We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

Nivolumab and its use in the second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial cancer

    Daniele Raggi

    *Author for correspondence: Tel.: +39 02 2390 2407; Fax: +39 02 2390 3150;

    E-mail Address: daniele.raggi@istitutotumori.mi.it

    Deptartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

    ,
    Andrea Necchi

    Deptartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

    &
    Patrizia Giannatempo

    Deptartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2017-0735

    Nivolumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody blocking PD-1 with demonstrated effectiveness against metastatic urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we describe the pharmacological properties of nivolumab and the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma with this checkpoint inhibitor after the failure of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Cancer immunotherapy by checkpoint inhibition offers potential to prolong patient survival with well manageable toxicity although serious immune-related adverse events may occur. The overall response rate to nivolumab after first-line chemotherapy is about 20%. Patients unfit for cisplatin may benefit from first-line cancer immunotherapy. It remains unclear which patient will respond and PD-1/PD-L1 expression alone is not a sufficiently reliable predictive biomarker.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1 Witjes AJ, Lebret T, Compérat EM et al. Updated 2016 EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 71(3), 462–475 (2017).
    • 2 Meeks JJ, Bellmunt J, Bochner BH et al. A systematic review of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 62(3), 523–533 (2012).
    • 3 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J. Clin. 67(1), 7–30 (2017).
    • 4 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Bladder Cancer v5 (2017).
    • 5 Kaufman D, Raghavan D, Carducci M et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(9), 1921–1927 (2000).
    • 6 von der Maase H, Hansen SW, Roberts JT et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, Phase III study. J. Clin. Oncol. 18(17), 3068–3077 (2000).
    • 7 Kamat AM, Hegarty PK, Gee JR et al. ICUD-EAU international consultation on bladder cancer 2012: screening, diagnosis, and molecular markers. Eur. Urol. 63(1), 4–15 (2013).
    • 8 Bellmunt J, von der Maase H, Mead GM et al. Randomized Phase III study comparing paclitaxel/cisplatin/gemcitabine and gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer without prior systemic therapy: EORTC intergroup study 30987. J. Clin. Oncol. 30(10), 1107–1113 (2012).
    • 9 Loehrer SPJ, Einhorn LH, Elson PJ et al. A randomized comparison of cisplatin alone or in combination with methotrexate, vinblastine and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a cooperative group study. J. Clin. Oncol. 10(7), 1066–1073 (1992).
    • 10 Yafi FA, North S, Kassouf W. First- and second-line therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Curr. Oncol. 18(1), e25–e34 (2011).
    • 11 Galsky MD, Pal SK, Chowdhury S et al. Comparative effectiveness of gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, plus cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cancer 121(15), 2586–2593 (2015).
    • 12 Raggi D, Miceli R, Sonpavde G et al. Second-line single-agent versus doublet chemotherapy as salvage therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. 27(1), 49–61 (2016).
    • 13 Couzin-Fraenkel J. Breakthrough of the year 2013. Cancer immunotherapy. Science 342(6165), 1432–1433 (2013).
    • 14 Brester SF, Simons JW. Gene therapy in urological oncology: principles, strategies and potential. Eur. Urol. 25, 177–181 (1994).
    • 15 Bellmunt J, Fougeray R, Rosenberg JE et al. Long-term survival results of a randomized Phase III trial of vinflunine plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone in advanced urothelial carcinoma patients after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy. Ann. Oncol. 24(6), 1466–1472 (2013).
    • 16 Bellmunt J, Kerst JM, Vazquez F. A randomized Phase II/III study of cabazitaxel versus vinflunine in metastatic or locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium (SECAVIN). Ann. Oncol. 28(7), 1517–1522 (2017).
    • 17 Patel MR, Elettron J, Infante JR et al. Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN solid tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohort of an open-label, Phase I trial. Lancet Oncol. 19(1), 51–64 (2018).
    • 18 Petrylak DP, de Wit R, Chi KN et al. Ramucirumab plus docetaxel versus placebo in patients with locally advanced or metastic urothelial carcinoma after platinum-based therapy (RANGE): a randomised, double-blind, Phase III study. Lancet 390(10109), 2266–2277 (2017).
    • 19 Rosenberg JE, Hoffman-Censits J, Powles T et al. Atezolizumab in patients with locally advanced and metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progressed following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy: a single-arm, multicentre, Phase II trial. Lancet 387(10031), 1909–1920 (2016). •• Atezolizumab, an anti-PD-L1 antibody, was the first immune-checkpoint inhibitor to be approved by the US FDA in May 2016.
    • 20 Ko YJ, Canil CM, Mukherjee SD et al. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel for second-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single group, multicentre, Phase II study. Lancet Oncol. 14(8), 769–776 (2013).
    • 21 Powles T, O'Donnell PH, Massard C et al. Efficacy and safety of durvalumab in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: updated results from a Phase I/II open-label study. JAMA Oncol. 3(9), e172411 (2017).
    • 22 Berman D, Korman A, Peck R et al. The development of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies as a new therapeutic modality for cancer: the Bristol-Myers Squibb experience. Pharmacol. Ther. 148, 132–153 (2015).
    • 23 Taube JM, Klein A, Brahmer JR et al. Association of PD-1, PD-1 ligands, and other features of the tumor immune microenvironment with response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 20(19), 5064–5074 (2014). • Definition of the predictive role of PD-1 expression.
    • 24 Brahmer J, Tykodi S, Chow L et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 2455–2465 (2012).
    • 25 Chen YB, Mu CY, Huang JA. Clinical significance of programmed death-1 ligand-1 expression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a 5-year follow-up study. Tumori 98(6), 751–755 (2012).
    • 26 Wang C, Thudium KB, Han M et al. In vitro characterization of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab, BMS-936558, and in vivo toxicology in non-human primates. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2(9), 846–856 (2014).
    • 27 Zugazagoitia J, Guedes C, Ponce S, Ferrer I, Molina-Pinelo S, Paz-Ares L. Current challenges in cancer treatment. Clin. Ther. 38(7), 1551–1566 (2016).
    • 28 Robertson AG, Kim J. Comprehensive molecular characterization of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Cell 171(3), 540–556 (2017).
    • 29 Feng Y, Bajaj G, Wang X et al. Model-based analysis of nivolumab to support clinical pharmacology profiling in subjects with solid tumors [abstract]. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 97(Suppl. 1), S41–S42 (2015).
    • 30 Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. Opdivo (nivolumab) injection, for intravenous use: US prescribing information (2015). www.fda.gov/.
    • 31 European Medicines Agency. Opdivo 10 mg/ml concentrate for infusion: summary of product characteristics (2015). www.ema.europa.eu/.
    • 32 Passey C, Simon J, Roy A et al. Assessment of drug interaction potential by nivolumab using cytokine modulation data [abstract no. 118]. Presented at: American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA, USA, March 2015.
    • 33 Shih K, Arkenau HT, Infante JR. Clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors as novel cancer therapies. Drugs 74(17), 1993–2013 (2014).
    • 34 Sharma P, Retz M, Siefker-Radtke A et al. Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, Phase II trial. Lancet Oncol. 18(3), 312–322 (2017). •• This is the first published study with nivolumab in metastatic refractory urothelial carcinoma.
    • 35 Mahoney KM, Rennert PD, Freeman GJ. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14(8), 561–584 (2015).
    • 36 Apolo AB, Mortazavi A, Stein MNB et al. A Phase I study of cabozantinib plus nivolumab (CaboNivo) and ipilimumab (CaboNivoIpi) in patients (pts) with refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and other genitourinary (GU) tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 35(Suppl. 6), 293 (2017). • Innovative combination Phase I study with cabozantinib and nivolumab +/- ipilimumab with promising data of overall response rate and survival.
    • 37 Ribas A, Robert C, Hodi FS et al. Association of response to programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) blockade with pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with an interferon-inflammatory immune gene signature. J. Clin. Oncol. 33(Suppl. 15), 3001 (2015).
    • 38 Weinstein JN, Akbani R, Broom BM et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of urothelial bladder carcinoma. Nature 507(7492), 315–322 (2014). • This is the first molecular characterization of bladder carcinoma from the The Cancer Genome Atlas.
    • 39 Topalian SL, Hodi FS, Brahmer JR et al. Safety, activity and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(26), 2443–2454 (2012). •• Statement of immunotherapy regarding safety profile and efficacy.
    • 40 Sharma P, Callahan MK, Bono P et al. Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, two-stage, multi-arm, Phase I/II trial. Lancet Oncol. 17(11), 1590–1598 (2016).
    • 41 Sweis RF, Spranger S, Bao R et al. Molecular drivers of the non-T-cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment in urothelial bladder cancer. Cancer Immunol. Res. 4(7), 563–568 (2016).
    • 42 Galsky MD, Saci A, Szabo PM et al. Impact of tumor mutation burden on nivolumab efficacy in second-line urothelial carcinoma patients: exploratory analysis of the Phase II Checkmate 275 study. Ann. Oncol. 28(Suppl. 5), 1 (2017).
    • 43 Routy B, Le Chatelier E, Derosa L et al. Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1-based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors. Science 359(6371), 91–97 (2018).
    • 44 Tartari F, Santoni M, Burattini L et al. Economic sustainability of anti-PD-1 agents nivolumab and pembolizumab in cancer patients: recent insights and future challenges. Cancer Treat. 48, 20–40 (2016).