Research Article

SLC6A4 promoter region methylation and socio-emotional stress response in very preterm and full-term infants

Rosario Montirosso

*Author for correspondence:

E-mail Address: rosario.montirosso@bp.lnf.it

0-3 Center for the at-Risk Infant, Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Livio Provenzi

0-3 Center for the at-Risk Infant, Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Roberto Giorda

Molecular Biology Laboratory, Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Monica Fumagalli

NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences & Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Francesco Morandi

Pediatric Unit, Sacra Famiglia Hospital, Erba, CO, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Ida Sirgiovanni

NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences & Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Uberto Pozzoli

Bioinformatic Lab, Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Ruth Grunau

Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, & Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

Tim F Oberlander

Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, & Child & Family Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

Fabio Mosca

NICU, Department of Clinical Sciences & Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Renato Borgatti

Neuropsychiatry & Neurorehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute IRCCS Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini, LC, Italy

Search for more papers by this author

Published Online:6 Jul 2016https://doi.org/10.2217/epi-2016-0010

View article

Abstract

Aim: The present study is part of a prospective micro-longitudinal research project and reports on the association between SLC6A4 methylation and socio-emotional stress response in very preterm (VPT) and full-term (FT) infants. Materials & methods:SLC6A4 methylation was assessed at birth and discharge in 32 VPT infants, and at birth in 27 FT infants. Socio-emotional stress response (i.e., negative emotionality) was assessed at 3 months (corrected age). Results: Negative emotionality was higher in VPTs compared with FT counterpart. In VPT infants only, stress response was associated with SLC6A4 methylation status at discharge, which was predictive of greater negative emotionality. Conclusion: The present study extends previous reports, suggesting that altered SLC6A4 methylation associates with greater socio-emotional stress sensitivity in 3-month-old VPT infants.

Keywords:

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest

References

1 Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in very preterm infants: long-term effects on brain, neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Rambam Maimonides Med. J. 4(4), e0025 (2013).Medline, Google Scholar
2 Valeri BO, Holsti L, Linhares MBM. Neonatal pain and developmental outcomes in children born preterm: a systematic review. Clin. J. Pain 31(4), 355–362 (2015). • Systematic review on pain-related stress exposures across neonatal intensive care unit stay and their effects on preterm children development.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
3 Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Zaidman-Zait A, Weinberg J, Nordstokke D, Cepeda IL. Cortisol levels in relation to maternal interaction and child internalizing behavior in preterm and full-term children at 18 months corrected age. Dev. Psychobiol. 53(2), 184–195 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
4 Ranger M, Synnes AR, Vinall J, Grunau RE. Internalizing behaviours in school-age children born very preterm are predicted by neonatal pain and morphine exposure. Eur. J. Pain 18(6), 844–852 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
5 Lester BM, Tronick E, Nestler E et al. Behavioral epigenetics. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1226, 14–33 (2011).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
6 Montirosso R, Provenzi L. Implications of epigenetics and stress regulation on research and developmental care of preterm infants. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 44(2), 174–182 (2015). • Theoretical piece that sets a preliminary ground for the application of behavioral epigenetics to the field of prematurity.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
7 Lesch KP. When the serotonin transporter gene meets adversity: the contribution of animal models to understanding epigenetic mechanisms in affective disorders and resilience. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 7, 251–280 (2011). • Shows that the serotonin transporter gene is a relevant marker of epigenetic changes related to early exposures to adverse environments.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
8 Canli T, Lesch KP. Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognition. Nat. Neurosci. 10(9), 1103–1109 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
9 Pluess M, Velders FP, Belsky J et al. Serotonin transporter polymorphism moderates effects of prenatal maternal anxiety on infant negative emotionality. Biol. Psychiatry 69(6), 520–525 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
10 Auerbach JG, Faroy M, Ebstein R, Kahana M, Levine J. The association of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4) and the serotonin transporter promoter gene (5-HTTLPR) with temperament in 12 month-old infants. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 42(6), 777–783 (2001).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
11 Booij L, Szyf M, Carballedo A et al. DNA methylation of the serotonin transporter gene in peripheral cells and stress-related changes in hippocampal volume: a study in depressed patients and healthy controls. PLoS ONE 10(3), e0119061 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
12 Hyman SE. How adversity gets under the skin. Nat. Neurosci. 12(3), 241–243 (2009).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
13 Vijayendran M, Beach SR, Plume JM, Brody GH, Philibert RA. Effects of genotype and child abuse on DNA methylation and gene expression at the serotonin transporter. Front. Psychiatry 3, 55 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
14 Devlin AM, Brain U, Austin J, Oberlander TF. Prenatal exposure to maternal depressed mood and the MTHFR C677T variant affect SLC6A4 methylation in infants at birth. PLoS ONE 5(8), e12201 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15 Beach SRH, Brody GH, Todorov AA, Gunter TD, Philibert RA. Methylation at SLC6A4 is linked to family history of child abuse: an examination of the Iowa Adoptee sample. Am. J. med. Genet. B, Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 153B(2), 710–713 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
16 Provenzi L, Fumagalli M, Sirgiovanni I et al. Pain-related stress during the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit stay and SLC6A4 methylation in very preterm infants. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9, 1–9 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
17 Chau CMY, Ranger M, Sulistyoningrum D, Devlin AM, Oberlander TF, Grunau RE. Neonatal pain and COMT Val158Met genotype in relation to serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) promoter methylation in very preterm children at school age. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 1–12 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
18 Tronick E, Als H, Adamson L, Wise S, Brazelton TB. The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiatry 17(1), 1–13 (1978).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
19 Adamson LB, Frick JE. The still face: a history of a shared experimental paradigm. Infancy 4(4), 451–473 (2003).Crossref, Google Scholar
20 Mesman J, van IJzendoorn MH, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. The many faces of the Still-Face Paradigm: a review and meta-analysis. Dev. Rev. 29(2), 120–162 (2009). • Systematic review and meta-analysis on the Still-Face paradigm.Crossref, Google Scholar
21 Hsu HC, Jeng SF. Two-month-olds’ attention and affective response to maternal still face: a comparison between term and preterm infants in Taiwan. Infant Behav. Dev. 31, 194–206 (2008).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
22 Segal LB, Oster H, Cohen M, Caspi B, Myers M, Brown D. Smiling and fussing in seven-month-old preterm and full-term black infants in the still-face situation. Child Dev. 66, 1829–1843 (1995).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
23 Montirosso R, Borgatti R, Trojan S, Zanini R, Tronick E. A comparison of dyadic interactions and coping with still-face in healthy pre-term and full-term infants. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 28(2), 347–368 (2010).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
24 Jean ADL, Stack DM. Full-term and very-low-birth-weight preterm infants’ self-regulating behaviors during a Still-Face interaction: influences of maternal touch. Infant Behav. Dev. 35(4), 779–791 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
25 Klein VC, Gaspardo CM, Martinez FE, Grunau RE, Linhares MBM. Pain and distress reactivity and recovery as early predictors of temperament in toddlers born preterm. Early Hum. Dev. 85(9), 569–576 (2009).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
26 Kang H-JJ, Kim J-MM, Stewart R et al. Association of SLC6A4 methylation with early adversity, characteristics and outcomes in depression. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 44, 23–28 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
27 Oberlander TF, Weinberg J, Papsdorf M, Grunau R, Misri S, Devlin AM. Prenatal exposure to maternal depression, neonatal methylation of human glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) and infant cortisol stress responses. Epigenetics 3(2), 97–106 (2008). • One of the first studies to apply behavioral epigenetics to the study of early adversities and stress regulation in young infants.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
28 Tabano S, Colapietro P, Cetin I et al. Epigenetic modulation of the IGF2/H19 imprinted domain in human embryonic and extra-embryonic compartments and its possible role in fetal growth restriction. Epigenetics 5(4), 313–324 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
29 Haley DW, Stansbury K. Infant stress and parent responsiveness: regulation of physiology and behavior during Still-Face and Reunion. Child Dev. 74(5), 1534–1546 (2003).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
30 DiCorcia JA, Snidman N, Sravish AV, Tronick E. Evaluating the nature of the Still-Face effect in the double Face-to-Face Still-Face paradigm using different comparison groups. Infancy 21(3), 332–352 (2016).Crossref, Google Scholar
31 Hollingshead AB. Four Factor Index Of Social Status. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA (1978).Google Scholar
32 Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
33 Brummelte S, Grunau RE, Chau V et al. Procedural pain and brain development in premature newborns. Ann. Neurol. 71(3), 385–396 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
34 Lesch KP, Bengel D, Heils A et al. Association of anxiety-related traits with a polymorphism in the serotonin transporter gene regulatory region. Science 274(5292), 1527–31 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
35 Heils A, Teufel A, Petri S et al. Allelic variation of human serotonin transporter gene expression. J. Neurochem. 66(6), 2621–2624 (1996).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
36 Zymo Research: Bisulfite Primer Seeker. www.zymoresearch.com/tools/bisulfite-primer-seeker.Google Scholar
37 Slone-Wilcoxon J, Redei EE. Maternal-fetal glucocorticoid milieu programs hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid function of adult offspring. Endocrinology. 145(9), 4068–4072 (2004).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
38 Provenzi L, Casini E, de Simone P, Reni G, Borgatti R, Montirosso R. Mother–infant dyadic reparation and individual differences in vagal tone affect 4 month-old infants’ social stress regulation. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 140, 158–170 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
39 Barry RA, Kochanska G, Philibert RA. G x E interaction in the organization of attachment: mothers’ responsiveness as a moderator of children's genotypes. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(12), 1313–1320 (2008).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
40 Montirosso R, Provenzi L, Tavian D et al. Social stress regulation in 4 month-old infants: contribution of maternal social engagement and infants’ 5-HTTLPR genotype. Early Hum. Dev. 91(3), 173–179 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
41 Duman EA, Canli T. Influence of life stress, 5-HTTLPR genotype, and SLC6A4 methylation on gene expression and stress response in healthy Caucasian males. Biol. Mood Anxiety Disord. 5(1), 2 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
42 Van Ijzendoorn MH, Caspers K, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Beach SRH, Philibert R. Methylation matters: interaction between methylation density and serotonin transporter genotype predicts unresolved loss or trauma. Biol. Psychiatry 68(5), 405–407 (2010).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
43 Beach SR, Dogan M V, Brody GH, Philibert RA. Differential impact of cumulative SES risk on methylation of protein-protein interaction pathways as a function of SLC6A4 genetic variation in African American young adults. Biol. Psychol. 96, 28–34 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
44 Nikolova YS, Koenen KC, Galea S et al. Beyond genotype: serotonin transporter epigenetic modification predicts human brain function. Nat. Neurosci. 17(9), 1153–1155 (2014).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
45 Kantake M, Yoshitake H, Ishikawa H, Araki Y, Shimizu T. Postnatal epigenetic modification of glucocorticoid receptor gene in preterm infants: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 4(7), e005318 (2014). • One of the first studies to apply behavioral epigenetics to unveil methylation changes within stress-related genes in association with neonatal intensive care unit stay.Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
46 Brenet F, Moh M, Funk P et al. DNA methylation of the first exon is tightly linked to transcriptional silencing. PLoS ONE 6(1), e14524 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
47 Frodl T, Szyf M, Carballedo A et al. DNA methylation of the serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) is associated with brain function involved in processing emotional stimuli. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 40(5), 296–305 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
48 Wan J, Oliver VF, Wang G et al. Characterization of tissue-specific differential DNA methylation suggests distinct modes of positive and negative gene expression regulation. BMC Genomics 16, 49 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
49 Relton CL, Groom A, St Pourcain B et al. DNA methylation patterns in cord blood DNA and body size in childhood. PLoS ONE 7(3), e31821 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
50 Gao F, Xia Y, Wang J et al. Integrated detection of both 5-mC and 5-hmC by high-throughput tag sequencing technology highlights methylation reprogramming of bivalent genes during cellular differentiation. Epigenetics 8(4), 421–430 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
51 Vinall J, Grunau RE. Impact of repeated procedural pain-related stress in infants born very preterm. Pediatr. Res. 75(5), 584–587 (2014).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
52 Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty G et al. NIDCAP improves brain function and structure in preterm infants with severe intrauterine growth restriction. J. Perinatol. 32(10), 797–803 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar
53 Symington A, Pinelli J. Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. (2), CD001814 (2006).Medline, Google Scholar
54 Provenzi L, Montirosso R. “Epigenethics” in the neonatal intensive care unit conveying complexity in health care for preterm children. JAMA Pediatr. 169(7), 617–618 (2015).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar

Vol. 8, No. 7

Supplemental Materials

Metrics

Downloaded 118 times

History

Published online 6 July 2016

Published in print July 2016

Information

Keywords

Acknowledgements

The authors thank F Bernasconi, P de Simone and H Tasca for their help in FFSF coding, and S Beri and G Menozzi for their help in epigenetics data analysis. The authors are also grateful to the staff of Pediatric and Obstetric Units of the Sacra Famiglia Hospital of Erba (Como, Italy). Finally, the authors would like to thank all the families, since they made this study possible.

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This research was supported by funds from the Italian Health Ministry for a research on epigenetic mechanisms involved in preterm birth and early stress exposure (Ricerca Corrente 2012: Studio della reattività dell'asse ipotalamo ipofisario in bambini nati fortemente pretermine: fattori genetici e meccanismi epigenetici associati allo stress sociale). The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

The writing of the paper occurred during a visiting period of Livio Provenzi at the Children's and Women's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada), which was fully funded by the Banca del Monte di Lombardia, thanks to the Progetto Professionalità grant.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

PDF download