Research Article

Early-life lead exposure results in dose- and sex-specific effects on weight and epigenetic gene regulation in weanling mice

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Amanda Barks

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Kevin Liu

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Jaclyn M Goodrich

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Dana C Dolinoy

* Author for correspondence

Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2200, USA.

Search for more papers by this author

Email the corresponding author at ddolinoy@umich.edu

Published Online:24 Sep 2013https://doi.org/10.2217/epi.13.49

View article

Abstract

Aims: Epidemiological and animal data suggest that the development of adult chronic conditions is influenced by early-life exposure-induced changes to the epigenome. This study investigates the effects of perinatal lead (Pb) exposure on DNA methylation and bodyweight in weanling mice. Materials & methods: Viable yellow agouti (A^vy) mouse dams were exposed to 0, 2.1, 16 and 32 ppm Pb acetate before conception through weaning. Epigenetic effects were evaluated by scoring coat color of A^vy/a offspring and quantitative bisulfite sequencing of two retrotransposon-driven (A^vy and CDK5 activator-binding protein intracisternal A particle element) and two imprinted (Igf2 and Igf2r) loci in tail DNA. Results: Maternal blood Pb levels were below the limit of detection in controls, and 4.1, 25.1 and 32.1 µg/dl for each dose, respectively. Pb exposure was associated with a trend of increased wean bodyweight in males (p = 0.03) and altered coat color in A^vy/a offspring. DNA methylation at A^vy and the CDK5 activator-binding protein intracisternal A-particle element was significantly different from controls following a cubic trend (p = 0.04; p = 0.01), with male-specific effects at the A^vy locus. Imprinted genes did not shift in methylation across exposures. Conclusion: Dose- and sex-specific responses in bodyweight and DNA methylation indicate that Pb acts on the epigenome in a locus-specific fashion, dependent on the genomic feature hosting the CpG site of interest, and that sex is a factor in epigenetic response.

Keywords:

