Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: adaptation through the germline epigenome?

Papers of special note have been highlighted as: • of interest; •• of considerable interest

References

• 1 Hajkova P, Erhardt S, Lane N et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 117(1–2), 15–23 (2002).• Demonstrates epigenetic reprogramming in primordial germ cells (PGCs).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 2 Saitou M, Kagiwada S, Kurimoto K. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse pre-implantation development and primordial germ cells. Development 139(1), 15–31 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 3 Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(Suppl. 1), R47–R58 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 4 Feng S, Jacobsen SE, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 330(6004), 622–627 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kelly WG. Transgenerational epigenetics in the germline cycle of Caenorhabditis elegans. Epigenetics Chromatin 7(1), 6 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 6 Mintz B, Russell ES. Gene-induced embryological modifications of primordial germ cells in the mouse. J. Exp. Zool. 134(2), 207–237 (1957).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 7 Tam PPL, Snow MHL. Proliferation and migration of primordial germ-cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos. J. Embryol. Exp. Morph. 64, 133–147 (1981).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 8 Tachibana M, Ueda J, Fukuda M et al. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3-K9. Genes Dev. 19(7), 815–826 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 9 Yabuta Y, Kurimoto K, Ohinata Y, Seki Y, Saitou M. Gene expression dynamics during germline specification in mice identified by quantitative single-cell gene expression profiling. Biol. Repro. 75(5), 705–716 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 10 Seki Y, Yamaji M, Yabuta Y et al. Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells in mice. Development 134(14), 2627–2638 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 11 Seki Y, Hayashi K, Itoh K, Mizugaki M, Saitou M, Matsui Y. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol. 278(2), 440–458 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hajkova P, Ancelin K, Waldmann T et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature 452(7189), 877–881 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 13 Seisenberger S, Andrews S, Krueger F et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell 48(6), 849–862 (2012).•• Used whole genome bisulfite sequencing and RNA-seq to identify dynamics of DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse PGCs.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 14 Ancelin K, Lange UC, Hajkova P et al. Blimp1 associates with Prmt5 and directs histone arginine methylation in mouse germ cells. Nat. Cell. Biol. 8(6), 623–630 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 15 Kagiwada S, Kurimoto K, Hirota T, Yamaji M, Saitou M. Replication-coupled passive DNA demethylation for the erasure of genome imprints in mice. EMBO J. 32(3), 340–353 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 16 Aoto T, Saitoh N, Sakamoto Y, Watanabe S, Nakao M. Polycomb group protein-associated chromatin is reproduced in post-mitotic G1 phase and is required for S phase progression. J. Biol. Chem. 283(27), 18905–18915 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hackett JA, Zylicz JJ, Surani MA. Parallel mechanisms of epigenetic reprogramming in the germline. Trends Genet. 28(4), 164–174 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 18 Stringer J, Barrand S, Western P. Fine-tuning evolution: germ-line epigenetics and inheritance. Reproduction 146(1), R37–R48 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 19 Stringer JM, Pask AJ, Shaw G, Renfree MB. Post-natal imprinting: evidence from marsupials. Heredity 113(2), 145–155 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 20 Constancia M, Kelsey G, Reik W. Resourceful imprinting. Nature 432(7013), 53–57 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 21 Li Y, Sasaki H. Genomic imprinting in mammals: its life cycle, molecular mechanisms and reprogramming. Cell Res. 21(3), 466–473 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 22 Bartolomei MS, Ferguson-Smith AC. Mammalian genomic imprinting. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3(7), pii:a002592 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 23 Charalambous M, Da Rocha ST, Ferguson-Smith AC. Genomic imprinting, growth control and the allocation of nutritional resources: consequences for postnatal life. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes. 14(1), 3–12 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 24 Kaneda M, Okano M, Hata K et al. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature 429(6994), 900–903 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 25 Kato Y, Kaneda M, Hata K et al. Role of the Dnmt3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16(19), 2272–2280 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 26 La Salle S, Mertineit C, Taketo T, Moens PB, Bestor TH, Trasler JM. Windows for sex-specific methylation marked by DNA methyltransferase expression profiles in mouse germ cells. Dev. Biol. 268(2), 403–415 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 27 Sakai Y, Suetake I, Shinozaki F, Yamashina S, Tajima S. Co-expression of de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a2 and Dnmt3L in gonocytes of mouse embryos. Gene Expr. Patterns 5(2), 231–237 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 28 Shovlin TC, Bourc’his D, La Salle S et al. Sex-specific promoters regulate Dnmt3L expression in mouse germ cells. Hum. Reprod. 22(2), 457–467 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 29 Webster KE, O’bryan MK, Fletcher S et al. Meiotic and epigenetic defects in Dnmt3L-knockout mouse spermatogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102(11), 4068–4073 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 30 Western PS, Van Den Bergen JA, Miles DC, Sinclair AH. Male germ cell differentiation involves complex repression of the regulatory network controlling pluripotency. FASEB J. 24(8), 3026–3035 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 31 Bourc’his D, Xu GL, Lin CS, Bollman B, Bestor TH. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science 294(5551), 2536–2539 (2001).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 32 Hata K, Okano M, Lei H, Li E. Dnmt3L cooperates with the Dnmt3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development 129(8), 1983–1993 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lucifero D, La Salle S, Bourc’his D, Martel J, Bestor TH, Trasler JM. Coordinate regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during oogenesis. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 36 (2007).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 34 Lesch BJ, Dokshin GA, Young RA, Mccarrey JR, Page DC. A set of genes critical to development is epigenetically poised in mouse germ cells from fetal stages through completion of meiosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110(40), 16061–16066 (2013).•• Performed ChIP-seq and RNA-seq analysis on male and female germ cells during embryogenesis and identified a set of developmentally critical epigenetically poised genes.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 35 Kota SK, Feil R. Epigenetic transitions in germ cell development and meiosis. Dev. Cell 19(5), 675–686 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 36 Hammoud SS, Nix DA, Zhang H, Purwar J, Carrell DT, Cairns BR. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460(7254), 473–478 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 37 Brykczynska U, Hisano M, Erkek S et al. Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17(6), 679–687 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 38 Erkek S, Hisano M, Liang CY et al. Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20(7), 868–875 (2013).•• Analyzed the location of nucleosome retention in mouse spermatozoa, supporting the hypothesis for nucleosomal epigenetic inheritance.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 39 Smallwood SA, Tomizawa S, Krueger F et al. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat. Genet. 43(8), 811–814 (2011).•• High-throughput bisulfite analysis of mouse oocytes, sperm and preimplantation embryos.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 40 Chatterjee A, Rodger EJ, Stockwell PA, Weeks RJ, Morison IM. Technical considerations for reduced representation bisulfite sequencing with multiplexed libraries. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 741542 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 41 Payer B, Saitou M, Barton SC et al. Stella is a maternal effect gene required for normal early development in mice. Curr. Biol. 13(23), 2110–2117 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 42 Li X, Ito M, Zhou F et al. A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev. Cell 15(4), 547–557 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 43 Messerschmidt DM, De Vries W, Ito M, Solter D, Ferguson-Smith A, Knowles BB. Trim28 is required for epigenetic stability during mouse oocyte to embryo transition. Science 335(6075), 1499–1502 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 44 Monk M, Boubelik M, Lehnert S. Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development 99(3), 371–382 (1987).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 45 Howlett SK, Reik W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development 113(1), 119–127 (1991).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 46 Van Der Heijden GW, Dieker JW, Derijck AA et al. Asymmetry in histone H3 variants and lysine methylation between paternal and maternal chromatin of the early mouse zygote. Mech. Dev. 122(9), 1008–1022 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 47 Mayer W, Niveleau A, Walter J, Fundele R, Haaf T. Demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature 403(6769), 501–502 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 48 Oswald J, Engemann S, Lane N et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol. 10(8), 475–478 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 49 Santos F, Hendrich B, Reik W, Dean W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 241(1), 172–182 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 50 Wossidlo M, Nakamura T, Lepikhov K et al. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Commun. 2, 241 (2011).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 51 Li Y, O’Neill C. Persistence of cytosine methylation of DNA following fertilisation in the mouse. PLoS ONE 7(1), e30687 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 52 Stancheva I, Meehan RR. Transient depletion of xDnmt1 leads to premature gene activation in Xenopus embryos. Genes Dev. 14(3), 313–327 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 53 Beaujean N, Hartshorne G, Cavilla J et al. Non-conservation of mammalian preimplantation methylation dynamics. Curr. Biol. 14(7), R266–R267 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 54 Macleod D, Clark VH, Bird A. Absence of genome-wide changes in DNA methylation during development of the zebrafish. Nat. Genet. 23(2), 139–140 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 55 Smith ZD, Chan MM, Mikkelsen TS et al. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature 484(7394), 339–344 (2012).•• High-throughput DNA methylation analysis of mouse gametes and from zygote to postimplantation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 56 Smith ZD, Chan MM, Humm KC et al. DNA methylation dynamics of the human preimplantation embryo. Nature 511(7511), 611–615 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 57 Inoue A, Zhang Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science 334(6053), 194 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 58 Tahiliani M, Koh KP, Shen Y et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science 324(5929), 930–935 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 59 Borgel J, Guibert S, Li Y et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nat. Genet. 42(12), 1093–1100 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 60 Nakamura T, Liu YJ, Nakashima H et al. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature 486(7403), 415–419 (2012).• Demonstrated that STELLA binds H3K9me2 to protect CpG sites against TET demethylation.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 61 Messerschmidt DM. Should I stay or should I go: protection and maintenance of DNA methylation at imprinted genes. Epigenetics 7(9), 969–975 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 62 Nakamura T, Arai Y, Umehara H et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 9(1), 64–71 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 63 Ratnam S, Mertineit C, Ding F et al. Dynamics of Dnmt1 methyltransferase expression and intracellular localization during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Dev. Biol. 245(2), 304–314 (2002).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 64 Quenneville S, Verde G, Corsinotti A et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol. Cell 44(3), 361–372 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 65 Zuo X, Sheng J, Lau HT et al. Zinc finger protein ZFP57 requires its co-factor to recruit DNA methyltransferases and maintains DNA methylation imprint in embryonic stem cells via its transcriptional repression domain. J. Biol. Chem. 287(3), 2107–2118 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 66 Kurihara Y, Kawamura Y, Uchijima Y et al. Maintenance of genomic methylation patterns during preimplantation development requires the somatic form of DNA methyltransferase 1. Dev. Biol. 313(1), 335–346 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 67 Cirio MC, Ratnam S, Ding F, Reinhart B, Navara C, Chaillet JR. Preimplantation expression of the somatic form of Dnmt1 suggests a role in the inheritance of genomic imprints. BMC Dev. Biol. 8, 9 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 68 Mackay DJ, Callaway JL, Marks SM et al. Hypomethylation of multiple imprinted loci in individuals with transient neonatal diabetes is associated with mutations in ZFP57. Nat. Genet. 40(8), 949–951 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 69 Surani MA, Barton SC, Norris ML. Development of reconstituted mouse eggs suggests imprinting of the genome during gametogenesis. Nature 308(5959), 548–550 (1984).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 70 McGrath J, Solter D. Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37(1), 179–183 (1984).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 71 Mann JR, Lovell-Badge RH. Inviability of parthenogenones is determined by pronuclei, not egg cytoplasm. Nature 310(5972), 66–67 (1984).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 72 Searle AG, Beechey CV. Noncomplementation phenomena and their bearing on nondisjunctional effects. Basic Life Sci. 36, 363–376 (1985).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 73 Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366(6453), 362–365 (1993).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 74 Saitou M, Payer B, Lange UC, Erhardt S, Barton SC, Surani MA. Specification of germ cell fate in mice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 358(1436), 1363–1370 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 75 Davis TL, Trasler JM, Moss SB, Yang GJ, Bartolomei MS. Acquisition of the H19 methylation imprint occurs differentially on the parental alleles during spermatogenesis. Genomics 58(1), 18–28 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 76 Davis TL, Yang GJ, McCarrey JR, Bartolomei MS. The H19 methylation imprint is erased and re-established differentially on the parental alleles during male germ cell development. Hum. Mol. Genet. 9(19), 2885–2894 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 77 Li JY, Lees-Murdock DJ, Xu GL, Walsh CP. Timing of establishment of paternal methylation imprints in the mouse. Genomics 84(6), 952–960 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 78 Lucifero D, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Trasler JM. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13(8), 839–849 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 79 Henckel A, Chebli K, Kota SK, Arnaud P, Feil R. Transcription and histone methylation changes correlate with imprint acquisition in male germ cells. EMBO J. 31(3), 606–615 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 80 Chotalia M, Smallwood SA, Ruf N et al. Transcription is required for establishment of germline methylation marks at imprinted genes. Genes Dev. 23(1), 105–117 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 81 Smith EY, Futtner CR, Chamberlain SJ, Johnstone KA, Resnick JL. Transcription is required to establish maternal imprinting at the Prader-Willi syndrome and Angelman syndrome locus. PLoS Genet. 7(12), e1002422 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 82 Lander ES, Linton LM, Birren B et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409(6822), 860–921 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 83 Slotkin RK, Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8(4), 272–285 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 84 Lane N, Dean W, Erhardt S et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis 35(2), 88–93 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 85 Hackett JA, Sengupta R, Zylicz JJ et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 339(6118), 448–452 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 86 Guibert S, Forne T, Weber M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Genome Res. 22(4), 633–641 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 87 Peaston AE, Evsikov AV, Graber JH et al. Retrotransposons regulate host genes in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Dev. Cell 7(4), 597–606 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 88 Rubin CM, Vandevoort CA, Teplitz RL, Schmid CW. Alu repeated DNAs are differentially methylated in primate germ cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 22(23), 5121–5127 (1994).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 89 Sapienza C. Sex-linked dosage-sensitive modifiers as imprinting genes. Development 108(Suppl.), 107–113 (1990).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 90 Barlow DP. Methylation and imprinting: from host defense to gene regulation? Science 260(5106), 309–310 (1993).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 91 McDonald JF. Transposable elements: possible catalysts of organismic evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10(3), 123–126 (1995).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 92 Surani MA. Imprinting and the initiation of gene silencing in the germ line. Cell 93(3), 309–312 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 93 Matzke MA, Mette MF, Matzke AJM. Transgene silencing by the host genome defense: implications for the evolution of epigenetic control mechanisms in plants and vertebrates. Plant Mol. Biol. 43(2), 401–415 (2000).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 94 Mcdonald JF, Matzke MA, Matzke AJ. Host defenses to transposable elements and the evolution of genomic imprinting. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110(1–4), 242–249 (2005).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 95 Constancia M, Pickard B, Kelsey G, Reik W. Imprinting mechanisms. Genome Res. 8(9), 881–900 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 96 Reik W, Walter J. Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2(1), 21–32 (2001).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 97 Daxinger L, Whitelaw E. Understanding transgenerational epigenetic inheritance via the gametes in mammals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13(3), 153–162 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 98 Radford EJ, Isganaitis E, Jimenez-Chillaron J et al. An unbiased assessment of the role of imprinted genes in an intergenerational model of developmental programming. PLoS Genet. 8(4), 41–53 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• 99 Ashe A, Sapetschnig A, Weick EM et al. piRNAs can trigger a multigenerational epigenetic memory in the germline of C. elegans. Cell 150(1), 88–99 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 100 Shirayama M, Seth M, Lee HC et al. piRNAs initiate an epigenetic memory of nonself RNA in the C. elegans germline. Cell 150(1), 65–77 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 101 Bagijn MP, Goldstein LD, Sapetschnig A et al. Function, targets, and evolution of Caenorhabditis elegans piRNAs. Science 337(6094), 574–578 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 102 Lim SL, Tsend-Ayush E, Kortschak RD et al. Conservation and expression of PIWI-interacting RNA pathway genes in male and female adult gonad of amniotes. Biol. Reprod. 