Welcome Guest user | Log in | Athens Login | Shibboleth Login | Register
Resources
Register
For Authors
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Services
Subscriptions/Pricing
Reprints
Advertising
Press Releases/News
Help
Downloads/Links
2008/9 Catalogue
Library Recommendation
 

Summary
Apr 2006, Vol. 7, No. 3, Pages 441-454 , DOI 10.2217/14622416.7.3.441
(doi:10.2217/14622416.7.3.441)

Collaborative Study: chronic fatigue syndrome – Research Report
Exploration of the gene expression correlates of chronic unexplained fatigue using factor analysis
Jennifer Fostel1, Roumiana Boneva2 & Andrew Lloyd3
1National Center for Toxicogenomics, NIEHS MD F1-05, 111 Alexander Drive, PO Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2233, USA.
2Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
3University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Author for correspondence



Objective: To identify biomarkers of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and related disorders through analysis of microarray data, pathology test results and self-report symptom profiles. Method: To empirically derive the symptom domains of the illnesses, factor analysis was performed on responses to self-report questionnaires (multidimensional fatigue inventory, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) symptom inventory and Zung depression scale) before validation with independent datasets. Gene expression patterns that distinguished subjects across each factor dimension were then sought. Results: A four-factor solution was favored, featuring ‘fatigue’ and ‘mood disturbance’ factors. Scores on these factors correlated with measures of disability on the Short Form (SF)-36. A total of 57 genes that distinguished subjects along each factor dimension were identified, although the separation was significant only for subjects beyond the extreme (15th and 85th) percentiles of severity. Clustering of laboratory parameters with expression of these genes revealed associations with serum measurements of pH, electrolytes, glucose, urea, creatinine, and liver enzymes (aspartate amino transferase [AST] and alanine amino transferase [AST]); as well as hematocrit and white cell count. Conclusion: CFS is a complex syndrome that cannot simply be associated with changes in individual laboratory tests or expression levels of individual genes. No clear association with gene expression and individual symptom domains was found. However, analysis of such multifacetted datasets is likely to be an important means to elucidate the pathogenesis of CFS.

Full Text PDF (1897 KB) PDF Plus (1831 KB)

Cited by

Jonathan R. Kerr. (2009) Gene profiling of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. Current Rheumatology Reports 10:6, 482-491
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009.
CrossRef
Jonathan R. Kerr, Robert Petty, Beverley Burke, John Gough, David Fear, Lindsey I. Sinclair, Derek L. Mattey, Selwyn C. M. Richards, Jane Montgomery, Don A. Baldwin, Paul Kellam, Tim J. Harrison, George E. Griffin, Janice Main, Derek Enlander, David J. Nutt, Stephen T. Holgate. (2008) Gene Expression Subtypes in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 197:8, 1171-1184
Online publication date: 15-May-2008.
CrossRef
 

Prev. Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (1897 KB)
View PDF Plus (1831 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Jennifer Fostel
Roumiana Boneva
Andrew Lloyd
Keywords:
chronic fatigue
factor analysis
molecular expression
surrogate biomarker