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

References

1 Barker D. Intrauterine programming of coronary heart disease and stroke. Acta Paediatra Suppl.423,178–182 (1997).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
2 Barker D. Programming the baby. In: Mothers, Babies, and Disease in Later Life. Barker D (Ed.). BMJ Publishing, London, UK (1994).▪ Developmental origins of adult disease are clearly presented and human health implications laid forth.
Google Scholar
3 Hu H, Tellez-Rojo MM, Bellinger D et al. Fetal lead exposure at each stage of pregnancy as a predictor of infant mental development. Environ. Health Perspect.114(11),1730–1735 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
4 Bellinger DC. Teratogen update: lead and pregnancy. Birth Defects Res. A Clin. Mol. Teratol.73(6),409–420 (2005).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
5 Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J et al. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ. Health Perspect.113(7),894–899 (2005).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
6 Navas-Acien A, Guallar E, Silbergeld EK, Rothenberg SJ. Lead exposure and cardiovascular disease – a systematic review. Environ. Health Perspect.115(3),472–482 (2007).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
7 Wong GP, Ng TL, Martin TR, Farquharson DF. Effects of low-level lead exposure in utero.Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.47(5),285–289 (1992).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
8 Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Lead. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, GA, USA (2007).
Google Scholar
9 Gilbert SG, Weiss B. A rationale for lowering the blood lead action level from 10 to 2 microg/dl. Neurotoxicology27(5),693–701 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
10 Snyder JE, Filipov NM, Parsons PJ, Lawrence DA. The efficiency of maternal transfer of lead and its influence on plasma IgE and splenic cellularity of mice. Toxicol. Sci.57(1),87–94 (2000).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
11 Leasure JL, Giddabasappa A, Chaney S et al. Low-level human equivalent gestational lead exposure produces sex-specific motor and coordination abnormalities and late-onset obesity in year-old mice. Environ. Health Perspect.116(3),355–361 (2008).▪▪ Notable for its careful study of low levels of gestational lead exposure in mice and the effects in male and female offspring at 1 year of life.
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
12 Iavicoli I, Carelli G, Stanek EJ, Castellino N, Li Z, Calabrese EJ. Low doses of dietary lead are associated with a profound reduction in the time to the onset of puberty in female mice. Reprod. Toxicol.22(4),586–590 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
13 Faulk C, Dolinoy DC. Timing is everything: the when and how of environmentally induced changes in the epigenome of animals. Epigenetics6(7),791–797 (2011).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
14 Lim U, Song MA. Dietary and lifestyle factors of DNA methylation. Methods Mol. Biol.863,359–376 (2012).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
15 Anderson OS, Nahar MS, Faulk C et al. Epigenetic responses following maternal dietary exposure to physiologically relevant levels of bisphenol A. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.53(5),334–342 (2012).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
16 Koedrith P, Kim H, Weon JI, Seo YR. Toxicogenomic approaches for understanding molecular mechanisms of heavy metal mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health216(5),587–598 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
17 Dolinoy DC. The agouti mouse model: an epigenetic biosensor for nutritional and environmental alterations on the fetal epigenome. Nutr. Rev.66(Suppl. 1),S7–S11 (2008).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
18 Waterland RA, Dolinoy DC, Lin JR, Smith CA, Shi X, Tahiliani KG. Maternal methyl supplements increase offspring DNA methylation at axin fused. Genesis44(9),401–406 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
19 Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ. Health Perspect.114(4),567–572 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
20 Rakyan VK, Blewitt ME, Druker R, Preis JI, Whitelaw E. Metastable epialleles in mammals. Trends Genet.18(7),348–351 (2002).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
21 Hackett JA, Surani MA. DNA methylation dynamics during the mammalian life cycle. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.368(1609),20110328 (2013).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
22 Downing C, Johnson TE, Larson C et al. Subtle decreases in DNA methylation and gene expression at the mouse Igf2 locus following prenatal alcohol exposure: effects of a methyl-supplemented diet. Alcohol45(1),65–71 (2011).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
23 McKay JA, Williams EA, Mathers JC. Effect of maternal and post-weaning folate supply on gene-specific DNA methylation in the small intestine of weaning and adult apc and wild type mice. Front. Genet.2,23 (2011).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
24 Ding GL, Wang FF, Shu J et al. Transgenerational glucose intolerance with Igf2/H19 epigenetic alterations in mouse islet induced by intrauterine hyperglycemia. Diabetes61(5),1133–1142 (2012).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
25 Zhang XF, Zhang LJ, Feng YN et al. Bisphenol A exposure modifies DNA methylation of imprint genes in mouse fetal germ cells. Mol. Biol. Rep.39(9),8621–8628 (2012).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
26 Somm E, Stouder C, Paoloni-Giacobino A. Effect of developmental dioxin exposure on methylation and expression of specific imprinted genes in mice. Reprod. Toxicol.35,150–155 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
27 Susiarjo M, Sasson I, Mesaros C, Bartolomei MS. Bisphenol A exposure disrupts genomic imprinting in the mouse. PLoS Genet.9(4),e1003401 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
28 Gallou-Kabani C, Gabory A, Tost J et al. Sex- and diet-specific changes of imprinted gene expression and DNA methylation in mouse placenta under a high-fat diet. PLoS One5(12),e14398 (2010).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
29 Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell Biol.23(15),5293–5300 (2003).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
30 Green MR, Sambrook J. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (4th Edition). Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, NY, USA (2012).
Google Scholar
31 Grunau C, Clark SJ, Rosenthal A. Bisulfite genomic sequencing: systematic investigation of critical experimental parameters. Nucleic Acids Res.29(13),E65–E65 (2001).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
32 Druker R. Complex patterns of transcription at the insertion site of a retrotransposon in the mouse. Nucleic Acids Res.32(19),5800–5808 (2004).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
33 Waterland RA, Lin JR, Smith CA, Jirtle RL. Post-weaning diet affects genomic imprinting at the insulin-like growth factor 2 (Igf2) locus. Hum. Mol. Genet.15(5),705–716 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
34 Fauque P, Ripoche MA, Tost J et al. Modulation of imprinted gene network in placenta results in normal development of in vitro manipulated mouse embryos. Hum. Mol. Genet.19(9),1779–1790 (2010).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
35 Miltenberger RJ, Mynatt RL, Wilkinson JE, Woychik RP. The role of the agouti gene in the yellow obese syndrome. J. Nutr.127(9),1902S–1907S (1997).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
36 Rossi-George A, Virgolini MB, Weston D, Cory-Slechta DA. Alterations in glucocorticoid negative feedback following maternal Pb, prenatal stress and the combination: a potential biological unifying mechanism for their corresponding disease profiles. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.234(1),117–127 (2009).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
37 Ronis MJ, Badger TM, Shema SJ et al. Endocrine mechanisms underlying the growth effects of developmental lead exposure in the rat. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A54(2),101–120 (1998).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
38 Pine M, Hiney J, Dearth R, Bratton J, Les Dees WL. IGF-1 administration to prepubertal female rats can overcome delayed puberty caused by maternal Pb exposure. Reprod. Toxicol.21,104–109 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
39 Dearth RK, Hiney JK, Srivastava V, Burdick SB, Bratton GR, Dees WL. Effects of lead (Pb) exposure during gestation and lactation on female pubertal development in the rat. Reprod. Toxicol.16(4),343–352 (2002).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
40 McGivern RF, Sokol RZ, Berman NG. Prenatal lead exposure in the rat during the third week of gestation: long-term behavioral, physiological, and anatomical effects associated with reproduction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.110(2),206–215 (1991).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
41 Petrusz P, Weaver CM, Grant LD, Mushak P, Krigman MR. Lead poisoning and reproduction: effects on pituitary and serum gonadotropins in neonatal rats. Environ. Res.19(2),383–391 (1979).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
42 Gorbel F, Boujelbene M, Makni-Ayadi F et al. Cytotoxic effects of lead on the endocrine and exocrine sexual function of pubescent male and female rats. Demonstration of apoptotic activity. C R Biol.325(9),927–940 (2002).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
43 Ronis MJ, Gandy J, Badger T. Endocrine mechanisms underlying reproductive toxicity in the developing rat chronically exposed to dietary lead. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A54(2),77–99 (1998).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
44 Faulk C, Barks A, Dolinoy DC. Phylogenetic and DNA methylation analysis reveal novel regions of variable methylation in the mouse IAP class of transposons. BMC Genomics14(1),48 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
45 Bernal AJ, Dolinoy DC, Huang D, Skaar DA, Weinhouse C, Jirtle RL. Adaptive radiation-induced epigenetic alterations mitigated by antioxidants. FASEB J.27(2),665–671 (2013).▪ Hormetic response was observed following low-dose gestational radiation exposure, correlating with increased DNA methylation.
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
46 Li G, Kohorst JJ, Zhang W et al. Early postnatal nutrition determines adult physical activity and energy expenditure in female mice. Diabetes62(8),2773–2783 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
47 Patel BB, Raad M, Sebag IA, Chalifour LE. Lifelong exposure to bisphenol A alters cardiac structure/function, protein expression, and DNA methylation in adult mice. Toxicol. Sci.133(1),174–185 (2013).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
48 Sterrenburg L, Gaszner B, Boerrigter J et al. Chronic stress induces sex-specific alterations in methylation and expression of corticotropin-releasing factor gene in the rat. PLoS One6(11),e28128 (2011).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
49 Schneider JS, Kidd S, Anderson DW. Influence of developmental lead exposure on expression of DNA methyltransferases and methyl cytosine-binding proteins in hippocampus. Toxicol. Lett.217(1),75–81 (2012).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
50 Thompson SL, Konfortova G, Gregory RI, Reik W, Dean W, Feil R. Environmental effects on genomic imprinting in mammals. Toxicol. Lett.120(1–3),143–150 (2001).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
51 Heijmans BT, Tobi EW, Stein AD et al. Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(44),17046–17049 (2008).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
52 Roberts CT, Owens JA, Sferruzzi-Perri AN. Distinct actions of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) on placental development and fetal growth: lessons from mice and guinea pigs. Placenta29(Suppl. A),S42–S47 (2008).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
53 Li YY, Chen T, Wan Y, Xu SQ. Lead exposure in pheochromocytoma cells induces persistent changes in amyloid precursor protein gene methylation patterns. Environ. Toxicol.27(8),495–502 (2012).▪▪ Gene-specific and global DNA hypomethylation were observed in this study, and may be associated with lead-induced neurodegeneration.
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
54 Park SK, Elmarsafawy S, Mukherjee B et al. Cumulative lead exposure and age-related hearing loss: the VA normative aging study. Hear. Res269(1–2),48–55 (2010).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
55 Schwartz BS, Hu H. Adult lead exposure: time for change. Environ. Health Perspect.115(3),451–454 (2007).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
56 Tokar EJ, Diwan BA, Waalkes MP. Early life inorganic lead exposure induces testicular teratoma and renal and urinary bladder preneoplasia in adult metallothionein-knockout mice but not in wild type mice. Toxicology276(1),5–10 (2010).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
57 Gonzalez-Cossio T, Peterson KE, Sanin LH et al. Decrease in birth weight in relation to maternal bone-lead burden. Pediatrics100(5),856–862 (1997).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
58 Lee MG, Chun OK, Song WO. Determinants of the blood lead level of US women of reproductive age. J. Am. Coll. Nutr.24(1),1–9 (2005).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
59 Bernard SM, McGeehin MA. Prevalence of blood lead levels > or = 5 micro g/dl among US children 1 to 5 years of age and socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with blood of lead levels 5 to 10 micro g/dl, Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Pediatrics112(6 Pt 1),1308–1313 (2003).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
60 Kaminen-Ahola N, Ahola A, Flatscher-Bader T et al. Postnatal growth restriction and gene expression changes in a mouse model of fetal alcohol syndrome. Birth Defects Res. Part A Clin. Mol. Teratol.88(10),818–826 (2010).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
61 Dolinoy DC, Weidman JR, Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Maternal genistein alters coat color and protects Avy mouse offspring from obesity by modifying the fetal epigenome. Environ. Health Perspect.114(4),567–572 (2006).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar

Vol. 5, No. 5

Metrics

Downloaded 301 times

History

Published online 24 September 2013

Published in print October 2013

Information

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank BN Sanchez, Z Zhang and KE Peterson for their technical and intellectual assistance with this project.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported by the University of Michigan (UM) NIEHS/EPA Children’s Environmental Health Formative Center (P20 ES018171/RD834800), as well as the UM NIEHS Core Center (P30 ES017885). C Faulk was supported by the UM NIEHS Core Center (T32 ES007062). JM Goodrich was supported by the UM NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences grant (2UL1TR000433). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

PDF download