89(6), 136 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 103 Malone CD, Hannon GJ. Small RNAs as guardians of the genome. Cell 136(4), 656–668 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 104 Lee HC, Gu W, Shirayama M, Youngman E, Conte D Jr., Mello CC. C. elegans piRNAs mediate the genome-wide surveillance of germline transcripts. Cell 150(1), 78–87 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 105 Grossniklaus U, Kelly B, Ferguson-Smith AC, Pembrey M, Lindquist S. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: how important is it? Nat. Rev. Genet. 14(3), 228–235 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 106 Francis D, Diorio J, Liu D, Meaney MJ. Nongenomic transmission across generations of maternal behavior and stress responses in the rat. Science 286(5442), 1155–1158 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 107 Francis DD, Champagne FA, Liu D, Meaney MJ. Maternal care, gene expression, and the development of individual differences in stress reactivity. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 896, 66–84 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 108 Wolff GL, Kodell RL, Moore SR, Cooney CA. Maternal epigenetics and methyl supplements affect agouti gene expression in Avy/a mice. FASEB J. 12(11), 949–957 (1998).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 109 Waterland RA, Jirtle RL. Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23(15), 5293–5300 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 110 Cropley JE, Suter CM, Beckman KB, Martin DI. Germ-line epigenetic modification of the murine A vy allele by nutritional supplementation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103(46), 17308–17312 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 111 Cropley JE, Dang TH, Martin DI, Suter CM. The penetrance of an epigenetic trait in mice is progressively yet reversibly increased by selection and environment. Proc. Biol. Sci. 279(1737), 2347–2353 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 112 Waterland RA, Travisano M, Tahiliani KG. Diet-induced hypermethylation at agouti viable yellow is not inherited transgenerationally through the female. FASEB J. 21(12), 3380–3385 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 113 Morgan HD, Sutherland HG, Martin DI, Whitelaw E. Epigenetic inheritance at the agouti locus in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 23(3), 314–318 (1999).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 114 Zamudio N, Bourc’his D. Transposable elements in the mammalian germline: a comfortable niche or a deadly trap? Heredity 105(1), 92–104 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 115 Blewitt ME, Vickaryous NK, Paldi A, Koseki H, Whitelaw E. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation at an epigenetically sensitive allele in mice. PLoS Genet. 2(4), e49 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 116 Padmanabhan N, Jia D, Geary-Joo C et al. Mutation in folate metabolism causes epigenetic instability and transgenerational effects on development. Cell 155(1), 81–93 (2013).•• Showed transgenerational epigenetic effects using embryo transfer experiments.
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 117 Gapp K, Jawaid A, Sarkies P et al. Implication of sperm RNAs in transgenerational inheritance of the effects of early trauma in mice. Nat. Neurosci. 17(5), 667–669 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 118 Schübeler D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature 517(7534), 321–326 (2015).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 119 Dunn GA, Bale TL. Maternal high-fat diet promotes body length increases and insulin insensitivity in second-generation mice. Endocrinology 150(11), 4999–5009 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 120 Carone BR, Fauquier L, Habib N et al. Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals. Cell 143(7), 1084–1096 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 121 Ng SF, Lin RC, Laybutt DR, Barres R, Owens JA, Morris MJ. Chronic high-fat diet in fathers programs beta-cell dysfunction in female rat offspring. Nature 467(7318), 963–966 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 122 Pembrey ME. Male-line transgenerational responses in humans. Hum. Fertil. (Camb) 13(4), 268–271 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 123 Jimenez-Chillaron JC, Isganaitis E, Charalambous M et al. Intergenerational transmission of glucose intolerance and obesity by in utero undernutrition in mice. Diabetes 58(2), 460–468 (2009).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 124 Wei Y, Yang C-R, Wei Y-P et al. Paternally induced transgenerational inheritance of susceptibility to diabetes in mammals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111(5), 1873–1878 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 125 Guerrero-Bosagna C, Settles M, Lucker B, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of vinclozolin on promoter regions of the sperm epigenome. PLoS ONE 5(9), e13100 (2010).