Role of mechanical factors in fate decisions of stem cells

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪▪ of considerable interest

Bibliography

• 1  Evans MJ, Kaufman MH: Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature292,154–156 (1981).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2  Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al.: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science282,1145–1147 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3  Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL et al.: Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature418,41–49 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4  Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al.: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science284,143–147 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5  Deng J, Petersen BE, Steindler DA, Jorgensen ML, Laywell ED: Mesenchymal stem cells spontaneously express neural proteins in culture and are neurogenic after transplantation. Stem Cells24,1054–1064 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6  Hofstetter CP, Schwarz EJ, Hess D et al.: Marrow stromal cells form guiding strands in the injured spinal cord and promote recovery. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99,2199–2204 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7  Kondo T, Johnson SA, Yoder MC, Romand R, Hashino E: Sonic hedgehog and retinoic acid synergistically promote sensory fate specification from bone marrow-derived pluripotent stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102,4789–4794 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8  Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE: Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell126,677–689 (2006).▪▪ Matrix stiffness directs mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) lineage specification.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9  O’Neill C, Jordan P, Ireland G: Evidence for two distinct mechanisms of anchorage stimulation in freshly explanted and 3T3 Swiss mouse fibroblasts. Cell44,489–496 (1986).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 10  Chen CS, Mrksich M, Huang S, Whitesides GM, Ingber DE: Geometric control of cell life and death. Science276,1425–1428 (1997).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11  Engler AJ, Griffin MA, Sen S, Bonnemann CG, Sweeney HL, Discher DE: Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J. Cell. Biol.166,877–887 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12  McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, Bhadriraju K, Chen CS: Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell6,483–495 (2004).▪▪ Demonstrates that cell shape and RhoA activity control MSC differentiation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13  Georges PC, Miller WJ, Meaney DF, Sawyer ES, Janmey PA: Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys. J.90,3012–3018 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14  Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL: Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science310,1139–1143 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15  Wang N, Tytell JD, Ingber DE: Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.10,75–82 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16  Yeung T, Georges PC, Flanagan LA et al.: Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton60,24–34 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 17  Pouille PA, Ahmadi P, Brunet AC, Farge E: Mechanical signals trigger Myosin II redistribution and mesoderm invagination in Drosophila embryos. Sci. Signal2,ra16 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 18  Martin AC, Kaschube M, Wieschaus EF: Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature457,495–499 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19  Krieg M, Arboleda-Estudillo Y, Puech PH et al.: Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol.10,429–436 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20  Rauzi M, Verant P, Lecuit T, Lenne PF: Nature and anisotropy of cortical forces orienting Drosophila tissue morphogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol.10,1401–1410 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21  Desprat N, Supatto W, Pouille PA, Beaurepaire E, Farge E: Tissue deformation modulates twist expression to determine anterior midgut differentiation in Drosophila embryos. Dev. Cell15,470–477 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22  Levenstein ME, Ludwig TE, Xu RH et al.: Basic fibroblast growth factor support of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Stem Cells24,568–574 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23  Vallier L, Alexander M, Pedersen RA: Activin/Nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells. J. Cell Sci.118,4495–4509 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24  Xu RH, Sampsell-Barron TL, Gu F et al.: NANOG is a direct target of TGF-β/activin-mediated SMAD signaling in human ESCs. Cell Stem Cell3,196–206 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25  Chadwick K, Wang L, Li L et al.: Cytokines and BMP-4 promote hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Blood102,906–915 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26  Xu RH, Chen X, Li DS et al.: BMP4 initiates human embryonic stem cell differentiation to trophoblast. Nat. Biotechnol.20,1261–1264 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27  Zhang P, Li J, Tan Z et al.: Short-term BMP-4 treatment initiates mesoderm induction in human embryonic stem cells. Blood111,1933–1941 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28  D’Amour KA, Agulnick AD, Eliazer S, Kelly OG, Kroon E, Baetge EE: Efficient differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to definitive endoderm. Nat. Biotechnol.23,1534–1541 (2005).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 29  Chambers SM, Fasano CA, Papapetrou EP, Tomishima M, Sadelain M, Studer L: Highly efficient neural conversion of human ES and iPS cells by dual inhibition of SMAD signaling. Nat. Biotechnol.27,275–280 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30  Pera MF, Andrade J, Houssami S et al.: Regulation of human embryonic stem cell differentiation by BMP-2 and its antagonist noggin. J. Cell Sci.117,1269–1280 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31  Smith JR, Vallier L, Lupo G, Alexander M, Harris WA, Pedersen RA: Inhibition of Activin/Nodal signaling promotes specification of human embryonic stem cells into neuroectoderm. Dev. Biol.313,107–117 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32  Zhou J, Su P, Li D, Tsang S, Duan E, Wang F: High-efficiency induction of neural conversion in human ESCs and human induced pluripotent stem cells with a single chemical inhibitor of transforming growth factor-β superfamily receptors. Stem Cells28,1741–1750 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33  Daheron L, Opitz SL, Zaehres H et al.: LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to maintain self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells22,770–778 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34  Ying QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A: BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains embryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell115,281–292 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35  Brons IG, Smithers LE, Trotter MW et al.: Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature448,191–195 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36  Barry F, Boynton RE, Liu B, Murphy JM: Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow: differentiation-dependent gene expression of matrix components. Exp. Cell Res.268,189–200 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37  Ng F, Boucher S, Koh S et al.: PDGF, TGF-β, and FGF signaling is important for differentiation and growth of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs): transcriptional profiling can identify markers and signaling pathways important in differentiation of MSCs into adipogenic, chondrogenic, and osteogenic lineages. Blood112,295–307 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38  Discher D, Dong C, Fredberg JJ et al.: Biomechanics: cell research and applications for the next decade. Ann. Biomed. Eng.37,847–859 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 39  Janmey PA, McCulloch CA: Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Ann. Rev. Biomed. Eng.9,1–34 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40  Hahn C, Schwartz MA: Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.10,53–62 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41  Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR et al.: Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell8,241–254 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42  Pelham RJ Jr, Wang Y-L: High resolution detection of mechanical forces exerted by locomoting fibroblasts on the substrate. Mol. Biol. Cell10,935–945 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43  Zemel A, Rehfeldt F, Brown AE, Discher DE, Safran SA: Optimal matrix rigidity for stress fiber polarization in stem cells. Nat. Phys.6,468–473 (2010).▪▪ The alignment of non-muscle myosin (NMMII)-based stress fibers in MSCs depends non-monotonically on the matrix rigidity.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44  Huebsch N, Arany PR, Mao AS et al.: Harnessing traction-mediated manipulation of the cell/matrix interface to control stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater.9,518–526 (2010).▪▪ Assessed the effects of matrix stiffness on MSCs in 3D.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45  Gilbert PM, Havenstrite KL, Magnusson KE et al.: Substrate elasticity regulates skeletal muscle stem cell self-renewal in culture. Science329,1078–1081 (2010).▪▪ Substrate elasticity mimicking the elasticity of muscle supports self-renewal of muscle stem cells.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46  Roskelley CD, Desprez PY, Bissell MJ: Extracellular matrix-dependent tissue-specific gene expression in mammary epithelial cells requires both physical and biochemical signal transduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA91,12378–12382 (1994).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47  Watt FM, Jordan PW, O’Neill CH: Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA85,5576–5580 (1988).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48  Ren XD, Kiosses WB, Schwartz MA: Regulation of the small GTP-binding protein Rho by cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton. EMBO J.18,578–585 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49  Curtis A, Wilkinson C: Nantotechniques and approaches in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol.19,97–101 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50  Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey PF: Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials20,573–588 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51  Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R et al.: The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat. Mater.6,997–1003 (2007).▪▪ Investigated the effects of physical topography on MSC differentiation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52  Kurpinski K, Chu J, Hashi C, Li S: Anisotropic mechanosensing by mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103,16095–16100 (2006).▪▪ Mechanical strain controls MSC gene expression.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53  Kurpinski K, Chu J, Wang D, Li S: Proteomic profiling of mesenchymal stem cell responses to mechanical strain and TGF-β1. Cell. Mol. Bioeng.2,606–614 (2009).▪▪ Mechanical strain and TGF-β1 co-operate to regulate MSC gene expression.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54  Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126,663–676 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55  Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al.: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell131,861–872 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56  Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K et al.: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science318,1917–1920 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57  Park IH, Zhao R, West JA et al.: Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature451,141–146 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58  Wozniak MA, Chen CS: Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.10,34–43 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59  Chowdhury F, Na S, Li D et al.: Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Mater.9,82–88 (2010).▪▪ Adherent mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are softer and much more sensitive to a local cyclic stress.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60  Poh YC, Chowdhury F, Tanaka TS, Wang N: Embryonic stem cells do not stiffen on rigid substrates. Biophys. J.99,L19–L21 (2010).▪ Single ESCs do not stiffen on rigid substrates.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61  Chowdhury F, Li Y, Poh YC, Yokohama-Tamaki T, Wang N, Tanaka TS: Soft substrates promote homogeneous self-renewal of embryonic stem cells via downregulating cell–matrix tractions. PLoS One5,e15655 (2010).▪ Soft substrates promote homogeneous self-renewal of mouse ESCs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62  Shimizu N, Yamamoto K, Obi S et al.: Cyclic strain induces mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation into vascular smooth muscle cells by activating PDGF receptor-β. J. Appl. Physiol.104,766–772 (2008).▪ Cyclic strain induces mouse ESC differentiation to vascular smooth muscle cells.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63  Yamamoto K, Sokabe T, Watabe T et al.: Fluid shear stress induces differentiation of Flk-1-positive embryonic stem cells into vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.288,H1915–H1924 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64  Garin G, Berk BC: Flow-mediated signaling modulates endothelial cell phenotype. Endothelium13,375–384 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65  Adamo L, Naveiras O, Wenzel PL et al.: Biomechanical forces promote embryonic haematopoiesis. Nature459,1131–1135 (2009).▪▪ Fluid shear stress promotes differentiation of ESC-derived hematopoietic precursors.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66  Evans ND, Minelli C, Gentleman E et al.: Substrate stiffness affects early differentiation events in embryonic stem cells. Eur. Cell Mater.18,1–13; discussion 13–14 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67  Peerani R, Rao BM, Bauwens C et al.: Niche-mediated control of human embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. EMBO J.26,4744–4755 (2007).▪▪ Assessed the effects of colony sizes on ESC fate.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 68  Ng ES, Davis RP, Azzola L, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG: Forced aggregation of defined numbers of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies fosters robust, reproducible hematopoietic differentiation. Blood106,1601–1603 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69  Nostro MC, Cheng X, Keller GM, Gadue P: Wnt, activin, and BMP signaling regulate distinct stages in the developmental pathway from embryonic stem cells to blood. Cell Stem Cell2,60–71 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70  Friedland JC, Lee MH, Boettiger D: Mechanically activated integrin switch controls α5β1 function. Science323,642–644 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71  Shin ME, He Y, Li D et al.: Spatiotemporal organization, regulation, and functions of tractions during neutrophil chemotaxis. Blood116,3297–3310 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72  del Rio A, Perez-Jimenez R, Liu R, Roca-Cusachs P, Fernandez JM, Sheetz MP: Stretching single talin rod molecules activates vinculin binding. Science323,638–641 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73  Grashoff C, Hoffman BD, Brenner MD et al.: Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature466,263–266 (2010).▪ In living cells force transmission across focal adhesions is necessary for the stabilization of focal adhesions under force.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74  Johnson CP, Tang HY, Carag C, Speicher DW, Discher DE: Forced unfolding of proteins within cells. Science317,663–666 (2007).▪ Described a technology to detect forced unfolding of proteins within cells.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75  Lyons RM, Gentry LE, Purchio AF, Moses HL: Mechanism of activation of latent recombinant transforming growth factor-β1 by plasmin. J. Cell. Biol.110,1361–1367 (1990).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76  Wipff PJ, Rifkin DB, Meister JJ, Hinz B: Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-β1 from the extracellular matrix. J. Cell. Biol.179,1311–1323 (2007).▪ Myofibroblast contraction activates latent TGF-β1.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 77  Ahamed J, Burg N, Yoshinaga K, Janczak CA, Rifkin DB, Coller BS: In vitro and in vivo evidence for shear-induced activation of latent transforming growth factor-β1. Blood112,3650–3660 (2008).▪ Describes shear-induced activation of latent TGF-β1.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78  Conti MA, Even-Ram S, Liu C, Yamada KM, Adelstein RS: Defects in cell adhesion and the visceral endoderm following ablation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II-A in mice. J. Biol. Chem.279,41263–41266 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 79  Tullio AN, Accili D, Ferrans VJ et al.: Nonmuscle myosin II-B is required for normal development of the mouse heart. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA94,12407–12412 (1997).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80  Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D et al.: A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol.25,681–686 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81  Xu Y, Zhu X, Hahm HS et al.: Revealing a core signaling regulatory mechanism for pluripotent stem cell survival and self-renewal by small molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107,8129–8134 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 82  Li D, Zhou J, Wang L et al.: Integrated biochemical and mechanical signals regulate multifaceted human embryonic stem cell functions. J. Cell. Biol.191,631–644 (2010).▪▪ NMMIIA controls multifaceted human ESC functions.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83  Chen G, Hou Z, Gulbranson DR, Thomson JA: Actin-myosin contractility is responsible for the reduced viability of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7,240–248 (2010).▪ Actin–myosin contractility is responsible for the reduced viability of dissociated human ESCs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84  Ohgushi M, Matsumura M, Eiraku M et al.: Molecular pathway and cell state responsible for dissociation-induced apoptosis in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7,225–239 (2010).▪ The Rho–ROCK–NMMII pathway is responsible for dissociation-induced apoptosis in human ESCs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 85  Shewan AM, Maddugoda M, Kraemer A et al.: Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell–cell contacts. Mol. Biol. Cell16,4531–4542 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar