Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
 

Summary
October 2007, Vol. 2, No. 5, Pages 527-554 , DOI 10.2217/17460913.2.5.527
(doi:10.2217/17460913.2.5.527)

Review
New imaging tools for the diagnosis of infection
Ronald C Walker, Laurie B Jones-Jackson, William Martin, M Reza Habibian & Dominique Delbeke
Associate Professor Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675, USA.
Associate Professor Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675, USA
Associate Professor Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675, USA
Associate Professor Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675, USA
Professor Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, 1161 21st Avenue South, CCC-1121 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2675, USA
Author for correspondence



Infection imaging became widespread in 1971 with the release of 67Ga citrate. Multiphase skeletal scintigraphy and radiolabeled white blood cells (WBCs) have since become the most widespread clinically used agents for the imaging of infection. A wide variety of other radiolabeled probes are under investigation, based on antibodies, cytokines, assorted proteins and other molecules, alone or in various combinations. However, these latter agents, with a few exceptions, are not routinely used clinically. Radiolabeled ciprofloxacin represents the first attempt to develop an infection-specific imaging agent (most infection-imaging probes localized nonspecifically to inflammation as well), but it has not proven superior to radiolabeled WBCs or 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) PET. Because of the ability to combine exquisite anatomic detail with focal uptake of 18F-FDG, PET–computed tomography has achieved great success in the detection and localization of infection, including in clinically adverse conditions. Despite these advances, at this time an infection-specific imaging agent does not exist.

Full Text PDF (919 KB) PDF Plus (881 KB)
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (919 KB)
View PDF Plus (881 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Ronald C Walker
Laurie B Jones-Jackson
William Martin
M Reza Habibian
Dominique Delbeke
Keywords:
18F-FDG PET infection imaging
cytokine imaging
infection imaging
in vivo white cell labeling
radiolabeled ciprofloxacin
radiolabeled white blood cells