DNA methylation in cell differentiation and reprogramming: an emerging systematic view

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: ▪ of interest ▪ of considerable interest

Bibliography

• 1  Wu C, Morris JR: Genes, genetics, and epigenetics: a correspondence. Science293(5532),1103–1105 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2  Reik W: Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature447(7143),425–432 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3  Miranda TB, Jones PA: DNA methylation: the nuts and bolts of repression. J. Cell. Physiol.213(2),384–390 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4  Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E: DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for De novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell99(3),247–257 (1999).▪ First in vivo loss-of-function study of de novo methyltransferases, establishing the critical role of methylation for development.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5  Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R: Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell69(6),915–926 (1992).▪▪ First in vivo loss-of-function study of major methyltransferase, Dnmt1, establishing the critical role of methylation for development.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 6  Leonhardt H, Page AW, Weier HU, Bestor TH: A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell71(5),865–873 (1992).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7  Liu Y, Oakeley EJ, Sun L, Jost JP: Multiple domains are involved in the targeting of the mouse DNA methyltransferase to the DNA replication foci. Nucleic Acids Res.26(4),1038–1045 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8  Kim GD, Ni J, Kelesoglu N, Roberts RJ, Pradhan S: Co-operation and communication between the human maintenance and De novo DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases. EMBO J.21(15),4183–4195 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9  Chen T, Ueda Y, Dodge JE, Wang Z, Li E: Establishment and maintenance of genomic methylation patterns in mouse embryonic stem cells by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Mol. Cell. Biol.23(16),5594–5605 (2003).▪ Demonstrates partial redundant roles of DNA methylation between the methyltransferases in embryonic stem cells (ESCs).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10  Hattori N, Abe T, Suzuki M et al.: Preference of DNA methyltransferases for CpG islands in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Res.14(9),1733–1740 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11  Feng J, Zhou Y, Campbell SL et al.: Dnmt1 and Dnmt3a maintain DNA methylation and regulate synaptic function in adult forebrain neurons. Nat. Neurosci.13(4),423–430 (2010).▪ Demonstrates overlapping function of DNA methyltransferases in postmitotic neurons.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12  Hochedlinger K, Plath K: Epigenetic reprogramming and induced pluripotency. Development136(4),509–523 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13  Takahashi K, Yamanaka S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126(4),663–676 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14  Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M et al.: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell131(5),861–872 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15  Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K et al.: Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science (New York)318(5858),1917–1920 (2007).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 16  Jones PA, Baylin SB: The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet.3(6),415–428 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17  Gardiner-Garden M, Frommer M: Cpg islands in vertebrate genomes. J. Mol. Biol.196(2),261–282 (1987).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18  Takai D, Jones PA: Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99(6),3740–3745 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19  Meissner A, Mikkelsen TS, Gu H et al.: Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature454(7205),766–770 (2008).▪ Genomic map of both DNA methylation and histone markers.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20  Mohn F, Weber M, Rebhan M et al.: Lineage-specific polycomb targets and De novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol. Cell30(6),755–766 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21  Fouse SD, Shen Y, Pellegrini M et al.: Promoter Cpg methylation contributes to ES cell gene regulation in parallel with Oct4/Nanog, PcG complex, and histone H3 K4/K27 trimethylation. Cell Stem Cell2(2),160–169 (2008).▪ Genomic map of both DNA methylation and histone markers.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22  Weber M, Hellmann I, Stadler MB et al.: Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nat. Genet.39(4),457–466 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 23  Ball MP, Li JB, Gao Y et al.: Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol.27(4),361–368 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24  Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL: A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103(5),1412–1417 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25  Mikkelsen TS, Ku M, Jaffe DB et al.: Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature448(7153),553–560 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26  Suzuki MM, Bird A: DNA methylation landscapes: Provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat. Rev.9(6),465–476 (2008).