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 126 Radford EJ, Ito M, Shi H et al. In utero effects. In utero undernourishment perturbs the adult sperm methylome and intergenerational metabolism. Science 345(6198), 1255903 (2014).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 127 Dunn GA, Bale TL. Maternal high-fat diet effects on third-generation female body size via the paternal lineage. Endocrinology 152(6), 2228–2236 (2011).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 128 Lambrot R, Xu C, Saint-Phar S et al. Low paternal dietary folate alters the mouse sperm epigenome and is associated with negative pregnancy outcomes. Nat. Commun. 4, 2889 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 129 Blount BC, Mack MM, Wehr CM et al. Folate deficiency causes uracil misincorporation into human DNA and chromosome breakage: implications for cancer and neuronal damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94(7), 3290–3295 (1997).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 130 Chong S, Vickaryous N, Ashe A et al. Modifiers of epigenetic reprogramming show paternal effects in the mouse. Nat. Genet. 39(5), 614–622 (2007).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 131 Gu SG, Pak J, Guang S, Maniar JM, Kennedy S, Fire A. Amplification of siRNA in Caenorhabditis elegans generates a transgenerational sequence-targeted histone H3 lysine 9 methylation footprint. Nat. Genet. 44(2), 157–164 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 132 Buckley BA, Burkhart KB, Gu SG et al. A nuclear Argonaute promotes multigenerational epigenetic inheritance and germline immortality. Nature 489(7416) 447–451 (2012).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 133 Youngson NA, Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic effects. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9, 233–257 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 134 Daxinger L, Whitelaw E. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: more questions than answers. Genome Res. 20(12), 1623–1628 (2010).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 135 Huxley J. Evolution. The Modern Synthesis. Allen & Unwin, London (1942).
  Google Scholar
• 136 Mayr E. The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Harvard University Press, USA (1982).
  Google Scholar
• 137 Wolf JB, Oakey RJ, Feil R. Imprinted gene expression in hybrids: perturbed mechanisms and evolutionary implications. Heredity 113(2), 167–175 (2014).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 138 Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford University Press, UK, p360 (1995).
  Google Scholar
• 139 Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. The evolution of information in the major transitions. J. Theor. Biol. 239(2), 236–246 (2006).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 140 Jablonka E, Lamb MJ. Soft inheritance: challenging the modern synthesis. Genet. Mol. Biol. 31(2), 389–395 (2008).• Summarizes the assumptions of the Modern Synthesis model for evolution and discusses the need for expansion to incorporate soft inheritance.
  Google Scholar
• 141 Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M. Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol. Lett. 11(2), 106–115 (2008).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 142 Pigliucci M, Müller GB. Evolution, the Extended Synthesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA (2010).
  Google Scholar
• 143 Suter CM, Boffelli D, Martin DI. A role for epigenetic inheritance in modern evolutionary theory? A comment in response to Dickins and Rahman. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280(1771), 20130903; 20131820 (2013).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 144 Li CC, Young PE, Maloney CA et al. Maternal obesity and diabetes induces latent metabolic defects and widespread epigenetic changes in isogenic mice. Epigenetics 8(6), 602–611 (2013).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 145 Duhl DM, Vrieling H, Miller KA, Wolff GL, Barsh GS. Neomorphic agouti mutations in obese yellow mice. Nat. Genet. 8(1), 59–65 (1994).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 146 Bateson P, Gluckman P. Plasticity and robustness in development and evolution. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41(1), 219–223 (2012).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 147 Reik W, Constancia M, Fowden A et al. Regulation of supply and demand for maternal nutrients in mammals by imprinted genes. J. Physiol. 547(Pt 1), 35–44 (2003).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 148 Haig D, Westoby M. Parent-specific gene expression and the triploid endosperm. Am. Nat. 134(1), 147–155 (1989).
  Google Scholar
• 149 Haig D. Genomic imprinting and kinship: how good is the evidence? Annu. Rev. Genet. 38(1), 553–585 (2004).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar
• 150 Wolf JB, Hager R. A maternal–offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol. 4(12), e380 (2006).
  MedlineGoogle Scholar
• 151 Keverne EB, Curley JP. Epigenetics, brain evolution and behaviour. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 29(3), 398–412 (2008).
  Medline CASGoogle Scholar