We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

It is all about location: how to pinpoint microorganisms and their functions in multispecies biofilms

    Angela M Costa

    LEPABE, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    i3S – Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, University of Porto, Portugal

    INEB – Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    ,
    Filipe J Mergulhão

    LEPABE, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    ,
    Romain Briandet

    Micalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France

    &
    Nuno F Azevedo

    *Author for correspondence:

    E-mail Address: nazevedo@fe.up.pt

    LEPABE, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2017-0053

    Multispecies biofilms represent the dominant mode of life for the vast majority of microorganisms. Bacterial spatial localization in such biostructures governs ecological interactions between different populations and triggers the overall community functions. Here, we discuss the pros and cons of fluorescence-based techniques used to decipher bacterial species patterns in biofilms at single cell level, including fluorescence in situ hybridization and the use of genetically modified bacteria that express fluorescent proteins, reporting the significant improvements of those techniques. The development of tools for spatial and temporal study of multispecies biofilms will allow live imaging and spatial localization of cells in naturally occurring biofilms coupled with metabolic information, increasing insight of microbial community and the relation between its structure and functions.

    Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

    References

    • 1 Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2(2), 95–108 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8(9), 623–633 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Elias S, Banin E. Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36(5), 990–1004 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 4 Short FL, Murdoch SL, Ryan RP. Polybacterial human disease: the ills of social networking. Trends Microbiol. 22(9), 508–516 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 5 Roder HL, Sorensen SJ, Burmolle M. Studying bacterial multispecies biofilms: where to start? Trends Microbiol. 24(6), 503–513 (2016).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG et al. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 435–464 (1987).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Burmolle M, Ren D, Bjarnsholt T, Sorensen SJ. Interactions in multispecies biofilms: do they actually matter? Trends Microbiol. 22(2), 84–91 (2014).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Korgaonkar A, Trivedi U, Rumbaugh KP, Whiteley M. Community surveillance enhances Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence during polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110(3), 1059–1064 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Fazli M, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Moller K et al. Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47(12), 4084–4089 (2009).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Sanchez-Vizuete P, Orgaz B, Aymerich S, Le Coq D, Briandet R. Pathogens protection against the action of disinfectants in multispecies biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 6, 705 (2015).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Ren D, Madsen JS, Sorensen SJ, Burmolle M. High prevalence of biofilm synergy among bacterial soil isolates in cocultures indicates bacterial interspecific cooperation. ISME J. 9(1), 81–89 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Ren D, Madsen JS, de La Cruz-Perera CI, Bergmark L, Sorensen SJ, Burmolle M. High-throughput screening of multispecies biofilm formation and quantitative PCR-based assessment of individual species proportions, useful for exploring interspecific bacterial interactions. Microb. Ecol. 68(1), 146–154 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Han A, Zenilman JM, Melendez JH et al. The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 19(5), 532–541 (2011).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Jones DS, Albrecht HL, Dawson KS et al. Community genomic analysis of an extremely acidophilic sulfur-oxidizing biofilm. ISME J. 6(1), 158–170 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Ecker DJ, Sampath R, Massire C et al. Ibis T5000: a universal biosensor approach for microbiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6(7), 553–558 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Christensen BB, Haagensen JA, Heydorn A, Molin S. Metabolic commensalism and competition in a two-species microbial consortium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68(5), 2495–2502 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Gantner S, Schmid M, Durr C et al. In situ quantitation of the spatial scale of calling distances and population density-independent N-acylhomoserine lactone-mediated communication by rhizobacteria colonized on plant roots. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 56(2), 188–194 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Lucker S, Schwarz J, Gruber-Dorninger C, Spieck E, Wagner M, Daims H. Nitrotoga-like bacteria are previously unrecognized key nitrite oxidizers in full-scale wastewater treatment plants. ISME J. 9(3), 708–720 (2015).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Perez-Nunez D, Briandet R, David B et al. A new morphogenesis pathway in bacteria: unbalanced activity of cell wall synthesis machineries leads to coccus-to-rod transition and filamentation in ovococci. Mol. Microbiol. 79(3), 759–771 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Beier BD, Quivey RG, Berger AJ. Raman microspectroscopy for species identification and mapping within bacterial biofilms. AMB Express 2(1), 35 (2012).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Fischer M, Triggs GJ, Krauss TF. Optical sensing of microbial life on surfaces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82(5), 1362–1371 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Neu TR, Manz B, Volke F, Dynes JJ, Hitchcock AP, Lawrence JR. Advanced imaging techniques for assessment of structure, composition and function in biofilm systems. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 72(1), 1–21 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE. Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans builds mutualistic biofilm communities with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella species in saliva. Infect. Immun. 77(9), 3542–3551 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Houry A, Gohar M, Deschamps J et al. Bacterial swimmers that infiltrate and take over the biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109(32), 13088–13093 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 25 Amann RI, Krumholz L, Stahl DA. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172(2), 762–770 (1990).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Poulsen LK, Ballard G, Stahl DA. Use of rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for measuring the activity of single cells in young and established biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59(5), 1354–1360 (1993).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Amann RI, Stromley J, Devereux R, Key R, Stahl DA. Molecular and microscopic identification of sulfate-reducing bacteria in multispecies biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58(2), 614–623 (1992).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Odaa Y, Slagmana S, Meijerb WG, Forneya LJ, Gottschala JC. Influence of growth rate and starvation on fluorescent in situ hybridization of Rhodopseudomonas palustris. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 32(3), 205–213 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 29 Pernthaler A, Pernthaler J, Amann R. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and catalyzed reporter deposition for the identification of marine bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68(6), 3094–3101 (2002). • Describes the use of catalyzed reporter deposition-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to increase signal intensity in cells with low rRNA content.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 30 Fernandez-Suarez M, Ting AY. Fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9(12), 929–943 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 31 Stoecker K, Dorninger C, Daims H, Wagner M. Double labeling of oligonucleotide probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (DOPE-FISH) improves signal intensity and increases rRNA accessibility. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76(3), 922–926 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 32 Schimak MP, Kleiner M, Wetzel S, Liebeke M, Dubilier N, Fuchs BM. MiL-FISH: multilabeled oligonucleotides for fluorescence in situ hybridization improve visualization of bacterial cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82(1), 62–70 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 33 Choi HM, Chang JY, Trinh Le A, Padilla JE, Fraser SE, Pierce NA. Programmable in situ amplification for multiplexed imaging of mRNA expression. Nat. Biotechnol. 28(11), 1208–1212 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 34 Yamaguchi T, Fuchs BM, Amann R, Kawakami S, Kubota K, Hatamoto M. Rapid and sensitive identification of marine bacteria by an improved in situ DNA hybridization chain reaction (quickHCR-FISH). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 38(6), 400–405 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 35 Yamaguchi T, Kawakami S, Hatamoto M et al. In situ DNA-hybridization chain reaction (HCR): a facilitated in situ HCR system for the detection of environmental microorganisms. Environ. Microbiol. 17(7), 2532–2541 (2015). • Use of hybridization chain reaction-FISH to improve signal intensity in analysis of environmental microorganisms.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 36 Nikolakakis K, Lehnert E, Mcfall-Ngai MJ, Ruby EG. Use of hybridization chain reaction-fluorescent in situ hybridization to track gene expression by both partners during initiation of symbiosis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81(14), 4728–4735 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 37 Valm AM, Mark Welch JL, Rieken CW et al. Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(10), 4152–4157 (2011). •• A seminal paper that provides the first description of combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging-FISH, a technique that allows to improve significantly the number of different microorganisms that can be detected simultaneously.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 38 Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG. Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113(6), E791–E800 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 39 Behnam F, Vilcinskas A, Wagner M, Stoecker K. A straightforward DOPE (double labeling of oligonucleotide probes)-FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) method for simultaneous multicolor detection of six microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78(15), 5138–5142 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 40 Silahtaroglu AN, Tommerup N, Vissing H. FISHing with locked nucleic acids (LNA): evaluation of different LNA/DNA mixmers. Mol. Cell. Probes 17(4), 165–169 (2003).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 41 Stender H, Fiandaca M, Hyldig-Nielsen JJ, Coull J. PNA for rapid microbiology. J. Microbiol. Methods 48(1), 1–17 (2002).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 42 Almeida C, Azevedo NF, Santos S, Keevil CW, Vieira MJ. Discriminating multi-species populations in biofilms with peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (PNA FISH). PLoS ONE 6(3), e14786 (2011). • Use of in vivo hybridization for the detection of a pathogenic microorganism.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 43 Fontenete S, Guimaraes N, Leite M, Figueiredo C, Wengel J, Filipe Azevedo N. Hybridization-based detection of Helicobacter pylori at human body temperature using advanced locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes. PLoS ONE 8(11), e81230 (2013).