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 27  Hellman A, Chess A: Gene body-specific methylation on the active X chromosome. Science315(5815),1141–1143 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28  Deng J, Shoemaker R, Xie B et al.: Targeted bisulfite sequencing reveals changes in DNA methylation associated with nuclear reprogramming. Nat. Biotechnol.27(4),353–360 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29  Lister R, Pelizzola M, Dowen RH et al.: Human DNA methylomes at base resolution show widespread epigenomic differences. Nature462(7271),315–322 (2009).▪▪ Detailed methylation map by deep genome-wide bisulfite sequencing in ESCs and fibroblast cells with cross reference to various histone ChIP-seq experiments.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30  Laurent L, Wong E, Li G et al.: Dynamic changes in the human methylome during differentiation. Genome Res.20(3),320–331 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31  Straussman R, Nejman D, Roberts D et al.: Developmental programming of CpG island methylation profiles in the human genome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.16(5),564–571 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 32  Xu J, Watts JA, Pope SD et al.: Transcriptional competence and the active marking of tissue-specific enhancers by defined transcription factors in embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Genes Dev.23(24),2824–2838 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33  Ooi SK, Qiu C, Bernstein E et al.: Dnmt3l connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to De novo methylation of DNA. Nature448(7154),714–717 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 34  Oswald J, Engemann S, Lane N et al.: Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol.10(8),475–478 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35  Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T: Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature403(6769),501–502 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36  Rougier N, Bourc’his D, Gomes DM et al.: Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. Genes Dev.12(14),2108–2113 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37  Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, Dean W: Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.241(1),172–182 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38  Okada Y, Yamagata K, Hong K, Wakayama T, Zhang Y: A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation. Nature463(7280),554–558 (2010).▪ First implication of transcription elongator components in active paternal demethylation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39  Carlson LL, Page AW, Bestor TH: Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting. Genes Dev.6(12B),2536–2541 (1992).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40  Cardoso MC, Leonhardt H: DNA methyltransferase is actively retained in the cytoplasm during early development. J. Cell Biol.147(1),25–32 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 41  Mayer W, Fundele R, Haaf T: Spatial separation of parental genomes during mouse interspecific (Mus musculus x M. spretus) spermiogenesis. Chromosome Res.8(6),555–558 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42  Kwon GS, Viotti M, Hadjantonakis AK: The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Dev. Cell15(4),509–520 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43  Ng RK, Dean W, Dawson C et al.: Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of Elf5. Nat. Cell. Biol.10(11),1280–1290 (2008).▪▪ Demonstrates that DNA methylation is critical for earliest cell-fate commitment.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44  Donnison M, Beaton A, Davey HW, Broadhurst R, L’huillier P, Pfeffer PL: Loss of the extraembryonic ectoderm in Elf5 mutants leads to defects in embryonic patterning. Development132(10),2299–2308 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45  Hirasawa R, Sasaki H: Dynamic transition of Dnmt3b expression in mouse pre- and early post-implantation embryos. Gene Expr. Patterns9(1),27–30 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46  Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS et al.: Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science282(5391),1145–1147 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47  Tucker KL, Beard C, Dausmann J et al.: Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of nonimprinted genes. Genes Dev.10(8),1008–1020 (1996).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48  Tsumura A, Hayakawa T, Kumaki Y et al.: Maintenance of self-renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases Dnmt1, Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. Genes Cells11(7),805–814 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49  Jackson M, Krassowska A, Gilbert N et al.: Severe global DNA hypomethylation blocks differentiation and induces histone hyperacetylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.24(20),8862–8871 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50  Carlone DL, Lee JH, Young SR et al.: Reduced genomic cytosine methylation and defective cellular differentiation in embryonic stem cells lacking CpG binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol.25(12),4881–4891 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 51  Farthing CR, Ficz G, Ng RK et al.: Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet.4(6),e1000116 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 52  Brandeis M, Frank D, Keshet I et al.: Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from De novo methylation. Nature371(6496),435–438 (1994).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53  Gidekel S, Bergman Y: A unique developmental pattern of Oct-3/4 DNA methylation is controlled by a cis-demodification element. J. Biol. Chem.277(37),34521–34530 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54  Ramsahoye BH, Biniszkiewicz D, Lyko F, Clark V, Bird AP, Jaenisch R: Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97(10),5237–5242 (2000).▪ Early study identifying enrichment of non-CpG methylation in mouse ESCs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55  Gowher H, Jeltsch A: Enzymatic properties of recombinant Dnmt3a DNA methyltransferase from mouse: the enzyme modifies DNA in a non-processive manner and also methylates non-CpG [correction of non-CpA] sites. J. Mol. Biol.309(5),1201–1208 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56  Dodge JE, Ramsahoye BH, Wo ZG, Okano M, Li E: De novo methylation of MMLV provirus in embryonic stem cells: CpG versus non-CpG methylation. Gene289(1–2),41–48 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57  White GP, Watt PM, Holt BJ, Holt PG: Differential patterns of methylation of the IFN-γ promoter at CpG and non-CpG sites underlie differences in IFN-γ gene expression between human neonatal and adult CD45ro^- T cells. J. Immunol.168(6),2820–2827 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58  Suetake I, Miyazaki J, Murakami C, Takeshima H, Tajima S: Distinct enzymatic properties of recombinant mouse DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b. J. Biochem.133(6),737–744 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59  Barres R, Osler Me, Yan J et al.: Non-CpG methylation of the pgc-1α promoter through Dnmt3b controls mitochondrial density. Cell Metab.10(3),189–198 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60  Biniszkiewicz D, Gribnau J, Ramsahoye B et al.: Dnmt1 overexpression causes genomic hypermethylation, loss of imprinting, and embryonic lethality. Mol. Cell. Biol.22(7),2124–2135 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61  Broske AM, Vockentanz L, Kharazi S et al.: DNA methylation protects hematopoietic stem cell multipotency from myeloerythroid restriction. Nat. Genet.41(11),1207–1215 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 62  Trowbridge JJ, Snow JW, Kim J, Orkin SH: DNA methyltransferase 1 is essential for and uniquely regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell5(4),442–449 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63  Takizawa T, Nakashima K, Namihira M et al.: DNA methylation is a critical cell-intrinsic determinant of astrocyte differentiation in the fetal brain. Dev. Cell1(6),749–758 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64  Fan G, Martinowich K, Chin MH et al.: DNA methylation controls the timing of astrogliogenesis through regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. Development132(15),3345–3356 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65  Sen GL, Reuter JA, Webster DE, Zhu L, Khavari PA: Dnmt1 maintains progenitor function in self-renewing somatic tissue. Nature463(7280),563–567 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66  Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC et al.: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science284(5411),143–147 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67  Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H et al.: Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng.7(2),211–228 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 68  Boquest AC, Shahdadfar A, Fronsdal K et al.: Isolation and transcription profiling of purified uncultured human stromal stem cells: alteration of gene expression after in vitro cell culture. Mol. Biol. Cell16(3),1131–1141 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69  Noer A, Sorensen AL, Boquest AC, Collas P: Stable CpG hypomethylation of adipogenic promoters in freshly isolated, cultured, and differentiated mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue. Mol. Biol. Cell17(8),3543–3556 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70  Sorensen AL, Timoskainen S, West FD et al.: Lineage-specific promoter DNA methylation patterns segregate adult progenitor cell types. Stem Cells Dev. (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
  Google Scholar
• 71  Josephson R, Ording CJ, Liu Y et al.: Qualification of embryonal carcinoma 2102ep as a reference for human embryonic stem cell research. Stem Cells25(2),437–446 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72  Aranda P, Agirre X, Ballestar E et al.: Epigenetic signatures associated with different levels of differentiation potential in human stem cells. PloS ONE4(11),e7809 (2009).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 73  Attema JL, Papathanasiou P, Forsberg EC, Xu J, Smale ST, Weissman IL: Epigenetic characterization of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation using minichip and bisulfite sequencing analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(30),12371–12376 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74  Xu J, Pope SD, Jazirehi AR et al.: Pioneer factor interactions and unmethylated CpG dinucleotides mark silent tissue-specific enhancers in embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(30),12377–12382 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75  Tadokoro Y, Ema H, Okano M, Li E, Nakauchi H: De novo DNA methyltransferase is essential for self-renewal, but not for differentiation, in hematopoietic stem cells. J. Exp. Med.204(4),715–722 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76  Temple S: Stem cell plasticity – building the brain of our dreams. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.2(7),513–520 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 77  Shen Y, Chow J, Wang Z, Fan G: Abnormal CpG island methylation occurs during in vitro differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Human Mol. Genet.15(17),2623–2635 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78  Hemberger M, Dean W, Reik W: Epigenetic dynamics of stem cells and cell lineage commitment: digging Waddington’s canal. Nat. Rev.10(8),526–537 (2009).
