We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing to browse this site, you accept our cookie policy.×
Skip main navigation
Aging Health
Bioelectronics in Medicine
Biomarkers in Medicine
Breast Cancer Management
CNS Oncology
Colorectal Cancer
Concussion
Epigenomics
Future Cardiology
Future Medicine AI
Future Microbiology
Future Neurology
Future Oncology
Future Rare Diseases
Future Virology
Hepatic Oncology
HIV Therapy
Immunotherapy
International Journal of Endocrine Oncology
International Journal of Hematologic Oncology
Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine
Lung Cancer Management
Melanoma Management
Nanomedicine
Neurodegenerative Disease Management
Pain Management
Pediatric Health
Personalized Medicine
Pharmacogenomics
Regenerative Medicine

In vitro study of stem cell communication via gap junctions for fibrocartilage regeneration at entheses

    Bibhukalyan Prasad Nayak

    † Author for correspondence

    Department of Biotechnology & Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, India.

    ,
    James Cho Hong Goh

    Division of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    ,
    Siew Lok Toh

    Division of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore

    &
    Gyan Ranjan Satpathy

    Department of Biotechnology & Medical Engineering, National Institute of Technology (NIT), Rourkela, India.

    Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2217/rme.09.86

    Background: Entheses are fibrocartilaginous organs that bridge ligament with bone at their interface and add significant insertional strength. To replace a severely damaged ligament, a tissue-engineered graft preinstalled with interfacial fibrocartilage, which is being regenerated from stem cells, appears to be more promising than ligament-alone graft. Such a concept can be realized by a biomimetic approach of establishing a dynamic communication of stem cells with bone cells and/or ligament fibroblasts in vitro.Aim: The current study has two objectives. The first objective is to demonstrate functional coculture of bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) with mature bone cells/ligament fibroblasts as evidenced by gap-junctional communication in vitro. The second objective is to investigate the role of BMSCs in the regeneration of fibrocartilage within the coculture. Materials & methods: Rabbit bone/ligament fibroblasts were dual-stained with DiI-Red and calcein (gap-junction permeable dye), and cocultured with unlabeled BMSCs at fixed ratio (1:10). The functional gap junction was demonstrated by the transfer of calcein from donor to recipient cells that was confirmed and quantified by flow cytometry. Type 2 collagen (cartilage extracellular matrix-specific protein) expressed by the mixed cell lines in the cocultures were estimated by real-time reverse transcription PCR and compared with that of the ligament–bone coculture (control). Results: Significant transfer of calcein into BMSCs was observed and flow cytometry analyses showed a gradual increase in the percentage of BMSCs acquiring calcein with time. Cocultures that included BMSCs expressed significantly more type 2 collagen compared with the control. Conclusion: The current study, for the first time, reported the expression of gap-junctional communication of BMSCs with two adherent cell lines of musculoskeletal system in vitro and also confirmed that incorporation of stem cells augments fibrocartilage regeneration. The results open up a path to envisage a composite graft preinstalled with enthesial fibrocartilage using a stem cell-based coculture system.

    Bibliography

    • Francois RJ, Braun J, Khan MA: Entheses and enthesitis: a histopathologic review and relevance to spondyloarthritides. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol.13,255–264 (2001).
    • Gao J, Rasanen T, Persliden J, Messner K: The morphology of ligament insertions after failure at low strain velocity: an evaluation of ligament entheses in the rabbit knee. J. Anat.189(Pt 1),127–133 (1996).
    • Chu D, LeBlanc R, D’Ambrosia P, D’Ambrosia R, Baratta RV, Solomonow M: Neuromuscular disorder in response to anterior cruciate ligament creep. Clin. Biomech.18,222–230 (2003).
    • Wei X, Messner K: The postnatal development of the insertions of the medial collateral ligament in the rat knee. Anat. Embryol.193,53–59 (1996).
    • Benjamin M, Ralphs JR: Fibrocartilage in tendons and ligaments: an adaptation to compressive load. J. Anat.193(Pt 4),481–494 (1998).
    • Benjamin M, Toumi H, Ralphs JR, Bydder G, Best TM, Milz S: Where tendons and ligaments meet bone: attachment sites (‘entheses’) in relation to exercise and/or mechanical load. J. Anat.208,471–490 (2006).
    • Loty S, Foll C, Forest N, Sautier JM: Association of enhanced expression of gap junctions with in vitro chondrogenic differentiation of rat nasal septal cartilage-released cells following their dedifferentiation and redifferentiation. Arch. Oral. Biol.45,843–856 (2000).
    • Waggett AD, Benjamin M, Ralphs JR: Connexin 32 and 43 gap junctions differentially modulate tenocyte response to cyclic mechanical load. Eur. J. Cell Biol.85,1145–1154 (2006).
    • Nagineni CN, Amiel D, Green MH, Berchuck M, Akeson WH: Characterization of the intrinsic properties of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligament cells: an in vitro cell culture study. J. Orthop. Res.10,465–475 (1992).
    • 10  Turhani D, Weissenböck M, Watzinger E et al.: In vitro study of adherent mandibular osteoblast-like cells on carrier materials. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg.34,543–550 (2005).
    • 11  Bani-Yaghoub M, Bechberger JF, Underhill TM, Naus CC: The effects of gap junction blockage on neuronal differentiation of human NTera2/clone D1 cells. Exp. Neurol.156,16–32 (1999).
    • 12  Czyz J, Irmer U, Schulz G, Mindermann A, Hulser DF: Gap-junctional coupling measured by flow cytometry. Exp. Cell Res.255,40–46 (2000).
    • 13  Noreen NJ, Hickok AR, Tuan RS: Regulation of chondrocyte differentiation and maturation. Microsc. Res. Tech.43,174–190 (1998).
    • 14  Heng BC, Cao T, Lee EH: Directing stem cell differentiation into the chondrogenic lineage in vitro.Stem Cells22,1152–1167 (2004).