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 44 Silverman AP, Kool ET. Quenched autoligation probes allow discrimination of live bacterial species by single nucleotide differences in rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 33(15), 4978–4986 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 45 Yilmaz S, Haroon MF, Rabkin BA, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P. Fixation-free fluorescence in situ hybridization for targeted enrichment of microbial populations. ISME J. 4(10), 1352–1356 (2010).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 46 Okabe S, Satoh H, Kindaichi T. A polyphasic approach to study ecophysiology of complex multispecies nitrifying biofilms. Methods Enzymol. 496, 163–184 (2011).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 47 Behrens S, Losekann T, Pett-Ridge J et al. Linking microbial phylogeny to metabolic activity at the single-cell level by using enhanced element labeling-catalyzed reporter deposition fluorescence in situ hybridization (EL-FISH) and NanoSIMS. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(10), 3143–3150 (2008). •• Use of nanometer-scale secondary-ion mass spectrometry and FISH to link metabolic activity and species identification in a complex biofilm.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 48 Orphan VJ, House CH, Hinrichs KU, Mckeegan KD, Delong EF. Methane-consuming archaea revealed by directly coupled isotopic and phylogenetic analysis. Science 293(5529), 484–487 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 49 Berry D, Mader E, Lee TK et al. Tracking heavy water (D2O) incorporation for identifying and sorting active microbial cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112(2), E194–E203 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 50 Hatzenpichler R, Scheller S, Tavormina PL, Babin BM, Tirrell DA, Orphan VJ. In situ visualization of newly synthesized proteins in environmental microbes using amino acid tagging and click chemistry. Environ. Microbiol. 16(8), 2568–2590 (2014). • Description of bio-orthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging that can be combined with FISH to link taxonomy and translational activity.Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 51 Pernthaler A, Amann R. Simultaneous fluorescence in situ hybridization of mRNA and rRNA in environmental bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70(9), 5426–5433 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 52 Wendeberg A, Zielinski FU, Borowski C, Dubilier N. Expression patterns of mRNAs for methanotrophy and thiotrophy in symbionts of the hydrothermal vent mussel Bathymodiolus puteoserpentis. ISME J. 6(1), 104–112 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 53 Mota CR, So MJ, de los Reyes FL 3rd. Identification of nitrite-reducing bacteria using sequential mRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization and fluorescence-assisted cell sorting. Microb. Ecol. 64(1), 256–267 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 54 Tolker-Nielsen T, Brinch UC, Ragas PC, Andersen JB, Jacobsen CS, Molin S. Development and dynamics of Pseudomonas sp. biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 182(22), 6482–6489 (2000).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 55 Yang L, Liu Y, Markussen T, Hoiby N, Tolker-Nielsen T, Molin S. Pattern differentiation in co-culture biofilms formed by Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 62(3), 339–347 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 56 Wouters K, Maes E, Spitz JA et al. A non-invasive fluorescent staining procedure allows confocal laser scanning microscopy based imaging of Mycobacterium in multispecies biofilms colonizing and degrading polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Microbiol. Methods 83(3), 317–325 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 57 Beaufort S, Da Silva T, Lafforgue C, Alfenore S. Fluorescent proteins as in vivo and in situ reporters to study the development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast biofilm and its invasion by the bacteria Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 80(2), 342–351 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 58 Van Gestel J, Weissing FJ, Kuipers OP, Kovacs AT. Density of founder cells affects spatial pattern formation and cooperation in Bacillus subtilis biofilms. ISME J. 8(10), 2069–2079 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 59 Bridier A, Briandet R, Bouchez T, Jabot F. A model-based approach to detect interspecific interactions during biofilm development. Biofouling 30(7), 761–771 (2014). • Using real-time confocal laser scanning microscopy to analyze biofilms formed with fluorescent proteins reporter it was possible to establish a model for the detection of interspecific interactions during biofilm development.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 60 Shaner NC, Steinbach PA, Tsien RY. A guide to choosing fluorescent proteins. Nat. Methods 2(12), 905–909 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 61 Mergulhão F, Monteiro GA, Cabral JMS, Taipa MA. Design of bacterial vector systems for the production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Microb. Biotechnol. 14(1), 1–14 (2004).CASGoogle Scholar
    • 62 Teodosio JS, Simoes M, Mergulhao FJ. The influence of nonconjugative Escherichia coli plasmids on biofilm formation and resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 113(2), 373–382 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 63 Zhang T, Pabst B, Klapper I, Stewart PS. General theory for integrated analysis of growth, gene, and protein expression in biofilms. PLoS ONE 8(12), e83626 (2013).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 64 Hansen MC, Palmer RJ Jr, Udsen C, White DC, Molin S. Assessment of GFP fluorescence in cells of Streptococcus gordonii under conditions of low pH and low oxygen concentration. Microbiology 147(Pt 5), 1383–1391 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 65 Patterson GH, Knobel SM, Sharif WD, Kain SR, Piston DW. Use of the green fluorescent protein and its mutants in quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biophys. J. 73(5), 2782–2790 (1997).