  CASGoogle Scholar
• 79  Hajkova P, Ancelin K, Waldmann T et al.: Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature452(7189),877–881 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80  Popp C, Dean W, Feng S et al.: Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature463(7284),1101–1105 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81  Surani MA, Durcova-Hills G, Hajkova P, Hayashi K, Tee WW: Germ line, stem cells, and epigenetic reprogramming. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.73,9–15 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 82  Eckhardt F, Lewin J, Cortese R et al.: DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat. Genet.38(12),1378–1385 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83  Schilling E, Rehli M: Global, comparative analysis of tissue-specific promoter CpG methylation. Genomics90(3),314–323 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84  Illingworth R, Kerr A, Desousa D et al.: A novel CpG island set identifies tissue-specific methylation at developmental gene loci. PLoS Biol.6(1),e22 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 85  Rakyan VK, Down TA, Thorne NP et al.: An integrated resource for genome-wide identification and analysis of human tissue-specific differentially methylated regions (tDMRs). Genome Res.18(9),1518–1529 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 86  Song F, Mahmood S, Ghosh S et al.: Tissue specific differentially methylated regions (TDMR): changes in DNA methylation during development. Genomics93(2),130–139 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87  Doi A, Park IH, Wen B et al.: Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nat. Genet.41(12),1350–1353 (2009).▪ Compares methylation signatures distinguishing ESCs from induced pluripotent stem cells.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88  Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W et al.: Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell1(1),55–70 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89  Mikkelsen TS, Hanna J, Zhang X et al.: Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature454(7200),49–55 (2008).▪ First study demonstrating 5-aza-cytidine treatment improves reprogramming efficiencies.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 90  Ichida JK, Blanchard J, Lam K et al.: A small-molecule inhibitor of TGF-β signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. Cell Stem Cell5(5),491–503 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91  Zhu JK: Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu. Rev. Genet.43,143–166 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 92  Ma DK, Jang MH, Guo JU et al.: Neuronal activity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis. Science323(5917),1074–1077 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 93  Barreto G, Schafer A, Marhold J et al.: Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature445(7128),671–675 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94  Morgan HD, Dean W, Coker HA, Reik W, Petersen-Mahrt SK: Activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates 5-methylcytosine in DNA and is expressed in pluripotent tissues: implications for epigenetic reprogramming. J. Biol. Chem.279(50),52353–52360 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 95  Jin SG, Guo C, Pfeifer GP: GADD45A does not promote DNA demethylation. PLoS Genet.4(3),e1000013 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 96  Metivier R, Gallais R, Tiffoche C et al.: Cyclical DNA methylation of a transcriptionally active promoter. Nature452(7183),45–50 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 97  Bhutani N, Brady JJ, Damian M, Sacco A, Corbel SY, Blau HM: Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation. Nature463(7284),1042–1047 (2009).▪ First study demonstrating contribution of active demethylation in reprogramming.
  Google Scholar
• 98  Chin MH, Mason MJ, Xie W et al.: Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell5(1),111–123 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 99  Bibikova M, Chudin E, Wu B et al.: Human embryonic stem cells have a unique epigenetic signature. Genome Res.16(9),1075–1083 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100  Allegrucci C, Wu YZ, Thurston A et al.: Restriction landmark genome scanning identifies culture-induced DNA methylation instability in the human embryonic stem cell epigenome. Human Mol. Genet.16(10),1253–1268 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101  Maitra A, Arking DE, Shivapurkar N et al.: Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet.37(10),1099–1103 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102  Rugg-Gunn PJ, Ferguson-Smith AC, Pedersen RA: Epigenetic status of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet.37(6),585–587 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 103  Aasen T, Raya A, Barrero MJ et al.: Efficient and rapid generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human keratinocytes. Nat. Biotechnol.26(11),1276–1284 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 104  Choi SC, Yoon J, Shim WJ, Ro YM, Lim DS: 5-azacytidine induces cardiac differentiation of p19 embryonic stem cells. Exp. Mol. Med.36(6),515–523 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105  Huangfu D, Osafune K, Maehr R et al.: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nat. Biotechnol.26(11),1269–1275 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106  Huangfu D, Maehr R, Guo W et al.: Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat. Biotechnol.26(7),795–797 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107  Shi Y, Desponts C, Do JT, Hahm HS, Scholer HR, Ding S: Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell3(5),568–574 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 108  Shi Y, Do JT, Desponts C, Hahm HS, Scholer HR, Ding S: A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell2(6),525–528 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 109  Kohyama J, Abe H, Shimazaki T et al.: Brain from bone: efficient “meta-differentiation” of marrow stroma-derived mature osteoblasts to neurons with noggin or a demethylating agent. Differentiation68(4–5),235–244 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 110  Woodbury D, Reynolds K, Black IB: Adult bone marrow stromal stem cells express germline, ectodermal, endodermal, and mesodermal genes prior to neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res.69(6),908–917 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 111  Bibikova M, Laurent LC, Ren B, Loring JF, Fan JB: Unraveling epigenetic regulation in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell2(2),123–134 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 112  Ramirez-Carrozzi VR, Braas D, Bhatt DM et al.: A unifying model for the selective regulation of inducible transcription by CpG islands and nucleosome remodeling. Cell138(1),114–128 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113  Pietersen AM, Van Lohuizen M: Stem cell regulation by polycomb repressors: postponing commitment. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.20(2),201–207 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 114  Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y et al.: Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science324(5929),930–935 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 115  Kriaucionis S, Heintz N: The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain. Science324(5929),929–930 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116  Loenarz C, Schofield CJ: Expanding chemical biology of 2-oxoglutarate oxygenases. Nature Chem. Biol.4(3),152–156 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar