Aim: To evaluate a serum-free system where mitotically active subconjunctival fibroblasts were co-cultured with conjunctival epithelial cells to mimic a niche environment for conjunctival progenitor cells. Methods: Human conjunctival epithelial cells were expanded in vitro and evaluated for their colony-forming efficiency and clonal ability. The cells were then transferred to a serum-free co-culture system and cultured in the presence of mitotically active subconjunctival fibroblasts (human conjunctival epithelial cells and human bulbar subconjunctival fibroblasts [HCEC-HCF]). Cells were evaluated by Ki67 staining, total colony-forming efficiency and the number of colonies with a surface area of more than 10 mm². The expression of putative progenitor cell markers p63α, ABCG2 and CK15, and the presence of MUC5AC- and periodic acid-Schiff-positive cells was compared with standard culture conditions (HCEC-3T3). Results: Conjunctival epithelial cells cultured under HCEC-HCF and HCEC-3T3 conditions demonstrated strong immunoreactivity to p63α and ABCG2. Co-localization of CK15 and p63α revealed a subpopulation of CK15-positive cells under HCEC-3T3 conditions compared with only a few CK15-positive cells found under HCEC-HCF conditions. MUC5AC- and periodic acid-Schiff-positive cells were much more common under HCEC-3T3 conditions than under HCEC-HCF conditions. These results were confirmed by reverse transcription-PCR. Cells in HCEC-HCF conditions demonstrated a significantly higher total colony-forming efficiency and a significantly higher percentage of colonies with holoclone-like morphology. Conclusions: The simulation of a niche environment in vitro by co-culturing mitotically active subconjunctival fibroblasts with conjunctival epithelial cells supports the maintenance of conjunctival cells with progenitor cell characteristics and therefore might be a useful tool to expand conjunctival epithelial progenitor cells in vitro for clinical use.

Keywords:

Bibliography

1 Schrader S, Notara M, Beaconsfield M, Tuft SJ, Daniels JT, Geerling G: Tissue engineering for conjunctival reconstruction: established methods and future outlooks. Curr. Eye Res.34,913–924 (2009).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
2 Pellegrini G, Golisano O, Paterna P et al.: Location and clonal analysis of stem cells and their differentiated progeny in the human ocular surface. J. Cell Biol.145,769–782 (1999).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
3 Henderson HW, Collin JR: Mucous membrane grafting. Dev. Ophthalmol.41,230–242 (2008).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
4 Barrandon Y: Crossing boundaries: stem cells, holoclones, and the fundamentals of squamous epithelial renewal. Cornea26,S10–S12 (2007).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
5 Wei ZG, Lin T, Sun TT, Lavker RM: Clonal analysis of the in vivo differentiation potential of keratinocytes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.38,753–761 (1997).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
6 Revoltella RP, Papini S, Rosellini A, Michelini M: Epithelial stem cells of the eye surface. Cell Prolif.40,445–461 (2007).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
7 Spradling A, Drummond-Barbosa D, Kai T: Stem cells find their niche. Nature414,98–104 (2001).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
8 Blanpain C, Horsley V, Fuchs E: Epithelial stem cells: turning over new leaves. Cell128,445–458 (2007).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
9 Li DQ, Tseng SC: Three patterns of cytokine expression potentially involved in epithelial–fibroblast interactions of human ocular surface. J. Cell Physiol.163,61–79 (1995).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
10 Tsai RJ, Ho YS, Chen JK: The effects of fibroblasts on the growth and differentiation of human bulbar conjunctival epithelial cells in an in vitro conjunctival equivalent. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.35,2865–2875 (1994).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
11 Rheinwald JG, Green H: Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell6,331–343 (1975).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
12 Ang LP, Tan DT, Phan TT, Li J, Beuerman R, Lavker RM: The in vitro and in vivo proliferative capacity of serum-free cultivated human conjunctival epithelial cells. Curr. Eye Res.28,307–317 (2004).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
13 Pellegrini G, Dellambra E, Golisano O et al.: p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98,3156–3161 (2001).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
14 Galindo EEH, Theiss C, Pauklin M, Wettey FR, Steuhl KP, Meller D: Correlation of cell cycle kinetics with p63 expression in human limbal epithelial cells expanded on intact human amniotic membrane. Ophthalmic Res.41,83–90 (2009).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
15 Watanabe K, Nishida K, Yamato M et al.: Human limbal epithelium contains side population cells expressing the ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCG2. FEBS Lett.565,6–10 (2004).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
16 Budak MT, Alpdogan OS, Zhou MY, Lavker RM, Akinci MAM, Wolosin JM: Ocular surface epithelia contain ABCG2-dependent side population cells exhibiting features associated with stem cells. J. Cell Sci.118,1715–1724 (2005).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
17 Blazejewska EA, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Zenkel M et al.: Corneal limbal microenvironment can induce transdifferentiation of hair follicle stem cells into corneal epithelial-like cells. Stem Cells27,642–652 (2009).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
18 Schrader S, Notara M, Beaconsfield M, Tuft S, Geerling G, Daniels JT: Conjunctival epithelial cells maintain stem cell properties after long-term culture and cryopreservation. Regen. Med.4,677–687 (2009).
CASGoogle Scholar
19 Barrandon Y, Green H: Three clonal types of keratinocyte with different capacities for multiplication. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA84,2302–2306 (1987).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
20 Smith A: A glossary for stem-cell biology. Nature441,1060 (2006).
CASGoogle Scholar
21 Li W, Hayashida Y, He H, Kuo CL, Tseng SC: The fate of limbal epithelial progenitor cells during explant culture on intact amniotic membrane. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.48,605–613 (2007).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
22 Kolli S, Lako M, Figueiredo F, Mudhar H, Ahmad S: Loss of corneal epithelial stem cell properties in outgrowths from human limbal explants cultured on intact amniotic membrane. Regen. Med.3,329–342 (2008).
CASGoogle Scholar
23 Sun T, Higham M, Layton C, Haycock J, Short R, MacNeil S: Developments in xenobiotic-free culture of human keratinocytes for clinical use. Wound Repair Regen.12,626–634 (2004).
MedlineGoogle Scholar
24 Lyle S, Christofidou-Solomidou M, Liu Y, Elder DE, Albelda S, Cotsarelis G: The C8/144B monoclonal antibody recognizes cytokeratin 15 and defines the location of human hair follicle stem cells. J. Cell Sci.111(Pt 21),3179–3188 (1998).
Medline CASGoogle Scholar
25 Shatos MA, Rios JD, Horikawa Y et al.: Isolation and characterization of cultured human conjunctival goblet cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44,2477–2486 (2003).
MedlineGoogle Scholar

Vol. 5, No. 6

Metrics

Downloaded 202 times

History

Published online 17 November 2010

Published in print November 2010

Information

Keywords

Financial & competing interests disclosure

This work was supported in part by the Special Trustees of Moorfields Eye Hospital, a research fellowship grant (SCHR 1210/1–1) from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, NIHR BMRC for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital and the UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Gertrud Kusen Stiftung. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Ethical conduct of research

The authors state that they have obtained appropriate institutional review board approval or have followed the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for all human or animal experimental investigations. In addition, for investigations involving human subjects, informed consent has been obtained from the participants involved.

PDF download

Simulation of an in vitro niche environment that preserves conjunctival progenitor cells

Abstract

Bibliography