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 66 Habimana O, Meyrand M, Meylheuc T, Kulakauskas S, Briandet R. Genetic features of resident biofilms determine attachment of Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75(24), 7814–7821 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 67 Malone CL, Boles BR, Lauderdale KJ, Thoendel M, Kavanaugh JS, Horswill AR. Fluorescent reporters for Staphylococcus aureus. J. Microbiol. Methods 77(3), 251–260 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 68 Billi D. Plasmid stability in dried cells of the desert cyanobacterium Chroococcidiopsis and its potential for GFP imaging of survivors on Earth and in space. Orig. Life Evol. Biosph. 42(2–3), 235–245 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 69 Brzoska AJ, Firth N. Two-plasmid vector system for independently controlled expression of green and red fluorescent fusion proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79(9), 3133–3136 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 70 Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Givskov M, Molin S, Ciofu O. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 35(4), 322–332 (2010).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 71 Bridier A, Sanchez-Vizuete P, Guilbaud M, Piard JC, Naitali M, Briandet R. Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens. Food Microbiol. 45(Pt B), 167–178 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 72 Lenz AP, Williamson KS, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Franklin MJ. Localized gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(14), 4463–4471 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 73 Matsushima R, Watanabe R, Tsuda M, Suzuki T. Analysis of extracellular alginate lyase (alyA) expression and its regulatory region in a marine bacterial strain, Pseudoalteromonas atlantica AR06, using a gfp gene reporter system. Mar. Biotechnol. (NY) 15(3), 349–356 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 74 Garmyn D, Gal L, Briandet R et al. Evidence of autoinduction heterogeneity via expression of the Agr system of Listeria monocytogenes at the single-cell level. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77(17), 6286–6289 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 75 Rieu A, Briandet R, Habimana O, Garmyn D, Guzzo J, Piveteau P. Listeria monocytogenes EGD-e biofilms: no mushrooms but a network of knitted chains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(14), 4491–4497 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 76 Vlamakis H, Aguilar C, Losick R, Kolter R. Control of cell fate by the formation of an architecturally complex bacterial community. Genes Devel. 22(7), 945–953 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 77 Lopez D, Vlamakis H, Kolter R. Generation of multiple cell types in Bacillus subtilis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 33(1), 152–163 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 78 Hentschel E, Will C, Mustafi N, Burkovski A, Rehm N, Frunzke J. Destabilized eYFP variants for dynamic gene expression studies in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb. Biotechnol. 6(2), 196–201 (2013).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 79 Wessel AK, Hmelo L, Parsek MR, Whiteley M. Going local: technologies for exploring bacterial microenvironments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11(5), 337–348 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 80 Schramm A, Larsen LH, Revsbech NP, Ramsing NB, Amann R, Schleifer KH. Structure and function of a nitrifying biofilm as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62(12), 4641–4647 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 81 Hidalgo G, Burns A, Herz E et al. Functional tomographic fluorescence imaging of pH microenvironments in microbial biofilms by use of silica nanoparticle sensors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75(23), 7426–7435 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 82 Liu X, Ramsey MM, Chen X, Koley D, Whiteley M, Bard AJ. Real-time mapping of a hydrogen peroxide concentration profile across a polymicrobial bacterial biofilm using scanning electrochemical microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(7), 2668–2673 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 83 Koley D, Ramsey MM, Bard AJ, Whiteley M. Discovery of a biofilm electrocline using real-time 3D metabolite analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108(50), 19996–20001 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 84 Reuben S, Banas K, Banas A, Swarup S. Combination of synchrotron radiation-based Fourier transforms infrared microspectroscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy to understand spatial heterogeneity in aquatic multispecies biofilms. Water Res. 64, 123–133 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 85 Ivleva NP, Wagner M, Horn H, Niessner R, Haisch C. Raman microscopy and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) for in situ analysis of biofilms. J. Biophotonics 3(8–9), 548–556 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 86 Milucka J, Ferdelman TG, Polerecky L et al. Zero-valent sulphur is a key intermediate in marine methane oxidation. Nature 491(7425), 541–546 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 87 Kaltenpoth M, Strupat K, Svatos A. Linking metabolite production to taxonomic identity in environmental samples by (MA)LDI-FISH. ISME J. 10(2), 527–531 (2016).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 88 Daims H, Lucker S, Wagner M. Daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ. Microbiol. 8(2), 200–213 (2006).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 89 Schillinger C, Petrich A, Lux R et al. Co-localized or randomly distributed? Pair cross correlation of in vivo grown subgingival biofilm bacteria quantified by digital image analysis. PLoS ONE 7(5), e37583 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CASGoogle Scholar
    • 90 Fontenete S, Leite M, Cappoen D et al. Fluorescence in vivo hybridization (FIVH) for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection in a C57BL/6 mouse model. PloS ONE 11(2), e0148353 (2016).Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 91 Knierim B, Luef B, Wilmes P et al. Correlative microscopy for phylogenetic and ultrastructural characterization of microbial communities. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 4(1), 36–41 (2012). • Association of species identification and subcellular localization of gene expression patterns.Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar