancreas cancer: a potential quality measure. Arch. Surg. 142(8), 767–774 (2007).
- 176. The influence of total nodes examined, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio on survival after surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: a secondary analysis of RTOG 9704. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 81(5), 1328–1335 (2011).
- 177. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 39(10), 1116–1121 (2013).
- 178. N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 17(2), 257–266 (2013).
- 179. Determining the optimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate staging of pancreatic cancer: an analysis using the nodal staging score model. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 45(6), 1069–1076 (2019).
- 180. Reassessment of the optimal number of examined lymph nodes in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Nov 9 2020.
- 181. . 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 25(4), 845–847 (2018).
- 182. Nodal counts and lymph node ratio impact survival after distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 18(11), 1929–1935 (2014).
- 183. Number of examined lymph nodes and nodal status assessment in distal pancreatectomy for body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. 270(6), 1138–1146 (2019).
- 184. . Laparoscopy in pancreatic tumors. J. Min. Access. Surg. 3(2), 47–51 (2007).
- 185. . Pancreatic cancer. In: Surgical diseases of the pancreas and biliary tree. Barreto SGWindsor J (Ed.). Springer, Singapore, 427–469 (2018).
- 186. Indian council of medical research consensus document for the management of pancreatic cancer. Indian. J. Med. Paediatr. Oncol. 40(1), 9–14 (2019).
- 187. The role of laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of pancreatico-biliary cancers:a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 36(10), 941–948 (2010).
- 188. Guidelines for institutions granting bariatric privileges utilizing laparoscopic techniques. Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons Guidelines Committee. Surg. Endosc. 25(3), 671–676 (2011).
- 189. Diagnostic laparoscopy with ultrasound still has a role in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review of the literature. HPB Surg. 2016, 8092109 (2016).
- 190. . Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg. Endosc. 8(5), 408–410 (1994).
- 191. . Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 120(6), 1051–1054 (1996).
- 192. The effects of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on seeding of tumor in port sites in a rat model. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 181(6), 1329–1334 (1999).
- 193. Detection of gall bladder cancer metastases in rare sites by PET scan. Indian J. Gastroenterol. 26(6), 303–304 (2007).
- 194. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch. Surg. 138(7), 777–784 (2003).
- 195. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann. Surg. 271(1), 1–4 (2020).
- 196. Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumors (LEOPARD-2): a multicenter, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4(3), 199–207 (2019). •• Multicenter RCT from the Netherlands, which showed increased complication related mortality in laparoscopic PD in comparison to open PD, and was prematurely terminated, thus urging caution in widespread utilization of minimally invasive PD.
- 197. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): a multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 269(1), 2–9 (2019).
- 198. Comparison of the duration of hospital stay after laparoscopic or open distal pancreatectomy: randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Surg. 107(10), 1281–1288 (2020).
- 199. Oncologic outcomes of minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 45(5), 719–727 (2019).
- 200. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Reports 9(1), 1–8 (2019).
- 201. Up-to-date comparison of robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. Medicine 99(23), e20345 (2020).
- 202. . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg. 240(2), 205–213 (2004).
- 203. Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial). Br. J. Surg. 106(7), 910–921 (2019).
- 204. . Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 25, 291–298 (2018).
- 205. Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 12(12), e0189631 (2017).
- 206. Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): a pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann. Surg. 269(1), 10–17 (2019).
- 207. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 4(4), CD011391 (2016).
- 208. Impact of minimally invasive vs. open distal pancreatectomy on use of adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg 213(4), 601–605 (2017).
- 209. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors. Br. J. Surg. 104(11), 1443–1450 (2017).
- 210. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic and open approach for pancreatoduodenectomy: the PADULAP randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 268(5), 731–739 (2018).
- 211. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 21(12), 1613–1620 (2019).
- 212. Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted spleen-preserving pancreatectomy: does da Vinci have clinical advantages? Surg. Endosc. 25(6), 2004–2009 (2011).
- 213. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann. Surg. 257(1), 128–132 (2013).
- 214. Does robotic distal pancreatectomy surgery offer similar results as laparoscopic and open approach? A comparative study from a single medical center. Int. J. Med. Robot. 10(3), 280–285 (2014).
- 215. Distal pancreatectomy: a single institution's experience in open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 220(1), 18–27 (2015).
- 216. Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study. Surg. Endosc. 29(12), 3507–3518 (2015).
- 217. Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J. Robot. Surg. 8(2), 125–132 (2014).
- 218. Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for cancer: short-term oncologic outcomes in 1733 patients. World J. Surg. 39(10), 2564–2572 (2015).
- 219. Robotic-assisted approach improves vessel preservation in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Dig. Surg. 33(5), 406–413 (2016).
- 220. A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Int. J. Med. Robot. 13(1), e1733 (2017).
- 221. Robotic enucleation for benign or borderline tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective analysis and comparison from a high-volume center in Asia. World J. Surg. 40(12), 3009–3020 (2016).
- 222. Comparative analysis of clinical short-term outcomes of Da Vinci robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy and laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy. Int. J. Surg. 42(9), 596–599 (2015).
- 223. Minimally invasive versus open approach for distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective comparative study. HPB (Oxford) 18, e438 (2016).
- 224. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery 148(4), 814–823 (2010).
- 225. A prospective non-randomised single-center study comparing laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy. Surg. Endosc. 29(11), 3163–3170 (2015).
- 226. . Robotic distal pancreatectomy versus conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a comparative study for short-term outcomes. Front. Med. 9(3), 356–360 (2015).
- 227. Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy: a robotic or LESS approach. JSLS. 19(1), e2014.00246 (2015).
- 228. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS One. 11(3), e0151189 (2016).
- 229. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: the first meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 18(7), 567–574 (2016).
- 230. Comparison of surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic and open resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J. Surg. 42(1), 32–45 (2019).
- 231. The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg. Endosc. 31(6), 2380–2386 (2017).
- 232. Total laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Biosci. Trends 12(5), 484–490 (2018).
- 233. . A comparison of outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20(4), 364–369 (2018).
- 234. Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP analysis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 21(11), 1784–1792 (2017).
- 235. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes. Surg. Endosc. 32(6), 2907–2913 (2018).
- 236. . Independent predictors of increased operative time and hospital length of stay are consistent across different surgical approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 22(11), 1911–1919 (2018).
- 237. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 46(1), 6–14 (2020).
- 238. Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer. Br. J. Surg. 98(1), 50–59 (2011).
- 239. Factors affecting cytokine change after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22(9), 3130–3135 (2015).
- 240. The inflammatory response after laparoscopic and open pancreatoduodenectomy and the association with complications in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. HPB (Oxford) 21(11), 1453–1461 (2019).
- 241. Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 218(1), 129–139 (2014).
- 242. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy. Ann. Surg. 264(2), 257–267 (2016).
- 243. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy—systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbeck's Arch. Surg. 402(5), 841–851 (2017).
- 244. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Surg. 271(1), 54–66 (2020).
- 245. Is total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy superior to open procedure? A meta-analysis. World J. Gastroenterol. 25(37), 5711 (2019).